Escort Reports

**FirstTimeH** · 02-26-23 17:29

I know I've seen a few reports on this girl but man how do you get in touch with her? This girl rarely or never responds, she's worst than jojo back when she was ghosting everyone.

That ass looks nice.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/jacks...-/339480956077

**TomCat4871** · 02-26-23 14:24

I had my first Jojo. FINALLY, . As she was notorious for being hard to reach. She is a few pounds thicker than pictures (and obviously not all dolled up) but her curves and youthful firmness have her carry it well, she told me she left the Argyle area as it has become too hot and was now in a private ADU further down in the Blanding / College area. So maybe that's good news to you guys and she becomes easier to schedule especially if you can swing something during slow daytime periods? It was 1. 2 jelly beans for CBJ /CFS and all was well. Not sure if you guys ever managed a bbj or even bbfs with her. At this point I'm cutting down my supply chain and overall mongering since now in Jacksonville its a flex if the girl actually delivered a service and you didn't get robbed. So I'll def be seeing her again.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/jacks...2/054811166496

**TkuCoach** · 02-26-23 13:26

Any news on this one.

https://adultsearch.com/us/florida/j...scorts/2187257

**TkuCoach** · 02-26-23 13:22

Saw her a week ago when she was in Jax. She comes through regularly. Easy set up and $. 50 for hh. Bit older looked late 30's early 40's but nice body. Enjoyed the session.

https://adultsearch.com/us/alabama/a...scorts/2575022

**Low Baller** · 02-26-23 08:31

Originally Posted by JumboFisher98 [View Original Post]

I understand. But the key point you made was handing it over. Unless you talk about what you are going to do or initiate contact first they have no way of proving what the money was for. You could've come there to buy merchandise, or a foot rub. Prostitution can only occur if a verbal agreement or physical intercourse / masterbation occurs. Any court that tries to prosecute someone without those factors will lose everytime. This is why LEO needs you to discuss actual acts, or compensation before they move in to arrest. If you never discuss the act or what the money is for you are in the clear and no crime has actually occurred.

This is so far off point, my point was that mongers should not pay before the deed is done. I said that paying cash to a provider before the deed was not wise for a number of reasons, including that it is easier to get charged by LEO and that the provider may not perform as she agreed once she gets the cash from you. I still stand one hundred percent by my original point.

My point included the fact that giving the cash in an envelope before the deed was not any better than giving the cash before the deed. A magic envelope does not change the fact that cash was handed over from a legal prospective. Same goes for the fact that handing over the cash inside a magic envelope before the deed is done does not stop the provider from taking the envelope and then not doing all that she agreed to do. I still stand one hundred percent by my original point. In other words, mongers should not pay before the deed is done.

Pm me if one wants to get into the nuances of the law, various burdens of proof, and silly ploys to try escape LEO's grasp.

Enough said.

**Admin2** · 02-26-23 01:26

The next guy that talks about chicks seeing or not seeing guys based on race in any context gets banned.

A2

**Bad Ronald** · 02-25-23 23:21

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely antagonistic. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

**Powerhouse100** · 02-25-23 21:55

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

**PDC90** · 02-25-23 21:22

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

**PDC90** · 02-25-23 21:15

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

**JumboFisher98** · 02-25-23 20:21

Originally Posted by LowBaller [View Original Post]

Perhaps, but going before a judge or jury and saying you walked into a stranger's room, and you had your wallet with money in your pocket and you just happened to lay an envelope on her dresser with a benji in it and then you started to take off your clothes or reach for her tits. Then you say you were not giving her anything of value, you just had put that money down on her dresser. Well, I would not expect any jury or judge would believe that laying down an envelope of cash on her dresser was anything different than laying down just the cash and conviction seems more than probable.

Heck as prosecutor, I would point out why the envelope, what magic does simply putting the cash in an envelope do? If the monger is just putting his stuff on her dresser, then why not just put the monger's cash on her dresser, if he was just laying it down there is no difference if the cash is in an envelope or not. The envelope could have been left in the guy's pocket or car, just like cash, so there is no difference between cash or cash in an envelope.

Do not feel safe with handing over cash in an envelope because it is the same as handing over cash.

I understand. But the key point you made was handing it over. Unless you talk about what you are going to do or initiate contact first they have no way of proving what the money was for. You could've come there to buy merchandise, or a foot rub. Prostitution can only occur if a verbal agreement or physical intercourse / masterbation occurs. Any court that tries to prosecute someone without those factors will lose everytime. This is why LEO needs you to discuss actual acts, or compensation before they move in to arrest. If you never discuss the act or what the money is for you are in the clear and no crime has actually occurred.

**Powerhouse100** · 02-25-23 17:25

Originally Posted by PokeTiger [View Original Post]

Things have gotten much worse ever since the pandemic. I just realized with the inflation adjustment kicked into all the disabled or retired veterans around in JAX. The ones got free money plus the generous adjustments are never shy for paying stupid amounts for a warm hole.

Things may never get back to normal ever. Truly sad.

I've gotten to the point that once they tell me 100 plus, I move on. I am not paying these exorbitant amounts for stank puss! They can keep their stank puss for all I care. Honestly, these providers have wised up. Why see 6-10 guys at $60, when you can see 2-3 for $120-150 for a qv? I don't see it going back to pre-pandemic times. These heifers have tasted these higher prices that they know fools are willing to pay and they don't want to go back--I wouldn't, if I were them. In the first place, many of them don't like phucking, so raising prices to see less seems like the reasonable and smart thing to do. If I can get fools to pay me $150-$200 for a qv, I'd do the same, personally, and evidently, they are paying it!

**Powerhouse100** · 02-25-23 17:16

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.

**Low Baller** · 02-25-23 12:49

Originally Posted by JumboFisher98 [View Original Post]

Technically he is correct. A crime only occurs if the funds are exchanged for an act. The gray area would be having the girl look inside of an envelope. Placing an envelope on the table is the equivalent of placing your phone or wallet. Ill-advised but not a crime. Any of these items could be compensation but more importantly they are just your personal belongings so LEO can't say they were specifically for the girl. Prostitution must clearly display a planned act in exchange for compensation. If you never discuss what you will do or provide / discuss compensation. No crime has occurred. 99% of Prostitution arrest occur because a sex act was discussed. If you don't discuss any details and money doesn't change hands the likelihood of being arrested goes down to almost zero.

Perhaps, but going before a judge or jury and saying you walked into a stranger's room, and you had your wallet with money in your pocket and you just happened to lay an envelope on her dresser with a benji in it and then you started to take off your clothes or reach for her tits. Then you say you were not giving her anything of value, you just had put that money down on her dresser. Well, I would not expect any jury or judge would believe that laying down an envelope of cash on her dresser was anything different than laying down just the cash and conviction seems more than probable.

Heck as prosecutor, I would point out why the envelope, what magic does simply putting the cash in an envelope do? If the monger is just putting his stuff on her dresser, then why not just put the monger's cash on her dresser, if he was just laying it down there is no difference if the cash is in an envelope or not. The envelope could have been left in the guy's pocket or car, just like cash, so there is no difference between cash or cash in an envelope.

Do not feel safe with handing over cash in an envelope because it is the same as handing over cash.

**JFriday** · 02-25-23 12:12

[Racial Epithet(s) Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited in accordance with the Forum's Zero Tolerance policy regarding reports containing racial epithets.

Please be advised that Forum Members who succeed in having three or more of their reports deleted for personal attacks, racial epithets or other derogatory comments, will be banned under the Forum's Serial Antagonist Policy.