Agency Discussion and Reviews

**Member #6517** · 05-12-23 12:06

I just bite the bullet and sampled a dream with Sery.

No hugging, no kissing at the entrance. It started off weird.

No preview BBBJ during shower.

After shower, no kissing whatsoever.

BBBJ was good. She complained I was big- I don't think so. So the whole session was a glorified handjob mixed with BBBJ.

I thought I'd at least get a BBBJCIM but she avoided that at perfect timing.

Reported to booker.

She's kind of cute but also gives a tad of ladyboy vibes without makeup tbh.

1/10 for the HJ effort. I should have just burned $$ 50 instead.

**Member #6396** · 05-12-23 11:37

Originally Posted by BravoFox [View Original Post]

I guess you can say I am a tourist and will be in Atlanta soon. Is 280/30 mins, 310/45 mins, 330/60 mins (1 shot, 40/ extra for two shots) is this in line with local pricing? I would assume BBBJ / CFS or is these costs more BBFS? Trying to get a pulse if quotes are inflated. Local pricing as in what are you all currently quoted, being more familiar with the Agency (KBP). TIA.

2 pops for 1 hour was 360 which included BBBJ and cfs.

**BravoFox** · 05-12-23 08:44

I guess you can say I am a tourist and will be in Atlanta soon. Is 280/30 mins, 310/45 mins, 330/60 mins (1 shot, 40/ extra for two shots) is this in line with local pricing? I would assume BBBJ / CFS or is these costs more BBFS? Trying to get a pulse if quotes are inflated. Local pricing as in what are you all currently quoted, being more familiar with the Agency (KBP). TIA.

**ShinamotoJason** · 05-10-23 23:51

Sorry for the late response, it is now spacious. Thanks.

Originally Posted by RedneckStud [View Original Post]

Please clean out your inbox.

**RedneckStud** · 05-10-23 17:21

Originally Posted by ShinamotoJason [View Original Post]

Sorry for the troll tag, it's due to my aggressive behavior on the other board in the west coast. Hopefully I don't confuse anyone. But I know Violet Lee, she's an Eurasian indie GFE model. With K-Town Aria, Violet is one of my favorite GFE models; however, I believe she has the tour schedule to London, UK in May. I don't know the other girls in their website.

Good luck, brothers!

S. J.

Please clean out your inbox.

**FutureTrunks** · 05-10-23 14:38

Originally Posted by Ozymandias [View Original Post]

Definitely at least some fake pics (at least one is an escort in Canada). The domain name was registered in 2006, though. Mysterious!

Still, why bother when there's actual SPP?.

Before you give this a try.

**FreudFro** · 05-10-23 10:05

Originally Posted by ZeroDude [View Original Post]

Website gives SPP vibes. Maybe thet rebranded? Rate is 400 hr.

To be clear, this is NOT SPP. I even asked Sunny at SPP and she says no way. Truth is, why would she? She has a good biz with solid clients and she always puts up pics that represent her ladies appropriately.

No shill here, just keeping a good agency clear from this nonsense. Not enough agencies left in ATL.

Not sure what that other site is doing, but most of those pics have been confirmed as fake.

**Focker 2** · 05-10-23 00:51

I'm curious if anyone has tried ava at kbp yet? Her reviews seem kind of mixed. And her pics show like 3 different girls. LOL.

**Focker 2** · 05-09-23 22:05

Sery at lkatl.

Ter: 364758.

Looks: 8. 5/10. It's the same girl in the pics. She is thinner now, and aged a couple years. But still very attractive. I would look twice if I saw her on the street. Looks to be about 27-29 in person (add a few years for her real age). Half a point added for no catfishing.

Body: 7/10. Again, pics are her minus a little weight. No baby damage. Slim. Nice young P with very tight grip. Manmade C's. They must be the older versions, bc there is some hardness to them. I hate that. Otherwise decent kgirl features.

Service and IOP: 6/10. This was a slightly below average session for me. No preview BBBJ in shower. No rim / tuma. Not much buildup here. 2 things did make her standout though. BBBJ was very different than other girls. She has an incredibly gentle and light touch and suction. She was very sensual about it. If you need more aggressiveness, she isn't for you. Also, P is very tight and Iop is good from all positions. Mish, cg, BBBJCIM.

Attitude: 8/10. Nice girl. Good personality. Easy to talk to. Good english too. Has a very california girl voice that I found attractive.

**Focker 2** · 05-09-23 22:03

Aria at kbp.

Ter: 370253.

Had to see what all the hype was about. I'm not sure if all the hoopla surrounding this girl was caused by that jasonshinamoto guy, or not, but she was literally booked for every time slot for the first few days when I txted the booker. I haven't seen that kind of demand in a while. I can usually text at 4 pm and still get an appt within the hour. LOL.

Looks: 8/10. Definitely has that younger kpop idol look (looks about 24, so I would guess the real age to be about 28-31?) . But not the sexy / sultry kind. More of the cute younger member / gnd look. Google images for "Hong Eunchae". I think that might be kind of a close representation for what you can kind of expect.

Body: 7/10. Pics aren't her (duh). Don't expect very curvy hips or voluptuous. Seemed all Natural. Not many curves. But still fun. No baby damage. Nice clamshell with good grip. Very decent natural b's. I wouldn't say c's. Slightly above average kgirl butt, bc there's a little bit of muscle when she's on all fours. I was actually kind of surprised when grabbing from behind in k9.

Service and IOP: 7/10. Honestly, this was about average. It was only better bc it was with a cuter kgirl. She didn't really do anything spectacular or memorable. Just preview BBBJ in the shower, and a bit of massage. No tuma / rim if that's your thing. Or at least she didn't do it for me. But then, I don't push that. I think that's less normal for the younger, better looking girls, and more common among the older ones. She does spend a little more time on BBBJ than most other girls do. Otherwise, went thru all the other moves. Mish, k9, cg and reverse, and BBBJCIM. Mostly lfk, but slightly more like dfk deeper into both pops.

Attitude: 8. 5/10. She was tired. And she mentioned it very subtly quite a few times throughout our hr. It kind of threw off the session a bit. I blame it on her being overworked from open to close. So I'm curious what kind of vibe she would've brought if she was fresh and more energetic. But even though still, she was a pro and made sure my time there was well spent and my first and seconds were how / where I wanted them.

**CoolTdh21** · 05-09-23 20:08

Hi, I see a lot of new talent at LKATL. - Gia, Coco, Julia, Sery. Do any of the fellow mongers have had recent experience with these girls.

I saw Yu Hee in April and she was awesome. Let me know if any of these girls provide that level of satisfaction.

**Ozymandias** · 05-09-23 12:31

Originally Posted by BadaBng [View Original Post]

I saw a new agency while scrolling through TER. Does anyone have any history with them?

http://atlantaselect.cuties-sites.com/home

Thanks.

Definitely at least some fake pics (at least one is an escort in Canada). The domain name was registered in 2006, though. Mysterious!

Still, why bother when there's actual SPP?

O.

**FreudFro** · 05-09-23 08:59

Originally Posted by OopaRam [View Original Post]

Very good investigative work, detective monger Freud. I am so appreciative of this blog and fellow mongers.

All good brother, we have to look out for each other.

**OopaRam** · 05-09-23 08:44

Originally Posted by ThrowAway5837 [View Original Post]

I usually just lurk but did some sleuthing on lkatl coco since there was no TER ID attached and a quick search yielded no results. Seems like she is top k-girls Sarah, https://top-kgirls.com/sarah or at least they used the same pics. They used to be known as fantastic k-girls based on phone numbers. Anyway reviews are under I'd 366943 if anyone is curious.

I understand K-agencies don't use real pics for obvious reasons but as with LKATL, their pics are grossly inaccurate, at least that's my experience. I doubt this one is any different. The pics show a provider with at least a C if not D size breasts but the description on their site is 36 B. Also, most K-girls has small frame so a 36 is pretty wide. TOFTT and report back.

**OopaRam** · 05-09-23 08:32

Originally Posted by FreudFro [View Original Post]

As I posted on TER, I did a simple google image search on "Cindy. " The pics were stolen from another site. After that, all credibility is lost.

https://www.theeroticreview.com/disc...-291898?page=1

Very good investigative work, detective monger Freud. I am so appreciative of this blog and fellow mongers.