Asian Providers

**RocketManP** · 10-05-23 17:46

In the long term, maybe the booker apologizes and stops harassing and threatening customers. At the very least I'd hope he learned his lesson. And this debacle can be used to deter other orgs from doing the same.

And I disagree. You are saying "do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time."

No! They messed up when they instituted the policy, not when they got caught posting it publicly. I've canvassed many people throughout the years and many have told me the same thing about this place. If they (the agency) are proud of their policy and really believe in it, why hide it? Wear it proudly. Post it publicly.

The agency wants to have their cake and eat it too.

If the only thing they're sorry about is them accidentally posting it publicly, then they haven't learned their lesson. Which is. Let customers write any reviews they'd like to write provided they are honest and truthful. How hard is that? If they are so good as people say they are why do they need to silence people?

Originally Posted by Laf85 [View Original Post]

My guess would be any provider with an active link to an SDAG account got banned / deleted. Often times when a girl gets cycled out the link to their profile is no longer active and thus on the ter review the "current website / ad" defaults to a need a new url message. So you can see previous reviews under those conditions but I'm willing to bet as new reviews submitted with an SDAG website link gets submitted that will probably flag ter to remove those reviews. In the grand scheme of things it is quite a Lose-Lose situation for both the business and customers alike. Unreliable info mixed with real info allows the user to at least use his own smarts to differentiate between shill and legit reviews. But no info= no info. To boot no info for the business is an obvious drop in revenue.

I do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time. But before you call for pitchforks, understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!

**FreeWally** · 10-05-23 17:39

Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]

It's pretty common for the non-sdag groups popping up in sd that a flat-rate, all-inclusive of 320 is to be found. True, the turnaround on girls is quick yet that is determined by the girls, not the bookers. Reviews are fine when filtered through the bull shit lens. I want better value for my money. I'll donate 320 all-inclusive over the 280+100 option any day. The new kids on the block are bringing in younger girls, more accurate pics, better service, low rates.

Don't know how much this helps but I've rarely had accurate pics from any Korean bookers. Occasionally it's the actual girl in the photo. Whereas the Thai bookers SweetCandies, Sandra, Diamond seem to use real photos. I can confirm SweetCandies was 2 for 2 the actual girl with clear photos. But I will say the girls I've tried were both amateur (just started) and didn't offer the full range of services the Korean bookers offer (it hasn't mattered which one to me). On the plus I could preview and select by photo and so far the girls have been younger, early 20's.

Visited Chichi recently, she is curvy with big boobs for an Asian, English not too good (even compared to the Korean girls), loves having her tits sucked. Seems new. So pros and cons. Also it's in MV not UTC if that's a factor. But much simpler parking situation (lots of free 1 hour parking outside) and a straightforward gate unlike FEC. I was even thinking to go FEC but I guess I'm getting lazy when I think I'll have to try three ways just to get in.

Hope this helps.

**Clclcl** · 10-05-23 17:36

Originally Posted by M4473 [View Original Post]

So despite all the cross talk regarding SDAG business practices, has anyone TOFTT with Jupiter and care to report back?

Yes please let me know too. LOL.

**Clclcl** · 10-05-23 17:02

Rank.

Jessica.

Mimi.

Jupiter.

Cheri.

Fec girl.

Rate 1 -5.

The order you would grab them.

**Sir Bishop** · 10-05-23 16:34

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

I care less about their TER reviews, and more about their business ethics. Because let's face it, TER reviews already have a reputation for being inflated, and many think they are useless. But if they're tryna re-invent themselves, I recommend offering rates that can compete with LG (aka the new kids on the block).

It's pretty common for the non-sdag groups popping up in sd that a flat-rate, all-inclusive of 320 is to be found. True, the turnaround on girls is quick yet that is determined by the girls, not the bookers. Reviews are fine when filtered through the bull shit lens. I want better value for my money. I'll donate 320 all-inclusive over the 280+100 option any day. The new kids on the block are bringing in younger girls, more accurate pics, better service, low rates.

**SsStuntCock** · 10-05-23 11:47

Originally Posted by SoapieFreek [View Original Post]

Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.

I care less about their TER reviews, and more about their business ethics. Because let's face it, TER reviews already have a reputation for being inflated, and many think they are useless. But if they're tryna re-invent themselves, I recommend offering rates that can compete with LG (aka the new kids on the block).

**BrainLara** · 10-05-23 11:32

SDAG is trying to do damage control (based on their club post) but is it too late. My advice to them is to acknowledge a mistake was made, start over with a new domain, stop pressing people for good reviews, have Alex (if still there) work on his soft skills. I would hate to see them fold.

Originally Posted by SoapieFreek [View Original Post]

Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.

**SoapieFreek** · 10-05-23 09:56

Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.

**FreeWally** · 10-04-23 22:19

Originally Posted by Laf85 [View Original Post]

understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!

I just want to add some thoughts I didn't see mentioned here. I'm a happy customer of many bookers, FEC, SDAG, SweetCandies, etc. And some freelancers and girls in COI (I used to post mostly there). I've never had a bad experience, just maybe one girl I wasn't into out of 30. She still did her job right. So if I gave an honest review, the other 29 girls really would be 7 through 10. She'd get a 4 or 5. And just to give an idea I've been to TJ a lot and 90% of the girls in TJ I'd rate 5 to 7 so I'm not just inflating things, the services by these girls are objectively a whole league better.

And I'm not the only one, just today on HX Lollygirls sent out their mass spam ad and even posted TER ids for their two girls. I looked them up and Jessica literally has 30 reviews, 29 of them 7 through 10. Mimi only has 3 reviews and they're 8's. Even accounting for shills there aren't any big complaints. She wouldn't be working if it was common.

All I'm saying is even if half the reviews are fake shills, it is not unbelievable to me that girls would get 90%-95% 7 to 10 ratings. Because I personally would have rated 29 out of 30 girls the same. I also don't pay much attention to review numbers anyways, other than to read the reviews and get a general idea of the basic facts. I do think people should be free to post honest reviews of course. Wait a few days to post if you have concerns.

I want to close by saying even in countries where this is completely open and legal, the service is usually not as good. Sometimes cheaper. They are importing the right girls.

**Laf85** · 10-04-23 20:28

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

How so? Purple and others still have profiles. I haven't tried to review, but their profiles are still there.

My guess would be any provider with an active link to an SDAG account got banned / deleted. Often times when a girl gets cycled out the link to their profile is no longer active and thus on the ter review the "current website / ad" defaults to a need a new url message. So you can see previous reviews under those conditions but I'm willing to bet as new reviews submitted with an SDAG website link gets submitted that will probably flag ter to remove those reviews. In the grand scheme of things it is quite a Lose-Lose situation for both the business and customers alike. Unreliable info mixed with real info allows the user to at least use his own smarts to differentiate between shill and legit reviews. But no info= no info. To boot no info for the business is an obvious drop in revenue.

I do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time. But before you call for pitchforks, understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!

**Miguel Honcho** · 10-04-23 17:30

Originally Posted by Jstwntlvn1 [View Original Post]

I submitted one on 9-25 using SDAG URL and it was approved so not sure how that happened then if you're saying SDAG has been blocked for a while now. I'm not saying your info is wrong, just stating that I wasn't aware of all of this conflict between TER and SDAG. Kinda weird that my recent reviews went through no problem. I just went back to TER and all the girls from SDAG have been delisted cause I can't find any of them. That's a bummer cause I kinda got it down to where I knew which members were shills and which were legit reviews.

A lot of good info is gone. For the most part, you can read between the lines and tell what is exaggerated and what is actual review.

**PoonTangJohnny** · 10-04-23 17:27

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

"Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic. " < ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY! These types of blatant mandated censorship threats by sdag, is far more egregious IMO, than the shilling that cost 2 AMP's permanent banishment over in the AMP thread; the fact that these arrogant pricks feel emboldened and made no attempt at discretion in doing so. There's no doubt in my mind, that sdag and their shills, were 100% behind the constant attacks / sabotage / vandalism, which drove their main competition, VIP, out of business and ultimately out of San Diego.

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

I'm also not a fan how they delete all the reviews and profiles, throwing out the real reviews with the bathwater.

But I can understand their point even though I may not agree with the complete removal. If reviews were curated and manipulated in such a way to threaten non-8+ reviews. Then what really is their worth?

This could have been prevented too.

If the policy was made public ten years ago, then you'd just not have them on ter at all.

If the booker could just let negative (shit a 7 is often a good review and 7 was also frowned upon) reviews be and wouldn't police and then hunt down people who left a review anonymously for a reason. This wouldn't have happened.

What's the saying. Play stupid games win stupid prizes?

This is 100% percent sdag own doing. Do you really expect TER to read every single fucking review written for sdag, then spend countless hundreds of man hours trying to figure out and determine, fact from shill? GMAFB!

TER made the right call, just like Admin would be here, banning this type of BS business model which basically mandates that every single member here to write a BS shill review for every single 1 of their ladies, regardless of whether they provide horrible service, or not. < Somebody here please explain to me why this fucking BS should be tolerated!?

Once again, SDAG policy mandate, quote:

"ASK THE EXPERT.

We appreciate reviews on any site but we hope that you remember a few things.

Some ladies you are going to love.

Some ladies you are going to like.

Some ladies are just ok.

Some ladies you aren't going to match with.

Please do NOT give 7 or 6 or 5 or less.

* 7 or less KILLS business for that lady and other ladies.

If you choose to give reviews that are negative, then we will.

Have to sever our partnership and you will not get to visit others.

We will do our best to figure out who you are.

Remember our rule. If you like the lady tell everyone.

8 or higher.

If you don't then tell the assistant. ".

Could you imagine, had an AMP had the audacity to mandate this type of threatening mandate / policy against it's customers!? It's a direct order from the business, to shill. Period.

**SsStuntCock** · 10-04-23 16:31

Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]

Confirmed. SDAG has been totally wiped off TER eliminating 10+ years of effort and reviews.

How so? Purple and others still have profiles. I haven't tried to review, but their profiles are still there.

**RocketManP** · 10-04-23 15:08

I'm also not a fan how they delete all the reviews and profiles, throwing out the real reviews with the bathwater.

But I can understand their point even though I may not agree with the complete removal. If reviews were curated and manipulated in such a way to threaten non-8+ reviews. Then what really is their worth?

This could have been prevented too.

If the policy was made public ten years ago, then you'd just not have them on ter at all.

If the booker could just let negative (shit a 7 is often a good review and 7 was also frowned upon) reviews be and wouldn't police and then hunt down people who left a review anonymously for a reason. This wouldn't have happened.

What's the saying. Play stupid games win stupid prizes?