NoVA SugarBabies

[ChefMan2019]

I'm new to this, I've chatted with Blackpearl and she wants to meet up for coffee, but I still have not seen her picture. Has anyone seen her or has a picture? Not sure if its a bot or scam.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...0-957d34f05332

[JustLikeThe]

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...9-34f53d64011e

April time if I remember. Spotty communication as first but picked up after that. Moved direct to hotel and had to uber. She has a good body to speak (but a liitle saggy on tits) . She timeboxed a bit but overall experience was good in intimacy. What I thought was lacking was she came of cold a bit as in it reciprocated to she hitting as may guys as they come. It was was 500 . But recently seeing reports north of that.

[BuckNaked84]

Bullshit.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...3-6d57007ef134

Whoops. My mistake. That girl didn't text, this was the one that was fake.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...5-12cdf3de1a26

[TopGun9]

I know some of the more senior brethren here say peak Seeking has been over for years. What do y'all who experienced Seeking at its peak day make of this announcement? The beginning of the end?

Bring back Craigslist Personals.

Best fucking days for finding cheap amateur pussies, without all these BS and membership costs.

[TomFordModel]

Bro I'm disappointed in you. Why you going for fugly? I wouldn't do her if she was free.

I'd rather spank the monkey a couple times than waste time chasing these fugly girls.

DC is barren!! All scammers or ghetto chicks. It's getting expensive flying down NYC girls.

[HeyDuhman]

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...9-8559efbde4ec

Wants 5 for cover. Too thick I'll try to get 3.

Bro I'm disappointed in you. Why you going for fugly? I wouldn't do her if she was free.

I'd rather spank the monkey a couple times than waste time chasing these fugly girls.

[BuckNaked84]

Bullshit.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...3-6d57007ef134

[HeyDuhman]

Any info on this one? https://members.seeking.com/member/6...d-cba6a84dd256.

Pretty sure its a new profile. Based on comms she seems DTF but she looks like (and texts like) a boring lay.

[BDM1227]

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...f-5c2c722f1880

Reviewed before by others.

Asked for 950. Would settle for 650. I'm fucking hot under 25 chicks for under 500 for overnights in NYC can't pay more for a thick 30 something.

[TomFordModel]

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...9-8559efbde4ec

Wants 5 for cover. Too thick I'll try to get 3.

[NovaNova]

Sapphire 24.

Chatted over the course of a few days and sent me a number to text. Quick search of the number brings up ads for a pro and obviously not the same girl.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...0-9f5711337ac2

https://www.yesbackpage.com/325/post...REMEMBER-.html

[TomFordModel]

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...9-36b29c189b1b

Location DC asked for a grand. Not a surprise pics led to some wannabe influencer.

LOL. She's ethnic. No more than 3.

[NovaNova]

https://members.seeking.com/messages...7-bb62aada9a44

Good convo, planning to meet? Any inter, no ppm discussed yet.



https://members.seeking.com/member/0...b-4a66082974ef

Strange convos, can't tell if she is real or not yet.



Hotgirlsummerforever.

Good Convo but additional pics not great.



Happy hunting. Over and out.

My guess is that Ashley 38 is fake. Her headline, about me, and what I am seeking make absolutely no sense at all.

"Heart like a butterfly, lively and dynamic" WTF does that even mean?

HotGirlSummerForever has been on SA for a long time but no positive reports that I ever saw. I chatted with her previously but she abruptly blocked me. Never got to her actual pics so glad I did not miss anything.

Who knows if she is real or what she is looking for but for me anyway a total waste of time.

[NovaNova]

Traveling Pro from California posing as a SB.

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...a-72766d62a9e2

https://adultsearch.com/us/washingto...y-rubs/3061932

Staying in seven corners. Asked if I would come this afternoon for a massage. Nope blocked.

Pic Seller.

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...3-af627cf309fd

Had high hopes for this one as conversation was really good, she asked all the right questions and had all the right answers. 24 or so messages back and forth then comes the dreaded "naughty pics line". Blocked after that.

[ChrisCarr]

I know some of the more senior brethren here say peak Seeking has been over for years. What do y'all who experienced Seeking at its peak day make of this announcement? The beginning of the end?

It used to be UTR's, BP girls, sexually curious legit HS grads working shite jobs, and college coeds who needed male attention / validation that included a nice cash bonus. Now its pic / vid marketing insta-thots, data-gathering bots, girls that continue to make terrible life choices after having their first kid, and the newly-liberated sex-worker category whom are girls you happen to see advertising on Tryst or Slixa.

Sugaring was never as taboo as other sex work because most other sex work has almost always involved some dude in the background and not much degree of agency for the woman. That brings about imagery of streetwalkers, needles, graffiti, and yellow tape. Then came along Ana Nicole Smith. We know that there are many girls out there that believe and live their sugaring career in never having sex. They think sugaring really means 27 yr old plastic doll and 87 year old billionaire widower. Because the concept was always a tongue-in-cheek jab at what we would later start calling "gold-diggers" in popular parlance, Anna Nicole Smith was the original brunt of that joke. This made it appealing to the brave girls (who are probably the type of girls that figured out early on that they like anal sex) and made it mysterious to the remainder of our puritanized lives.

Then the internet becomes the thing and the pool of sex-seekers grew by a bazillion fold and the Brandon Wade guy, who looks like every other monger I've ever encountered, has this bright idea for seekingarrangement dot com. Over time word gets out that it is really just an exchange of sexual intimacy for money (prostitution) with another name and arguably better outcomes for everyone compared to what is being offered on backpage or listcrawler. This brought in sexually curious legit HS grads working shite jobs, and college coeds who needed male attention / validation that included a nice cash bonus. The ones that were hot, a little less risk averse, and assertive enough to take advantage of her smarts and youth. They were 20-24 years old. College or near graduation. Smart and well spoken, played high school sports, had a body count under 7 with that one long-term boyfriend that she did everything with. These girls knew how to keep a secret, knew what good sex could be, and the self control to keep her black book small, manageable, consistent, and enjoyable. And they read about seekingarrangement on reddit or some other pop-culture site that ran the story as "ooh, the hidden life of a sugar baby" and ended up steering a ton of girls to the site. This was the golden times for her and for us.

After the pandemic the next batch of 18-32 year olds are going to be very different. More entitled, and more confident in their youthful ideologies and grossly less educated than ever before. They will always be asking for more money, they will always be highly risk averse, they will all be taking some psychiatric prescription cocktail. You will not want to get to know them outside of just sex, and because their politics are driven by algorithm you would be right not to trust them at all. They are more likely to be heavier in the wrong way, not as attractive, not as interesting, and not worth your time and money. I do wonder how much of this is to blame seeking dot com for ruining sugaring vs much how this new generation has been responding to the latest version of youth indoctrination and thought-programming.

Exhibit A:

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...f-9a2fd9c81fd9

Her headline reads "why does no one ever respond to me:

The recent K-pop bust in Tysons is a reminder that the real goal of those brick-and-mortar sex parlors is to fish for customers that are far more than just $100 tips, and doing so on a site like seeking is fertile ground for cyber exploitation. To what degree have they engaged in state-sponsored intel and LEO ops? How many warrants do they get? How many do they comply with vs how many do they play the legal back-and-forth game? Which countries and jurisdictions do they interact with? How easy is it to get hired and get access to their datacenter space? They want more pictures and more ways to verify you as if they ALREADY DON'T KNOW WHO TF YOU ARE LOL.

"As*leyMa*ison kept customer info in an encrypted Excel spreadsheet. Seeking is probably doing more but c'Mon. What do their day-to-day data-security practices really look like after the boiler-plate privacy policy statements?

I'd also be curious to know how many pimps have tried to leverage seeking, and what steps Seeking uses to weed out pimps, pimped girls. Again, prostitution has always been crap because of dudes that have no objection to exploiting a woman's free agency for the meager amount of value he brings, which is just physical protection from other dudes that have no objection to exploiting a woman's free agency for the meager amount of value he brings. Seeking has been great because that dude element seems removed. Now that guy just texts you directly with requests for babysitter money instead of opening the door with the other key while you are naked and demanding all your money.