We are the premier VIP portal for massage and escort services.
rubmaps
The Velvet Rooms
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Thread: Trying this Sugar Baby thing.

+ Add Report
Page 3 of 458 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 53 103 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 6862
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #6832
    Quote Originally Posted by Blueridgenc  [View Original Post]
    I don't remember the wording but I've had several messages blocked that I had to carefull reword to get through. I didn't message any specifics or anything graphic. I think it was sentences that mentioned mutually beneficial and intimacy in the same sentence. Each time I changed the wording and it went through. I usually wait for even that until text but some sb's are slower to move off the platform.

    Blue.
    On SA you really just need to be vanilla as possible and still trying to get a feel for what they want. Always take anything specific to text. Even in text, I'm not totally specific. Let's meet first and see how it goes.

  2. #6831

    Good sites?

    Any other good sites besides SB and Seeking?

  3. #6830

    A little info about two cuddlers

    I'm back on Seeking after being away from it for a while. It has changed so much over the last 20 yrs.

    Mya https://members.seeking.com/member/4...b-ce9c19627ab9.

    I'm guessing she's been reviewed b / c she has been around a while. 29, cute, aa. She said she usually sticks to 400 ppm but maybe she could do 3 which I had offered. I ended up not pursuing further but 400 is her number and she might come down a bit.

    Ang early 20's (20 or 22 aa, I can't remember) and I don't have her link anymore. Super cute in her pics. She was okay with 250 ppm (I started at 200) but the more we talked, the poorer communications got. Responses were short, sometimes terse, and often ambiguous. I had to keep pulling info and clarifying. Ex: She said she didn't want to be close to a SD. It took a while to sort this out but she was okay with sex but not with being emotionally close. Eventually, she said she just wanted to get in and get out. I tried to clarify how long she was okay with hanging out and it devolved from there. I don't like feeling rushed or being limited to 1 round, etc. So I bailed.

    I travel a lot so most of the people I've message with are in other states.

  4. #6829

    Re: Seeking flagged me for inappropriate behavior

    Quote Originally Posted by HoHopper  [View Original Post]
    I just got a warning form Seeking about inappropriate behavior, I never posted anything about money or arrangements. I think a girl reported me about our texts. I had to agree to their terms to get back in my account. Seeking is FOS they know what is going on. It's really not worth $150 to tell you the truth. Dia anyone else get this warning?
    I don't remember the wording but I've had several messages blocked that I had to carefull reword to get through. I didn't message any specifics or anything graphic. I think it was sentences that mentioned mutually beneficial and intimacy in the same sentence. Each time I changed the wording and it went through. I usually wait for even that until text but some sb's are slower to move off the platform.

    Blue.

  5. #6828
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamEve7  [View Original Post]
    How can it be possible that they are believing in evidence on any conversation that happened outside there damn platform, that's breach of trust on there behalf.
    They are covering their ass because the feds were on them. These girls get off on reporting guys and it's not like it used to be. Once they ban you you can't just rejoin unless you have a friend pose as you for their new facial recognition texts. It's really hard to get back on. One more report and you will be banned and they keep your $150. If you try to join again and pay they will use their facial recognition tools to ban you after they take your next $150. Between the new higher prices and the fake and scamming girls on their I'm done with it! You can report girls all day and they never get removed unless it's really damning.

  6. #6827

    SugarLifeNow

    Hey everyone, new fun SLN girl in Charlotte, her name is Kyhla and she is 19. She is not into anal, giving head, or girls. She likes being f*cked rough including being spanked, slapped, and choked, but doesn't like her hair being pulled. Asking for a mid range PPM allowance, but will do BBFS for a bit more and very recent testing.

    https://sugarlifenow.com/profile/kyh8ia/
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Screenshot 2026-05-09 at 11.43.42 AM.png‎   Screenshot 2026-05-09 at 11.43.55 AM.png‎  

  7. #6826

    Are they tracking stuff outside the platform?

    Quote Originally Posted by HoHopper  [View Original Post]
    I just got a warning form Seeking about inappropriate behavior, I never posted anything about money or arrangements. I think a girl reported me about our texts. I had to agree to their terms to get back in my account. Seeking is FOS they know what is going on. It's really not worth $150 to tell you the truth. Dia anyone else get this warning?
    How can it be possible that they are believing in evidence on any conversation that happened outside there damn platform, that's breach of trust on there behalf.

  8. #6825

    Seeking flagged me for inappropriate behavior

    I just got a warning form Seeking about inappropriate behavior, I never posted anything about money or arrangements. I think a girl reported me about our texts. I had to agree to their terms to get back in my account. Seeking is FOS they know what is going on. It's really not worth $150 to tell you the truth. Dia anyone else get this warning?

  9. #6824
    Senior Member


    Posts: 197

    SA Intel

    Anyone seen this? Any intel to share, you can DM me if you want.

    Nia.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/1...e-5674e359fbc9

    Mari.

    Doesn't want to text and talk on Site, which indicates time wasters and scammers, but she looks real with charlotte background in the pics.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/a...5-d731abb5144d

  10. #6823
    Senior Member


    Posts: 197

    SA Intel

    Anyone met these in person, know they are DTF? you can DM me if you prefer.

    Mari.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/a...5-d731abb5144d

    Nia.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/1...e-5674e359fbc9

  11. #6822
    Quote Originally Posted by EstebanelSucio  [View Original Post]
    Rose (formerly Samantha on SA) is for sure real. I'm not so sure about "major GPS" tho. I met her for $$ maybe because we are both very local to each other but YMMV. It is sometimes hard to schedule with her due to her having 3 kids. She can only meet when her ex has the kids. I didn't notice any demons at the time. She even mentioned she didn't drink when asked if she wanted to initially meet at a bar. She is very submissive.
    Can one of you PM me her number? My Burner app got glitchy and when I rebooted her contact was gone. Thanks.

  12. #6821

    Shay / Rose

    Quote Originally Posted by BDChristie  [View Original Post]
    Yes real. As mentioned before, doing porn. Offered bareback but politely declined. Lives in fort mill and can host when kids aren't there. A little too skinny with post-baby lose skin around stomach. Fake tits that are old and ripple due to weight loss as well. Definitely fun for $$ great head but no greek. But would not repeat. Seems extremely high volume and not concerned with STIs, so I would just be cautious.
    You guys are really hard on her. Shay is mid 30's and pretty. She does have a little.

    Baby damage, but I think she is mostly thin and fit. She has a clean.

    Safe incall. She does not drink, I don't know about pills.

    But she seems sober to me.

    She does tend to rush and goes out of her way to tell you she is not high.

    Volume, but I am pretty sure she is very high volume. She also told me that she would never go bare) this was after I told her I would not do that.

    I am pretty sure based on a few reports on here and elsewhere that bare is not an issue for her.

    In summary, I would do her again, but covered. I cannot think of a provider in the same.

    Price range who is better.

  13. #6820
    Quote Originally Posted by HoHopper  [View Original Post]
    I can't find her anywhere.
    Just google "Shay Smiles porn". Whole bunch comes up.

  14. #6819

    Rose / shy smiles

    Quote Originally Posted by EstebanelSucio  [View Original Post]
    I meant $$.
    Yes real. As mentioned before, doing porn. Offered bareback but politely declined. Lives in fort mill and can host when kids aren't there. A little too skinny with post-baby lose skin around stomach. Fake tits that are old and ripple due to weight loss as well. Definitely fun for $$ great head but no greek. But would not repeat. Seems extremely high volume and not concerned with STIs, so I would just be cautious.

  15. #6818

    Rose

    Quote Originally Posted by EstebanelSucio  [View Original Post]
    Rose (formerly Samantha on SA) is for sure real. I'm not so sure about "major GPS" tho. I met her for $$ maybe because we are both very local to each other but YMMV. It is sometimes hard to schedule with her due to her having 3 kids. She can only meet when her ex has the kids. I didn't notice any demons at the time. She even mentioned she didn't drink when asked if she wanted to initially meet at a bar. She is very submissive.
    I meant $$.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts

Protected by Copyscape