Escort Reports

**MongerBob** · 07-01-22 06:56

Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]

But NONE of the above women ever offered BBFS as an "upsell". It came by default with the standard price. And while I agree that the upsellers probably reduce OUR risk, I do not think that is the intention of the upsell for THEM! Indeed it seems to me, that upselling for BBFS is for the same reason as for a hoe upselling for anything else. It is just another way of taking advantage of supply and demand. In other words, if we are willing to pay an upsell for it, then, all else being equal, they will surely charge an upsell!

Yeah, while I don't go seeking out BBFS specifically, I've certainly encountered it a number of times and I'd have to agree that in the majority of cases it wasn't an upsell. Either they just asked me my preference, or didn't even mention a condom at all. There were a handful who asked for more money for it. In my view though, that's fair to upcharge for it, and I never had a problem paying if it was something I decided I wanted. You are asking her to take an additional risk, after all.

**KingOfFours** · 07-01-22 06:31

Originally Posted by MongerBob [View Original Post]

I think that placing a higher barrier to entry (whether that's charging more or restricting it to only regular clients who have been seeing her for awhile or providing recent STD test results or whatever) on the raw-dogging reduces the number of guys who she'll be doing it with, so yes, I'd say it reduces the risk to some extent (how much it reduces it would depend on how high that barrier is).

As to what you said about some providers who used to offer it and now refuse to, do you think that's probably because they caught something? Seems to me that would likely be the reason why someone who used to be ok with raw-dogging would do a complete 180 on it.

There were actually very very few that did a 180 and stopped providing BBFS, who previously did. Cranston Jessica (my pics in post #8998 here: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...006&viewfull=1#post4607006) let me bareback her in 2011, but refused on the phone to agree after that, in numerous attempts. She said it was "a mistake". I don't think anyone else has gotten BBFS with her since then? But correct me if I'm wrong?

Years earlier, back around the turn of the millennium, a very popular tall thin nymphomaniacal redhead MILF hoe who went by Jolene in Seattle let me inseminate her, when she was drunk as a skunk, on the vodka I brought, but a few weeks later said that was a mistake and it would never happen again.

In Thailand, 15 years ago, I spent about an hour pounding a big natural tit model quality 10/10 stripper raw, and then, after cumming like a freight train multiorgasmically during the bareback fuck, she suddenly jumped up and without warning, absolutely refused to continue fucking raw, for any amount of money, and insisted that I either put on a rubber, or else she would finish me with a BBBJCIM. I chose the latter, of course! That indeed was the oddest situation of all! (I will dig up pics of that one later, stay tuned!

Then there was a very fine gorgeous young lady with BDJ, the winner of the Best Tits contest on the other board, my ATF at that time, around 2002, who ALWAYS took CIP from EVERYBODY, and she indeed TOLD me that she did! But she suddenly slapped a condom on me after I'd inseminated her on many prior visits. She said she had caught a minor non-gonnocal infection, but it created great problems for her because she turned out to be highly allergic to the medication she was prescribed. Nevertheless, she returned to taking cuntfulls of sperm again a few weeks later, from me and from everybody else.

So yes, I do think that these women either actually caught something, or else perceived that they might, when they reversed course on BBFS. And yes, I do believe that their worries about disease (rather than getting knocked up) is the primary determinant of YMMV regarding whether they will fuck raw, and whether they offer it to some dudes, but not others. Indeed, I've been told by more than one hoe that they are letting me fuck them raw because they "can tell that I am clean". And they were quite confident in their ability to distinguish the "safe" dudes from the diseased ones, LOL!

But NONE of the above women ever offered BBFS as an "upsell". It came by default with the standard price. And while I agree that the upsellers probably reduce OUR risk, I do not think that is the intention of the upsell for THEM! Indeed it seems to me, that upselling for BBFS is for the same reason as for a hoe upselling for anything else. It is just another way of taking advantage of supply and demand. In other words, if we are willing to pay an upsell for it, then, all else being equal, they will surely charge an upsell!

**Bourque77** · 06-30-22 22:42

Originally Posted by Sitteb36 [View Original Post]

This coming from someone who sucks cock for a living!!

Sucks cock? I think I was one of the first to post about this girl. What I call sucking cock, she does not! LOL.

Not even close. It's just a shame because she is beautiful. Everything else about her is just plain ugly. FYI, this Coco should not be confused with another Coco out of Warwick. She is a small / cute bbw who provides a great service if your into her look. However she is now very pregnant with baby #2.

**Sitteb36** · 06-30-22 19:25

Originally Posted by Style20 [View Original Post]

If I show you a text of what she sent me about men. I don't think any of us would want to see her. She said every guys are piece of and will pay her the amount she ask for and she don't give a fuck about any of them because she's pretty and we are losers.

This coming from someone who sucks cock for a living!!

**Style20** · 06-30-22 17:00

Originally Posted by DoItForTheCat [View Original Post]

https://www.adultlook.com/p/3105326

411 request: Anyone verified, tagged, or shagged this one? Looks like she could be fun.

Nada on TER or ECCIE; and from what I can tell, no one in RI uses ToB or OH2. Why is that? Never mind.

And nothing when searching this forum.

If I show you a text of what she sent me about men. I don't think any of us would want to see her. She said every guys are piece of and will pay her the amount she ask for and she don't give a fuck about any of them because she's pretty and we are losers.

**T Frost** · 06-30-22 13:20

https://tryst.link/escort/isabellaus

I tried to get in touch via text and she responded asking if we have met before. Is she only seeing mongers she met before COVID?

Thanks and stay safe!

**ElHammer** · 06-30-22 12:04

Originally Posted by DoItForTheCat [View Original Post]

https://www.adultlook.com/p/3105326

411 request: Anyone verified, tagged, or shagged this one? Looks like she could be fun.

Nada on TER or ECCIE; and from what I can tell, no one in RI uses ToB or OH2. Why is that? Never mind.

And nothing when searching this forum.

Stay away bad service piece of shit person house smells of dog shit honestly I'd give her a zero out of 10.

Search coco on the thread and you'll see I'm not the only one that's had a bad experience.

**MongerBob** · 06-30-22 11:43

Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]

Also--Mr Stevens, just to clarify-are you saying that hoes SHOULD always slap on an upcharge, for BBFS? And that doing that makes them "safer"? Or what? Just wondering what your thoughts are, and what the thinking of other mongers are, about this?

I think that placing a higher barrier to entry (whether that's charging more or restricting it to only regular clients who have been seeing her for awhile or providing recent STD test results or whatever) on the raw-dogging reduces the number of guys who she'll be doing it with, so yes, I'd say it reduces the risk to some extent (how much it reduces it would depend on how high that barrier is).

As to what you said about some providers who used to offer it and now refuse to, do you think that's probably because they caught something? Seems to me that would likely be the reason why someone who used to be ok with raw-dogging would do a complete 180 on it.

**DoItForTheCat** · 06-30-22 10:21

https://www.adultlook.com/p/3105326

411 request: Anyone verified, tagged, or shagged this one? Looks like she could be fun.

Nada on TER or ECCIE; and from what I can tell, no one in RI uses ToB or OH2. Why is that? Never mind.

And nothing when searching this forum.

**KingOfFours** · 06-30-22 08:48

Originally Posted by SwimSays [View Original Post]

I tried to set something up with her a few months back and was denied because of my age (too young! She lists her cut off in her listing which I am only a bit shy of, figured it would be a non-issue. Mentioned it on the phone (she wants to talk on phone + meet at public place before leading you to her incall) and her tone abruptly changed when I told her the year I was born. She absolutely refused to budge, I actually thought she was kidding at first by how she responded and but soon realized there was no reasoning with her.

Hope her stubbornness on rules ends once you get in the room. If and when you do encounter her please report back and I will work on getting a few years older.

Thanks, Swim. I do think I would be able to easily pass her 40+ age requirement, no problem, LOL!

So, any of you other dedicated raw-dogging dinosaurs: PLEASE post if you saw her and tried to bareback her, and please let us know the out-cum?!

**SwimSays** · 06-30-22 08:22

Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]

https://www.adultlook.com/p/3174236

I scanned over the dozens of reviews on the illustrious other board, and there are lots of mentions of condoms, far too many, and no real indication of a raw fuck. So, has anyone here, tried? Surely some of you other dedicated raw dogging afficiandos of vintage MILF cunnt must have made the attempt?! If so, please fill us in? If the pictures are accurate, I would surely love to inseminate that! 😜.

I tried to set something up with her a few months back and was denied because of my age (too young! She lists her cut off in her listing which I am only a bit shy of, figured it would be a non-issue. Mentioned it on the phone (she wants to talk on phone + meet at public place before leading you to her incall) and her tone abruptly changed when I told her the year I was born. She absolutely refused to budge, I actually thought she was kidding at first by how she responded and but soon realized there was no reasoning with her.

Hope her stubbornness on rules ends once you get in the room. If and when you do encounter her please report back and I will work on getting a few years older.

**KingOfFours** · 06-30-22 07:02

https://www.adultlook.com/p/3174236

I scanned over the dozens of reviews on the illustrious other board, and there are lots of mentions of condoms, far too many, and no real indication of a raw fuck. So, has anyone here, tried? Surely some of you other dedicated raw dogging afficiandos of vintage MILF cunnt must have made the attempt?! If so, please fill us in? If the pictures are accurate, I would surely love to inseminate that! 😜.

**MongerBob** · 06-29-22 20:14

I think maybe many of us just aren't so hung up about slight bodily imperfections. I mean, realistically, you're not going to find girls who look like Playboy models in the prices ranges you're talking about here.

For what it's worth, I do recall some of Mandy's earliest reviews mentioning that she had a little bit of a loose belly, so I don't think it's fair to say there was "not one mention" of it. I think to most it just wasn't a big enough deal to bring up.

Originally Posted by IinTooDeep [View Original Post]

What I'm really after is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. What I have presented are facts. You are entitled to your own opinion, not to your own facts. Not one person has ever mentioned her effed up belly, saggy tits and weathered face. NOT ONE. The same thing happened with forum fav Mandy. So many reviews, not one mentions her cow belly.

Perhaps my assessment was a bit harsh. I did mention that she was a nice person, but I don't think there's any question she's not the best looking. Unless you have really low standards reg looks. That's why I said maybe *I* am looking in the wrong thread and would be better off on SA hooking up with young civis that don't look like her. Money is not an issue for some, but I don't go stick my key in just about any hole.

**KidPort38** · 06-29-22 18:44

Melanie has ghosted others before and can have an attitude. But IMO a few times was actually decent. Has demons and major issues like the others though. Wears a lot of makeup, so natural looks aren't good.

Originally Posted by HornyApe9999 [View Original Post]

This is too much! Ghosted again! Twice in one week. This time it was Melanie. Do they think I'm a cop?? WTF??

https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/s...night/47355809

SMH.

**Bourque77** · 06-29-22 17:36

Originally Posted by MongerBob [View Original Post]

Yeah, I had one of those back in the day too. But it's much easier these days to just use a free texting app. Free, much easier to switch numbers if you need to, and if you're concerned about keeping it hidden from an S / O, you can just uninstall the app when you're not using it. No need to find a spot to hide a second phone.

The text me app has worked great for me. Trac phones are doa.