Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 3,736 to 3,750 of 4466
-
05-31-20 13:31 #731Banned Member

Posts: 201What's your preferences in terms of looks and service? Like body type, rough service, mild service etc. If you want doubles, BGC many have a double available tomorrow, but will need cover for at least 1 of the WGs. Feel free to PM me.
Originally Posted by AngelPena
[View Original Post]
-
05-31-20 13:10 #730Senior Member

Posts: 148Pse
Alright gents.
I'll be in San Jose and San Mateo tomorrow. I'm looking for some outstanding PSE kgirls, maybe possibly a double? Need some recommendations on looks and service. I have given up on caras, I text and no reply. I have seen Claire from KGA and Ciara from LSC. I would like to try something new. Any info would help! Was looking at Kira.
-
05-30-20 23:45 #729Regular Member

Posts: 9Glad I'm not the only one
I saw her about two years ago in the summer. Was overall a terrible experience. Setup an appointment for 9 pm at her incall. When I arrived, she ghosted me and so I left. Come midnight she apologized and says she'll make it worth my while if I came to see her. Should have left it there but I was thinking with the wrong head.
Originally Posted by StarSkyMmc
[View Original Post]
This time I made it inside of her room, she looked just as hot as her photos, but was definitely faded / tired. The session started out good, GFE attitude even. As soon as we got naked, that completely changed. Nongfe to the max, no lfk, no dfk, laid there like a starfish. Sad CBJ and mish. I finished up in 30 minutes and left. Terrible way to spend $$$ What fucks me up is her reviews on PD are stellar. I bet 90% are fake.
-
05-30-20 20:42 #728Senior Member

Posts: 169Bonnie LSC
I'm all shagged out, napped on the ride home on the scooter even.
She _is_ a little older, _is_ a little rounder in the stomach, and _is_ a little taller.
Very small amounts in all of those. But being a _little_ rounder makes her a tall soft well arsed and titted ride.
She has a VERY full C cup, or a small D, if it wasnt for the point-at-the-sky nipples her crosseyed surgeon gave her, she would look 100% natural.
Veiny too, if you're in to that.
But enhanced, moderately well done, I'd give them an A-. But I bad she had a _fantastic_ rack before that.
Doesn't DFK, allows 'respectful' pecking but doesn't fully engage. Claims ticklish nipples and pussy, so. Mostly hands and mouth off. *booo* But she loves a good grabbing of her tits, when she's on the road to the big 'O, she will on her own grab lift and knead them. And she locks down nicely on your cock at the same time.
And about that. Other than while cumming, a but of throwing a hotdog down a hallway. But will get wet as hell too. So that may be part of it.
I have a feeling she would turn your head at the mall, tall, fills what she wears, and has a cracking ass with full matching thighs and calves made for 80's jeans. I hate those super great asses that instantly turn into chicken legs.
Would I repeat. Ya. A Solid mid-bench player for my team.
Ohh. Take walking shoes, this has to be the longest walk -ever- from the facility entrance, to the door. And back out I've ever done.
-
05-30-20 19:17 #727Senior Member

Posts: 96I tried back in December. I might try again now to see if their process has changed.
Originally Posted by JunkFoodFtw
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-20 16:05 #726Senior Member

Posts: 169Ohh. Ya, feedback on Bonnie / Suzie's funbags?
Originally Posted by MrStaypuft
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-20 16:04 #725Senior Member

Posts: 169It was identifiable -as- an I'd from -a- state, but didn't show anything but name and face. So who I say I am, is who I am, that matches where I work. All identifiable in public as well (FB, LinkedIn, etc) already.
Originally Posted by JunkFoodFtw
[View Original Post]
And they waived pay stub, which would have only said name and employer to tie in the work card, and I'd data. Not specifics. I've been successful usually in not sharing anything you can't visibly see on social media already.
I would not say "handed over", their interests are WHO are you, and is there a reasonable chain of evidence that you're not pulling their chain. And edited -way- down. .
The signature in my Email from work contains more identifiable information than this. Fu*k knows where an Email can end up.
-
05-30-20 14:30 #724Banned Member

Posts: 201I see, pretty sure they were just as stringent back then. So you handed over your I'd and pay stub?
Originally Posted by MrStaypuft
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-20 13:53 #723Regular Member

Posts: 18Ashley Foxx from PD
I saw Ashley Foxx earlier this week when in South bay at her incall (2 bills for hh). I chose her because, cmon she's obviously bangin in her photos and she had an insane amount of positive reviews on PD (412 ratings as of now) so I was quite excited. That excitement turned to disappointment immediately seeing her. There's a reason on TER she's rated poorly!
Upon arriving to her location (which was a nicer hotel) she was 45 min late! In addition, gave me wrong room directions. I felt the hotel staff was getting quite suspicious as I'm the only person walking back and forth up and down the hotel. I don't think it was intentional as she's not the brightest, but c'Mon. That's 2 strikes! Have some professionalism. Now, how hot was she in person? She was a complete fraud! Her face had tons of acne and scarring that it was hard looking at her. Probably one of the worst looking providers I've been with, being generous I'd say she's a 5/10. Her body was nice and tight (no complaints there) and she was unshaved (I kinda liked that), but when getting down to action, her moans felt so fake, like a porn actress. It was very distracting especially since it was hard looking at her face. I finished in <5 min and dipped.
-
05-30-20 13:48 #722Senior Member

Posts: 1693-4 wks ago tops?
Originally Posted by JunkFoodFtw
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-20 13:34 #721Regular Member

Posts: 18Yeah I know exactly that feeling. Been recently seeing some PD providers closer to me since SJ is over an hour drive, and the service is just crap. The girls on PD fraud with photos just as bad as the K-orgs and it's always in some sketchy degrading hotel / motel.
Originally Posted by StraightOmar
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-20 11:53 #720Regular Member

Posts: 13I agree. I am less concerned about LE and more about my detailed personal information getting into anonymous hands.
Originally Posted by JunkFoodFtw
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-20 11:09 #719Banned Member

Posts: 201It all depends on when you initially contacted LSC, you might have contacted them when their screening wasn't as stringent. Care to share when you got screened for LSC?
Originally Posted by MrStaypuft
[View Original Post]
-
05-30-20 01:19 #718Senior Member

Posts: 294Haha, I do like Thai but not that much, and not as much as Viet.
Originally Posted by MrStaypuft
[View Original Post]
I did try ThaiSoda months back, she's a little old for my taste, although she is cheaper than Kgirls, I think it's better to spend the extra money.
It would be nice to have a slight change of pace, but when I do I end up regretting it, since the service doesn't match the typical Kgirl service.
-
05-30-20 01:17 #717Banned Member

Posts: 201Caras did respond back at end of March, but silent ever since.
Originally Posted by StraightOmar
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote



