Rubrankings.com
Best Escorts
High Class Companions
Top Tier Escorts
Top Escorts
This blog is moderated by Fahq1
  1. #3900

    Doubt she's real

    Quote Originally Posted by Shinshi86  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seeking.com/member/0cc30...3-4de7bc4fb4e6

    This one's my weekend backup plan to a backup plan (really sucks that SA has devolved into this kind of preparation). She quoted 8 for me, which I laughed before promptly wishing her best of luck elsewhere. She then immediately countered 6 for two hrs of fun at a hotel and then dinner afterwards. If that one picture that she uploaded is indeed accurate, well then this could be more than fine. You're right about her giving off the vibe of being a pro and all business. At least everything seemed to be moving right along after exchanging numbers.

    But as with other aforementioned SBs, I'm not holding my breath. Hell, I'm not even making any reservation (s) until I see her with my own eyes. It's far more preferable to lose an hour of one's time than to purchase a non-refundable room with a probable no-show for a night. As if to further reinforce my skepticism, she just texted a minute ago if it's okay for her to bring a friend and have the allowance be 6 per. I declined and she messaged back that was fine.

    This whole thing seems TGTBT, but fingers crossed that it all pans out. And if it doesn't, at least I'll have contributed another addition to be blacklisted.
    She quoted me 7 as that was her last arrangement. Asked what happened to him and he said he moved. Told her she should of moved with him. Asked for a picture and she kept saying she sent it but I never got anything so I stopped responding.

    Let me know how it turns out.

  2. #3899

    Changes

    The creation of Cashapp and Venmo has opened up such a new opportunity for scammers and this has infiltrated Seeking.

    It is too easy to send money now and they are taking advantage of this. The M and G allowance mindset is part of this, as they think sugaring is easy money. Also seeing this on SnapChat and other places, girls pushing premium accounts, OnlyFan accounts and other "easy money".

    Seeking still is one of the better places to find p4 p and until something better is able to pop up, I'll use it every so often. I need to put together a recap of my month I had on there. Met a few off there and had chances with others that timing / schedule and funding limitations held me back.

    To bring up something that always seems to crop up on here, re: sharing digits and such, there is the financial aspect of a monger spending 90.00 a month to gather intel, digits and so forth and then others expecting to get all that info. I think letting others know which girls are scammers, which ones are platonic only and which are DTf is a great tool of this board. But for any monger (especially ones with no posting history) to expect mongers to provide every piece of information about a Sugar baby off one of these pay sugar sites seems entitled. A lot of these sugar babies don't know that they are what they are and to share their digits with a guy they don't know will be contacting them will scare them off and then no one will win.

    I asked one recently if she wanted referrals since I couldn't see her very often and she was hesitant at first then pulled back and said no.

    Let's keep sharing intel as we get it but not feel like we are entitled. This place is great but it depends on all of us keeping it going.

    Quote Originally Posted by IluvSmellyFish  [View Original Post]
    WTF happened to SA? I remember it being bad, but not this bad. Almost every pot I've messaged requires a m&g allowance. I don't play that gamw tho. Guess I'll just have to keep on wading through these profiles.

  3. #3898

    Tiffanyxoxo71

    Quote Originally Posted by Xyzpdqa  [View Original Post]
    Yes I've chatted with her She is poor about keeping a convo going. She is maybe a UTR pro. Very business like. Not interested in chatting. She quoted 7 for my first inquiry. After I relied too rich for me, She said OK. Several days later she came back with 5. I pushed for confirmatory picture of her face and paper w / my profile name and she declined to comply.
    https://www.seeking.com/member/0cc30...3-4de7bc4fb4e6

    This one's my weekend backup plan to a backup plan (really sucks that SA has devolved into this kind of preparation). She quoted 8 for me, which I laughed before promptly wishing her best of luck elsewhere. She then immediately countered 6 for two hrs of fun at a hotel and then dinner afterwards. If that one picture that she uploaded is indeed accurate, well then this could be more than fine. You're right about her giving off the vibe of being a pro and all business. At least everything seemed to be moving right along after exchanging numbers.

    But as with other aforementioned SBs, I'm not holding my breath. Hell, I'm not even making any reservation (s) until I see her with my own eyes. It's far more preferable to lose an hour of one's time than to purchase a non-refundable room with a probable no-show for a night. As if to further reinforce my skepticism, she just texted a minute ago if it's okay for her to bring a friend and have the allowance be 6 per. I declined and she messaged back that was fine.

    This whole thing seems TGTBT, but fingers crossed that it all pans out. And if it doesn't, at least I'll have contributed another addition to be blacklisted.

  4. #3897

    Funny how you and I are messaging the same girls lately

    Quote Originally Posted by IluvSmellyFish  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seeking.com/member/436e5...6-bbc601cbc7b3

    Read mixed reports about her and wanted fo see who was right and who was wrong.

    Responded that she was interested but that her time was valuable. When I asked if she requires $ for meeting on a first date, she ghosted.
    So yeah, I don't know what to make of her. She never once brought up paying before meeting, so hopefully that's not becoming her standard. Going off previous reporting, people say she looks like her pics (jaw-droppingly gorgeous in my opinion! Can host, allows a LOT more than what most other SBs / providers typically permit, and asks for a reasonable allowance. We were trying to set up a meet last weekend when she went offline for several consecutive days. After she logged back on, she apologized for being M. I. A. And took down my number in hopes of meeting this coming weekend. I'm still very much interested in seeing her, but I'm also not holding my breath that this will be any different.

    My guess is she's juggling a lot of traffic lately and unable to keep up with it all. But that's why you have backup plans (unless those fail too, in which case I'm just unlucky as hell).

  5. #3896

    SA = Scamville

    Quote Originally Posted by IluvSmellyFish  [View Original Post]
    WTF happened to SA? I remember it being bad, but not this bad. Almost every pot I've messaged requires a m&g allowance. I don't play that gamw tho. Guess I'll just have to keep on wading through these profiles.
    I dunno, man. I'm starting to think that I subscribed right when it started to take the downward plunge into Scamville. Everyday, I keep getting lots of views & favorites from women in Venezuela or Russia (why those two specific countries, I don't know) and it's irritating that they bother since it's obvious we'll never meet. On top of that, approximately 80% of my messages are ignored. The rest are read and responded to, only for said SBs to suddenly ghost or demand an allowance upfront prior to meeting. If this is what SA is all about now, then I'm for certain going to let this subscription die out in a couple months. It's very reminiscent of Tinder after it reached its peak before taking a nose-dive.

  6. #3895

    Now requires a 1st date allowance.

    Quote Originally Posted by IluvSmellyFish  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seeking.com/member/d5aaa...1-77864f1b31ae

    Started a conversation. Got a date with her after she gets off work latet this week and trying to figure out if she's TGTBT.
    WTF happened to SA? I remember it being bad, but not this bad. Almost every pot I've messaged requires a m&g allowance. I don't play that gamw tho. Guess I'll just have to keep on wading through these profiles.

  7. #3894
    Regular Member


    Posts: 19

    Scammers

    Scutiezz1 is a scammer.

    Roseflit is a scammer.

  8. #3893

    Maryland, Maryland

    Quote Originally Posted by VegaWrap  [View Original Post]
    Had a nice little meet with a cute rookie a while ago. Thick maybe overweight but not fat. Good shape good face, still has a waist, ass, and real good tits.

    19 and good personality.

    Said she had daddies before but negotiated like she don't know the game at all.

    Took my first offer for 2 $. Prob wouldn't pay that for it cause she's a little thicker than I like. Offered to as an opener just to get her open that she was dtf.

    Day of the meet, talked her into a bbjws for 60. Did a second date for the same rate to see if I could sweet talk her into giving up more. Works for me often enough, I like to see what how far I can get for the fun of it.

    Met her the second time for the same BJ rate, got BBFS CIP in her car. Filled her up like a cupcake and sent her sweet ass home.

    Wouldn't work again tho. Talked to her later and she realized she went way too cheap just cause she hopped on the pole without negotiating the price first. Swore she wouldn't do it again for less than 2.

    Will have a username for well trusted seniors later. Sure thing for 2 but you could easily talk her down to 150 if you have any skill.
    Anyone with the city matching the state name is usually a problem (except New York, NY).

  9. #3892

    Anyone have any info on Svetlanax?

    https://www.seeking.com/member/d5aaa...1-77864f1b31ae

    Started a conversation. Got a date with her after she gets off work latet this week and trying to figure out if she's TGTBT.

  10. #3891
    Quote Originally Posted by Shinshi86  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seeking.com/member/56f4a...8-8ef77761ba19

    Another one of my failures worth sharing. A month ago when I was fairly new to SA, I met this one for coffee. The pictures on her page are indeed accurate. Barely 5', 19 yo, with a cute face. Could've been bullshitting, but she claims to work a seasonal job (and lives) in Pennsylvania while attending school. Every other weekend, she stays with a friend out in Annapolis (hence why she could potentially meet me sporadically). She asked for 300 for the month of Jan and Feb (total of 3 weekends), which seemed fair at the time. I figured we had hit it off from that first meet, that we both liked what we saw in one another, very similar interests, easy-going conversations, etc.

    Anyway, for our 2nd meet she claimed a friend bailed on her & couldn't house or drive her to / from Annapolis. So I offered to book her a hotel for the weekend as long as she takes care of her own transportation (no way was I driving halfway across the state). She agreed before asking if I was getting one or two beds. I replied one, but then she begs for two because she's embarrassed about "suffering from sleep apnea. " I told her it wouldn't be a problem, but she insisted otherwise. I acquiesced & said I'd book a room with two beds. It was at this point she asked about how much was I thinking of paying. Despite being pissed, I still respectfully reminded her of our agreed arrangement of 300 for Jan-Feb. She then laughs it off, says she's okay with that, and that she would see me that weekend. Low & behold, change of plans in the form of a "sick friend heading to the ER. " I ignored any subsequent messages.

    On a positive note, I hadn't booked any hotel nor wasted anything more than that initial 300. Still, paying before any kind of fun to be had was admittedly stupid on my part. It breaks my own damn rule set, and I won't be making the same mistake any time soon. Also, even if "platonic" isn't one of the tags used in an SA profile, you should ALWAYS check to see what your SB / provider is okay with. That means doing so by getting her number then texting her there outside of SA. There's no sense in giving any woman potential ammunition in having your SA profile banned for soliciting. She claimed she was seeking a FWB, but that turned out to be false.

    Bottom line: don't waste your time or money on this one.
    Interesting have been talking to her, nothing scheduled yet, but the details I have are slightly different (but could still mesh with your info). Thanks for the info.

  11. #3890

    Ry_B

    https://www.seeking.com/member/44c77...7-83b398b69600

    Any intel? Have a lunch scheduled for tomorrow.

  12. #3889

    Pixie princess now requires a m&g allowance

    https://www.seeking.com/member/436e5...6-bbc601cbc7b3

    Read mixed reports about her and wanted fo see who was right and who was wrong.

    Responded that she was interested but that her time was valuable. When I asked if she requires $ for meeting on a first date, she ghosted.

  13. #3888

    Butterflies32

    https://www.seeking.com/member/56f4a...8-8ef77761ba19

    Another one of my failures worth sharing. A month ago when I was fairly new to SA, I met this one for coffee. The pictures on her page are indeed accurate. Barely 5', 19 yo, with a cute face. Could've been bullshitting, but she claims to work a seasonal job (and lives) in Pennsylvania while attending school. Every other weekend, she stays with a friend out in Annapolis (hence why she could potentially meet me sporadically). She asked for 300 for the month of Jan and Feb (total of 3 weekends), which seemed fair at the time. I figured we had hit it off from that first meet, that we both liked what we saw in one another, very similar interests, easy-going conversations, etc.

    Anyway, for our 2nd meet she claimed a friend bailed on her & couldn't house or drive her to / from Annapolis. So I offered to book her a hotel for the weekend as long as she takes care of her own transportation (no way was I driving halfway across the state). She agreed before asking if I was getting one or two beds. I replied one, but then she begs for two because she's embarrassed about "suffering from sleep apnea. " I told her it wouldn't be a problem, but she insisted otherwise. I acquiesced & said I'd book a room with two beds. It was at this point she asked about how much was I thinking of paying. Despite being pissed, I still respectfully reminded her of our agreed arrangement of 300 for Jan-Feb. She then laughs it off, says she's okay with that, and that she would see me that weekend. Low & behold, change of plans in the form of a "sick friend heading to the ER. " I ignored any subsequent messages.

    On a positive note, I hadn't booked any hotel nor wasted anything more than that initial 300. Still, paying before any kind of fun to be had was admittedly stupid on my part. It breaks my own damn rule set, and I won't be making the same mistake any time soon. Also, even if "platonic" isn't one of the tags used in an SA profile, you should ALWAYS check to see what your SB / provider is okay with. That means doing so by getting her number then texting her there outside of SA. There's no sense in giving any woman potential ammunition in having your SA profile banned for soliciting. She claimed she was seeking a FWB, but that turned out to be false.

    Bottom line: don't waste your time or money on this one.

  14. #3887
    Had a nice little meet with a cute rookie a while ago. Thick maybe overweight but not fat. Good shape good face, still has a waist, ass, and real good tits.

    19 and good personality.

    Said she had daddies before but negotiated like she don't know the game at all.

    Took my first offer for 2 $. Prob wouldn't pay that for it cause she's a little thicker than I like. Offered to as an opener just to get her open that she was dtf.

    Day of the meet, talked her into a bbjws for 60. Did a second date for the same rate to see if I could sweet talk her into giving up more. Works for me often enough, I like to see what how far I can get for the fun of it.

    Met her the second time for the same BJ rate, got BBFS CIP in her car. Filled her up like a cupcake and sent her sweet ass home.

    Wouldn't work again tho. Talked to her later and she realized she went way too cheap just cause she hopped on the pole without negotiating the price first. Swore she wouldn't do it again for less than 2.

    Will have a username for well trusted seniors later. Sure thing for 2 but you could easily talk her down to 150 if you have any skill.

  15. #3886
    Quote Originally Posted by Duuuuuuude  [View Original Post]
    Unfortunately, I wasted an afternoon on her. Definitely not DTF!
    Same, she wanted some bullshit up front money to verify that I was for real.

    Fuck that.

    Then they try to challenge you with some line like. If risking up front money is a problem for you you must not have the wealth I'm looking for anyway. If you had it like that it wouldn't be an issue.

    Haha. Nah kid. If I got it like that didn't get here by having no fucking business sense, getting suckered, giving something for nothing.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
The Velvet Rooms
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Live Escorts

Protected by Copyscape