Non Pro's

[DelToro]

Nothing first hand, but.

https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?592144-stormjay333

Nice and helpful catch.

She did remind me of a provider I used to see a few years ago. It's not her but they do look alike.

[MilfHunter66]

This one on SA cracks me up mainly because her name is Great Smile and in my opinion, her fake smile is not her strong point. Just curious, has anyone seen her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...7-466a314fb30f

I sent her a message a while back. She never responded or even bothered to read it.

[BuckNaked123]

This one on SA cracks me up mainly because her name is Great Smile and in my opinion, her fake smile is not her strong point. Just curious, has anyone seen her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...7-466a314fb30f

[HelloThar]

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...1-45545f8af29a

This one can host for $400. Not my type though after looking again, so didn't pursue. Have zero info other than that.

I think I missed out on 2-3 potential hookups so far based on polite replies back regarding them not being able to host, but not declining ppm. Will probably keep them in back pocket.

Also found some success and met someone for fun times in Seattle already, so dunno if I want more there. Hate driving downtown and had to go a benji higher but whatever, much better looks/value/service than most on other board. I'd love for one to be 15 min or closer to me but it's tough.

My profile being explicit as can be without violating guidelines definitely helps. I still get the occasional type that goes, "wait, you want what!?" after being fine with the ppm and it just blows my mind. As if I'd pay just to chat or be in their presence. The ones that know exactly what they want, what you want, and answer all your questions are the best tho sometimes you want someone new. The one I saw straight up said she loves sex when I tried asking tactfully.

[Bronco62]

Nothing first hand, but.


https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?592144-stormjay333

Thanks, she had a pro vibe.

[ScotchYoke]

Anyone have information on this one?

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...e-0830986ba3fc

Nothing first hand, but.

https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?592144-stormjay333

[Bronco62]

Anyone have information on this one?

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...e-0830986ba3fc

[Member #6729]

Thanks for sharing the link to that study. No offense to anyone if it's your thing (to each their own), but that advertising point for niche videos and certain ladies on the board is something that I avoid. Years ago I ended up with a $100 cleaning fee on my credit card after the fact from a hotel, because a chick drenched the sheets & mattress. Most dudes who've banged a chick that has squeezed out a few pups could tell you it's piss. There's no magic vessel of fluid hidden away in a woman's body that the medical community has oddly never located.

I remember I was seeing a girl from SA. Massive squirter, but once I threw that mattress away, looked like a kid constantly urinated on it lmao it was yellow from all the squirting. I've since bought covers that are water proof so no more of that. The squirting is part of the experience, I can give two shits if is 20% pee, 50% pee or 1%. It's fun in the moment, and I'm cleaning the sheets after anyways, if people don't like it, nothing on them.

[KitWalker1967]

There was a medical study that I posted online on the other board about 2 years ago. It's piss. Of course, that loser chick ClaraTuring I believe (I have her blocked), arrogantly told me that I don't know what I was talking about after I posted the study. She's a woman and she should know (idiot). Anyway, the study was done by doctors, they measured the bladder before and after and analyzed the contents. The bladder was smaller after squirting and the contents were basically piss with a trace of other stuff added in.

Here is a report on the summary. I actually posted the original study from the Journal of Urology (but according the Clara, what do they know)? https://www.iflscience.com/female-sq...dy-finds-65373.

Thanks for sharing the link to that study. No offense to anyone if it's your thing (to each their own), but that advertising point for niche videos and certain ladies on the board is something that I avoid. Years ago I ended up with a $100 cleaning fee on my credit card after the fact from a hotel, because a chick drenched the sheets & mattress. Most dudes who've banged a chick that has squeezed out a few pups could tell you it's piss. There's no magic vessel of fluid hidden away in a woman's body that the medical community has oddly never located.

[3Putt]

Do these profile links work for others? I find that most of these are giving me a message saying profile is not found etc.

Worked for me.

[BuckNaked123]

There was a medical study that I posted online on the other board about 2 years ago. It's piss. Of course, that loser chick ClaraTuring I believe (I have her blocked), arrogantly told me that I don't know what I was talking about after I posted the study. She's a woman and she should know (idiot). Anyway, the study was done by doctors, they measured the bladder before and after and analyzed the contents. The bladder was smaller after squirting and the contents were basically piss with a trace of other stuff added in.

Here is a report on the summary. I actually posted the original study from the Journal of Urology (but according the Clara, what do they know)? https://www.iflscience.com/female-sq...dy-finds-65373.

Finally a study that makes sense and actually proves that it is urine or mainly urine. The blue dye in the bladder and measuring the quantity of urine in the bladder before and after the squirting makes so much sense and in my opinion solves the mystery.

The providers that squirt and try telling you it isn't urine are basically selling their "snake oil". They want you to think it's something special and not just a golden shower.

Thanks for the link.

[Epsilon7890]

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...d-49abdaf325e3

Said previous guys paid her 850+ (probably true unfortunately), seemed like a pro anyway on profile. Sent me a mean message telling me I'd have better luck going to pick up a SW downtown, LOL.

Was tempted to bite back saying I've seen girls much better than her both in looks and personality at half that rate, but decided against the bait. I actually like it when they send those types of messages, makes it easier to block and not waste time.

On that note, starting to see some success. I noticed if you tailor your profile right, you'll actually get messaged yourself from semi-experienced types though you have to play the numbers negotiating game then. Definitely getting the vibe that 500 is more closer to the sweet spot, though I know there are outliers for less, especially as you get out of the early 20's range.

Do these profile links work for others? I find that most of these are giving me a message saying profile is not found etc.

[OliverQueen]

Just beware that she'll completely soak the sheets. The first time or two I experienced it (not just with her) I thought it was hot and a compliment but lately I tend to avoid.

First thing to say, she is really cool. Friendly, kinky, and very responsive. Saying she's a squirter does not encompass how soaked you will be, assuming you do the job right. I've been with other squirters and would say that she was by far the top squirter. She is super fun, in and out of bed. Not only is she a squirter, but kegels so hard when she comes she'll push you out.

With me, 5. PPM covered. 6. Uncovered with a test, due to the extra body maintenance required.

When I saw her more than a year ago, she could host. IMHO, it is a requirement due to the squirting. I would not want to do the full cleanup myself.

[HelloThar]

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...d-49abdaf325e3

Said previous guys paid her 850+ (probably true unfortunately), seemed like a pro anyway on profile. Sent me a mean message telling me I'd have better luck going to pick up a SW downtown, LOL.

Was tempted to bite back saying I've seen girls much better than her both in looks and personality at half that rate, but decided against the bait. I actually like it when they send those types of messages, makes it easier to block and not waste time.

On that note, starting to see some success. I noticed if you tailor your profile right, you'll actually get messaged yourself from semi-experienced types though you have to play the numbers negotiating game then. Definitely getting the vibe that 500 is more closer to the sweet spot, though I know there are outliers for less, especially as you get out of the early 20's range.

[PriceIsRight39]

It looks like the season of vacation planning is going to ramp up soon, where our local college girls turn to us to help them pay for their international jaunts. For example, this one, SmartSiren:

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...1-1dfd4ba13e3c

Member since 2020, clearly making the case. I guess this is the other time of the year they tend to cluster (winter holidays being the other), so I'm thinking of renewing my premium subscription after a two-month lapse (thus the previous post requesting a discount code). I really shouldn't, considering the amount of women I currently see and have seen. Separate issue.

Question to those who've been doing this a while: Historically, is this the best time of the year to find college babes? I honestly feel like having a subscription to Seeking outside these two major spikes is useless.

I let them pay for their own f-cking summer vacations! LOL. This hate they gone be hurting. I got um in Miami asking for 1 k, I say 6, they txt right back. OK! Play the down economy boys!! And remember our border is wide open. The competition is coming. And they broke!