Escort Reports

**CoolPatrick** · 10-30-17 14:08

Originally Posted by RattleHead [View Original Post]

I've been wanting to try one of the Chicago agencies, and I've tried (twice) to get verified by CEC. I really want to meet Milena. For some reason, however, I haven't been able to get verified. Are they a hard agency to verified with? I'm really disappointed. I have a few days off of work, and wanted to take advantage of the free time I have. It was a great opportunity to go down to Chicago and try one of these well reviewed agencies. I don't want to email them and harass them. I don't think that would help my cause. I guess maybe I'll just have to give up on them and try someone else.

CEC is responsive on the Telegram texting app. If you emailed them already, you can go on telegram and text them to follow up. Even if they ask from pics, you can send a self-destructive one and you would even receive a warning if the receiver taking a screen grab of the image. You should be fine with screening on Telegram. They didn't ask me for pics when I followed up on Telegram since I am verified over email, and the booking via telegram is just easy.

**RattleHead** · 10-30-17 13:41

I've been wanting to try one of the Chicago agencies, and I've tried (twice) to get verified by CEC. I really want to meet Milena. For some reason, however, I haven't been able to get verified. Are they a hard agency to verified with? I'm really disappointed. I have a few days off of work, and wanted to take advantage of the free time I have. It was a great opportunity to go down to Chicago and try one of these well reviewed agencies. I don't want to email them and harass them. I don't think that would help my cause. I guess maybe I'll just have to give up on them and try someone else.

**Eric Lex** · 10-30-17 03:38

Originally Posted by DaytimeJay [View Original Post]

Hard to book is an understatement! Booked appointment with her early in day only for her to forget I was coming and she had to cancel while I was on my way there. Every other time I try to book she had been unavailable and doesn't reply to texts quickly, or even the same day.

Keep trying. Once you see her, you'll be glad you did!

**Starks** · 10-29-17 21:06

Originally Posted by Rv237 [View Original Post]

One of my favorite stars will be in Chicago Oct 31-Nov 3. I'm sure it'll come with a hefty price. We'll see if I decide to pull the trigger. Definitely will report if a date happens. Not sure if anyone else is interested.

Stay Safe.

Where do you book her?

**Daytime Jay** · 10-29-17 17:32

Originally Posted by EricLex [View Original Post]

I'd highly recommend that you see Iris if you're into a hot, spinner, young lady. She is hard to book depending on her availability but def worth seeing. 240/ hr. I posted a visit in the asian report section--check my post.

Have fun, and gl!

http://asianiris.escortprotools.com/

Hard to book is an understatement! Booked appointment with her early in day only for her to forget I was coming and she had to cancel while I was on my way there. Every other time I try to book she had been unavailable and doesn't reply to texts quickly, or even the same day.

**Rv237** · 10-29-17 09:51

Originally Posted by AsianAddict [View Original Post]

Where are you seeing this?

https://www.eros.com/illinois/chicag...748.htm?cat=32

No email back yet. So if I don't hear back I may try their text method of communication.

Stay Safe.

**AsianAddict** · 10-29-17 09:45

Originally Posted by AsianAddict [View Original Post]

Where are you seeing this?

Forget it, I answered my own question.

**AsianAddict** · 10-29-17 00:33

Originally Posted by Rv237 [View Original Post]

One of my favorite stars will be in Chicago Oct 31-Nov 3. I'm sure it'll come with a hefty price. We'll see if I decide to pull the trigger. Definitely will report if a date happens. Not sure if anyone else is interested.

Stay Safe.

Where are you seeing this?

**Rv237** · 10-28-17 20:25

One of my favorite stars will be in Chicago Oct 31-Nov 3. I'm sure it'll come with a hefty price. We'll see if I decide to pull the trigger. Definitely will report if a date happens. Not sure if anyone else is interested.

Stay Safe.

**ElJefe69** · 10-28-17 02:15

Originally Posted by Twiggy2076 [View Original Post]

Hey all,

If anyone didn't notice 262's website bit the dust finally.

http://262escortschicago.com/?reqp=1...EvLaE5pv5jLab=

Anyway I was inquiring to see if Collette had moved agencies? If anyone has seen postings please keep me posted! She had a rack that was just amazing.

I haven't seen her since but another agency sent me an email that said 262 girls. I did not see her in their lineup but it was odd that it said 262 girls.

**BrutusB74** · 10-27-17 19:24

Originally Posted by CoolPatrick [View Original Post]

This is the perfect example of how sharing can help us connect the dots to have intel of great values for everyone! Doing our own research and sharing is the key.

I personally would take my own findings and what the girls say a grain of salt because if I don't look at the right place, I'd miss something. Seems like Mrlows did have solid info and personal experience to back up his post. I can find all her ads in March 2017 from liveescortreviews.com. Of all the jessa posts we can easily find, there is at least one ad using explicit's 773 number. http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/chic...4750/1/2134332.

For me, all these means that she was trying to get into the biz by working with agency and listing independently. As she learns more about how girlfriending biz works, she tries to move up the food chain by creating nice personal website and avoiding BP etc.

The bottom line is, knowing more about CChanelle is not to pry into her real life, but to have information that helps people to decide whether they want to meet her and how they want to account for any risks in this hobby. Knowing her used to offer BBFS or knowing who she used to work with doesn't mean that we can assume she is now still doing her girlfriending service like how she did in the past.

The intel is helpful for people to discern the risks and how they want to mitigate the risks should they want to meet her. Likewise, it's her own choice in terms of how she does her sexwork and how much risks she was / is willing to take. Maybe she wants to bury this to avoid unwanted client base, but it is not a realistic thought. Folks likes BBFS would still want to ask about it regardless. That's their preference and choice too.

@BrutusB74, if she continue to treat you well, I don't see how her past as Jessa would change your relationship, unless you feel like providers allowing BBFS may exceed your acceptable level of risks. Any provider can be any hobbyist's ATF sweetheart and treat somebody else in a trashy, bitchy, and bitter way at the same time.

For other readers, I hope you find these information helpful for you to decide if you want meet her.

I couldn't have said it better myself sir!

Maybe every lady should have a disclaimer tattooed on them stating past performance does not guarantee future performance. Kind of like mutual funds have! LOL.

There is an unfortunate aspect to all this, whether it be from credible sources or the other site boasting, I've heard many a lady complain then mongers just expect it because they read it somewhere. More than enough have been pressured or downright assaulted.

Personally, I think if that is your thing, ask politely before the meeting and if politely declined, either accept graciously or move on.

But that's just me.

**JPother100** · 10-27-17 18:02

Can someone PM me about your experience with getting verified through EEC?

My office is pretty small and the IT crew are pretty ah, paranoid and extra thorough. Just want to make sure I'm prepared with answers in case they get too thorough.

Thanks.

JP.

**CoolPatrick** · 10-27-17 12:20

Originally Posted by BrutusB74 [View Original Post]

Agreed. We all have had YMMV experiences or even no connection with a provider that others seem to have ATF status, it still is a role of the dice. IMO, the guys who have a bad experience want to tell the world how horrible someone was because they didn't get exactly what one guy got (even though we all know some reviews are exagerrated).

That's why I take all reviews with a grain of salt.

Originally Posted by Mrlows [View Original Post]

She used to go by Jessa and as I said she started with explicit right before she was the Angellis and it was after being with these two agencies that she went independent.

Here is the old explicit BP ad:

http://420.com.chicago.hoxnif.com/post/20583492/

I reported my session on the BBFS thread (post# 356) back in March.

This is the perfect example of how sharing can help us connect the dots to have intel of great values for everyone! Doing our own research and sharing is the key.

I personally would take my own findings and what the girls say a grain of salt because if I don't look at the right place, I'd miss something. Seems like Mrlows did have solid info and personal experience to back up his post. I can find all her ads in March 2017 from liveescortreviews.com. Of all the jessa posts we can easily find, there is at least one ad using explicit's 773 number. http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/chic...4750/1/2134332.

For me, all these means that she was trying to get into the biz by working with agency and listing independently. As she learns more about how girlfriending biz works, she tries to move up the food chain by creating nice personal website and avoiding BP etc.

The bottom line is, knowing more about CChanelle is not to pry into her real life, but to have information that helps people to decide whether they want to meet her and how they want to account for any risks in this hobby. Knowing her used to offer BBFS or knowing who she used to work with doesn't mean that we can assume she is now still doing her girlfriending service like how she did in the past.

The intel is helpful for people to discern the risks and how they want to mitigate the risks should they want to meet her. Likewise, it's her own choice in terms of how she does her sexwork and how much risks she was / is willing to take. Maybe she wants to bury this to avoid unwanted client base, but it is not a realistic thought. Folks likes BBFS would still want to ask about it regardless. That's their preference and choice too.

@BrutusB74, if she continue to treat you well, I don't see how her past as Jessa would change your relationship, unless you feel like providers allowing BBFS may exceed your acceptable level of risks. Any provider can be any hobbyist's ATF sweetheart and treat somebody else in a trashy, bitchy, and bitter way at the same time.

For other readers, I hope you find these information helpful for you to decide if you want meet her.

**Raw Deal** · 10-27-17 06:28

Hello Good people of Gotham. I have a question about the verification process that almost everyone applies here. I am traveling to Chicago this weekend and was hoping to sample some delights on offer. But this verification thing has thrown me off (completely alien this process to me).

I am from the UK and the most prominent site used there is adultwork.com where I have a lot of complementory feedback from providers. An alternative is providers ask for your phone number / hotel room number and name to verify if you are who you claim to be. Unfortunately it does seem to count here. How should I go about his?

The agencies I am considering to use, based on the feedback on here.

CEC, EEC, CCG, 2 K presents (I am a MILF man and like the look of Julia there) and Sheri if she responds to my email.

Appreciate your feedback.

**Member #6352** · 10-27-17 00:06

Hey all,

If anyone didn't notice 262's website bit the dust finally.

http://262escortschicago.com/?reqp=1...EvLaE5pv5jLab=

Anyway I was inquiring to see if Collette had moved agencies? If anyone has seen postings please keep me posted! She had a rack that was just amazing.