Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 1,336 to 1,350 of 16882
-
04-10-25 12:17 #15547Senior Member

Posts: 234Sinibee
She's been around for a while. I think someone reviewed her before, but I can't find it.
Anyone have updated thoughts?
https://members.seeking.com/member/f...c-9f79d84f10ac
-
04-08-25 23:23 #15546Senior Member

Posts: 548Most people here are using Seeking (was called Seeking Arrangements a few years ago) and SugardaddyMeet (SDM). Seeking has the most members by far, but it costs the most and is pretty strict about any talk of money. SDM is smaller but cheaper, and doesn't care if you talk money with the girls. There's also Secret Benefits is ok too but be careful with the bot accounts. Get a free account on all of them and see which one you like best.
Originally Posted by Covnito
[View Original Post]
-
04-08-25 22:59 #15545Senior Member

Posts: 548Fixed your last link: https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73551412&nsp=1 - .
Originally Posted by ElPerron
[View Original Post]
Haven't tried contacting them, but they all have the right kind of words ("mutually menificial", "regular meet-ups" etc.) and a bunch of Moments updates plus plenty of pictures, a lot of professional photos mixed in with a few regular photos. Carmen would me my pick too - she's got the look I like. I wouldn't be surprised if all of them are on Seeking, too. Included the pictures if someone recognizes them from Seeking.
I'm thinking they're probably real, but if they put that money into photos, I'm guessing they're all not new to this? Youlovesky says right in her bio that she's an experienced sugar baby.
-
04-07-25 23:17 #15544Senior Member

Posts: 423Info
I taking to some girls at sdm, looks like this site is more promising, Carmen looks very familiar she been in both sites, looks like she is a pro, any info on any of those?
https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=72656928
https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...serId=73277773
https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/message?userId=73551412
Pm please.
-
04-07-25 14:34 #15543Senior Member

Posts: 481Your point is mostly correct. Not every woman sells. I've had serious relationships with other professionals who chip in for half of everything we do.
Originally Posted by TheAnswer4
[View Original Post]
-
04-07-25 11:17 #15542Senior Member

Posts: 449A red flag would be referring to college as attending university. I know she may not be from here, but that's not how most typically say that. I'd be very cautious.
Originally Posted by PeterPan
[View Original Post]
-
04-06-25 10:56 #15541Senior Member

Posts: 149Anyone had luck with this girl?
-
04-06-25 10:51 #15540Senior Member

Posts: 3272True that. I would hate to calculate the 'ppm' for my marriages.
Originally Posted by TheAnswer4
[View Original Post]
-
04-05-25 00:04 #15539Senior Member

Posts: 257Have you been successful on this site? Look for new opportunities.
Originally Posted by MrBlueSea
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-25 19:03 #15538Senior Member

Posts: 181Every woman sell sex, it's just how they package it. You think it's free to have sex with your girlfriend, fiancée, or wife? LOL.
Originally Posted by NewAnonymousName
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-25 11:43 #15537Senior Member

Posts: 347Give me a break
Mr Respectful over here, on this site. My experience has been very different, and from what you've regularly shared, so has yours.
Originally Posted by JohnnyMapalo
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-25 10:34 #15536Senior Member

Posts: 515Semantics.
Are we really arguing over a term? Personally, I agree with GFG 100%.
Originally Posted by NewAnonymousName
[View Original Post]
Pro=Does this for her existence, whether that be food, drugs, other.
SB=Does it because she like expensive crap she can't afford on her tips at Applebees.
Are they both hos. Yes, technically. SB's do not like to be "thought" of that way typically and do not "advertise availability" even though they are putting themselves out there for purview.
Like GFG, I have never had a CBJ from a NON Pro who has never been so much as a stripper. Got plenty of BBJNQNS from SB's for nothing more than lunch / dinner or a drink.
-
04-04-25 01:05 #15535Senior Member

Posts: 181I agree
I'm inclined to agree here. Out of all the girls I've hooked up with organically, not a single one has sucked rubber.
Originally Posted by GoneForGood97
[View Original Post]
-
04-03-25 21:10 #15534Senior Member

Posts: 481I agree with almost all of this except the last part. Sugar babies are pros. They aren't high volume full time hos. They don't like to think of themselves as hos. We don't call them hos because then they'd cut us off. But they are still hos. An allowance is payment for sex. Shopping sprees and spa days are payment for sex. If you sell sex, your a ho.
Originally Posted by GoneForGood97
[View Original Post]
-
04-03-25 18:30 #15533Senior Member

Posts: 1234What if you're wrong?
When I was younger and better looking, I found my fair share of fun. One night stands from bars, college parties, typical things. When Fetlife first came around that was a gold mine for hook ups, and later Tinder before it went to the shitter.
Originally Posted by JohnnyMapalo
[View Original Post]
Never once, not a single solitary time, did any girl I ever went home with or took home ever ask or expect a rubber on BJ. Not. A. Single. Time. A majority of them expected it during sex, but never, NEVER for a BJ. The ONLY time I've EVER had a girl suck on rubber is if...and ONLY if...they were an escort. Escorts / hookers / prostitutes are the only girls with high enough volume to ask. Even if they don't consider themselves one, if they think they need to suck on rubber, their volume is high enough that they are.
The entire premise of a SB is it's closer to a GF or tinder hookup than an escort. Now, maybe the game has changed and every 1 night stand from Tinder requires a cover for a BJ (my easy hook up days are long behind me), but I find that doubtful.
If the girls you're scoring with are wanting to suck on rubber, you're scoring a pro. And that's clearly not a problem, everyone here does. But an SB is not a pro, and if they are, then I'm blocking them and moving to the next option that isn't.









Reply With Quote


