Thread: Non Pro's
+
Add Report
Results 7,246 to 7,260 of 10422
-
09-14-20 20:02 #3177Senior Member

Posts: 135LOL! No. That one screams of GPS and is probably a very lame experience.
Originally Posted by DelToro
[View Original Post]
-
09-14-20 19:45 #3176Senior Member

Posts: 135Seekingbabbbyy. Definitely looks like photos were probably taken from somewhere else on the Internet. I'm skeptical she's real at all.
Originally Posted by WFM20
[View Original Post]
MissingArizona. This one screams "fake profile".
-
09-14-20 14:59 #3175Senior Member

Posts: 907That certainly is true in theory.
In practice I've rarely committed to any long-term kind of deal with any of these girls. Usually it is meeting by meeting. My own observation is that very few girls on those sites are actually adult enough to be able to handle a long-term commitment.
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
For a few months in the early 2010's I had a $5 k / month arrangement with a beautiful girl who was also a major freak. The arrangement was that she'd spend at least two weeks a month with me and that there weren't many boundaries (we discussed them beforehand, basically no permanent damage or injury was permitted, she got an IUD at my expense so no bastards, &c) during our time together. She agreed and actually was okay with it, but in the end I became bored with her (even though the fucking was great) and she also had a serious maturity problem which made any public situation kind of fraught. But all in all it was money I was okay spending.
-
09-14-20 13:55 #3174Senior Member

Posts: 461She said an arrangement with those 2 guys (I understood the 2 guys knew each other and were friends but not her friends) was for good money and higher than what I offered.
So its was like a SB looking for an arrangement but in her case it was with 2 guys to have sex at same time.
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
-
09-14-20 10:01 #3173Senior Member

Posts: 503That's funny because I contacted that chick and rejected me because my profile said I was looking for something "casual" as opposed to "serious".
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
Hard to pinpoint what her angle is.
-
09-14-20 09:26 #3172Senior Member

Posts: 116The first one is fake and scammer. Has a sob story and just asks for money before meet. Will not meet you! Beware.
Originally Posted by HBadger
[View Original Post]
-
09-14-20 03:41 #3171Senior Member

Posts: 1544A SB would be not be looking for two guys to do her at the same time for a bunch of money. That's an escort. A SB would be looking at a longer-term relationship where she's taken care of for 6 months to a year or longer.
Originally Posted by MyNickname
[View Original Post]
-
09-14-20 01:55 #3170Senior Member

Posts: 70There are some real chicks on there who try and test and see what they can get away with, but might actually meet up with you. And there are some legit chicks on there who are really passive and agree to do whatever for whatever allowance. But the chicks who are trying to test you and get you to pay for stuff before meeting are not the same chicks who are passively agreeing to whatever. My hunch is that if you ever actually try and meet she'll come up with a reason why she needs some money before hand, she'll say her car has broken down or she's suddenly in some trouble or whatever.
Originally Posted by KuatoKuato
[View Original Post]
-
09-14-20 01:55 #3169Senior Member

Posts: 461I think she is a tease or going for the highest arrangement offer. She is probably still in SA to see if she can get a higher arrangement.
.
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
-
09-14-20 01:49 #3168Senior Member

Posts: 461SA scammers have become more role players and elaborated. They try to connect and gather information on you. They will ask for money in different attempts like need transportation or a bill to pay and ultimately sell you online arrangement or photos until you meet. Worst case scenario you decline all and they sell all the information you shared about yourself to a scam / blackmail website that will publish your information in a web site like predator or john hiring hookers etc and later you will be contacted to pay to get your information out of that web site.
Originally Posted by KuatoKuato
[View Original Post]
-
09-14-20 01:47 #3167Senior Member

Posts: 1544So, basically, she's an escort, not a SB.
Originally Posted by MyNickname
[View Original Post]
-
09-14-20 01:40 #3166Senior Member

Posts: 461She is a big tease. We had a meeting scheduled that she kept postponing for days and she ended up cancelling day before saying she had found two guys to do her at same time and for more money than arrangement we agreed. I see she is still on SA and given that she recently told me she got into the 2 guys arrangement then I don't know what her deal is.
Originally Posted by ByTemexo
[View Original Post]
-
09-13-20 23:49 #3165Senior Member

Posts: 189Weird that you say this. She did view my profile before favoriting me. I checked. She also reached out with a real message, not just Hey. Weird?
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
-
09-13-20 23:35 #3164Senior Member

Posts: 135One caveat- women with premium profiles can hide that they viewed the profile. But if they aren't showing a premium profile they are spamming.
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
One thing that always works- have them take a picture with something specific- my favourite is car keys and their face- if they cannot produce the picture they are a scammer.
Also LEO has way better things to do than do seeking stings, I have never heard of a LEO sting off of seeking.
-
09-13-20 23:21 #3163Senior Member

Posts: 907Secret Benefits
I can't say one or the other is better. I have met girls off of Secret Benefits so at least some of their profiles are real.
Originally Posted by KuatoKuato
[View Original Post]
There are a lot fewer of the weird rules on Secret Benefits and so you are somewhat more free to pursue whatever kind of deal you'd like. While I suspect messages are still monitored they aren't as aggressively monitored as SA.












Reply With Quote





