Escort Reports

**BrutusB74** · 10-27-17 19:24

Originally Posted by CoolPatrick [View Original Post]

This is the perfect example of how sharing can help us connect the dots to have intel of great values for everyone! Doing our own research and sharing is the key.

I personally would take my own findings and what the girls say a grain of salt because if I don't look at the right place, I'd miss something. Seems like Mrlows did have solid info and personal experience to back up his post. I can find all her ads in March 2017 from liveescortreviews.com. Of all the jessa posts we can easily find, there is at least one ad using explicit's 773 number. http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/chic...4750/1/2134332.

For me, all these means that she was trying to get into the biz by working with agency and listing independently. As she learns more about how girlfriending biz works, she tries to move up the food chain by creating nice personal website and avoiding BP etc.

The bottom line is, knowing more about CChanelle is not to pry into her real life, but to have information that helps people to decide whether they want to meet her and how they want to account for any risks in this hobby. Knowing her used to offer BBFS or knowing who she used to work with doesn't mean that we can assume she is now still doing her girlfriending service like how she did in the past.

The intel is helpful for people to discern the risks and how they want to mitigate the risks should they want to meet her. Likewise, it's her own choice in terms of how she does her sexwork and how much risks she was / is willing to take. Maybe she wants to bury this to avoid unwanted client base, but it is not a realistic thought. Folks likes BBFS would still want to ask about it regardless. That's their preference and choice too.

@BrutusB74, if she continue to treat you well, I don't see how her past as Jessa would change your relationship, unless you feel like providers allowing BBFS may exceed your acceptable level of risks. Any provider can be any hobbyist's ATF sweetheart and treat somebody else in a trashy, bitchy, and bitter way at the same time.

For other readers, I hope you find these information helpful for you to decide if you want meet her.

I couldn't have said it better myself sir!

Maybe every lady should have a disclaimer tattooed on them stating past performance does not guarantee future performance. Kind of like mutual funds have! LOL.

There is an unfortunate aspect to all this, whether it be from credible sources or the other site boasting, I've heard many a lady complain then mongers just expect it because they read it somewhere. More than enough have been pressured or downright assaulted.

Personally, I think if that is your thing, ask politely before the meeting and if politely declined, either accept graciously or move on.

But that's just me.

**JPother100** · 10-27-17 18:02

Can someone PM me about your experience with getting verified through EEC?

My office is pretty small and the IT crew are pretty ah, paranoid and extra thorough. Just want to make sure I'm prepared with answers in case they get too thorough.

Thanks.

JP.

**CoolPatrick** · 10-27-17 12:20

Originally Posted by BrutusB74 [View Original Post]

Agreed. We all have had YMMV experiences or even no connection with a provider that others seem to have ATF status, it still is a role of the dice. IMO, the guys who have a bad experience want to tell the world how horrible someone was because they didn't get exactly what one guy got (even though we all know some reviews are exagerrated).

That's why I take all reviews with a grain of salt.

Originally Posted by Mrlows [View Original Post]

She used to go by Jessa and as I said she started with explicit right before she was the Angellis and it was after being with these two agencies that she went independent.

Here is the old explicit BP ad:

http://420.com.chicago.hoxnif.com/post/20583492/

I reported my session on the BBFS thread (post# 356) back in March.

This is the perfect example of how sharing can help us connect the dots to have intel of great values for everyone! Doing our own research and sharing is the key.

I personally would take my own findings and what the girls say a grain of salt because if I don't look at the right place, I'd miss something. Seems like Mrlows did have solid info and personal experience to back up his post. I can find all her ads in March 2017 from liveescortreviews.com. Of all the jessa posts we can easily find, there is at least one ad using explicit's 773 number. http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/chic...4750/1/2134332.

For me, all these means that she was trying to get into the biz by working with agency and listing independently. As she learns more about how girlfriending biz works, she tries to move up the food chain by creating nice personal website and avoiding BP etc.

The bottom line is, knowing more about CChanelle is not to pry into her real life, but to have information that helps people to decide whether they want to meet her and how they want to account for any risks in this hobby. Knowing her used to offer BBFS or knowing who she used to work with doesn't mean that we can assume she is now still doing her girlfriending service like how she did in the past.

The intel is helpful for people to discern the risks and how they want to mitigate the risks should they want to meet her. Likewise, it's her own choice in terms of how she does her sexwork and how much risks she was / is willing to take. Maybe she wants to bury this to avoid unwanted client base, but it is not a realistic thought. Folks likes BBFS would still want to ask about it regardless. That's their preference and choice too.

@BrutusB74, if she continue to treat you well, I don't see how her past as Jessa would change your relationship, unless you feel like providers allowing BBFS may exceed your acceptable level of risks. Any provider can be any hobbyist's ATF sweetheart and treat somebody else in a trashy, bitchy, and bitter way at the same time.

For other readers, I hope you find these information helpful for you to decide if you want meet her.

**Raw Deal** · 10-27-17 06:28

Hello Good people of Gotham. I have a question about the verification process that almost everyone applies here. I am traveling to Chicago this weekend and was hoping to sample some delights on offer. But this verification thing has thrown me off (completely alien this process to me).

I am from the UK and the most prominent site used there is adultwork.com where I have a lot of complementory feedback from providers. An alternative is providers ask for your phone number / hotel room number and name to verify if you are who you claim to be. Unfortunately it does seem to count here. How should I go about his?

The agencies I am considering to use, based on the feedback on here.

CEC, EEC, CCG, 2 K presents (I am a MILF man and like the look of Julia there) and Sheri if she responds to my email.

Appreciate your feedback.

**Member #6352** · 10-27-17 00:06

Hey all,

If anyone didn't notice 262's website bit the dust finally.

http://262escortschicago.com/?reqp=1...EvLaE5pv5jLab=

Anyway I was inquiring to see if Collette had moved agencies? If anyone has seen postings please keep me posted! She had a rack that was just amazing.

**DMichaels69** · 10-26-17 16:21

Grain of salt is right.

Originally Posted by BrutusB74 [View Original Post]

Agreed. We all have had YMMV experiences or even no connection with a provider that others seem to have ATF status, it still is a role of the dice. IMO, the guys who have a bad experience want to tell the world how horrible someone was because they didn't get exactly what one guy got (even though we all know some reviews are exagerrated).

That's why I take all reviews with a grain of salt.

**Mrlows** · 10-26-17 15:56

Originally Posted by JangoFouts [View Original Post]

If you do see Holly Berry, and if you are curious, ask her about gangbangs. She does them every so often. My third time visiting her was one.

Sure, you'll have to take turns with other guys, but there is MSOG, it went for about 3 hours, the potential for dp is there, and it costs less than her 1 hour rate.

Yes I actually contacted her a couple of times about her GB events but I couldn't coordinate with her schedule (her GBs are usually hosted on the weekends and I can only monger Mon-Fri LOL).

If there's anyone out there that's interested in a threesome or foursome with Holly, feel free to pm me, I'd love to DP that gorgeous woman.

**Mrlows** · 10-26-17 15:48

Originally Posted by BrutusB74 [View Original Post]

Mrlows,

Not sure you are talking about the right Cchanelle. She has never been with Explicit, she started as an independent and had a brief stint with Angellis for a short time. She has never offered BBFS and all the reviews on the other site claim the same.
BB74

She used to go by Jessa and as I said she started with explicit right before she was the Angellis and it was after being with these two agencies that she went independent.

Here is the old explicit BP ad:

http://420.com.chicago.hoxnif.com/post/20583492/

I reported my session on the BBFS thread (post# 356) back in March.

**BrutusB74** · 10-26-17 15:27

Originally Posted by CoolPatrick [View Original Post]

No problem, I haven't met her, only researched her and can only back up based on what I have learned. But seems like someone got a bad experience from her.

Agreed. We all have had YMMV experiences or even no connection with a provider that others seem to have ATF status, it still is a role of the dice. IMO, the guys who have a bad experience want to tell the world how horrible someone was because they didn't get exactly what one guy got (even though we all know some reviews are exagerrated).

That's why I take all reviews with a grain of salt.

**Explorer8** · 10-26-17 14:21

Originally Posted by BrutusB74 [View Original Post]

Thanks for backing me up CP. This business is hard on both sides with trust being thrown out the window so easily.

You're a stand up guy in my book.

Yup CoolPatrick is cool in my book too.

**CoolPatrick** · 10-26-17 13:10

Originally Posted by BrutusB74 [View Original Post]

Thanks for backing me up CP. This business is hard on both sides with trust being thrown out the window so easily.

You're a stand up guy in my book.

No problem, I haven't met her, only researched her and can only back up based on what I have learned. But seems like someone got a bad experience from her.

**CoolPatrick** · 10-26-17 13:02

Originally Posted by CarmineW [View Original Post]

Everything reported about this woman needs to be stricken from the record. Just met her and she came in my place told me she was on drugs took my 200 and I begged her to leave. Smelled like a dump truck. She is not only crazy but looks nothing like her pics.

Good luck, carmine.

I don't think I saw any recent BP ad from her, after the whole USASG discount thing. There is an ongoing discussion about her under Escort report section. Just want to make sure people get all the stories about her, good or bad.

Sorry about your bad experience. How did you convince her to do outcall for just $200? was it just for 30 minutes? It is hard to imagine she would take half of what she advertises. But who knows what's really going on? As for looks, her professional pics are certainly photoshopped a bit. Hey, as long as tattoos are matching, at least you met the right girl.

**BrutusB74** · 10-26-17 12:56

Originally Posted by CoolPatrick [View Original Post]

I have the same question about your ATF, but decided not to respond given that someone (I don't care if it's you or not) told Cchanelle about my observational post regarding her pricing change and that she responded to it on her own blog.

Since you addressed to Mrlows but quoting my post instead, I feel I need to clarify that I AM NOT THE ONE SAYING SHE OFFERS BBFS.

I suspect Mrlows confuses her with Autumn (TER 314913), who was on Explicit's roster very early on. http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/chic...9690/5/1967329

I only spotted Chanelle's personal website when she starts girlfriending, so the story of her being independent seems more credible. And she did reveal a bit of personal story on her site, so it's more believable to me as I was able to check out something else about her and find her story consistent with the source online.

Thanks for backing me up CP. This business is hard on both sides with trust being thrown out the window so easily.

You're a stand up guy in my book.

**CoolPatrick** · 10-26-17 10:44

Originally Posted by BrutusB74 [View Original Post]

Mrlows,

Not sure you are talking about the right Cchanelle. She has never been with Explicit, she started as an independent and had a brief stint with Angellis for a short time. She has never offered BBFS and all the reviews on the other site claim the same.
BB74

I have the same question about your ATF, but decided not to respond given that someone (I don't care if it's you or not) told Cchanelle about my observational post regarding her pricing change and that she responded to it on her own blog.

Since you addressed to Mrlows but quoting my post instead, I feel I need to clarify that I AM NOT THE ONE SAYING SHE OFFERS BBFS.

I suspect Mrlows confuses her with Autumn (TER 314913), who was on Explicit's roster very early on. http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/chic...9690/5/1967329

I only spotted Chanelle's personal website when she starts girlfriending, so the story of her being independent seems more credible. And she did reveal a bit of personal story on her site, so it's more believable to me as I was able to check out something else about her and find her story consistent with the source online.

**BrutusB74** · 10-26-17 09:18

Originally Posted by CoolPatrick [View Original Post]

Then it would be really nice that we can be sure to get what we are willing to pay for, instead of being YMMV. I couldn't care less about BBFS but I love the idea of being able to take pics and videos for private collection. BBFS is too much risk for me.

Those who had a chance to stick into Alicia Coxxx via Explicit should feel lucky that you had a chance to fock her for $300 per hour, even though her service may be just so-so. Now she is listed under the famous TLC, The Luxury Companions, her ego would become 5 X bigger and would probably be asking $1 K or more as if she is an a-lister.

Mrlows,

Not sure you are talking about the right Cchanelle. She has never been with Explicit, she started as an independent and had a brief stint with Angellis for a short time. She has never offered BBFS and all the reviews on the other site claim the same.
BB74