BBFS Providers Manhattan

[KirkDiggler]

I can only go by what her rate is and has been past few years fivehundred now andfour hundred few years back. Those rates are too much for her age. That was and still is my point.

You're making an big assumption and not making sence, some people do get 200 or other grandfathered rates. If you've seen Mott St Chinese chicks its the same thing on par.


And even if she is charging some 400 to 500 these older chics at some of these Asian agencies you talked about on her ,are on par with her in the looks department.

[Itinm]

I said how long ago it was to show the context this isn't recent it still stands she is less than 1/3 of Gina's rate. That quote is months ago. All her fans are out. If you said Lily should be or should've been less at her age. I wouldn't disagree LOL. These escorts have a rate and we decide if it makes sense or not. Someone else brought up her rate being higher now and I commented how it's high af for her age. Then the fans come out.

How does pointing out its not recent have any bearing on the conversation?

This has nothing to do with being fans of hers or not, the point being made is that you're not being productive. If you want to say something about her rate for her age, it better be to give everyone an alternative who does everything she does at the same rate who is younger. That's what the board is for. Put up or shut up.

People pay her for what she does, not how old she is. It sounds like you booked her for some vanilla sex you could've gotten from any other provider, and wasted your money . It's like a mook who buys an iphone when all he wanted was to use the calculator app on it, then whines about it when he realized he could have just bought a calculator for ten bucks.

[RealInTheField]

You're the one that highlighted it being three years ago like that changes something relevant to the conversation. Don't get all in a huff just because someone pointed out that doesn't change anything that you seem to think it changes.

I said how long ago it was to show the context this isn't recent it still stands she is less than 1/3 of Gina's rate. That quote is months ago. All her fans are out. If you said Lily should be or should've been less at her age. I wouldn't disagree LOL. These escorts have a rate and we decide if it makes sense or not. Someone else brought up her rate being higher now and I commented how it's high af for her age. Then the fans come out.

[Itinm]

She wasn't. She also wasn't $400 nor $500. She was $120. Follow along. My post said I don't believe in paying a high rate to an older escort. It's not complicated.

You're the one that highlighted it being three years ago like that changes something relevant to the conversation. Don't get all in a huff just because someone pointed out that doesn't change anything that you seem to think it changes.

[KirkDiggler]

98 Mott 6th floor would take 60 for short time.

98 mott 3rd floor wanted 150 for an hour. Maybe you can negotiate it to 130.3rd Floor moved to other locations and want 150 an hour.

I've been to their new place, and was quoted 120 for maybe 100 for the short, and 180 for everything byLily. , but the grannie looking ***** that was doable was willing to go 60 with me. At the Mott st location they did 80 or 100 for some, I've even heard 60. This is not for an hour though.

[DR Monger II]

98 Mott 6th floor would take 60 for short time.

98 mott 3rd floor wanted 150 for an hour. Maybe you can negotiate it to 130.3rd Floor moved to other locations and want 150 an hour.

[RealInTheField]

Doesn't matter, these are old women, women at Mott St, and the standard there was $60 3 years ago. Even up to some months ago before they moved it was. When I went to their new spot I was quoted $60 from the older one and $100 for the younger but their still old. Thing is Gina Rollins has been know to Grandfather her rates from what I know so she is not way to pricey for all.

Really Think about what you said dude.

Try 20 years ago.

I can only go by what her rate is and has been past few years fivehundred now andfour hundred few years back. Those rates are too much for her age. That was and still is my point.

[KirkDiggler]

Perhaps read my quote again. I said I saw Lily 3 years ago and tried seeing her over a year ago and couldn't. I also gave her $120. An escort over 50 imo isn't worth more than around that rate. This just proves my stance.

Doesn't matter, these are old women, women at Mott St, and the standard there was $60 3 years ago. Even up to some months ago before they moved it was. When I went to their new spot I was quoted $60 from the older one and $100 for the younger but their still old. Thing is Gina Rollins has been know to Grandfather her rates from what I know so she is not way to pricey for all.

Really Think about what you said dude.

Hahahahaa. Yeah. Lily was real young 3 years ago.

Try 30 years ago.

[RealInTheField]

Hahahahaa. Yeah. Lily was real young 3 years ago.

She wasn't. She also wasn't $400 nor $500. She was $120. Follow along. My post said I don't believe in paying a high rate to an older escort. It's not complicated.

[OkTotti]

While they are def hit or miss, when they hit they are the best service in NYC. Nala is the new talent there, legit body.

How is her face? Does she allow creampies?

[RicardoM85]

While they are def hit or miss, when they hit they are the best service in NYC. Nala is the new talent there, legit body.

[Itinm]

Perhaps read my quote again. I said I saw Lily 3 years ago and tried seeing her over a year ago and couldn't. I also gave her $120. An escort over 50 imo isn't worth more than around that rate. This just proves my stance.

Hahahahaa. Yeah. Lily was real young 3 years ago.

[RealInTheField]

I don't understand how you have a problem with older escorts when you were talking about seeing Lucy and Lily from Mott St. 2 months ago. One is in her 60's another in her 50's.

Perhaps read my quote again. I said I saw Lily 3 years ago and tried seeing her over a year ago and couldn't. I also gave her $120. An escort over 50 imo isn't worth more than around that rate. This just proves my stance.

[KirkDiggler]

To you her price is fine to me just like an athlete that has passed their prime I think the same of escorts.

Higher prices for older escorts never made sense to me. I can't support that. Enjoy.

I don't understand how you have a problem with older escorts when you were talking about seeing Lucy and Lily from Mott St. 2 months ago. One is in her 60's another in her 50's.

I disagree. I think you can rawdog them both for $200. Fact is they are both old and know it. I ran out of there when I saw Lucy like 3 years ago. Lily looked a bit better. However gave it another shot last year and I ran out of there again. This time with Lily. She insisted I can stay and have them both for $200.

No way should anyone pay more than $200-240 for the both of them.

[FkHerHard]

The ad doesn't mention the name of the place and uses generic photos which I can guarantee are not accurate. In fact this almost seems like a sting operation, or worse yet you'll go there, someone'll stick you with a needle, then you'll wake up in an abandoned warehouse missing a kidney or something.

I wouldn't trust it.

That's what I was kinda feeling too. Too good to be true. I ended up finding a new place though, just had to drive kinda far but it was a pretty cool set up not really a parlor either not sure what I would call it but it cost $60 at the door and I got to hook up with 2 of the bitches that were working and only ended up spending like another 60 They post who on the Twitter but I'll prolly go check out another time they said it gets busy sometimes not sure what that means but it was cheap enough to try one more time haha.

Here go the only site I found for it if anyone interested I'll post up the Twitter too just lmk.

https://tuscl.net/listing.php?id=4753