Massage Parlor Reports

[Into N Out]

I just tried Victoria again today.

It wasn't as good as the first time. This session was really rushed. Idk if she was expecting another customer or they got confused and didn't know I was the customer who text to make an appointment. So maybe she was trying to finish me fast thinking someone else was on the way. Also, just like Tina, she didn't want to give me My change since I paid with 60.

Yes, Lola told me she's back next month. I'll wait for her haha.

I was there a couple weeks ago and stopped in. Asked her if she'd be willing to do a shorter session for $100 since that's all I had and she obliged. Was in and out in like 20 min, which was a great deal. I generally tend to not have very prolonged visits, so this strategy worked out well for me. The houses I frequent all have $100 specials and I usually get 20 min or sometimes a little longer.

[Jrp21]

Asked for lineup tomorrow and got Victoria, Tina, Anna. I have seen Victoria, Tina has mixed reviews. Anyone try Anna? I asked about Lola they say she will be back next month.

I just tried Victoria again today.

It wasn't as good as the first time. This session was really rushed. Idk if she was expecting another customer or they got confused and didn't know I was the customer who text to make an appointment. So maybe she was trying to finish me fast thinking someone else was on the way. Also, just like Tina, she didn't want to give me My change since I paid with 60.

Yes, Lola told me she's back next month. I'll wait for her haha.

[JimmyJohns21]

Asked for lineup tomorrow and got Victoria, Tina, Anna. I have seen Victoria, Tina has mixed reviews. Anyone try Anna? I asked about Lola they say she will be back next month.

[JimmyJohns21]

Asked for lineup tomorrow and got Victoria, Tina, Anna. I have seen Victoria, Tina has mixed reviews. Anyone try Anna?

[Vulva Nut]

I agree but sometimes even the reviews are not what they seem. I remember some reviews for the GS Spa on Garvey said how pretty someone was until a picture was shown and it was a big woofer. Best suggestion is read multiple reviews before you go or TOFTT. IE is known for reviews with bait and switched of big whoofers so be happy SGV reviewers give enough details.

I totally remember that! I think Jrp21 sobered people up and said what... ?

But as I recall those prior reviews were mostly value judgements, not objective descriptions. One person's "hot" or "amazing" is not a description, and I simply take those comments with grain of salt as you do. Just the facts ma'am.

However, "Natural B cups, pale, smooth skin, large, plump nipples", "EE cup breasts that sag low on a narrow frame", "lumpy man-made D cups with stretched flat areolas": these are more like descriptions.

But "banging" body "sexy" "bomb" ass etc- Thats just about the reviewer's attraction, not the girl herself.

[PhoKingAwesome]

Thanks Willie. You get it, re looks, our types, and anatomical preferences.

Like the ol box of chocolates. There are some kinds you like, maybe caramel or almond, and some you don't want to get, maybe the hazelnut mint cream and are disappointed after you've already bitten.

Certain boxes have a helpful key or insert, info that lets you know exactly what's what.

I agree but sometimes even the reviews are not what they seem. I remember some reviews for the GS Spa on Garvey said how pretty someone was until a picture was shown and it was a big woofer. Best suggestion is read multiple reviews before you go or TOFTT. IE is known for reviews with bait and switched of big whoofers so be happy SGV reviewers give enough details.

[Vulva Nut]

I share the frustration with vague reviews. Some of us have specific anatomical preferences and descriptions are important.

We are talking about travel time on LA streets & freeways and the value of our time in "treatment" and the cash outlay. All those things are investments.

Thanks Willie. You get it, re looks, our types, and anatomical preferences.

Like the ol box of chocolates. There are some kinds you like, maybe caramel or almond, and some you don't want to get, maybe the hazelnut mint cream and are disappointed after you've already bitten.

Certain boxes have a helpful key or insert, info that lets you know exactly what's what.

[Vulva Nut]

I understand the frustration about the lack of description in some reviews. But understand also that Lola has been extensively reviewed. I'm sure you're not just depending on one review to get you to make that extensive drive from LA or OC to see Lola or any other provider. So doing a search into past reviews I'm sure someone posted a description of her. Usually the first few reviews have all that information in them.

I would put Lola about early 30's. She's about average build, MM C's, and stands 5'1"-5'3"ish range. Her face is interesting because it really depends on when you catch her. If she's working that day and she's made up (doesn't put on much makeup) she looks pretty ok. But if not then she's pretty plain and not what I would call a looker. My first time with her she wasn't working that day so she had on a clear face mask. When I asked to see her she said she wasn't working that day and had a mask on. I told her I'd come back. Then she changed her tune and ushered me into a room and I guess got herself ready. What followed was an awesome session of rimming, BBBJ, CFS, DFK, and more rimming, finishing in her mouth.

Also one word of warning for those making that long trek. I've called in to make sure Lola was working only to arrive and she was gone. First time I bounced and came back the next day. Then when I arrived again they said she stepped out to get food or something. I thought that was bullshit but my balls were aching and I had made it a point of seeing Victoria at some point in the future so I just stayed. About 10 minutes later Lola comes back through the door and I ended up w/ a 3some. Session was great with Lola being the highlight. Victoria is 5'2ish, thin, MM C's, her ass is surprisingly nice for someone so thin. She's cute at about a 6/10. I did end up asking where Lola went since I contacted her earlier and she said she went to get food.

Good luck everyone.

My suggestion / post about descriptions was based on the review for Yoyo. I did in fact search whether Yoyo was reviewed in other reports recently and already described, and she was not. But had a brain fart and mistakenly wrote "Lola", not Yoyo as I meant. Unfortunately this obfuscated my suggestion that it helps all of us to describe the girl in detail.

Thanks again, I appreciate your helpful spirit and info nonetheless.

[TommyCool]

Alright I found out where Lola is.

She's not in the SGV. She's out in Moreno Valley at Mei Mei spa.

Good thing I was finally able to get Lola before she left. She's a popular item. Every monger wants her and literally during the session as I was pounding away her bootie hole 3 mongers came in asking for her. She said to keep fucking her ass and cum inside. Paid for the hour, got 2 rounds. CIA and CIM. She's wasn't all that hot in my opinion, but a freak! Came back again the following week, but Lola wasn't there. Got Victoria or something like that. She was pretty, but no extra service. I think my favorite position was banging her doggy. She definitely knows how to get into that doggy position. Probably won't repeat with her again though. Guess we'll have to wait for another monger to check out the new rotation the time comes.

[Eilers]

I share the frustration with vague reviews. Some of us have specific anatomical preferences and descriptions are important.

We are talking about travel time on LA streets & freeways and the value of our time in "treatment" and the cash outlay. All those things are investments.

I understand the frustration about the lack of description in some reviews. But understand also that Lola has been extensively reviewed. I'm sure you're not just depending on one review to get you to make that extensive drive from LA or OC to see Lola or any other provider. So doing a search into past reviews I'm sure someone posted a description of her. Usually the first few reviews have all that information in them.

I would put Lola about early 30's. She's about average build, MM C's, and stands 5'1"-5'3"ish range. Her face is interesting because it really depends on when you catch her. If she's working that day and she's made up (doesn't put on much makeup) she looks pretty ok. But if not then she's pretty plain and not what I would call a looker. My first time with her she wasn't working that day so she had on a clear face mask. When I asked to see her she said she wasn't working that day and had a mask on. I told her I'd come back. Then she changed her tune and ushered me into a room and I guess got herself ready. What followed was an awesome session of rimming, BBBJ, CFS, DFK, and more rimming, finishing in her mouth.

Also one word of warning for those making that long trek. I've called in to make sure Lola was working only to arrive and she was gone. First time I bounced and came back the next day. Then when I arrived again they said she stepped out to get food or something. I thought that was bullshit but my balls were aching and I had made it a point of seeing Victoria at some point in the future so I just stayed. About 10 minutes later Lola comes back through the door and I ended up w/ a 3some. Session was great with Lola being the highlight. Victoria is 5'2ish, thin, MM C's, her ass is surprisingly nice for someone so thin. She's cute at about a 6/10. I did end up asking where Lola went since I contacted her earlier and she said she went to get food.

Good luck everyone.

[Willie23]

Yes, maybe too harsh, apologies. But it was about the review, not the reviewer. At other times MaxG has in fact given descriptive reviews and made great contributions. Not sure he was even aware he made no mention of Yoyo's looks this time.

The general point is I'm not the only one here who benefits from descriptions of the provider. (Maybe there are some who don't care what the girl looks like, just what she does?)
Many/most of us use this board to decide exactly who to spend our money on, who is worth seeing, or our type physically.
Then, we want to know we got the right girl, to avoid bait and switch or the name game. Difficult without details.

Could have PM'd him I guess but was just trying to help more than me. Sorry I was too harsh.
Peace.

I share the frustration with vague reviews. Some of us have specific anatomical preferences and descriptions are important.

We are talking about travel time on LA streets & freeways and the value of our time in "treatment" and the cash outlay. All those things are investments.

[Vulva Nut]

Seriously, you're too harsh on the reviewer. He didn't get paid to write a review and you didn't pay to access this site. Does he has any legal obligations to provide you with useful information?

Yes, maybe too harsh, apologies. But it was about the review, not the reviewer. At other times MaxG has in fact given descriptive reviews and made great contributions. Not sure he was even aware he made no mention of Yoyo's looks this time.

The general point is I'm not the only one here who benefits from descriptions of the provider. (Maybe there are some who don't care what the girl looks like, just what she does?)
Many/most of us use this board to decide exactly who to spend our money on, who is worth seeing, or our type physically.
Then, we want to know we got the right girl, to avoid bait and switch or the name game. Difficult without details.

Could have PM'd him I guess but was just trying to help more than me. Sorry I was too harsh.
Peace.

[Vulva Nut]

He didn't mention any Lola dude. You quoted the wrong dude.

You're right Lost. I meant Yoyo, my bad, had searched recent Happy providers to see if anyone had described her and made a mistake on the name. Apologies, on that aspect of the comment.

[LostLimit]

Who is this Lola? 3 feet tall, 200 lbs? Grey hair, with a no-lip chicken skin pussy? Inverted nipples on E cups? You mean this Lola??

Many reviewers are poor with descriptions but in this particular review there are zero. Maybe an oversight or got truncated.

Objective, detailed descriptions of body under the clothes (shape, skin, nipples, pussy, etc). And of course face, hair, and figure.

Its helpful to your fellow members here to describe the provider, not just the services:
There are hundreds of providers out there providing, doing a lot of the same exact things. But we all have our preferences in looks and bodies and naughty bits.

Plus, its good to confirm that its the same Lola, vs bait and switch. Hopefully reviewers get this.

Glad her service was solid though, and you had a good time (whatever she looked like).

He didn't mention any Lola dude. You quoted the wrong dude.

[Vince682]

Who is this Lola? 3 feet tall, 200 lbs? Grey hair, with a no-lip chicken skin pussy? Inverted nipples on E cups? You mean this Lola??

Many reviewers are poor with descriptions but in this particular review there are zero. Maybe an oversight or got truncated.

Objective, detailed descriptions of body under the clothes (shape, skin, nipples, pussy, etc). And of course face, hair, and figure.

Its helpful to your fellow members here to describe the provider, not just the services:
There are hundreds of providers out there providing, doing a lot of the same exact things. But we all have our preferences in looks and bodies and naughty bits.

Plus, its good to confirm that its the same Lola, vs bait and switch. Hopefully reviewers get this.

Glad her service was solid though, and you had a good time (whatever she looked like).

Seriously, you're too harsh on the reviewer. He didn't get paid to write a review and you didn't pay to access this site. Does he has any legal obligations to provide you with useful information?