Thread: "Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?
+
Add Report
Results 3,151 to 3,165 of 23685
-
08-22-21 10:53 #20535Senior Member

Posts: 86I saw her several times under her last account when she had her own apartment out near Doswell last summer. She could take a pounding but she's not at that residence anymore and I seem to remember someone here saying they had drama with her recently.
Originally Posted by TheHobbyLobby
[View Original Post]
-
08-22-21 10:29 #20534Senior Member

Posts: 60KatieKat Intel?
Have been messaging this one. Seems open, but profile also reads like potential drama. Anybody have any intel on her?
https://www.seeking.com/member/be512...c-285d158ac9cd
-
08-22-21 09:48 #20533Senior Member

Posts: 362Thanks for posting about Kamo. I'm going to look into it.
Originally Posted by Shampoo55
[View Original Post]
I'd love to hear from some of the more computer savvy here -- I know nothing is foolproof, especially when it comes to computers, and that true anonymity is nearly impossible while still having a computer be actually "usable" in real life.
But, what do you all think about, for general privacy, the following:
1. Using strong passwords.
2. Using a good, zero-knowlege password manager.
3. Encrypted hard drive (bitlocker or filevault).
4. Good, zero-knowlege, paid VPN based in a privacy minded country (ProtonVPN, perhaps, and the like).
5. Good ad and javascript blocker.
6. Setting browser to delete history and cookies on every exit.
7. Browser fingerprint spoofing like Kamo (are there other trusted products in this space?
Anything else you'd do?
-
08-22-21 08:05 #20532Senior Member

Posts: 96She was good to go for a long time. Anything goes. But a couple recent reports said she was trying to scam guys. So try at your own risk. She's definitely crazy so be careful.
Originally Posted by TheHobbyLobby
[View Original Post]
-
08-22-21 07:29 #20531Senior Member

Posts: 514Who remembers this girls
So this girl advertised a lot on SA. She was more pro than SB. I know she was very popular but I can't remember if she had good reviews. Does anyone remember her. I made contact with her from my burner phone and surprisingly she replied. I asked if she was still in the game and she said from time to time. I am in need of a good BJ so I may hit her up. I know she used to be able to host. Any help is appreciated.
-
08-22-21 06:15 #20530Senior Member

Posts: 957Same
I am exactly the same. Use to have Tony Soprano from the nose to the waist as my profile pic. After over three years, my account got deactivated for using a fake pic by SA. I got in a nasty back & forth with a scammer & I think she ratted me out.
Originally Posted by SaTraveler
[View Original Post]
So now I have a guy from a clothes web site, from the mouth to the knees.
I actually think not having a full pic makes some curious & more likely to go to text to see a pic. If they ask on SA why I don't have a pic, I tell them I have a high government security clearance for my job & they do random searches for my pics to maintain it. I then joke, "no Princess, I'm not a spy, I do some high level work for the Navy on nuclear subs & aircraft carriers. They buy it every time.
Unlike pics on the internet that are forever, pics directly to a Baby are only between you two. Of course I only use my play number.
Google Voice & play name.
-
08-21-21 11:18 #20529Senior Member

Posts: 1898Multiple Active Accounts
I also have a second account under a different email but I have never activated it by paying anything. I use it to see when I have been blocked by a profile. I suspect this provision only applies to two active paid accounts.
Bam.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
-
08-20-21 19:16 #20528Senior Member

Posts: 502Milkacoco3
Tried her today. Was expecting a butterface, but she has gained significant weight, and even sent some older pics. Very doughy body, and an unkempt Bush. Not much skill in bed. She did let me BBFSCIP though. Definitely won't be repeating. https://www.seeking.com/member/4b731...4-7f67a53f88be.
-
08-20-21 13:53 #20527Senior Member

Posts: 3354BTW, one other way to have this not devastate your activity is to have another profile. I do. Different email and login. However, reviewing the reasons for accounts getting suspended, I found this:
Originally Posted by ErnestLl
[View Original Post]
Having multiple active accounts.
-
08-20-21 13:41 #20526Senior Member

Posts: 3354The question is, who is the bigger threat? SA, or the POT? I want to keep the girl from having my photo. I also should want SA to not have it either.
Some of the girl's profile pictures I've seen lately have been very obscure, if I can get something like that that is really me to work, I'll be OK.
Originally Posted by SaTraveler
[View Original Post]
-
08-20-21 13:38 #20525Senior Member

Posts: 432No no no no -- no to any pics on SA
Do not send ANY pics on the site -- do not post a picture of you or anything like you. -- no not send pics via messages (if they let you) - and P.S. NOTHING IS EVER DELETED!
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
Then the SA moderators have nothing to hang their hat on and kick you off.
Basically imagine the site is hacked by the dark web -- and then the dark web has your pictures and MAY have even an E-mail or worse a real phone number and address (all that nice info you gave them).
Now you get blackmail threats showing your pictures and your SA profile -- just do not do it.
For EVERY potential SB - - this is what you message them.
" I will not put any pictures up on the seeking site as there is a good chance it will be hacked -- I am happy to txt you my picture if you let me have your txt number. Or I am happy to give you mine".
(it goes without saying that at least your number is a google voice number).
Be safe out there.
SA.
-
08-20-21 13:38 #20524Senior Member

Posts: 3354Well, I don't know that I got anyone mad, but I am preparing for a trip, and the recommendation for road baby is to give them a real photo with the initial contact, don't wait for messaging. So I did some of that. When I deleted the real pic out of SA messaging, I had a little explanation concerning hacking etc.
Originally Posted by ErnestLl
[View Original Post]
I guess one of them who didn't reply could have reported me. I also just changed my profile, literally by the addition of one word, but of course those changes get the site police to look at the profile, which you really really really want to avoid.
I think a seasoned profile is very valuable just because it isn't as subject to the whims of the folks running SA. I will try to resurrect.
-
08-20-21 12:13 #20523Senior Member

Posts: 3434Nothing really surprising here. Marriott has long admitted to assisting the government with "trafficking" etc. Most hookers I've met in these two chains, especially the higher tier hotels will tell me that they make themselves scarce. As in, no going down and having a drink at the bar alone, no eating alone in the restaurant, etc.
Originally Posted by Shampoo55
[View Original Post]
-
08-20-21 11:33 #20522Senior Member

Posts: 880Nothing new here
This has been part of Hotel SOP for years.
Originally Posted by Shampoo55
[View Original Post]
They are more concerned with trafficking not solo practitioners.
I'm in the hotel business as a supplier and several of the GMs say they don't mind the solo pros -- they just use a lot of towels, but they always pay in cash.
-
08-20-21 11:28 #20521Senior Member

Posts: 880Same problem, the fix isn't easy
I used a fake photo and sent a real one via messaging. She got mad about some toher stuff and reported me. Not sure if I deleted the pic or not, probably not, but it seems the accusation is all that SA needs.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
They said to fix the issue, I had to submit a copy of govt I'd showing the photo on the I'd matched the one in my profile NOT.
So I created a new profile, but all my messages and traction are gone. Have to explain to ones I re-engage why I got bounced. They are understanding of discretion and if not, they arent for me.












Reply With Quote




