BackPage Advertiser Reviews

**HavingFun6931** · 07-10-16 19:41

Originally Posted by Utwogood [View Original Post]

Went to see this lady off the review. Sorry, man, either I got another Asian lady working under that ad or your review is highly complementary. She's in her 40's and her body is typical for an Asian lady that age, B cup, a little bit of a gut. I don't consider that "ample" - those pics cannot be accurate, or that is one hell of a pushup bra. She is pretty, but again, for her 40's. Granted, I paid the hh, so I didn't get the extras you did. But apparently the hh doesn't include CBJ anymore with these establishments.

You were right in that she speaks almost no English, which for me, is becoming more and more frustrating. A few minutes in, she was doing something I didn't really like, and I was like "That's not working. " She goes "(your pecker's) Not working?" and took that to mean the session was over, jumped up and started to get dressed. I had to explain to her that that wasn't what I meant. OMG. There are certain things I like that get me going, and you cannot express that to them. You can't negotiate, persuade, or argue. Seems many are expressing this as well. I feel like they get way too much credit on this board in general.

They are aware of all this, and use the language barrier to their advantage. I'm glad you had a great time, but my experience was lackluster and not repeatable. I shouldn't have to bring a basket of fruit to get good service. I'll probably stick with Joyce and call it a day for the Asian establishments.

I've partaken in the Older Asian service out in Centreville, five or six times now. Seen Lulu (okay), Nana (no thank you) and one or two other more recent ones that have come through as well, including two that spoke no English. The pictures are NOT accurate. They never are. The providers are all older 30's or 40's but aging well as many Asian ladies do. For me, other than Nana, who seemed entirely distracted, my experiences have not been bad. Full hour. BBBJ, nice FS in various positions, little massage to start or end with. Never rushed. Never GFE but still a good session with the provider attentive and interested (and occasionally experiencing real pleasure). One. I forget who. Wanted me to enter her unprotected. That of course was a no-no and quite surprising. She really wanted it, but I had to insist on covered. They are, for me, when I am in the mood for FS at a non-ripoff price, a good go to option. I'll go back again. They also now have one or two girls working in Fairfax (near Fair Oaks Mall) and I understand also out in Sterling, if Centreville is inconvenient. For those that have had truly bad experiences, I suggest early morning appointments (which is my usual. The girls are fresh, not tired, more willing, attentive, and they're not busy in the AM so they're not trying to get you out in a hurry).

**Member #5480** · 07-10-16 17:40

Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]

As others have reported previously in the forum, Tara has had a lot of problems (water leaks, etc.) in her Fairfax location. Her current ad lists a new location in Annandale.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/The...-tara/10252768

As HF said, Tara is a gem and is well worth many visits.

Clearly a gem. I texted her today, and she's all booked upWill have to contact her in advance, I imagine.

**Member #5480** · 07-10-16 17:39

http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscor...-6085/23092263

Didn't see a review, so I decided to TOFTT.

This is the same condo that has Memory, Yuki, Ruby, etc. This was my third visit, the first being Ruby and the second being Memory.

I went with 45 minutes, and I think it was well worth it, although I would personally stick with Memory if you had the choice (I think she works there all the time, whether advertised or not).

Damage was $. 6.

Walked in, and she was very friendly with a kiss. In this regard she is better than Memory because she is more handsy and playful (whereas Memory seemed a bit more subdued). Stripped, played with her nice sees, and then started with a shower, got very clean and she played with my backdoor (joking about entering, not that I would have minded. Probably would have if I asked), and then we went to business.

Gave a terrible back massage, but that's not what I was there for- did a cat bath thing, which I don't particularly care for, but I like being pampered so I let her do it. Memory is much more thorough with hers We moved on to the oral presentation, which was decent. I'm not really into DATY, so I didn't ask. Gave me covered beejay for a few minutes and then moved onto CG. Did that for a while and then I flipped her and went mish. She's not super tight (unlike Ruby, but Ruby loses out on almost all other aspects except her face). Didn't want to pop too soon, so I turned her around and went with DS while rubbing her special button down there- very hot and she was extremely wet. I last a long time though, so we added some KY later, and then I went back into mish. I was running out of time, so I focused, and with her encouragement (and kisses, not FK though), finished in the cover.

Showered at the end, gave me more kisses and was out the door. She'll be here for about two more weeks folks.

Message me if you want more details.

Pictures are real.

**JmSuttr** · 07-10-16 12:19

Originally Posted by HavingFun6931 [View Original Post]

Hi all, I wanted to add in a report on Asian masseuse Tara. XXX-6765. There's quite a few reviews of her here and on other forums, so I'm not sure if I'm providing anything new. However, that said, I do want to add a review for those who may not have seen her, or seen those other reviews. Let me cut to the chase. She is absolutely spectacular. She's cute, friendly, a bit heavy body but very firm and attractive. Her therapeutic massage is 8/10, finish is off the charts 10/10, overall experience 9/10, consistently. She's warm, fun, talkative, teasing, enjoyable and if you connect with her she can absolutely be a GFE experience. Reading other poster's reviews I suspect she's pretty generous with her customers if she likes you and gets to know you. She's been VERY generous with me. I don't know how much she advertises anymore as I'm sure she has a ton of regulars. But if she's taking new customers I very much recommend her. Standard NOVA rates, standard tipping, and she's not going to bug you about a tip. Just go, be nice to her, and have fun.

As others have reported previously in the forum, Tara has had a lot of problems (water leaks, etc.) in her Fairfax location. Her current ad lists a new location in Annandale.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/The...-tara/10252768

As HF said, Tara is a gem and is well worth many visits.

**HavingFun6931** · 07-10-16 10:13

Hi all, I wanted to add in a report on Asian masseuse Tara. XXX-6765. There's quite a few reviews of her here and on other forums, so I'm not sure if I'm providing anything new. However, that said, I do want to add a review for those who may not have seen her, or seen those other reviews. Let me cut to the chase. She is absolutely spectacular. She's cute, friendly, a bit heavy body but very firm and attractive. Her therapeutic massage is 8/10, finish is off the charts 10/10, overall experience 9/10, consistently. She's warm, fun, talkative, teasing, enjoyable and if you connect with her she can absolutely be a GFE experience. Reading other poster's reviews I suspect she's pretty generous with her customers if she likes you and gets to know you. She's been VERY generous with me. I don't know how much she advertises anymore as I'm sure she has a ton of regulars. But if she's taking new customers I very much recommend her. Standard NOVA rates, standard tipping, and she's not going to bug you about a tip. Just go, be nice to her, and have fun.

**HavingFun6931** · 07-10-16 10:05

Hello everyone,

I am a longtime monger in the DC and Northern Virginia area. Have lurked and read reviews here and I'd like to thank you all as I've gained such good information from all of you. It's now time to give back and to contribute. This is the first of many reviews and recommendations I will be providing. Any advice you all have for how to best shape my reports is welcome. So. First. Here goes. This week I decided to TOFTT and called Iris XXX-8031 and scheduled an appointment. Her advertisement pictures are not real or accurate, but I figured that going in. They very rarely are. And I couldn't find any reliable reviews. But decided why not. Paid standard NOVA rate. 2 for the hour. When I arrived she was dressed in a little nightie and was quite cute. Getting down to business the massage was pretty boring and not very therapeutic. As she moved to a lighter touch things got a bit nicer. Not bad technique. I've had better. But she got things going. On the flip it was a nice finish. She has good technique. However, that said, she's not personable, didn't make eye contact except a few moments before the 'end' (nice smile), and it was all a bit impersonal. I didn't try any touching. She wasn't sending that vibe. Overall, massage was a 4/10, finish 7/10, overall experience 5/10. If you're needing some quick relief in the Falls Church Tysons area, and there's no better options, may be worth a visit. I did not tip her. Her service was not tip-worthy (she did not ask nor did she give me a hard time about not tipping).

**Tom McAn** · 07-09-16 13:45

Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]

Very little is off the table when it comes to tactics LEO might use to get mongers to take their bait.

Also, even if she's legit it's important to remember that there's a high percentage of BP pics that are either misleading or completely fake. So without reviews or intel to back it up it's always a case of buyer beware.

We always have to be careful when there's little or no history on a provider.

I did some research and found Blake has posted ads for a few weeks on both the body rub and escort sections of BP, but I've seen no reviews on any credible sites. If anyone TOFTT, please post and let us know.

**JmSuttr** · 07-09-16 13:02

Originally Posted by MikeInDC [View Original Post]

She looks really cute. Would LEO have someone pose in skimpy lingerie? I'm sure anything is possible.

Very little is off the table when it comes to tactics LEO might use to get mongers to take their bait.

Also, even if she's legit it's important to remember that there's a high percentage of BP pics that are either misleading or completely fake. So without reviews or intel to back it up it's always a case of buyer beware.

**MikeInDC** · 07-09-16 10:55

Originally Posted by LKnit [View Original Post]

Anyone check this one out yet? Something about her is irresistible to me. If I was single and could take a dive I'd of TOFTT. PM if need be.

BP.

Blake 571-5905.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...r-you/23582781

She looks really cute. Would LEO have someone pose in skimpy lingerie? I'm sure anything is possible.

**The Nub** · 07-08-16 16:54

Originally Posted by LKnit [View Original Post]

Anyone check this one out yet? Something about her is irresistible to me. If I was single and could take a dive I'd of TOFTT. PM if need be.

BP.

Blake 571-5905.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...r-you/23582781

I reached out to her before to TOFTT, but after a strange exchange of text messages which raised some red flags I backed out of my appointment last minute. I'm staying away from this one for now.

**L Knit** · 07-07-16 18:24

Anyone check this one out yet? Something about her is irresistible to me. If I was single and could take a dive I'd of TOFTT. PM if need be.

BP.

Blake 571-5905.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...r-you/23582781

**JmSuttr** · 07-07-16 06:29

Originally Posted by BunkerBuster [View Original Post]

With that many different phone numbers and cities, as well as different names, this might also be a case of multiple girls stealing the same pix from each other. The review is for "Exquisite Beauty," whose ad says her name is "Amy. ".

Either way, the review says Amy isn't worth it, or Jennifer here is using stolen pix.

But the LER pics were close enough to those in her local ad, and the style of the ad looks similar, so I thought it was worth a heads up. And if her required donation is 300+, as the oThER site lists, it could be an expensive mistake for some unsuspecting monger who gets sucked in by the pics.

**Sjoh842** · 07-07-16 02:30

Originally Posted by HardanFast [View Original Post]

I booked a half hour both times and not sure I was there quite that long the second time. Even though I tipped an extra. 4 upfront based on my previous experience. The first time, I book a half and must have been there at least an hour or more. I did not ask, but I am sure she does offer multiple pops, but I don't know if it would be with an uncharge or not.

With the 300+ donations now a day, she sounds pretty fair for what she offers. Thanks a lot again for the info.

**Roamin Roman** · 07-07-16 00:00

Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...londe/22951236

Number search found this link:

http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/nash...8-0209/1/47732

At the bottom of the page you can see all the other associated pics and numbers. Reviews on the oThER site agree that her service is not worth the price of admission (300+) so buyer beware.

Originally Posted by BunkerBuster [View Original Post]

With that many different phone numbers and cities, as well as different names, this might also be a case of multiple girls stealing the same pix from each other. The review is for "Exquisite Beauty," whose ad says her name is "Amy. ".

Either way, the review says Amy isn't worth it, or Jennifer here is using stolen pix.

Not only that, but in the video at the bottom of the second link, the girl holds up a sign indicating her name is Tiffany.

**Bunker Buster** · 07-06-16 23:18

Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...londe/22951236

Number search found this link:

http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/nash...8-0209/1/47732

At the bottom of the page you can see all the other associated pics and numbers. Reviews on the oThER site agree that her service is not worth the price of admission (300+) so buyer beware.

With that many different phone numbers and cities, as well as different names, this might also be a case of multiple girls stealing the same pix from each other. The review is for "Exquisite Beauty," whose ad says her name is "Amy. ".

Either way, the review says Amy isn't worth it, or Jennifer here is using stolen pix.