Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 2,836 to 2,850 of 7257
-
10-18-21 12:32 #4422Senior Member

Posts: 263Her ad says no BJ, FS.
Originally Posted by LurkerStu
[View Original Post]
-
10-18-21 09:16 #4421Senior Member

Posts: 283Ads down was 302 number this time and didn't get a Reply yet.
Originally Posted by BigDawg9711
[View Original Post]
-
10-17-21 09:00 #4420Regular Member

Posts: 15I have never seen her, but she used to go by "rubyrestrained". You can use that to find her on pornhub and elsewhere, if you want a preview before contacting her.
Originally Posted by Orion413
[View Original Post]
-
10-16-21 16:13 #4419Senior Member

Posts: 91Sasha
I have a feeling Sasha posting this afternoon is Salena. Same payments, services. Same ass and tatt.
-
10-16-21 11:05 #4418Senior Member

Posts: 70Her contact info is on Tryst, no login or subscription required.
Originally Posted by BeFriends
[View Original Post]
https://tryst.link/bdsm/bowtoruby
-
10-15-21 23:14 #4417Senior Member

Posts: 97Exactly my point. Why would anyone in their right mind message shrek over there for some lazy cheap dude who doesn't want to pay for his own membership on this guys behalf? We have better things to do and if you have a membership you're going to talk to actually attractive women on their and leave the ogres to their swamps. Stg is all junkies and 4's at best. Other than the rare gems. You have to pay for a real membership on SA to meet anyone attractive who isn't an addict. And even then it's a lot of homework to get anywhere with most of them. The idea anyone is paying for a membership for pictures is laughable. Nobody cares about pictures. It's just that some people care about privacy so they aren't going to show their face that they are selling themselves. Half are scam artists nowadays. There has to be a tik tok or something about scamming guys on seeking since they all use the same playbook. It gets old fast. But then again. It's the only place to go to find anyone legit at all these days. Otherwise it's all just junkies and trannies on stg. But it seems that lots of guys are content with junkies or these girls wouldn't have any business.
Originally Posted by EffinGood33
[View Original Post]
-
10-15-21 18:20 #4416Senior Member

Posts: 49You have to pay to message on the SA site
My best guess is that he did not want to spend cash to get the info. On that site you have to pay for private pics and to message them. BTW the private pictures are not allowed to show nudity, so you won't see anything good if you pay for them, best you might get is a see through top. It runs similar to SB in that regard.
Originally Posted by SideOfIrish
[View Original Post]
Stay Safe.
EG33.
-
10-15-21 11:17 #4415Senior Member

Posts: 49Pic of her
I took a picture as requested, as I have access to the site.
Originally Posted by SmokenGlasses
[View Original Post]
Stay Safe,
EG33.
-
10-15-21 08:37 #4414Senior Member

Posts: 5229Dee-licious
She is real and has been around 20+ years. She's in the east Windsor area. She has no sense of time, doesn't look at her phone for new messages, and doesn't keep punctual appointments.
Originally Posted by SergeG
[View Original Post]
BMD.
-
10-14-21 23:43 #4413Senior Member

Posts: 468Same here. I've messaged daily for about a week. I think she has a positive review on here somewhere.
Originally Posted by RamDogging
[View Original Post]
-
10-14-21 20:25 #4412Senior Member

Posts: 263Don't have SA can you screen shot her pic?
Originally Posted by BeFriends
[View Original Post]
-
10-14-21 20:08 #4411Senior Member

Posts: 87Young Fun
I messaged her several times and no response.
Originally Posted by XxxPorn
[View Original Post]
-
10-14-21 19:20 #4410Senior Member

Posts: 96Any one seen this one?
-
10-14-21 18:30 #4409Senior Member

Posts: 224Is not this a fake or hijacked add? One pic is from Diane I think. Right?
Originally Posted by BigMacDaddy
[View Original Post]
-
10-14-21 18:29 #4408Senior Member

Posts: 468Outcall?
Any ideas for a provider who does outcall north of Springfield? The few I used to know seem to have moved on.








Reply With Quote




