Asian Providers

[SsStuntCock]

Confirmed. SDAG has been totally wiped off TER eliminating 10+ years of effort and reviews.

How so? Purple and others still have profiles. I haven't tried to review, but their profiles are still there.

[RocketManP]

I'm also not a fan how they delete all the reviews and profiles, throwing out the real reviews with the bathwater.

But I can understand their point even though I may not agree with the complete removal. If reviews were curated and manipulated in such a way to threaten non-8+ reviews. Then what really is their worth?

This could have been prevented too.

If the policy was made public ten years ago, then you'd just not have them on ter at all.

If the booker could just let negative (shit a 7 is often a good review and 7 was also frowned upon) reviews be and wouldn't police and then hunt down people who left a review anonymously for a reason. This wouldn't have happened.

What's the saying. Play stupid games win stupid prizes?

[M4473]

So despite all the cross talk regarding SDAG business practices, has anyone TOFTT with Jupiter and care to report back?

[Sir Bishop]

Ter requires an active ad, and a lot of times sdag wouldn't have direct ads.

Now, in the light of this proof of threats against clients (thank you Alex for publishing it) TER removed all profiles that relate to sdag.

And I'll say, Good. All clients should be able to post honest, truthful negative feedback they want without any fear of repercussions. Doesn't matter what happens to your business. It's clients right to post what they think a girl deserved.

The booker will wear this on his sleeve.

Confirmed. SDAG has been totally wiped off TER eliminating 10+ years of effort and reviews.

[RocketManP]

Ter requires an active ad, and a lot of times sdag wouldn't have direct ads.

Now, in the light of this proof of threats against clients (thank you Alex for publishing it) TER removed all profiles that relate to sdag.

And I'll say, Good. All clients should be able to post honest, truthful negative feedback they want without any fear of repercussions. Doesn't matter what happens to your business. It's clients right to post what they think a girl deserved.

The booker will wear this on his sleeve.

[Jstwntlvn1]

TER has been blocking the SDAG site as a link for quite some time. Too many fake reviews, all in the 9's and 10's, were being posted, or so I was told.

I submitted one on 9-25 using SDAG URL and it was approved so not sure how that happened then if you're saying SDAG has been blocked for a while now. I'm not saying your info is wrong, just stating that I wasn't aware of all of this conflict between TER and SDAG. Kinda weird that my recent reviews went through no problem. I just went back to TER and all the girls from SDAG have been delisted cause I can't find any of them. That's a bummer cause I kinda got it down to where I knew which members were shills and which were legit reviews.

[Sir Bishop]

I tried posting a review on TER and it seems they are blocking SDAG's webpage as an acceptable URL for reviews. Is anyone else having this issue? Can't use Humaniplex either cause they said in the past that that website can't be used since it requires a password to view it so not sure if anyone else has a different website for SDAG? Or are they just completely blocked from being reviewed on TER? Wonder if this has anything to do with SDAG trying to control reviews.

TER has been blocking the SDAG site as a link for quite some time. Too many fake reviews, all in the 9's and 10's, were being posted, or so I was told.

[RolfTorren]

Always wait a few days before posting anything. Either positive or negative. I learnt the hard way.

I never tell booker or providers about my user I'd or handle for review site.

[Jstwntlvn1]

I tried posting a review on TER and it seems they are blocking SDAG's webpage as an acceptable URL for reviews. Is anyone else having this issue? Can't use Humaniplex either cause they said in the past that that website can't be used since it requires a password to view it so not sure if anyone else has a different website for SDAG? Or are they just completely blocked from being reviewed on TER? Wonder if this has anything to do with SDAG trying to control reviews.

[RocketManP]

Here it is, I saved it in archive:

https://archive.ph/VfFlw

[DRaj123]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

I never tell booker or providers about my user I'd or handle for review site.

[Laf85]

Are they talking about reviews on here or T ER or here or both or anywhere? I don't remember if I needed to give them my T ER to get verified with them. I got in almost 10 years ago and don't even remember. How would they find this out unless you say specifics, something along the lines of "I texted early morning on Saturday on xyz's first day when she first started and I was late 15 minutes and booker was cool" then yea they would be able to look at previous text messages and reference it. Assuming they save all our text messages. I don't want to be banned either and not sure how they would even know. Can they obtain the email addresses linked to T ER or elsewhere. But I guess I'll stick with the rules as well. I'm paranoid like that. Most of my experiences have been good anyways but I definitely wrote a couple of 7's and below reviews in the past.

Just want to point out from a leverage standpoint that if a business is providing a product that customers consider to be subpar and the business claims it hurts revinues and that you need to stop sharing that their product is subpar otherwise your money is no longer good. Got to ask yourself if said business can really afford to say no to already paying customers? As paying customers don't forget that your spending power is worth.

[JP858]

Totally agree with your post title.

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

.

[HornyToad007]

Sorry just to clarify, not defending them doing this as it's definitely an affront to letting mongers discuss and I'm not cool with that. I guess it was just more of a comment about how this behavior is emergent from the review environment itself. I agree it sucks but I stick to the rules since I don't really want to be blacklisted LOL.

Are they talking about reviews on here or T ER or here or both or anywhere? I don't remember if I needed to give them my T ER to get verified with them. I got in almost 10 years ago and don't even remember. How would they find this out unless you say specifics, something along the lines of "I texted early morning on Saturday on xyz's first day when she first started and I was late 15 minutes and booker was cool" then yea they would be able to look at previous text messages and reference it. Assuming they save all our text messages. I don't want to be banned either and not sure how they would even know. Can they obtain the email addresses linked to T ER or elsewhere. But I guess I'll stick with the rules as well. I'm paranoid like that. Most of my experiences have been good anyways but I definitely wrote a couple of 7's and below reviews in the past.

[Member #6585]

Oh boo hoo their biz depends on the reviews. Well duh. They're gaining tons of biz from positive reviews too. Funny how they want to use reviews to only benefit them, but if they are detrimental they can't take it.

Guess what, freedom of expression your biz. Mongers have a right to evaluate a product publicly with bookers / girls taking a bad review like they can take a dick.

Imagine if instead of removing expired product from shelves, a store would implement a policy that you can't shop there anymore if you point out the said expired product.

This is a scumbag technique and it's not new for this shop. They included it in their introductory email back when they were called differently and for their OC branch too.

Sorry just to clarify, not defending them doing this as it's definitely an affront to letting mongers discuss and I'm not cool with that. I guess it was just more of a comment about how this behavior is emergent from the review environment itself. I agree it sucks but I stick to the rules since I don't really want to be blacklisted LOL.