BBFS Providers Manhattan

**BareHunterNYC** · 09-09-21 18:10

I saw Chocolate at WSD last week.

Petite, small natural breasts, tiny butt, young looking.

Fairly mechanical, but got the job done. Rimmed on the table shower and again on the bed.

300 plus 100 for BBFS plus another 100 for CIP. She was very direct at the beginning of the session about the menu and rates.

Times Square location.

www.wallstreetdesires.com

**TheDonald** · 09-09-21 14:15

Comecomeplay Rina Japanese 929xxxx773.

Rina is a slim tallish maybe 5'6" Japanese girl, pretty fce too.

This place checks I'd verify before you can visit. Mix of Chinese Japanese and occasional Latina girls here.

Got a table shower together, nude of course and a BBBJ then she did a P2P slide all wet and my cock slid right in to her juicy pussy. She did a cowgirl on the table for a few minutes then we rinsed off and went to the room. Rooms are good with mirrors and full bed. She mentioned an extra reward for the extra fun and I assured her. Nice tight kitty and felt great. She preferred I nut outside the target, so OK. First one pulled out and Rina took my in her lips and got a mouthful. After second round did lazy doggy and I got full hard again due to her kitty feelin so fine and donated on her ass cheeks.

**Masoko23** · 09-09-21 12:55

I recently went to visit the doctor. I have not seen her in awhile. The usual, I gave her double creampie. To my pleasant surprise she was blonde now. But something caught my eyes. Maybe I wrong but I think Dr Lisa advertises under a different escort name. A premium version. I asked her vaguely during the meeting but she pushed it aside. Maybe I am wrong but I am 90% certain it's her. She slightly touches up her alter ego pics but I am sure it's her.

I have seen escort with alter Ego in a very long time.

**Masoko23** · 09-09-21 07:34

Originally Posted by PunkedLife [View Original Post]

Correct me if I'm wrong but if you click on a particular model it will state whether they provide extra service for extra tips on parentheses. I'm sure that means bare although idk about cip as that varies with each girl. Some girls do not have an extra service provided statement on their profiles. So that makes me think that I am correct. Plus I saw chocolate (review too come) and she provided these extras and again her profile states she does.

It is pretty clear.

**OkTotti** · 09-08-21 10:56

Originally Posted by Big0318 [View Original Post]

No, Amber Lynn is not BBFS friendly. I tried when I saw her, and she said she doesn't do that. Brandy is though.

Cici is also not BBFS friendly anymore.

**PunkedLife** · 09-08-21 10:44

Originally Posted by DS080 [View Original Post]

Recently moved nearby, and want to explore the scene here. I checked out the WSD website. I noticed that Saki, Mio, and Emi have been in J-Porn. I would think they would be really popular, but couldn't find any reports on them. Does anybody know if any of these providers offer BBFSCIP?

Correct me if I'm wrong but if you click on a particular model it will state whether they provide extra service for extra tips on parentheses. I'm sure that means bare although idk about cip as that varies with each girl. Some girls do not have an extra service provided statement on their profiles. So that makes me think that I am correct. Plus I saw chocolate (review too come) and she provided these extras and again her profile states she does.

**Big0318** · 09-08-21 10:01

Originally Posted by JoeIsLive [View Original Post]

Anybody know what the deal is with Amber Lynn at lears? I read conflicting reports that she is / isn't BBFS friendly. Is she BBFS for an extra fee or not? Her and Brandy are the only decent options left at lears now anyway ever since Baylee came back and raised her rates too much for me, and all those crummy overcharging florida girls I have no interest in, BBFS or not.

No, Amber Lynn is not BBFS friendly. I tried when I saw her, and she said she doesn't do that. Brandy is though.

**JoeIsLive** · 09-08-21 07:41

Anybody know what the deal is with Amber Lynn at lears? I read conflicting reports that she is / isn't BBFS friendly. Is she BBFS for an extra fee or not? Her and Brandy are the only decent options left at lears now anyway ever since Baylee came back and raised her rates too much for me, and all those crummy overcharging florida girls I have no interest in, BBFS or not.

**DS080** · 09-07-21 23:29

Recently moved nearby, and want to explore the scene here. I checked out the WSD website. I noticed that Saki, Mio, and Emi have been in J-Porn. I would think they would be really popular, but couldn't find any reports on them. Does anybody know if any of these providers offer BBFSCIP?

**RedSox1775** · 09-07-21 20:56

Originally Posted by OkTotti [View Original Post]

Yeah, she got Woke in 2021 and is full supporter of BLM

Anyone got an ad or link for her?

**JohnLongDong** · 09-06-21 19:38

Originally Posted by MeDroogies [View Original Post]

That is accurate.

However, the the has declined to prosecute many of these, which is just as effective. It's like in San Fran where Chesa Boudin has decided that theft is just income redistribution and isn't prosecuting any theft under about $400. It's a great policy, really. I mean, if you love taking shit.

The the doesn't have to prosecute, and as someone else here points out NYC cops have bigger fish to fry at the moment. If push comes to shove yeah they'll drag someone in. Someone most likely with a big mouth giving them a hard time and making their life difficult.

But generally I don't see them shoving any resources into pursuing this with all the other problems people have created with the 'defund the police' movement.

https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/data...n-predecessor/

So a shoplifter in San Francisco can lift $390 a day at a location and sell the stuff on the Street. Selling stolen property is another crime. Will they set the limit at $400 for stolen property?

So the businesses are losing money through legalized theft and paying taxes to boot unless they itemize their losses and they will pay 0 taxes for their losses. Big and small stores will move from San Francisco because no one works for nothing.

**MeDroogies** · 09-04-21 23:41

Originally Posted by JohnLongDong [View Original Post]

Nope. It was never decriminalized for women. It's a political move and really it's not legal. You can't have 2 people breaking the law for the same act and enforce 1 statute while using prosecutorial discretion for another. For it to be decriminalized, the State Legislature would need to vote to decriminalize selling and the Governor would need to sign it. It hasn't happened.

That is accurate.

However, the the has declined to prosecute many of these, which is just as effective. It's like in San Fran where Chesa Boudin has decided that theft is just income redistribution and isn't prosecuting any theft under about $400. It's a great policy, really. I mean, if you love taking shit.

The the doesn't have to prosecute, and as someone else here points out NYC cops have bigger fish to fry at the moment. If push comes to shove yeah they'll drag someone in. Someone most likely with a big mouth giving them a hard time and making their life difficult.

But generally I don't see them shoving any resources into pursuing this with all the other problems people have created with the 'defund the police' movement.

https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/data...n-predecessor/

**ApplePiePussy** · 09-04-21 23:29

Originally Posted by JohnLongDong [View Original Post]

I don't think prosecutorial discretion allows them to choose like that. I think some brave soul will file suit that will go to the Supreme Court and the practice of choosing which crimes to prosecute based on political preferences will eliminate examples like this.

Still, the cops or sheriffs will be less inclined to make arrests, busts, stings etc in the first place. They have much bigger problems in NYC to deal with.

**JohnLongDong** · 09-04-21 21:05

Originally Posted by Taita [View Original Post]

You are correct. However, the current the is not prosecuting cases.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/n...stitution.html

I don't think prosecutorial discretion allows them to choose like that. I think some brave soul will file suit that will go to the Supreme Court and the practice of choosing which crimes to prosecute based on political preferences will eliminate examples like this.

**Taita** · 09-04-21 19:36

Originally Posted by JohnLongDong [View Original Post]

Nope. It was never decriminalized for women. It's a political move and really it's not legal. You can't have 2 people breaking the law for the same act and enforce 1 statute while using prosecutorial discretion for another. For it to be decriminalized, the State Legislature would need to vote to decriminalize selling and the Governor would need to sign it. It hasn't happened.

You are correct. However, the current the is not prosecuting cases.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/n...stitution.html