Rubrankings.com
rubmaps
Top Tier Escorts
Top Escorts
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
The Velvet Rooms

Thread: Stupid Shit in NoVa

+ Add Report
Page 32 of 43 FirstFirst ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... LastLast
Results 466 to 480 of 639
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #174

    Easy

    Quote Originally Posted by Madaboutmax  [View Original Post]
    I respectfully disagree. When you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail. There are escorts that act like SB's and SB's that act like escorts. They are both Sex Workers, but in general are on completely different ends of the spectrum. If you contact profiles on SA treating them like escorts, you will scare away the legitimate SBs and only get replies from the escorts. If you contact profiles treating them like SBs, you will scare away the escorts and only get replies from legitimate SBs.
    If you pay a woman for sex then their Hookers. Easy.

  2. #173
    Quote Originally Posted by Admin2  [View Original Post]
    This is exactly the same shit that guys used to write about BP chicks being stupid and unreliable.

    Literally exactly the same shit, most of these chicks probably were on backpage. Do any of you guys actually know what sugar babies are? Not singling you out Shinshi all the "SD's" do it. You're trying to arrange a session with a prostitute. I understand that they are on a site called seeking arrangements but the arrangement you're trying to work out isn't exclusive, there will not be a monthly stipend, you're going to pay her when you fuck her and she's going to be fucking other guys who pay her when they fuck her.

    They are hookers.

    I will never understand this distinction you guys try to make.

    A2.
    I respectfully disagree. When you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail. There are escorts that act like SB's and SB's that act like escorts. They are both Sex Workers, but in general are on completely different ends of the spectrum. If you contact profiles on SA treating them like escorts, you will scare away the legitimate SBs and only get replies from the escorts. If you contact profiles treating them like SBs, you will scare away the escorts and only get replies from legitimate SBs.

  3. #172

    I think you misunderstood me

    Quote Originally Posted by Admin2  [View Original Post]
    This is exactly the same shit that guys used to write about BP chicks being stupid and unreliable.

    Literally exactly the same shit, most of these chicks probably were on backpage. Do any of you guys actually know what sugar babies are? Not singling you out Shinshi all the "SD's" do it. You're trying to arrange a session with a prostitute. I understand that they are on a site called seeking arrangements but the arrangement you're trying to work out isn't exclusive, there will not be a monthly stipend, you're going to pay her when you fuck her and she's going to be fucking other guys who pay her when they fuck her.

    They are hookers.

    I will never understand this distinction you guys try to make.

    A2.
    We're almost in 100% agreement, man. SBs are hookers, no arguments there. However, I do tend to treat SBs better and more willing to take them out wherever than I would a professional escort. For 400+, I can expect from a decent quality escort maybe an hour of fun? With roughly that same amount (to include hotel and meal), the SBs I've been with stay 3+ hours to overnight where we wouldn't get much sleep at all! You get more bang for your buck--pun intended--and I've never paid an amateur (which is what a SB is) the same as a professional escort. It goes back to my analogy in an earlier post about paying the same for rinkside tickets to watch a minor league hockey team and the New York Rangers. Who'd do that?

    Ever since that first SB date months ago (late-February I think?) , I've only been back to pros maybe three times? And that was just because I got stood up by a SB or Tinder date earlier and didn't want to go home completely empty-handed. I'm under no illusions that I'm the only john that a SB is seeing. We're not dating, so I can't reasonably expect her to abide by exclusivity. Especially since I can't meet more than 2 x's / month due to work. Only two SBs claimed to only be seeing me. I kinda believe one of them is being truthful based on her general personality. But as I said to all who ask me: I don't mind one way or another.

    So to kinda clear up the minute distinction: I treat amateurs--the SBs--better because the odds are in my favor of having a fantastic, less expensive time than with a professional escort. And if I get stood up by a SB, I will not have completely wasted my time and still gotten to eat great food and explored a new area (I'm a glass half-full guy, haha). That said, you're right them being hookers one way or another. Unless they offer it up for free, in which case I don't know what that'd make them (one of my regulars only wants Doordash, a hotel room, and that's it).

  4. #171
    Administrator


    Posts: 5114

    What I will never understand

    Quote Originally Posted by Shinshi86  [View Original Post]
    I recently changed my approach on Seeking to see what would happen. Previously, I'd message 3-4 different SBs a week--maybe more if I'm traveling for work or on vacation. If there's no response, I'd message new ones while trying again with the previous week's SBs after 10-14 days go by. The latter is dependent on when they're back online and if they've really caught my attention (and if there's still nothing, I cut my losses and move on). In the last couple weeks, I sent out 32 messages thinking that I'll get maybe a couple replies and probably one meet (it had been that kind of a losing streak). However of those 32, I received 16 responses with an additional 7 SBs who initiated the convo!

    Needless to say, I was a bit overwhelmed to see so much activity! But as always, that number of potentials dropped off after subsequent follow-ups. It can be difficult to get a read on some of them: who likes / dislikes small talk; who prefers / loathes public meet-and-greets; who has FWB tagged despite not wanting such an arrangement; who's a scam despite a well-written profile; etc. For their convenience, I offered to meet them at any restaurant / cafe near their area and that they can pick the day & time as long as I know a few days in advance (working multiple jobs kinda limits my free time). Meeting in public doesn't only put their mind at ease, but also mine as it helps knowing if they look like their pics and what their expectations are. If they're afflicted with GPS or if I get stood up, at least I'll still have enjoyed great food and explored a new area outside of where I typically visit.
    This is exactly the same shit that guys used to write about BP chicks being stupid and unreliable.

    Literally exactly the same shit, most of these chicks probably were on backpage. Do any of you guys actually know what sugar babies are? Not singling you out Shinshi all the "SD's" do it. You're trying to arrange a session with a prostitute. I understand that they are on a site called seeking arrangements but the arrangement you're trying to work out isn't exclusive, there will not be a monthly stipend, you're going to pay her when you fuck her and she's going to be fucking other guys who pay her when they fuck her.

    They are hookers.

    I will never understand this distinction you guys try to make.

    A2.

  5. #170
    Quote Originally Posted by Zerry  [View Original Post]
    Yeah its called asking them, meeting them in public and getting to know them. While there is always some risk I feel pretty safe talking to girls who also have lot to lose if they themselves were found out. Scholarships, internships, jobs etc. The mutually assured destruction theory.

    Never interacting with a woman and spending hours online uncovering their personal information to then contact them via means they have not invited you to contact them by is what incels and serial killers do.
    You play the game your way. I'll play the game my way.

    I'm not being "creepy", I'm simply confirming things they've told me but by all means. Do what you do and I'll continue to do things my way.

  6. #169
    Quote Originally Posted by Mdubya  [View Original Post]
    How many of you have been at a stoplight and seen a homeless girl and been like how the fk are you homeless? I would take you to a hotel, clean you up and fk you. Has anyone ever got car play from a homeless girl? This fake ad made me think of that.

    https://northern-virginia.skipthegam...o/797328955074
    A few years ago I was in Cincinnati coming out of a store and this thin white girl around 21 or 22 years old sheepishly asks me for a handout. She wasn't hot like a $300 per hour working girl but she wasn't bad looking either. I froze in my tracks and spent about 3 or 4 seconds thinking and came really close to asking her if she wanted to spend the night at my hotel room and also offer her a really nice dinner at a restaurant before that. However I did feel like that was pretty scummy taking advantage of somebody in dire straits just to get a BJ and some pussy. So I gave her $10 and went on my way.

    Still makes me wonder what answer she would've gave me. Might've been a Penthouse Letters kind of happy ending. "Yeah we can go back to your room. I hope we can fuck all night, too".

  7. #168

    Vice cop girl

    Quote Originally Posted by JonFisher  [View Original Post]
    Not quite sure what or who you are referring to.

    The fairoaks girl is diff.

    The vice cop scammer is back on seeking. I just happen to see her profile so I thought I will alert.
    Mentioned that she is in that area and I was curious since all these happened at the same time,
    -her mention of this area,
    -your post alerting about her and
    -your post asking about a girl in this area.

    Darn coincidence.

  8. #167

    Vice cop scammer is different from fairoaks girl

    Quote Originally Posted by RegularJoe1985  [View Original Post]
    Said that she's in this area. Is that what led to her profile?
    Not quite sure what or who you are referring to.

    The fairoaks girl is diff.

    The vice cop scammer is back on seeking. I just happen to see her profile so I thought I will alert.

  9. #166

    Homeless girls

    How many of you have been at a stoplight and seen a homeless girl and been like how the fk are you homeless? I would take you to a hotel, clean you up and fk you. Has anyone ever got car play from a homeless girl? This fake ad made me think of that.

    https://northern-virginia.skipthegam...o/797328955074

  10. #165

    The scammer that poses as Vice cop

    Quote Originally Posted by JonFisher  [View Original Post]
    Few days back I read someone's post about spotting a girl neat best buy in Fairlakes. Trying to search for it. If someones know please help.
    Said that she's in this area. Is that what led to her profile?

  11. #164

    Spotted near best buy fairoaks

    Few days back I read someone's post about spotting a girl neat best buy in Fairlakes. Trying to search for it. If someones know please help.

  12. #163
    Administrator


    Posts: 5114

    This was when I knew

    Quote Originally Posted by Zerry  [View Original Post]
    Yeah its called asking them, meeting them in public and getting to know them. While there is always some risk I feel pretty safe talking to girls who also have lot to lose if they themselves were found out. Scholarships, internships, jobs etc. The mutually assured destruction theory.

    Never interacting with a woman and spending hours online uncovering their personal information to then contact them via means they have not invited you to contact them by is what incels and serial killers do.
    I was suspecting you were a chick with the "I'm a creep but this is really creepy" because a guy wasn't going to let two chicks rob him over the internet for a virtual relationship.

    But referring to a guy who is finding OBVIOUS hookers on facebook (they are answering) and calling him a serial killer was all I needed.

    As hard as you ladies try and pretend you are men you can't because the golden pussy always shows.

    A2

  13. #162
    Some SB (hooker) with GPS, ignore my posts.


    Posts: 112

    Sugar baby spotted in the wild

    I used to think the other men on SA were just a bunch of nobodies (like myself) but I recently saw a sugar baby I've been with a couple times out with a fairly well know TV news reporter. I wonder if he met her on SA? I know the girl was very active on SA and an absolute freak in bed. Thats the only time I've seen a SB out in public.

  14. #161

    Keep calm and monger on

    Quote Originally Posted by Zerry  [View Original Post]
    I'm a creep, but this is seriously creepy behavior. Reading this made my skin crawl.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zerry  [View Original Post]
    You must be a blast at parties.
    I mean, did you seriously expect Serpico99 to just roll over and let you call him out without a clap back? That's not how life works, man. And besides, both he and BookerTNelson are 100% in the right. It is always beneficial for folks in this hobby to do their homework on potential SBs and providers. Doing so can help mitigate the risks and limit the potential bad times / disappointment to be had.

    The ONLY instances where that wouldn't be okay is if they were digging up dirt on said SB / provider to blackmail, extort, or embarrass them in their personal life (I. E. - on social media). Also, it probably wouldn't be advisable shotgunning the info to the greater public here. Apart from those instances, they're just getting a feel for what the woman's comfortable with, what she actually looks like, where she's located, etc. Personally, I've yet to figure out a way to backtrace someone's pics to their social media and am always grateful that others here can do so. It helps knowing that the SA user claiming to be a petite 20-something is really an overweight whale in their late-40's.

  15. #160
    Some SB (hooker) with GPS, ignore my posts.


    Posts: 112
    Yeah its called asking them, meeting them in public and getting to know them. While there is always some risk I feel pretty safe talking to girls who also have lot to lose if they themselves were found out. Scholarships, internships, jobs etc. The mutually assured destruction theory.

    Never interacting with a woman and spending hours online uncovering their personal information to then contact them via means they have not invited you to contact them by is what incels and serial killers do.

    Quote Originally Posted by BookerTNelson  [View Original Post]
    If you aren't trying to find out a little bit about your potential SB's then you're asking for some blowback for these endeavors.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Protected by Copyscape