Agency Discussion and Reviews

**ClassySemite** · 11-18-23 21:56

Originally Posted by KingLoki [View Original Post]

Can you share the agency? I miss her so much. Truly a gem.

Kovergirls!

Let's run a Virginia train on her haha!! I've heard a few girls complain that we fuck them too hard compared to NYC guys but I think kora will appreciate it hehe.

**Jacobs Patrick** · 11-18-23 21:55

Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]

I recently posted in the Boston forum that any individual prosecution will involve a cost-benefit calculation by local prosecutors. So I would ask the attorney about what tactics they might use to drive up the costs for the prosecution. Some items that come to mind would be demanding a jury trial and lots of pre-trial discovery. And also issuing witness subpoenas for as many federal agents and federal records as possible, esp those from MA. Since everything about this case appears to have originated in MA, it would seem reasonable to require testimony (and records) from those involved in developing the info that led to charges in VA.

Also, since the federal case is likely to take (much?) longer than cases at the local level, the feds will probably not want their info to be prematurely disclosed. If the feds are unwilling to provide witnesses and records, then that would seem to make the local case much harder, if not impossible, to prosecute.

The main idea being that, by driving up the costs for a garden-variety prostitution (or solicitation) case, a client might be able to get charges dropped or force some kind of favorable settlement. But it's possible that some of those tactics might be harder to pull off in a misdemeanor case, so it would be interesting to hear the opinion of an experienced attorney.

The government has unlimited funds and time to prosecute these frivolous matters, while true murders / crimes ravage our inner cities. People are really scared; businesses are moving out. It's the wild west. Anyone can do whatever they want, but they focus on these three idiots. SAD.

**ClassySemite** · 11-18-23 21:50

Originally Posted by MrFairfax [View Original Post]

YESSSSSSSSSS. I'm right behind you, brother! LMAO.

Going to be a lot to be thankful for this Thanksgiving, hehehehe.

HAHA my wife won't be thankful come Christmas time. I'm going to spend the money for multiple appointments fucking the absolute dog shit out of one favorite sluts the lovely Kora instead hehehehehe.

https://ibb.co/p0c3WXz

This pic of her is so hot too. Again I cannot figure out how to attach pics.

**MrFairfax** · 11-18-23 21:31

Originally Posted by ClassySemite [View Original Post]

I'm going to make the drive up to see her!! Maybe convince her to visit us here again.

I just found some more real pics of here too. I'm unable to attach the images like BonerA did, maybe someone can assist.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210506...lists.com/suzi

YESSSSSSSSSS. I'm right behind you, brother! LMAO.

Going to be a lot to be thankful for this Thanksgiving, hehehehe.

**King Loki** · 11-18-23 15:14

Don't you guys remember when BAD / EAA / RHF got busted? I don't think the client list ever got released.

**King Loki** · 11-18-23 14:26

Originally Posted by ClassySemite [View Original Post]

I'm going to make the drive up to see her!! Maybe convince her to visit us here again.

I just found some more real pics of here too. I'm unable to attach the images like BonerA did, maybe someone can assist.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210506...lists.com/suzi

Can you share the agency? I miss her so much. Truly a gem.

**JmSuttr** · 11-18-23 12:04

Originally Posted by Viger99 [View Original Post]

Anything is possible but it is very likely they will keep the client list under wrap because of potential legal liability. Some of the names and identities may be borrowed by other people and having the names in public may cause real personal, family, financial, business and professional damages which would lead to backlash and lawsuits. The Maine Zumba case was very unique. There were actual video recording and other evidences. About half of the reported 100 to 150 clients were charged including mayor, minister, firefighter and coach. That incident was 10 years ago and there has not been another case like that since.

Anything is possible but it is very unlikely they will go after everyone on the client list. It is going to take resources they don't have. Sexual conduct for a fee is a low priority enforcement item unless it causes public quality of life issues or complains. There just have not been that many stings and other enforcement actions in the recent past. They do it to squash down on the activity and in this case they have been very successful. It has been on local and national news very prominently. What would be the additional policy benefits of pursuing clients on the list? They will never say they would not pursue any client list. There are some people in the population who take the extreme position that sex work always involve human trafficking..

But it's important to remember that there are a variety of factors at play for each individual client, and not everyone is (yet) out of the woods. Risks remain for some, as I've posted about here:

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6673266

And here:

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6679747

All of which is simply to say that there's a balance between unwarranted worry, and a false sense of complacency, that every client will need to assess for themselves. For everyone not directly involved, hopefully this serves as a reminder about the risks of the hobby, esp when it comes to divulging personal info.

**Viger99** · 11-18-23 11:09

Anything is possible but it is very likely they will keep the client list under wrap because of potential legal liability. Some of the names and identities may be borrowed by other people and having the names in public may cause real personal, family, financial, business and professional damages which would lead to backlash and lawsuits. The Maine Zumba case was very unique. There were actual video recording and other evidences. About half of the reported 100 to 150 clients were charged including mayor, minister, firefighter and coach. That incident was 10 years ago and there has not been another case like that since.

Anything is possible but it is very unlikely they will go after everyone on the client list. It is going to take resources they don't have. Sexual conduct for a fee is a low priority enforcement item unless it causes public quality of life issues or complains. There just have not been that many stings and other enforcement actions in the recent past. They do it to squash down on the activity and in this case they have been very successful. It has been on local and national news very prominently. What would be the additional policy benefits of pursuing clients on the list? They will never say they would not pursue any client list. There are some people in the population who take the extreme position that sex work always involve human trafficking.

The BTT bust is another bust that happens from time to time. This too shall pass and others will rise up to meet demand which is not going away. Demand from every profession including our bros in LE. Back in the summer XOC was busted and there has not been any going after the clients. XOC was a much larger and better organized operation. The HSI affidavit on BTT listed 3 units in the same building and some very explicit texts which are probably not the best current practices in this line of business in my opinion.

**ClassySemite** · 11-18-23 09:16

I'm going to make the drive up to see her!! Maybe convince her to visit us here again.

Originally Posted by SweetDog [View Original Post]

I think BonerA posted Kora's real pics a couple years ago. They are still up. She was Seowoo / Bluestar / Suzy / Maya etc.

If you want to see her real pics: (click here).

I just found some more real pics of here too. I'm unable to attach the images like BonerA did, maybe someone can assist.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210506...lists.com/suzi

**Jacobs Patrick** · 11-17-23 18:02

Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]

My point about political pressure is simply that, once a high-profile case has gone public, the ability of politicians to exert influence or pressure is greatly diminished. I wasn't making any point about the origin of the case.

These idiots were depositing LARGE quantities of CASH into their personal bank accounts and making money orders with the cash, read the affidavit. Not to mention, keeping everyone's personal information, is just the icing for a huge newsworthy story. Clearly, very low hanging fruit for the feds to grab.

**Xonms** · 11-17-23 13:13

Originally Posted by LuckyLuciano00 [View Original Post]

I miss BO. They had some nice J Girls but they'll be back. MP got busted a while back and they came back. They're just laying low for a bit. They're going to see that the K shops are back in business and they won't want to miss out.

How do you know that? When they get busted?

**JmSuttr** · 11-17-23 12:01

Originally Posted by JacobsPatrick [View Original Post]

Doubt it was any political pressure. My guess is that the confidental source gave agents the EASY keys to kgirl castle (for an immigration deal) and those three asshatdumbassses let them in, read the affidavit.

My point about political pressure is simply that, once a high-profile case has gone public, the ability of politicians to exert influence or pressure is greatly diminished. I wasn't making any point about the origin of the case.

**JmSuttr** · 11-17-23 11:54

Originally Posted by TommyDawson [View Original Post]

There is a criminal complaint. Which I didn't see in previous versions of the affidavit. A Fairfax defense attorney also did a writeup on the case.

So far most of the legal action has happening in MA. With the intense media focus on this case, there should be something in news reports if a criminal complaint has been filed. Of course, the initial arrests would have been supported by a criminal complaint, so maybe that's what the Fairfax atty is talking about. And, if that's the case, those complaints would contain info substantially similar to what's in the search warrant affidavit.

But that won't be the final charging document, rather it's a placeholder until the actual indictment is handed down. And I continue to think that what's currently happening is that the evidence obtained in the searches is being evaluated to produce the strongest possible indictment. And, even once the initial indictment is handed down, that isn't necessarily the final word. The prosecution can file superseding indictments if they find more evidence.

Edit: I just went back and scanned thru the publicly released affidavit and it appears to my non-lawyer eye that the same document was used to support both the arrests and the search.

**DMV Average Joe** · 11-17-23 11:21

Originally Posted by IronClad999 [View Original Post]

Anyone want to test this chick? LOL.

Met her back in Dec 18' when HT was in that popular Mosaic building.

Skinny / slender / sexy MILF with great attitude and performance.

I might repeat if find time!