Thread: Sugar Daddy Sites
+
Add Report
Results 2,326 to 2,340 of 10931
-
02-04-24 16:01 #8606Senior Member

Posts: 3293Simply don't believe it. Provide evidence. I have not had that sense. SA doesn't need to do this. Plenty of people do fakes on their own. They are relying on the cravenness of the (mostly male) population of the world who want to try to make some easy money or just mess w / us.
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 15:54 #8605Senior Member

Posts: 43I think SA is on its last legs. I just recently activated my account after 4 years away and the pond is filled with fake accounts. I believe SA girls moved to OF, showing your butthole for $3. 99 is easier than meeting people.
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 14:46 #8604Banned Member

Posts: 171Pornstar Felicity Feline.
Originally Posted by WowU812
[View Original Post]
Escort Jayden Fox.
-
02-04-24 14:41 #8603Banned Member

Posts: 171I posted on this as well. I think SA is posting fake profiles and goes as far as having fake people text with you. Been confirmed Tinder and Bumble do this.
Originally Posted by StudBucket
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 14:31 #8602Senior Member

Posts: 187I am also sorry to say guys that in my 5 years on Seeking, I have never came acroos so many fake profiles, scammers, catfishes. SA is becoming a cespool of the above. Just in the last couple of weeks, 3 out 5 girls I met could not do a Face Time video, take a call, so I ended up having to block them. So, always, always ask them to verify themselves via a video call to prove they are who they say they are or you can waste a lot of time. Remember, that there are many scammers out there who are dudes usually or girls looking for victims to send them money while posing as someone else, and SA does not have a verification policy.
Originally Posted by Chupacabra
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 13:55 #8601Senior Member

Posts: 3293Not
Those were taken in a broken mirror I thought. Anyway, people often hide their eyes, it is key to facial rec. In many cases, eyes are also what make them attractive, in hers it was a definite negative.
Originally Posted by SteveTandberg
[View Original Post]
She is definitely a female, with a child, a nice little butt, and some decent boobs. Just a flake.
-
02-04-24 13:08 #8600Senior Member

Posts: 622SB Reviews 02/04/2024
Dolce Far Niente: A girl in her late 20's. Her private photos are fake. It's not her. Her profile states White but she looks Indian. She's an actress, tall and skinny. Her looks are a 6 and her body is a 7. Allowance negotiable.
https://members.seeking.com/member/f...1-d4f9c94c159d
Coolnewgirl: Latino girl in her late 20's from South America. Her looks are a 7 and her body is a 8. She's tall and skinny and works out regularly. Allowance negotiable. She's condom only. Non-negotiable.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d...d-74eaae6c015c
Lolitalovesmoney: Tall white girl in her early 20's. She's asking for 1 k ppm. BB only with recent tests. Her looks are a 7 and her body is a 7. She will only meet up if you're DTF.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a...3-5ce6bd6591da
GorgGirl: She's back again with a new profile. White girl in her mid or late 20's. She lives in WEHO. Her looks are a 6 and her body is a 6. Allowance negotiable.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7...9-465de2b087f4
Babygirl: Fake / Scammer. Asking you to send money before the meeting.
https://members.seeking.com/member/5...7-0e45a3afa100
Olga: Fake / Scammer.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...b-58f9e7a3eb91
Shesthatgirl: Fake / Scammer.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1...c-0bdd6a58ade6
-
02-04-24 11:43 #8599Senior Member

Posts: 119Dead giveaway
Weren't the cracked cellphone lens photos a dead giveaway? 🤣
Originally Posted by Alkalinedio
[View Original Post]
-
02-04-24 00:19 #8598Senior Member

Posts: 399That looks like a Tranny!
Originally Posted by Uncountable
[View Original Post]
Thanks for the warning.
AD.
-
02-03-24 21:05 #8597Senior Member

Posts: 415Those are all solid reasons, alright. Looks like you're finding a TON of scammers, I wonder if SA is dying. Maybe most of the real babies are on Snapchat or Instagram now, or something.
Originally Posted by UnknownSD
[View Original Post]
-
02-03-24 16:11 #8596Senior Member

Posts: 94https://members.seeking.com/member/2...e-a73969c02409
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
-
02-03-24 12:48 #8595Senior Member

Posts: 3293Instagram
I have mentioned a few POTs who turned out to be IG models. The most recent 3. I already described the Asian one, not for me but for some single guys at a very very good price point.
I had given my GV# to another, but she hadn't texted. Trying to revive the conversation, I asked 'milk or dark chocolate', as her profile did say she loved flowers and chocolate. Her response was 'I love my chocolate in the form of Benjamins'. OK then.
The last one was a score, so I have a batting average fine w / major league baseball. M&G, exactly the stunning model in her profile. We did talk by phone beforehand. Super nice, a quick coffee and talk in the car. She lives (not in LA) and is happy to host. I offered a fair 500 and away we went. Smoking!
So, I would not be intimidated to see a profile from an IG model. And I am not any sort of a prize, no Brad Pitt. They might work out. But you can't be a jerk. IDK if you want to call that 'game', but it is certainly the opposite of the abundance of jerks on the site.
-
02-02-24 23:54 #8594Senior Member

Posts: 622One or more of the reasons below:
Originally Posted by HoDough
[View Original Post]
1. They cannot meet in person.
2. They are not looking for arrangements.
3. Selling pics / videos.
4. Scam you to join or sell other products or services.
5. The recent location doesn't match their listed location.
6. They are not willing to video chat or do a voice call.
-
02-02-24 19:40 #8593Senior Member

Posts: 3293Stay away
Jenny, 34 years old, Mission Viejo. I blocked her so can't give you the link.
She is way older than 34, she has her eyes covered for a reason, something weird about them, bad lip plastic surgery, terrible comms, irresponsible on M&G.
-
02-02-24 19:27 #8592Senior Member

Posts: 537I'm curious what's your criteria for listing them as a "Fake / Scammer"?
Originally Posted by UnknownSD
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



