Asian Providers

**Dmzhost** · 09-26-23 20:27

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

This doesn't seem like it would work. It would likely just destroy business for their girls who have little to no reviews? Either people will just assume anyone not rated an 8 or better is a 1, and that anyone without reviews becomes an even bigger risk to TOFTT.

**TacoManVa** · 09-26-23 18:57

Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]

The Thai agencies like SweetCandies sometimes use real photos, for better or worse. Hit and miss but there's at least that.

Back in the day it was close to the same service, but now it is not even the same sport. Thai girls in SD offer terrible service meanwhile SDAG has some super stars. Worth every penny to me. They crush the FS massage spas, and as sad as it may be the popular FS spots in Kearny Mesa and UFS are better than the Thai agencies.

But nowhere close to the K groups. K groups are much safer too.

**Member #6585** · 09-26-23 16:20

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

A while back another member had alerted me of being careful what I post for this exact reason. Its a bit unfortunate, but I guess it kind of makes sense with how review based this hobby is. Its just like restaurants with Yelp. A restaurant's business is definitely make or break based on reviews, and yelp runs a racket based on that. We luckily have the free speech and have no fear of removal / fake metrics, so it makes sense that the bookers themselves would probably purge who they feel is disadvantageous to their business.

Not sure what the right solution is, but I suppose its just the unfortunate reality. I'm usually willing to TOFTT with girls with little to no reviews, but have definitely been burned before by that, so I understand the reluctance from other mongers to see a girl with little / no reviews.

**Member #6585** · 09-26-23 16:12

Originally Posted by Yogurt2020 [View Original Post]

Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.

I kinda don't mind it because I feel like SDAG and FEC seem to cover taller / average height women. I love the petite and small Asians so I'm a big fan and have found myself frequenting the SAG and Lolly girls much more.

Which speaking of, saw Mimi today and was very impressed.

BBFS (no cip), lots of DFK and LFK and BJ was off the charts. Very sloppy with lots of gagging and deep throating and ball and gooch licking.

She doesn't look like the pics but she's very cute and pretty still. She has like all of the stereotypical Korean features, which I loved. Perfect little tiny natural b's, maybe a's with erect nipples and small areolas. What's really impressive is how big of an ass is on this tiny girl. I love the tiny tits, big booty and nice hips combo. She's nice and slim as well.

She's a ton of fun and loves to fuck while being cute and playful. I'm a big fan and will be repeating.

**PoonTangJohnny** · 09-26-23 15:31

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

Cancel Culture / Censorship, meets the San Diego AAMP scene; what a wonderful business model for your customer's. 1 which instills trust / honesty / satisfaction. Whether you're happy, or not. AYFKE!?

Copied & Pasted from your link, SDPP:

"ASK THE EXPERT.

We appreciate reviews on any site but we hope that you remember a few things.

Some ladies you are going to love.

Some ladies you are going to like.

Some ladies are just ok

Some ladies you aren't going to match with.

Please do NOT give 7 or 6 or 5 or less.

* 7 or less KILLS business for that lady and other ladies.

If you choose to give reviews that are negative, then we will.

Have to sever our partnership and you will not get to visit others.

We will do our best to figure out who you are.

Remember our rule. If you like the lady tell everyone.

8 or higher.

If you don't then tell the assistant. "

SDAG, is the Private Delights, of the San Diego AAMP business market.

I'm just so very grateful, 1 for never having paid for an HX membership (3 years in quarantine), and secondly, for not being approved by SDAG. The stringent approval methods, have easily saved me $5-10 k over the past few years, which I've happily spent elsewhere. This self-serving AAMP isn't the only game in town. & if they keep this type of censorship BS up (along with their ridiculously higher prices). They'll eventually learn a very hard lesson in business 101, trickle down Economics.

FWIW: I've been doing just fine, having so much hot fun with some fucking amazing hot talent at so MANY of the awesome places, here in Disneyland AMP Central (SD County), USA!

**SsStuntCock** · 09-26-23 15:24

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

How brazen of SDAG to advertise that on their website. SMH. Good thing SD has FEC and LG to turn to.

**SDPewPew** · 09-26-23 14:01

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

**FreeWally** · 09-26-23 01:15

Originally Posted by Yogurt2020 [View Original Post]

Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.

Are you talking recently and from personal experience, because having gone for 9 years the vast majority were not.

**FreeWally** · 09-26-23 01:14

Originally Posted by BrainLara [View Original Post]

If only we could meet the gal below for real LOL.

https://www.instagram.com/a12486/?hl=en

The Thai agencies like SweetCandies sometimes use real photos, for better or worse. Hit and miss but there's at least that.

**HiroSlammer7** · 09-26-23 00:56

Originally Posted by Yogurt2020 [View Original Post]

Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.

Malnourished North Koreans.

**Sir Bishop** · 09-26-23 00:54

Originally Posted by Yogurt2020 [View Original Post]

Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.

Maybe it's the lack of McDonalds in Korea? LOL. I'm not worried, they are still HYA ladies.

**Yogurt2020** · 09-25-23 22:08

Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.

**M4473** · 09-25-23 16:17

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

What's all this racket about Niko being no cip? Can someone vouch and report that's pure nonsense and that she's hurtin for a squirtin?

Confirmed, it's a no. She is open to mutual ass play. Heads up for the heavy hitters out there, she's not that deep and I tried hard to find better angles to no avail. Other than those two items, she's cute and has no problem sucking for extended periods.

Then there's Rachel. God damn she was good. Like Kiko energetic. It takes a bit of effort for me to hit 2 in an hour and she wasn't taking no for an a answer. She is a definite repeat.

**Sir Bishop** · 09-25-23 15:50

Originally Posted by Gbrand [View Original Post]

That classified has expired. Can you please post the link to her homepage, as that link will not expire. Thank you.

The listing is on the Wowclub profile or find her on the SDAG website.

https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/wowclub

https://sdasiangirls.com

**Gbrand** · 09-25-23 14:32

Originally Posted by Magnum44 [View Original Post]

Some of you have pm'd me and I am sorry I didn't post the link to her ad. She is on HX https://www.humaniplex.com/classifieds/13031. She leaves the 28th.

That classified has expired. Can you please post the link to her homepage, as that link will not expire. Thank you.