Non Pro's

[ScotchYoke]

Anyone have information on this one?

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...e-0830986ba3fc

Nothing first hand, but.

https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?592144-stormjay333

[Bronco62]

Anyone have information on this one?

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...e-0830986ba3fc

[Member #6729]

Thanks for sharing the link to that study. No offense to anyone if it's your thing (to each their own), but that advertising point for niche videos and certain ladies on the board is something that I avoid. Years ago I ended up with a $100 cleaning fee on my credit card after the fact from a hotel, because a chick drenched the sheets & mattress. Most dudes who've banged a chick that has squeezed out a few pups could tell you it's piss. There's no magic vessel of fluid hidden away in a woman's body that the medical community has oddly never located.

I remember I was seeing a girl from SA. Massive squirter, but once I threw that mattress away, looked like a kid constantly urinated on it lmao it was yellow from all the squirting. I've since bought covers that are water proof so no more of that. The squirting is part of the experience, I can give two shits if is 20% pee, 50% pee or 1%. It's fun in the moment, and I'm cleaning the sheets after anyways, if people don't like it, nothing on them.

[KitWalker1967]

There was a medical study that I posted online on the other board about 2 years ago. It's piss. Of course, that loser chick ClaraTuring I believe (I have her blocked), arrogantly told me that I don't know what I was talking about after I posted the study. She's a woman and she should know (idiot). Anyway, the study was done by doctors, they measured the bladder before and after and analyzed the contents. The bladder was smaller after squirting and the contents were basically piss with a trace of other stuff added in.

Here is a report on the summary. I actually posted the original study from the Journal of Urology (but according the Clara, what do they know)? https://www.iflscience.com/female-sq...dy-finds-65373.

Thanks for sharing the link to that study. No offense to anyone if it's your thing (to each their own), but that advertising point for niche videos and certain ladies on the board is something that I avoid. Years ago I ended up with a $100 cleaning fee on my credit card after the fact from a hotel, because a chick drenched the sheets & mattress. Most dudes who've banged a chick that has squeezed out a few pups could tell you it's piss. There's no magic vessel of fluid hidden away in a woman's body that the medical community has oddly never located.

[3Putt]

Do these profile links work for others? I find that most of these are giving me a message saying profile is not found etc.

Worked for me.

[BuckNaked123]

There was a medical study that I posted online on the other board about 2 years ago. It's piss. Of course, that loser chick ClaraTuring I believe (I have her blocked), arrogantly told me that I don't know what I was talking about after I posted the study. She's a woman and she should know (idiot). Anyway, the study was done by doctors, they measured the bladder before and after and analyzed the contents. The bladder was smaller after squirting and the contents were basically piss with a trace of other stuff added in.

Here is a report on the summary. I actually posted the original study from the Journal of Urology (but according the Clara, what do they know)? https://www.iflscience.com/female-sq...dy-finds-65373.

Finally a study that makes sense and actually proves that it is urine or mainly urine. The blue dye in the bladder and measuring the quantity of urine in the bladder before and after the squirting makes so much sense and in my opinion solves the mystery.

The providers that squirt and try telling you it isn't urine are basically selling their "snake oil". They want you to think it's something special and not just a golden shower.

Thanks for the link.

[Epsilon7890]

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...d-49abdaf325e3

Said previous guys paid her 850+ (probably true unfortunately), seemed like a pro anyway on profile. Sent me a mean message telling me I'd have better luck going to pick up a SW downtown, LOL.

Was tempted to bite back saying I've seen girls much better than her both in looks and personality at half that rate, but decided against the bait. I actually like it when they send those types of messages, makes it easier to block and not waste time.

On that note, starting to see some success. I noticed if you tailor your profile right, you'll actually get messaged yourself from semi-experienced types though you have to play the numbers negotiating game then. Definitely getting the vibe that 500 is more closer to the sweet spot, though I know there are outliers for less, especially as you get out of the early 20's range.

Do these profile links work for others? I find that most of these are giving me a message saying profile is not found etc.

[OliverQueen]

Just beware that she'll completely soak the sheets. The first time or two I experienced it (not just with her) I thought it was hot and a compliment but lately I tend to avoid.

First thing to say, she is really cool. Friendly, kinky, and very responsive. Saying she's a squirter does not encompass how soaked you will be, assuming you do the job right. I've been with other squirters and would say that she was by far the top squirter. She is super fun, in and out of bed. Not only is she a squirter, but kegels so hard when she comes she'll push you out.

With me, 5. PPM covered. 6. Uncovered with a test, due to the extra body maintenance required.

When I saw her more than a year ago, she could host. IMHO, it is a requirement due to the squirting. I would not want to do the full cleanup myself.

[HelloThar]

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...d-49abdaf325e3

Said previous guys paid her 850+ (probably true unfortunately), seemed like a pro anyway on profile. Sent me a mean message telling me I'd have better luck going to pick up a SW downtown, LOL.

Was tempted to bite back saying I've seen girls much better than her both in looks and personality at half that rate, but decided against the bait. I actually like it when they send those types of messages, makes it easier to block and not waste time.

On that note, starting to see some success. I noticed if you tailor your profile right, you'll actually get messaged yourself from semi-experienced types though you have to play the numbers negotiating game then. Definitely getting the vibe that 500 is more closer to the sweet spot, though I know there are outliers for less, especially as you get out of the early 20's range.

[PriceIsRight39]

It looks like the season of vacation planning is going to ramp up soon, where our local college girls turn to us to help them pay for their international jaunts. For example, this one, SmartSiren:

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...1-1dfd4ba13e3c

Member since 2020, clearly making the case. I guess this is the other time of the year they tend to cluster (winter holidays being the other), so I'm thinking of renewing my premium subscription after a two-month lapse (thus the previous post requesting a discount code). I really shouldn't, considering the amount of women I currently see and have seen. Separate issue.

Question to those who've been doing this a while: Historically, is this the best time of the year to find college babes? I honestly feel like having a subscription to Seeking outside these two major spikes is useless.

I let them pay for their own f-cking summer vacations! LOL. This hate they gone be hurting. I got um in Miami asking for 1 k, I say 6, they txt right back. OK! Play the down economy boys!! And remember our border is wide open. The competition is coming. And they broke!

[PriceIsRight39]

It looks like the season of vacation planning is going to ramp up soon, where our local college girls turn to us to help them pay for their international jaunts. For example, this one, SmartSiren:

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...1-1dfd4ba13e3c

Member since 2020, clearly making the case. I guess this is the other time of the year they tend to cluster (winter holidays being the other), so I'm thinking of renewing my premium subscription after a two-month lapse (thus the previous post requesting a discount code). I really shouldn't, considering the amount of women I currently see and have seen. Separate issue.

Question to those who've been doing this a while: Historically, is this the best time of the year to find college babes? I honestly feel like having a subscription to Seeking outside these two major spikes is useless.

I let them pay for their own f-cking summer vacations! LOL. This hate they gone be hurting. I got um in Miami asking for 1 k, I say 6, they txt right back. Ok!! Play the down economy boys! And remember our border is wide open. The competition is coming. And they broke!

[MaCross19]

Let me guess, the whale didn't require condoms. Rose could probably do fine herself sadly, especially at half rate.

The HoneyImHome chicks seems GPS as hell just in her bio. Not surprised she's mean in text.

As an experiment, have any of you guys ever tried offering some crazy absurd amount to some of the women reported here just to see if they cave on any hard no's. I would be interested in seeing the amount needed to see who can suddenly host or now be perfectly fine going uncovered.

It is actually the opposite. The fat one requires condoms. But I don't want to pay $800 for one hot girl.

[HelloThar]

RoseandIris-.

https://members.seeking.com/member/85b9ba57-3295-4218-bc05-6c415b70fda0

$800 for both but they can't host and one requires condoms. No thank you

Let me guess, the whale didn't require condoms. Rose could probably do fine herself sadly, especially at half rate.

The HoneyImHome chicks seems GPS as hell just in her bio. Not surprised she's mean in text.

As an experiment, have any of you guys ever tried offering some crazy absurd amount to some of the women reported here just to see if they cave on any hard no's. I would be interested in seeing the amount needed to see who can suddenly host or now be perfectly fine going uncovered.

[MaCross19]

So I have a regular thing going but still had days remaining on my account and figured I would do some digging to see what I could get with some one off meets. Here are some findings:

LatinaNath- https://members.seeking.com/member/7...9-f7249a064b0e Is real, is the girl in the pictures, speaks no English, can't host, and will accept $400 if you play your cards right. Condoms are required but she has pretty decent skills and great tits. Can't really recommend her because of the condom thing with the price tag but if you are into the hot Latina women and don't mind wrapping up go for it.

RoseandIris-.

https://members.seeking.com/member/85b9ba57-3295-4218-bc05-6c415b70fda0

$800 for both but they can't host and one requires condoms. No thank you.

HoneyImHome.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...e-d92e61f3d47b

Real person but doesn't seem interested in actually doing anything physical. If anyone has actually hit it I would love to know if she is a mean person in bed or just via text?

Seekingdirectdaddy.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...7-26e8944ea309

She's back. She is huge, not very good in bed, and used to be an alcoholic. Would not recommend unless you have a thing for fat chicks who do nothing.

FriendlySeductress.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...f-cab7c24337e7

GPS wanting $600 per meeting and she has no time available. Couldn't make it work. With her schedule but seemed nice. Still has a mom bod.

[HelloThar]

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...c-85d818836745

This one says she can host for 500. Started off on a bad foot though as she got pissed off when I asked for pics to verify considering the age of her account. Said she was real, have had previous arrangements, and meeting in person would prove as much. She said she could share snapchat pics later in the day after work.

Guessing she's telling the truth but I got so annoyed with her attitude and semi-pro vibe that I blocked her.

If someone sees her, let me know how she is, LOL.