Thread: Sugar Daddy Sites
+
Add Report
Results 2,311 to 2,325 of 10928
-
02-05-24 17:31 #8618Senior Member

Posts: 271Personal firstl?
Great post Mr FarFarAway.
Can you elaborate more on the "Personal interaction first, rather than online" ? You meet most online correct? So, I'm not clear on how you go about it.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
-
02-05-24 15:38 #8617Senior Member

Posts: 3293Especially having an SO. IK guys who approach PYTs in public w / a proposition. I have heard this from SBs who tell me their first arrangements were made this way, and then they liked them, so after that one ended, they were trying to figure out how to find the next SD. I think you can only pull this stunt if you are single. You are very likely to get punched by her BF if she has one, or you misjudge them. But heck, sometimes these guys were just approaching girls obviously making minimum wage (kiosks in a mall).
Originally Posted by Murrican
[View Original Post]
If I were to do this, I would make up a fake business card w / my sugar name and burner contact info on it. I could pass those out to the appropriate POTs.
I also heard a great idea, if you happen to be in a bar and engage in some great flirting w / the bartender or waitress. Take a sugar packet and write your burner number on it. Hand it to the girl on your way out and say 'there's more sugar where that came from' or somesuch.
There is a point here. Personal interaction first, rather than online contact. It is what I recommend for having good SD experiences. This is how I get an Instagram model to bang me at her place for small money. If I pitched a ppm to her online, she would have shut me down.
-
02-05-24 14:07 #8616Senior Member

Posts: 300I concur. For all its faults, the 2 main advantages of seeking are that it's the biggest, and everyone on it has already declared their intentions, by virtue of being on the site. You might offend someone with the amount you ask, or the arrangement you are looking for, but you can be assured, you are all looking for arrangements.
Originally Posted by Avarun1972
[View Original Post]
I'd be scared making propositions on unrelated sites that have nothing to do with arrangements. Too much risk someone says "gross I'm looking for a boyfriend not a john and I'll be reporting you. " At least in the states.
-
02-05-24 11:21 #8615Senior Member

Posts: 622Yes. The cheap johns are the fake / salt daddies. They usually offer way below the market average or nothing.
Originally Posted by Avarun1972
[View Original Post]
-
02-05-24 05:32 #8614Senior Member

Posts: 111Is it lyn suki? If so, I've already dabbled LOL.
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
-
02-05-24 02:40 #8613Regular Member

Posts: 23My Experience
I have tried many ways to meet young girls for a decent Allowance, By far still SA is the best place. I know its becoming tough, but with 30 minutes of work, you can find a decent good-looking young girl. There is simply no replacement for SA as of now. Instagram has a lot of limitations in messaging and in SA the intention is very clear. When I talk to SB, they say there are a lot of cheap johns who are out here and offering them a very low allowance and wasting their time. Of course lot of fake SB profiles.
-
02-04-24 22:44 #8612Banned Member

Posts: 171White or maybe mixed. When I am done I I will share her info.
Originally Posted by SeanTime53
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 20:34 #8611Senior Member

Posts: 622SA didn't create the fake profiles. However, SA favors fake profiles so they don't need to hire someone to do it for them. Saves them lots of money. The fake profiles help to lure new SDs to join as well. SA can easily eliminate all the fake profiles or make it extremely difficult for fake profiles to sign up but doesn't.
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 20:15 #8610Senior Member

Posts: 3293My bowl buddy has investigated that site "only. " - if girls abandon SA for it, they are fools. Something like the top 3% (of hundreds of thousands) of girls make the lion's share of $. The rest make less than 200 per month.
Originally Posted by UnknownSD
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 19:40 #8609Senior Member

Posts: 111What ethnicity?
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 19:12 #8608Banned Member

Posts: 171However there is still magic on SA. 19 yo stoner girl this week for 300 each time. Keeps me coming back.
Originally Posted by RRyder
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 16:15 #8607Senior Member

Posts: 622SA is doing fine and there will always be more SDs willing to pay to look for new girls. There is a definite increase in fake / scammer accounts as well as an increase in fake SDS on the site. A lot of the SBs have gone elsewhere like OF, Instagram, and YouTube. That's because they go where the money is. If there were lots of SDs spoiling the SBs like crazy then the SBs would come back and more girls would join. But in reality, a lot of the SDs on SA are just fake daddies and just looking to sleep with the girls for free which resulted in the loss of many SBs to go elsewhere.
Originally Posted by RRyder
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 16:01 #8606Senior Member

Posts: 3293Simply don't believe it. Provide evidence. I have not had that sense. SA doesn't need to do this. Plenty of people do fakes on their own. They are relying on the cravenness of the (mostly male) population of the world who want to try to make some easy money or just mess w / us.
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 15:54 #8605Senior Member

Posts: 43I think SA is on its last legs. I just recently activated my account after 4 years away and the pond is filled with fake accounts. I believe SA girls moved to OF, showing your butthole for $3. 99 is easier than meeting people.
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 14:46 #8604Banned Member

Posts: 171Pornstar Felicity Feline.
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
Escort Jayden Fox.









Reply With Quote



