Seeking Arrangements

[TheList00]

She wanted more than 2. 5, so I passed.

I find it laughable that a 51 yr old woman who is very far from a " MILF " type thinks men 20 yrs younger than her on that site is going to pay her 300+ for her pussy. I seen her in person and fucking bailed, her pics don't show what youll see in person trust me.

[ManDownUnder]

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post5029028

She wanted more than 2. 5, so I passed.

[Syedna]

I know her. PM for details.

You won't see her on the cover of any magazines any time soon but she's really nice & absolutely loves sex. Worth a visit.

[MikeXTimTim]

https://www.seeking.com/member/c1d7b...6-65163590874c

Saw her a few days ago. PM for details. A big kink in the sheets.

[Banjomania]

I know her. PM for details.

https://www.seeking.com/member/b1218...3-42816052e225

I searched and could not find anything. Older but seems ready to meet.

[Jeremy66]

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but when it says "invalid date" for "Last Active", what's that mean? The profile is still up.

[Hobbyist420]

Anyone seen her?

https://www.seeking.com/member/e2a18...8-fa89c5431f9f

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post5029028

[Hobbyist420]

No response and she's logged on almost all of the time. So my question is, has anyone else been similarly time wasted by her, or better yet had an amazing time destroying a boxspring with her? If not then just a heads up that so far she comes off as a waste of time. (or that my private pics are super hideous).

There are a few flakes on there who are real, they just never meet anybody. The "online" marker means nothing too because one can be "online" and just have it on the background app on your phone.

I'll have girls fav me and not respond, it's maddening

[Jaristas]

https://www.seeking.com/member/b1218...3-42816052e225

I searched and could not find anything. Older but seems ready to meet.

[BostonJones]

https://www.seeking.com/member/5d638...a-5612c6b86af2

In this very particular order.

She favorites me.

I message her and open my private photos.

She then asked me to open my private photos.

I ask her to open her private photos.

3 days of crickets chirping.

I drop a quick hello.

No response and she's logged on almost all of the time. So my question is, has anyone else been similarly time wasted by her, or better yet had an amazing time destroying a boxspring with her? If not then just a heads up that so far she comes off as a waste of time. (or that my private pics are super hideous).

[Mattis1775]

Anyone seen her?

https://www.seeking.com/member/e2a18...8-fa89c5431f9f

I reached out, chatted a little and then radio silence.

[Mattis1775]

Sounds like your methodology and attitude have greatly improved. Keep plugging away until you are plugging away!

Tip: I generously us the HIDE profile button to clean up my search results and prevent me from accidently viewing profiles that say "you wallet better be thicker than my body" more than once and the you view the profile and it says "platonic". Give me a break.

Definitely. Cleans up the list for better people. Talking to one right now. But, after a few days, it seems like it's just "talking". Cool woman. But, not in it for chatting only. Gave a few hints to meet. But, nothing came out of it.

[Spill]

Having better luck on this type of account vice the other. Thanks guys for the intel. I forked over the 99 for the first month and using it like hell as it's an expensive one-month subscription. Sent hundreds of messages and got some back. I have to be honest, it's a strange world in SA.

- One member wanted advanced payment in Franklin. She said she wanted to get "pretty" before our meeting. Requested VENMO prior. Yeah, OK. Erased. She said others did it without any problems. That's because they were suckers and since it was so successful, you're doing it again. Nice try.

- One member was just a witch. Asked the normal questions and went full Karen on me, saying guys suck and they're only here for sex. Typical disgruntled bar woman. She ended up blocking me. LOL. Whatever.

- One member was a dominatrix, asked me to buy her over 1,000 worth of equipment for a meeting in Newton. Uh, if you're a dominatrix, shouldn't you have that already? I guess it's the season to freshen up? Yeah, no.

- One member, who was 67 years old wanted 200 or more. She looked OK. But, she's not worth more than a 100. Sorry.

- Conversing with a few right now. Mostly older women who have kids, divorced. Hopefully, it's not going to be a 3-4 week chat before meeting. But, warming up to one right now for a potential meeting.

- One member was a Provider, had a full website and all. Good way to find more Mongers I guess.

The search continues.

Sounds like your methodology and attitude have greatly improved. Keep plugging away until you are plugging away!

Tip: I generously us the HIDE profile button to clean up my search results and prevent me from accidently viewing profiles that say "you wallet better be thicker than my body" more than once and the you view the profile and it says "platonic". Give me a break.

[Spill]

I do think that the monthly fee is worth it IF you're also willing to spend the type of 'allowance' that gets you a sugar relationship with someone you're really into. For those who bottom-feed on SA (not making a judgment) it might not make $ sense.

No disrespect, but SA is probably NOT for a majority of the guys on this site. To each his own.

[Bran001]

I do think that the monthly fee is worth it IF you're also willing to spend the type of 'allowance' that gets you a sugar relationship with someone you're really into. For those who bottom-feed on SA (not making a judgment) it might not make $ sense.

I know why I may have chosen the other option. Membership is 99 for a month vice 19.99 for the other type. Meeyah. I'll have to rethink this. But, seems everyone here is having pretty good luck. Now that I can see more women, I did recognize one from Charlestown, use to post a lot on LC and STG. She's was OK. But, not enough for a repeat.