Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 10,216 to 10,230 of 26367
-
06-07-21 17:52 #16152Senior Member

Posts: 1163Ok, I have a couple more to add, but these aren't at the level of those above. Might still be good for some of the aficionados of black girls.
Originally Posted by LS4V8
[View Original Post]
Hazel / Mya.
https://escortbabylon.net/posts_list/3126224509/1
I've seen her several times over the last couple of years. Everything covered. I hate condoms, so I can only say that she can give a good handjob. Pics accurate. Sometimes her ads say "DATY-friendly" butb I found it totally bogus, she moaned a couple times then pronounced it done. Her butt is generally off-limits. She really doesn't want anything touching her butthole or crack. I saw her once when her location was given as "Westside", it was her bedroom in an apartment she shares with others, though they weren't apparent. Other times it was in budget motels.
Part way through, she *will* hit you up for a "tip". As in she quoted $100 for hhr, but wanted me to give her more after. I was younger then, and was enjoying what she was doing, so I went with it, so I don't know what happens if you say no, which would have been a far more correct answer. Lately, if a * tried that, I'll say "tips happen afterwards if this shit is good. " She's been using the same phone number for quite a while. She was willing to send me a verification pic.
I'll say this for her: at our very first meeting, I was expecting BBBJ, because she had (mistakenly?) posted that once, a few days earlier. When she pulled out the condom and I objected, she gave me my money back, and was civil about it. When I figured out I could do without BBBJ, I went back because of that.
Black Blossom.
https://escortbabylon.net/posts_list/7734910852/1
I saw her once a bit over 2 years ago, same phone number number. I got BBBJ which was pretty good, though she wasn't thrilled about the fact that I wanted it for the half hour. From what I've read, it's a fairly open menu, I get the feeling that other bare services might be available but I'm not sure if that. As I recall, price was reasonable. Incall locations vary.
ETA: her reviews on LC are a very interesting read. I generally like them younger and skinnier, but I'm thinking of giving this one another shot. Also, her older ads, no longer visible on LC definitely spoke to a pretty open menu, IIRC, which I probably do.
ETA2: sumo comes through, her older ads are amazing,
https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/b...cials/13108778
ETA3: my memory keeps pulling up stuff. I remember talking to her about BB FS and/or anal - she said she wanted to see papers for that.
-
06-07-21 17:32 #16151Senior Member

Posts: 160Bingo
This may be the best explanation of why to use a service that I've seen on the forum and it's exactly the way I feel.
Originally Posted by Jinurso
[View Original Post]
-
06-07-21 16:25 #16150Senior Member

Posts: 1445I personally felt more comfortable sharing it with one organization that can vouch for me with dozens of women than individually with dozens of women who have varying levels of problems that affect their trustworthiness.
Originally Posted by Ppete8231
[View Original Post]
I think the way p411 structures things is pretty smart, so that they (allegedly) don't store any identifying information about you. Aside from your first name, everything else is in code.
Nothing is 100% but I feel generally comfortable with them. Also, I've never had a bad experience with a girl who was listed there whereas LC can be either a really big hit or a really big miss with who you get.
-
06-07-21 15:49 #16149Senior Member

Posts: 1163Ashley Madison also turned out to be almost totally, if not totally fraudulent. There were few if any actually willing women there. Lots of bots and shills. So it's not surprising that security was way down their list.
Originally Posted by Member#1117
[View Original Post]
-
06-07-21 15:15 #16148Senior Member

Posts: 354This is a risky business, they are doing things that aren't above board and literally exposing themselves, the higher class / cost providers want to be careful about who they do business with.
Originally Posted by Member#1117
[View Original Post]
Honestly I don't think bad about verifying since I don't think badly about what I am doing. At times I want to spend time with someone to talk with and be intimate. Providers want verification to trust who the hobbyist is and they will either ask for that themselves or use a service that does.
If you're not willing to provide information to a particular provider you want to see or to a verification service which has existed for decades then keep searching elsewhere and not complain about it.
I'm not thinking I'm naive since I'm only sticking with services and providers that have been reviewed and verified themselves.
-
06-07-21 14:26 #16147Senior Member

Posts: 75100% agree. Every time you lower yourself guard and think with your junior, it's asking for trouble.
Originally Posted by Member#1117
[View Original Post]
-
06-07-21 12:03 #16146Senior Member

Posts: 327Uh Risks. Yeah lots of them
I guess it all comes down to how comfortable you are with giving your personal identifying information to a third party to engage in activities that "may be" breaking the law and looked down upon by certain folks.
Originally Posted by Ppete8231
[View Original Post]
Just use an example of the hack from Ashley Madison (different but similar). For those folk who used legit cc, billing and email info (come on there were a lot), all of their info got leaked and was available for anyone to search.
I get why providers like these sites. They've already taken the jump and most have their images pasted all over the internet. They have accepted being out in the open with their "career choice". There are a lot of dirt bags out there too, that do dumb shit. I've thought about RS2 K and P411 but it's too risky for me. I'd be giving them much more information than Ashley Madison and nothing guarantees that information will be safe. Black mail and extortion could easily happen. Also, all that information could easily hit the web for anyone to search.
Now for those that have jobs that don't care about any that and or don't care about having that information leaked, go for it. Anyone that has anything to lose, may want to think twice. Ashley Madison was over a hundred million dollar company, and they didn't do enough security. Do you think this much smaller sites care about your info? Nope.
-
06-06-21 21:29 #16145Senior Member

Posts: 75Assuming it's the same dynamics with rsk2 k. Any concerns about sharing personal info with a third party platform?
Originally Posted by LeeOskar
[View Original Post]
-
06-06-21 21:28 #16144Senior Member

Posts: 63Sasha Valentine might work
http://www.sashavalentinexo.com/
Originally Posted by DrRobotNik
[View Original Post]
Sasha Valentine is a tight spinner with incredible skin and tattoos. Has a SG thing going on. Has dark hair and will probably put on black lipstick if you asked.
-
06-06-21 21:10 #16143Senior Member

Posts: 548True, I just hope he finds the "newbie friendly" ones he likes.
Originally Posted by Jinurso
[View Original Post]
-
06-06-21 20:14 #16142Senior Member

Posts: 1445I got started by picking from "newbie friendly" girls which you can search for there. Once I got a couple of them the floodgates opened.
Originally Posted by LeeOskar
[View Original Post]
-
06-06-21 20:13 #16141Senior Member

Posts: 354Just suck it up already
Honestly people, they need to trust that you're who you say you are and not LEO, if you don't want to wait to get 2 verifications from members you can just pay the fee. I trust P411 more than a sketchy girl in a motel room. The only issue that I have with them is the required subscription. What I prefer about RS2 K is that I only need to pay once to say who I am instead of needing to repeatedly confirm who I am thru repeated payments.
Originally Posted by LeeOskar
[View Original Post]
-
06-06-21 20:12 #16140Senior Member

Posts: 1445Speaking of higher end girls from p411
I don't usually review the higher end girls on this site because there isn't much of a market for them here but if anybody is curious and has $700 to spare, Lacey Love is a great time. I saw her last week and she is just like her photos. She's model beautiful, with an exotic Persian look, a really great conversationalist, has a stylish incall location in River West, and provides a great GFE session.
The most shocking part of the experience for me is that after coming across super classy and refined while we were getting started, she became a total porn star during the BBBJ. She really got into the nasty gurgling deep throat and I was totally not expecting it.
It was hot seeing her in all of this expensive lingerie wearing expensive shoes with her expensive makeup running down her face and getting all over my cock.
Best high end experience I've had in Chicago.
https://www.yourlaceylove.com/
-
06-06-21 19:18 #16139Senior Member

Posts: 548My issue with P411, and it's more of a conundrum, is that many P411 providers won't see you unless you have P411 OKs. And to get the OKs, you have to see a P411 provider. I was lucky. I saw a P411 provider off a different site. She then invited me to join P411. With her and others that I had seen, I had enough OKs to see others on the site.
Originally Posted by Ppete8231
[View Original Post]
And as others were saying, P411 tend to have middle & upper tier talent. STG or EB / LC providers probably can't give you an OK. So if you're just staring out trying to get on P411, I'd try to find some P411 providers off another site, then ask them to invite you to P411. If you join without OKs ready to go, you may not get much response, and feel like it was a waste.
-
06-06-21 18:39 #16138Senior Member

Posts: 1445P411
Originally Posted by Ppete8231
[View Original Post]
I've had a p411 account for years. It's great for middle and higher end girls who aren't typically reviewed on this board. So if you're mainly doing your shopping through here you might not get to use p411 enough to justify the cost. But it's a good search engine if you cross reference it with the other site for reviews.
Originally Posted by Trojan83
[View Original Post]





Reply With Quote





