Rants, Raves, and Stupid Tinfoil Hat Wearing Conspiracy Bullshit

[GetControl]

Guys, take some time and read A2's forum post. You will notice that he gives advice and clues on how to enjoy the boards and interact with him. Here's what I learned:

• Use the report post button to make A2 aware of a user that's being an asshole or, for the noobs (I'm forever a noob), if you need help in editing or deleting your own post.

• Do not confront, argue or call out other users. Use the report post button.

• Use the ignore user feature for users that annoy you, personally. This is a great feature. Ignoring people makes me laugh to myself.

• Use the right Thread for the right conversation. Ex. Don't post about AMP in the BP Review Thread. A2 and team set up these Thread topics for a reason...keeps things organized and clean. We help him out when we Thread correctly.

• Write reviews! A2 loves slits just like we do and he wants to read reviews in the review threads. If you don't have a review and you just want to post, pick a Thread topic like General or this one.

• Dont be a dick, don't be a tough guy and don't take things personal. If someone pisses you off and you're ready to explode, talk to A2 about it by using the Report Post button.

It's easy to enjoy yourself on the boards if you listen to A2 and read the FAQs.

Hope this helps.

[Purple45]

If Pang decides to reinvent himself; well I hope things work out better this time and the lesson of saying your peace, letting go and moving on without being argumentive was learned.

[Purple45]

I doubt that admin needs trolls posting false info to drive up revenue.

Banning him / them and us calling him / them out, only stokes their fire. This is a free forum. Dealing with trolls is just the price we have to pay to exchange the information like we do. I have faught with the troll and argued with admin about it. And after fillowing the advice of "ignoring" him / them. It doesn't bother me anymore. If trolling is ruining the board, well then I'm sure that there are pay sites that police more stringently. Not trying to ruffle any feathers, just my opinion.

This site is about numbers. The more members and the more logged on during the day gives this site leverage to potential advertisers to support this site. Nothing works in society without some sort of investment. Trolls have their value because they are an active member who counts towards the number game plus trolls stokes conversation. Some drama is positive for this site if helps the bottom line with the numbers game. Trolls annoy the true hobbyist because only we know the facts locally not the A2. You can plead your case to the A2 about certain members posting absolute shit that hurts local good talent but the A2 will only do something if a post clearly violates a forum guideline because the A2 cannot verify the trolls shit or the hobbyist facts. It's a no win situation for the A2 but the genuine poster feels at a disadvantage because it seems that shit prevails against the facts. If the factual hobbyist confronts then their post could be deemed as argumentative which puts you and not the troll in hot water over forum guidance.

Ignoring a troll or poster with a hidden agenda is difficult for me. I usually have to respond at least once but I try to do it respectfully, factually and reasonably while stating my views. Diplomatic is the approach I try to take but it's hard not to be sarcastic while replying. Anybody can create a profile and I think we assume too much in that we think we are always talking to a hobbyists when it could very well be a journalist, Uncle, a provider or even a significant other whose whole purpose is counter to the reason for this forum.

This site has the capability to track IP addresses and determine who has multiple profiles and if a banned member is creating a new profile. That would take too much time and resources and this site usually only does that when their servers are attacked or spammed by those who wish to crash this site.

[Member #5959]

This site needs as much traffic as possible to get more advertising revenue. The real contributing members want a site that is free of jerks.

If the site wanted to they could ID those who get banned and come in with a new name. Every hacker worth anything knows how to do that. So let's stop the pretenses.

In order to survive and provide the site it needs advertisers, so the jerks generate users and traffic. Without that the site cannot exist since advertising revenue would take a hit.

Hows that for a Conspiracy. We will see if this post gets deleted, even though it meets the guidelines and is in the proper place.

So the site has determined that to survive they need to not ban the jerks.

I doubt that admin needs trolls posting false info to drive up revenue.

Banning him / them and us calling him / them out, only stokes their fire. This is a free forum. Dealing with trolls is just the price we have to pay to exchange the information like we do. I have faught with the troll and argued with admin about it. And after fillowing the advice of "ignoring" him / them. It doesn't bother me anymore. If trolling is ruining the board, well then I'm sure that there are pay sites that police more stringently. Not trying to ruffle any feathers, just my opinion.

[Jimjim77]

This site needs as much traffic as possible to get more advertising revenue. The real contributing members want a site that is free of jerks.

If the site wanted to they could ID those who get banned and come in with a new name. Every hacker worth anything knows how to do that. So let's stop the pretenses.

In order to survive and provide the site it needs advertisers, so the jerks generate users and traffic. Without that the site cannot exist since advertising revenue would take a hit.

Hows that for a Conspiracy. We will see if this post gets deleted, even though it meets the guidelines and is in the proper place.

So the site has determined that to survive they need to not ban the jerks.

[PleasureSeeker]

First, I didn't take this as an argument fat, I get it that you're talking it out. I moved it because it needs to be here, not there.

Let me take your arguments in order.

1a. Unsupported STD accusations are a violation of forum guidelines and will be redacted, you NEVER (this is not a suggestion) need to respond to them, you only need to report them and I will deal with them.

1b. There has never nor will ever be an attack against you on this forum. Some asshole, might try to troll the username FatLever, YOU are not FatLever, YOU are YOU and FatLever is a username on a fucking pussy board there is nothing to defend. If some asshole does that, report the post and I'll take care of it. (Are you spotting this whole "report the post and I take care of it" trend?)

2. I'm sorry but the answer to two is simply no. Ignoring trolls is always the way to go. They are looking for your attention. If you can see they are a crazy person then sooooo can everybody else you do not (again not a suggestion) need to respond to them, you especially do not need to call out BS. Do you understand what I mean when I say it's not a suggestion? Here let me spell it out for you

Crazy person posts but doesn't violate the guidelines --> You respond and do violate the guidelines = Who gets the flag? Answer, You. Why? Because there will always be crazy people on the internet and if break the guidelines then you just became one of them.

Ok, where does this leave us? Fat if you continue to do this (call guys out, not discuss shit with me in a reasonable manner such as you have done here), I will continue to throw flags at you, which will get you on moderation.

I hope this helps.

A2

I think FatLever and I can get on board with your point here. The only thing I'll add to the discussion is that it is annoying to see newcomers be led far astray by crazy or manipulative posters. Things like, "She's definitely working with LEO" or "She'll rob you. " etc. , when this may be the best provider around at the time. Just not cool, but I guess if you say just report that stuff, that may work.

[Admin2]

(1) One problem with the ignore list is for instance, there is a particular poster who keeps on saying this girl or that girl that I've seen has STD and I contracted them because I saw her. I don't want to miss that post because it's an attack against me and certain girls. It seems it's even gotten to the point where I didn't post for a few weeks and it looked safe that I wouldn't flag an STD post since I wasn't around so they thought it was ok to post 'Look FatLever' isn't posting, he must have an STD.

(2) Another problem with the ignore list is you ignore the crazy person disseminating misinformation and a good number of members accept and continue discussing the misinformation and accept it as true. I think this is a time where people who contribute good information feel it's necessary to step in and call out BS on the crazy poster as was the case here.

First, I didn't take this as an argument fat, I get it that you're talking it out. I moved it because it needs to be here, not there.

Let me take your arguments in order.

1a. Unsupported STD accusations are a violation of forum guidelines and will be redacted, you NEVER (this is not a suggestion) need to respond to them, you only need to report them and I will deal with them.

1b. There has never nor will ever be an attack against you on this forum. Some asshole, might try to troll the username FatLever, YOU are not FatLever, YOU are YOU and FatLever is a username on a fucking pussy board there is nothing to defend. If some asshole does that, report the post and I'll take care of it. (Are you spotting this whole "report the post and I take care of it" trend?)

2. I'm sorry but the answer to two is simply no. Ignoring trolls is always the way to go. They are looking for your attention. If you can see they are a crazy person then sooooo can everybody else you do not (again not a suggestion) need to respond to them, you especially do not need to call out BS. Do you understand what I mean when I say it's not a suggestion? Here let me spell it out for you

Crazy person posts but doesn't violate the guidelines --> You respond and do violate the guidelines = Who gets the flag? Answer, You. Why? Because there will always be crazy people on the internet and if break the guidelines then you just became one of them.

Ok, where does this leave us? Fat if you continue to do this (call guys out, not discuss shit with me in a reasonable manner such as you have done here), I will continue to throw flags at you, which will get you on moderation.

I hope this helps.

A2

[FatLever]

Why do some of you guys have such a hard time ignoring the crazy people. Yes, there is something obviously wrong with that user, who the fuck knows what it is, but who cares. Ignore them and move on.

Now, that all this attention has been brought I had to ban that name so what do you think happens now? Will it be "oh I guess I shouldn't have done that" and they go away or they IMMEDIATELY register a new name, start all over again and nobody knows who the fuck they are?

Which one seems more likely?

Add them to your ignore list, give them NO attention, and move on, that is how you get rid of trolls. They don't care what KIND of attention you give them, they just want you to respond.

A2

(1) One problem with the ignore list is for instance, there is a particular poster who keeps on saying this girl or that girl that I've seen has STD and I contracted them because I saw her. I don't want to miss that post because it's an attack against me and certain girls. It seems it's even gotten to the point where I didn't post for a few weeks and it looked safe that I wouldn't flag an STD post since I wasn't around so they thought it was ok to post 'Look FatLever' isn't posting, he must have an STD.

(2) Another problem with the ignore list is you ignore the crazy person disseminating misinformation and a good number of members accept and continue discussing the misinformation and accept it as true. I think this is a time where people who contribute good information feel it's necessary to step in and call out BS on the crazy poster as was the case here.

[NcPantyHose2]

I'm guessing no show?

Add disappeared about just before I arrived. A few other guys took the bait as well. No show so went over to apex AMP.

[Khris]

Add on CL said she be back t Pegasus Monday lunch time. Will toftt and report afterwards.

I'm guessing no show?

[NcPantyHose2]

Add on CL said she be back t Pegasus Monday lunch time. Will toftt and report afterwards.

[NoPostPang]

I got a PM one time from NCPanty on an old profile where he asked me if I was MajorSlow. So weird if they are they same person that he'd go that far to mess with my head.

I had caught on long ago, but got into trouble with admin for busting him a couple of times. It used to piss me off a little because so many newbies were confused and heading out on snipe hunts and such. But the more I think about it, admin was right. Best thing to do is just ignore him and let the noobs figure it out for themselves. And he is not just major and pantyhose either, this guy has so many accounts it is pathetic. But I have noticed some clues to identify him everytime.

First off, the unusual amount of posts for a regular member is red flag #1. Then there is the goofy off the wall stuff about weird fetishes and alot of homerotic references. But the kicker is reading further into his reviews. He does a decent job of sounding legit, but you will notice that all of the reviews will just be echoing comments of other mongers about a particular girl. Or he will review a streetwalker or bookstore girl that apparently only worked one day and only saw him, cause nobody else has ever even seen a glimpse of her. The troll is also on every thread. Most of us here have a particular niche and stick mainly in our area of preference, ex. Bookstore guys, AMP guys, streetwalker guys and so on. The troll will post a lot on all of these as if there are 36 hours in a day. I took admins advice and just started ignoring every member that fell into any of these categories. So I could never tell you if pang was him or not, after a paragraph into his 7th post in 3 days I just assumed he was be. S. And never read another word. And oh yeah, he drives a truck and always mentions hopping into it to head to an AMP, an adult bookstore, a street in the zone, a motel off capital, you get my drift?

Good luck out there.

Chavez (bookstore guy).

[NoPostPang]

I'm real. Just not posting. I hate that my post fell into the suspect category. Just wanted to set the record straight that I'm me and the stuff that I posted on this board really happened to me.

I had caught on long ago, but got into trouble with admin for busting him a couple of times. It used to piss me off a little because so many newbies were confused and heading out on snipe hunts and such. But the more I think about it, admin was right. Best thing to do is just ignore him and let the noobs figure it out for themselves. And he is not just major and pantyhose either, this guy has so many accounts it is pathetic. But I have noticed some clues to identify him everytime.

First off, the unusual amount of posts for a regular member is red flag #1. Then there is the goofy off the wall stuff about weird fetishes and alot of homerotic references. But the kicker is reading further into his reviews. He does a decent job of sounding legit, but you will notice that all of the reviews will just be echoing comments of other mongers about a particular girl. Or he will review a streetwalker or bookstore girl that apparently only worked one day and only saw him, cause nobody else has ever even seen a glimpse of her. The troll is also on every thread. Most of us here have a particular niche and stick mainly in our area of preference, ex. Bookstore guys, AMP guys, streetwalker guys and so on. The troll will post a lot on all of these as if there are 36 hours in a day. I took admins advice and just started ignoring every member that fell into any of these categories. So I could never tell you if pang was him or not, after a paragraph into his 7th post in 3 days I just assumed he was be. S. And never read another word. And oh yeah, he drives a truck and always mentions hopping into it to head to an AMP, an adult bookstore, a street in the zone, a motel off capital, you get my drift?

Good luck out there.

Chavez (bookstore guy).

[Member #5959]

Good work. I think you're onto something.

I had caught on long ago, but got into trouble with admin for busting him a couple of times. It used to piss me off a little because so many newbies were confused and heading out on snipe hunts and such. But the more I think about it, admin was right. Best thing to do is just ignore him and let the noobs figure it out for themselves. And he is not just major and pantyhose either, this guy has so many accounts it is pathetic. But I have noticed some clues to identify him everytime.

First off, the unusual amount of posts for a regular member is red flag #1. Then there is the goofy off the wall stuff about weird fetishes and alot of homerotic references. But the kicker is reading further into his reviews. He does a decent job of sounding legit, but you will notice that all of the reviews will just be echoing comments of other mongers about a particular girl. Or he will review a streetwalker or bookstore girl that apparently only worked one day and only saw him, cause nobody else has ever even seen a glimpse of her. The troll is also on every thread. Most of us here have a particular niche and stick mainly in our area of preference, ex. Bookstore guys, AMP guys, streetwalker guys and so on. The troll will post a lot on all of these as if there are 36 hours in a day. I took admins advice and just started ignoring every member that fell into any of these categories. So I could never tell you if pang was him or not, after a paragraph into his 7th post in 3 days I just assumed he was be. S. And never read another word. And oh yeah, he drives a truck and always mentions hopping into it to head to an AMP, an adult bookstore, a street in the zone, a motel off capital, you get my drift?

Good luck out there.

Chavez (bookstore guy).

[Purple45]

Good work. I think you're onto something.

I'll follow and say that I believe Pang is not related to Panty or Major. Pang got banned after an argument with PleasureCum on the Durham board. I do believe that NCPantyHose2, MajorSlowCum and maybe PleasureCum (banned) are all the same person.

Everybody likes a good laugh sometimes but when the truth is twisted or a post is purely fabricated or a member is harassed and all for a selfish amusement then this is member drama. The board doesn't need these antics. Panty and Major have had credible posts in the past but when games begin then the reader can't decipher on what is a credible post from what is a prank or a jab to get under people's skin. IMO this is childish behavior especially on a board where supposedly men help other men save time and resources seeking legitimate ladies offering memorable dreams from those ladies who don't.