Bareback Providers

**FastBreak Junk** · 09-04-18 01:56

Originally Posted by KurtCutter [View Original Post]

Went looking for an ebony provider and ended up with a blond. I've noticed Morgan's ads before but I couldn't find anything about menu so I always passed and then I stumble across her video on porn hub. Texted and asked if I could get the same menu, her response ABSOLUTELY. She's cool GFE, BBBJ and BBFS multiple positions. Afterwards she had wipes to clean me up and enjoyed some great conversation. $200 VIP (BBFS) is an extra $80.

https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.p...h5a692e33ea952

http://tacoma.skipthegames.com/femal...m/229095026657

Awesome! Great work dude!

It's great that site provides explicit menu details, though I don't see anyone openly indicating they do BB. Please let us know if you find others and if you have any tips searching for them on the site. Again, great work. FBJ.

**Lee Groinman** · 09-03-18 20:52

Originally Posted by Mojo567 [View Original Post]

$$$ for 30 mins $$ for 60. No LFK, DFK, FIV, GFE,69, Foreplay. Does she even enjoy doing it with men? I mean seriously when you look through her list of demands and what she will not do. You need to ask yourself what exactly are you paying $$ for. Talking?

She doesn't like talking.

Basically she's just a fuckhole and she likes it in her ass more than her pussy, or at least she used too. Was also into getting golden showers (again not sure what's on her menu now).

Back when she started she did BBFS but that was short lived. She'd be a definite NO on that front.

Personally I think she's a fucking ***** who is trying really hard to shake her fucked up past. She says what she wants and gives no shits.

Follow her rules to the letter or fuck off. I think one of her problems (which there are many) was too many steroids back in the day.

She's a fit gal but buckled from the neck up.

Also I'm not a fan of big fake silicone tits.

**Rousse** · 09-03-18 19:45

Originally Posted by Mojo567 [View Original Post]

She has reported several BB requests on TNA. So if you do txt her to ask, make sure she cannot link to your profile there (incase you have one). If anyone has intel on her please share, she is pretty bitchy on TNA.

She and I had a deep discussion. Not the erotic kind. Several years ago. She really believes she's all that. She'd be great to take out for drinks, if what you want is several hours of fantastic and entertaining conversation. But those boundaries. She has lines that make my Asperger's look like Dale Carnegie. You aren't likely to get across them.

I haven't experienced her this way, but I think of her as an intellectual, not-intimate, dominatrix.

**WarpFactor69** · 09-03-18 15:11

Originally Posted by Joseph1955 [View Original Post]

My impression is an emphatic NO. Also, her board presence is her schtick, her act. She's pretty darn smart but much more personable and sweet than she lets on in public. Asking her by text prior to meeting is a suicide mission, don't bother. I've only met her once. Perhaps if you're a long time client or have some larger connection? I kind of doubt anyone in that category would post it here, but I've been totally wrong before!

Totally agree.

**BuckNaked123** · 09-03-18 15:10

Originally Posted by JonathanSmyth [View Original Post]

If some does see her, grab her by the pussy for me. .

LMAO! Thanks, I needed a good laugh today.

**Rhombur** · 09-03-18 13:27

Originally Posted by Joseph1955 [View Original Post]

I doubt any deals were made. TNA just isn't that big or important to warrant it. They probably exist in some way that, for the moment, keeps them from being crushed by the wheels of the law.

They've certainly evolved into a forum that places a priority on giving the providers an equal or superior voice relative to the clients. That's fine. Who cares, just ignore it or work around it. Most reasonable people have no objection to the women having a place to express themselves or try to make the most of their situation.

What's too bad, in my opinion, is how that creates an environment of the least common denominator. People who should be the most accepting of diversity in thought and behavior become incredibly intolerant of both. A closed-minded attitude only hurts the women in the long run, as they are ultimately the vulnerable group and people will always find a way to do what they really want to do. Hence, this thread. In my experience, nearly as many women as men are okay with the possibility of uncovered play, given the right circumstances. It's just nobody is allowed to talk about it. How fucked up and unsafe is that?

Agreed. The moralizing and shaming / shunning / lecturing of people on that board isn't any different behavior than the prudes who hate escorting entirely. Whom they supposedly vehemently dislike. It's disgusting behavior, especially coming from a group that should, in theory, know better about marginalizing people.

**Joseph1955** · 09-03-18 13:01

Originally Posted by JohnShockley2 [View Original Post]

That site has been overrun for a decent while now. Their business model is mainly Predicated on providers paying to post ads. As such, they're the customers. And "always right" even though it's hypocrisy as male viewers drive the traffic counters, pay per clicks, and passive revenue.

At times I wonder what deals they cut to be one of the few legacy sites not closed down or pushed to foreign shores with a US blacklist.

I doubt any deals were made. TNA just isn't that big or important to warrant it. They probably exist in some way that, for the moment, keeps them from being crushed by the wheels of the law.

They've certainly evolved into a forum that places a priority on giving the providers an equal or superior voice relative to the clients. That's fine. Who cares, just ignore it or work around it. Most reasonable people have no objection to the women having a place to express themselves or try to make the most of their situation.

What's too bad, in my opinion, is how that creates an environment of the least common denominator. People who should be the most accepting of diversity in thought and behavior become incredibly intolerant of both. A closed-minded attitude only hurts the women in the long run, as they are ultimately the vulnerable group and people will always find a way to do what they really want to do. Hence, this thread. In my experience, nearly as many women as men are okay with the possibility of uncovered play, given the right circumstances. It's just nobody is allowed to talk about it. How fucked up and unsafe is that?

**Joseph1955** · 09-03-18 12:27

Originally Posted by Mojo567 [View Original Post]

She has reported several BB requests on TNA. So if you do txt her to ask, make sure she cannot link to your profile there (incase you have one). If anyone has intel on her please share, she is pretty bitchy on TNA.

My impression is an emphatic NO. Also, her board presence is her schtick, her act. She's pretty darn smart but much more personable and sweet than she lets on in public. Asking her by text prior to meeting is a suicide mission, don't bother. I've only met her once. Perhaps if you're a long time client or have some larger connection? I kind of doubt anyone in that category would post it here, but I've been totally wrong before!

**Mojo567** · 09-03-18 11:54

Originally Posted by JonathanSmyth [View Original Post]

If some does see her, grab her by the pussy for me. .

$$$ for 30 mins $$ for 60. No LFK, DFK, FIV, GFE,69, Foreplay. Does she even enjoy doing it with men? I mean seriously when you look through her list of demands and what she will not do. You need to ask yourself what exactly are you paying $$ for. Talking?

**Chlorine** · 09-03-18 11:12

Originally Posted by JohnShockley2 [View Original Post]

That site has been overrun for a decent while now. Their business model is mainly Predicated on providers paying to post ads. As such, they're the customers. And "always right" even though it's hypocrisy as male viewers drive the traffic counters, pay per clicks, and passive revenue.

At times I wonder what deals they cut to be one of the few legacy sites not closed down or pushed to foreign shores with a US blacklist.

I'm pretty sure the site was off-shored back in 2009 or 2010, shortly after it changed hands from local, individual ownership to the corporate owners of a certain nationwide, spam-infested, scam-ridden site (the name of which I am apparently prohibited from mentioning).

**JonathanSmyth** · 09-03-18 10:56

Originally Posted by MikeJennings [View Original Post]

https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?128206-AshleyAthens

Anyone get BBFS from her? Her ads are pretty absurd and she certainly thinks she is very smart and funny. Which whatever, I can't necessarily agree with, but who cares, her tits are huge and her body is bangin'. Anyone creampie this Trump hater?

If some does see her, grab her by the pussy for me. .

**Flyer99** · 09-03-18 07:37

[Political Commentary deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted to remove political commentary. Please remember that the purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Please do not post political commentary in the Forum EXCEPT local politics as it directly pertains to the subject of local laws and ordinances regarding commercial sex in the area defined by the thread title. Thanks!

**John Shockley2** · 09-03-18 01:46

Originally Posted by StreetTroller [View Original Post]

I haven't seen the Twitter post in question nor am I familiar with this particular provider, but I will say that it's been a rather disturbing trend in the past few years that guys just go along with accusations and automatically assume the provider is right. Even more disturbing is that a lot of those guys don't raise a voice when providers use tactics to accumulate information on various men. Years ago that would have never flown on TNA, but for some reason it does now. I don't ever play there and haven't in many years. Sometimes I'll logon and read-up on what's going on but in my opinion it's no longer a safe place to play.

That site has been overrun for a decent while now. Their business model is mainly Predicated on providers paying to post ads. As such, they're the customers. And "always right" even though it's hypocrisy as male viewers drive the traffic counters, pay per clicks, and passive revenue.

At times I wonder what deals they cut to be one of the few legacy sites not closed down or pushed to foreign shores with a US blacklist.

**Mojo567** · 09-03-18 00:40

Originally Posted by MikeJennings [View Original Post]

https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?128206-AshleyAthens

Anyone get BBFS from her? Her ads are pretty absurd and she certainly thinks she is very smart and funny. Which whatever, I can't necessarily agree with, but who cares, her tits are huge and her body is bangin'. Anyone creampie this Trump hater?

She has reported several BB requests on TNA. So if you do txt her to ask, make sure she cannot link to your profile there (incase you have one). If anyone has intel on her please share, she is pretty bitchy on TNA.

**Mojo567** · 09-03-18 00:36

Originally Posted by KurtCutter [View Original Post]

Went looking for an ebony provider and ended up with a blond. I've noticed Morgan's ads before but I couldn't find anything about menu so I always passed and then I stumble across her video on porn hub. Texted and asked if I could get the same menu, her response ABSOLUTELY. She's cool GFE, BBBJ and BBFS multiple positions. Afterwards she had wipes to clean me up and enjoyed some great conversation. $200 VIP (BBFS) is an extra $80.

https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.p...h5a692e33ea952

http://tacoma.skipthegames.com/femal...m/229095026657

Incredible. Good for you.