Like Beef Lolo?

[FutSniffA]

The PM system like everything here is a privilege, if you misuse it, you lose it. You have to work really fucking hard at it to lose it though. In the last three years I've taken it away from 4 guys. That's 4 people out of 400,000 that have lost that.

My only beef with the guy was that he refused to follow Jax's rules. When I send somebody a PM that says, "Hey don't do this thing anymore. " Then they write, "naw I'm going to keep doing that thing because you shouldn't try to stop me. " That's not a beef, that's not even a judgement call, that's just a "OK, let me drop you in a little tiny box" thing.

Why are you trying to start a beef with me? This isn't even close to what it takes to piss me off. I don't care if guys ask why. I've been wrong in the past, when people point it out I fix it. I'm not when it comes to this guy, his bullshit smells pretty bad even though he's good at selling it.

A2.

"Why are you trying to start a beef with me? I'm not trying to start beef you King A2, I don't know either of you in real life so I really don't have a dog in this fight. You seriously need a hug. Seems to me whenever someone questions your authority you fly off the rails and bring down the hammer.

I simply thought the PM (PRIVATE) system was a way to share info between two mongers and not have it in the open. I didn't know you wanted total control over that also. You really are on a serious power trip it seems. I still don't understand why you would be reading his PMs in the first place.

I don't think your beef with the guy stops at Jax's rules, anyone reading the back and forth can clearly see your beef is deeper than the "rules". Seems like he kicked your ass in an argument or two and you pulled the Admin card to settle a score. That's typical with power hungry types though.

"In the last three years I've taken it away from 4 guys. That's 4 people out of 400,000 that have lost that" If this is true, this underscores my point of the beef you have with the guy being much deeper than "Jaxs rules". FOUR people out of 400 K, I'll let those numbers speak for themselves. Note to all mongers reading this, don't challenge King A2.

[Admin2]

So why ban him from PM? I thought that was a way to keep things between two mongers out of the main forums? Seems like your beef with the guy is clouding better judgment. I'll shut up now in order to avoid your wrath sir.

The PM system like everything here is a privilege, if you misuse it, you lose it. You have to work really fucking hard at it to lose it though. In the last three years I've taken it away from 4 guys. That's 4 people out of 400,000 that have lost that.

My only beef with the guy was that he refused to follow Jax's rules. When I send somebody a PM that says, "Hey don't do this thing anymore. " Then they write, "naw I'm going to keep doing that thing because you shouldn't try to stop me. " That's not a beef, that's not even a judgement call, that's just a "OK, let me drop you in a little tiny box" thing.

Why are you trying to start a beef with me? This isn't even close to what it takes to piss me off. I don't care if guys ask why. I've been wrong in the past, when people point it out I fix it. I'm not when it comes to this guy, his bullshit smells pretty bad even though he's good at selling it.

A2.

[FutSniffA]

He never lost the ability to post, he lost the ability to post without having his posts moderated because he insisted that he would continue doing what he's doing.

I still think he's an asshole and untruthful (I admit I'm not unbiased, he's kind of being a dick with me) but nobody has taken away his ability to post. PM's yes, he lost that right as well but he can post.

Here is an example of a guy who posted the same info and followed the rules. This chick hasn't just been charged, she's been convicted of aggravated prostitution as well. That means she has been tested, found positive, and informed of that status by a competent authority. There is no possibility of a mistake and guys do indeed need to know about her.



If any of you guys here saying you should be able to do this can do this, I won't throw a flag.

A2

So why ban him from PM? I thought that was a way to keep things between two mongers out of the main forums? Seems like your beef with the guy is clouding better judgment. I'll shut up now in order to avoid your wrath sir.

[Opelu]

Moderating / banning Cronus would be a loss to us all. Please allow him to post. I am pro for the pro Cronus.

Maybe but what admin said makes sense. Is he really a doc who knows. Is what he claims is true who knows. If he is a doc some things that he claims to do does not make sense to me after I thought about it. But in the end who knows.

[Admin2]

Moderating / banning Cronus would be a loss to us all. Please allow him to post. I am pro for the pro Cronus.

He never lost the ability to post, he lost the ability to post without having his posts moderated because he insisted that he would continue doing what he's doing.

I still think he's an asshole and untruthful (I admit I'm not unbiased, he's kind of being a dick with me) but nobody has taken away his ability to post. PM's yes, he lost that right as well but he can post.

Here is an example of a guy who posted the same info and followed the rules. This chick hasn't just been charged, she's been convicted of aggravated prostitution as well. That means she has been tested, found positive, and informed of that status by a competent authority. There is no possibility of a mistake and guys do indeed need to know about her.

Just a public service announcement to let you guys know that it was on the news today that a SW by the name of Misty was busted and charged with aggravated prostitution for turning tricks after she was known to be HIV positive.

http://www.wdef.com/content/news/dev...-LdZDXRuw.cspx

If any of you guys here saying you should be able to do this can do this, I won't throw a flag.

A2

[Admin2]

That being said, I can appreciate the difficulty admin is faced with when it comes to protecting both the monger and the provider. However, information indicating that a provider may have a communicable illness, sexually or otherwise transmitted, shouldn't be stifled since our very hobby depends on safety. If in the event that some horrible but preventable illness got spread around, HPD might not be so inclined to turn a blind-eye to our deeds. Just a thought.

How will a 1,000 false reports about chicks having STD's help you?

That's what happens, we know this because that's what happened, every time, without fail.

I moved this here, don't post stuff like this on review threads.

A2

[Admin2]

I think we can all tell the high risk girls. They the ones that just met you but letting you put your wee wee in there with no cover. Swallow your cum and call you her husband!

Going forward Admin, should we post high risk girls in the ROB thread? Is that the appropriate place for them? Or should we just PM? On another note, this is why I'm unfazed when a girl doesn't offer BB. She might look good on the outside, but be burning up on the inside. I'm ok with BBBJs to an extent, but BBFS is playing Russian roulette with your dick.

Yes you guys can pass info through PM. We discourage guys from reporting false info but I there is no rule against reporting that chicks rob people. There would be a rule against reporting that chicks "rob" people. Like there isn't a rule about chicks being on vacation but there is one against chicks being on "vacation. ".

As far as raw dogging goes I personally am a wrap it up guy. I don't judge guys that go natural, well unless they borrow my dick to do it, but if I was mongering in Hawaii I know how I would use reports of chicks that go bare.

That's one of the reasons we have bare back threads on the forum. Everybody can get value from them, guys that want to go bare can find chicks that do that and guys that would prefer to avoid chicks that do that can use the info as well.

Mongering, covered or uncovered has risks, you got to accept that. If there weren't so many idiots reporting shit like that with an agenda we wouldn't have the rule. Commercial sex, in and by itself is considered a risky behavior by the CDC, especially in places where it is criminalized like in the US. Having these threads fill up with false reports of STD's, and that's exactly what used to happen before we had the rule, won't help.

A2.

[P Venkman]

Going forward Admin, should we post high risk girls in the ROB thread? Is that the appropriate place for them? Or should we just PM? On another note, this is why I'm unfazed when a girl doesn't offer BB. She might look good on the outside, but be burning up on the inside. I'm ok with BBBJs to an extent, but BBFS is playing Russian roulette with your dick.

I think we can all tell the high risk girls. They the ones that just met you but letting you put your wee wee in there with no cover. Swallow your cum and call you her husband!

[YellowFever78]

"This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting unsubstantiated reports claiming that another person is afflicted with a Sexually Transmitted Disease, this limitation being necessary because a disturbing number of these reports are less than genuine. ".

"STD allegations are not permitted in the forum at any time EXCEPT when substantiated by links to internet-accessible public records. ".

With all do respect to Admin, "substantiated" links to publicly assessable health care records wouldn't exist since they'd be considered Public Health Information (PHI) and by definition (contrary to the name) would be not be "public. ".

That being said, I can appreciate the difficulty admin is faced with when it comes to protecting both the monger and the provider. However, information indicating that a provider may have a communicable illness, sexually or otherwise transmitted, shouldn't be stifled since our very hobby depends on safety. If in the event that some horrible but preventable illness got spread around, HPD might not be so inclined to turn a blind-eye to our deeds. Just a thought.

[Larry Hoover]

All they need is a link to an internet available public record, simple as that.

We didn't used to have this rule and a couple of you guys probably wonder why. Here's why;

Chick won't give me a discount, I post she has AIDS.

Won't do bareback anal, no problem I'll post that she has AIDS

Didn't like the way she sucked my dick, she has AIDS.

Get the picture? You don't understand? That's because you have AIDS.

I called this guy a loser because I don't think he's a doc, he's trying to use that in order to have a "source" that is unverifiable but that only he can check which he thought would allow him to repeatedly post that some chick has AIDS. His reason for no posting it is bullshit. A while ago I worked on a team that was putting together an application for use in offshoring medical transcribing, I know what hipaa is, I know what kind of confidentiality that docs are supposed to keep.

At the end of the day it works like this. It's Jackson's ball, Jackson's bat, Jackson's whole fucking yard. He says you can't do it so you can't do it, simple as that. You used to be able to do it, and if 99.999999999999999% of the reports like that weren't bullshit from ex boyfriends, pimps that lost jobs, or pissed off mongers you still could, they were, the information was worthless, so the boss said no more. Until he says you can, you can't.

A2

Going forward Admin, should we post high risk girls in the ROB thread? Is that the appropriate place for them? Or should we just PM? On another note, this is why I'm unfazed when a girl doesn't offer BB. She might look good on the outside, but be burning up on the inside. I'm ok with BBBJs to an extent, but BBFS is playing Russian roulette with your dick.

[Admin2]

Not sure he's a "looser" for trying to warn others. This is a hobby after all and we should be allowed to warn others. I'm not sure why simply warning others is so taboo around here. Maybe we should create a banned provider thread that simply states "see at your own risk". This could include reasons from ROBS to STD to crappy service. The Honolulu board in general is more petty than any other out there. To Cronus, I recommend you stick to the PM forum going forward.

All they need is a link to an internet available public record, simple as that.

We didn't used to have this rule and a couple of you guys probably wonder why. Here's why;

Chick won't give me a discount, I post she has AIDS.

Won't do bareback anal, no problem I'll post that she has AIDS

Didn't like the way she sucked my dick, she has AIDS.

Get the picture? You don't understand? That's because you have AIDS.

I called this guy a loser because I don't think he's a doc, he's trying to use that in order to have a "source" that is unverifiable but that only he can check which he thought would allow him to repeatedly post that some chick has AIDS. His reason for no posting it is bullshit. A while ago I worked on a team that was putting together an application for use in offshoring medical transcribing, I know what hipaa is, I know what kind of confidentiality that docs are supposed to keep.

At the end of the day it works like this. It's Jackson's ball, Jackson's bat, Jackson's whole fucking yard. He says you can't do it so you can't do it, simple as that. You used to be able to do it, and if 99.999999999999999% of the reports like that weren't bullshit from ex boyfriends, pimps that lost jobs, or pissed off mongers you still could, they were, the information was worthless, so the boss said no more. Until he says you can, you can't.

A2

[FutSniffA]

You have violated Hippa, That's number one and if you are an employee at Diamond Head Medical Center an / or if you are a medical professional with access to certain data bases you already know what you have done so knock it off already. These guys monger and take the chance just like all the rest of us when they take the plunge. If the person in question is high risk but from what I have read from your past posts you come right out and name the wahine. You deserve to be on moderation just as I deserved to have my old screen name blocked and banned. A little knowledge is a good or bad thing depending on the situation and use. I would strongly suggest you use your information and medical access prudently, because if you are a Doctor with a felony conviction it will be very difficult for you, especially on the insurance side where you would have to explain it. This is just my 2 cents but you will never win against administration so why even try? You are the looser and being on permanent moderation may suck but better than getting banned. Entirely.

Not sure he's a "looser" for trying to warn others. This is a hobby after all and we should be allowed to warn others. I'm not sure why simply warning others is so taboo around here. Maybe we should create a banned provider thread that simply states "see at your own risk". This could include reasons from ROBS to STD to crappy service. The Honolulu board in general is more petty than any other out there. To Cronus, I recommend you stick to the PM forum going forward.

[Jaritsuh]

Holy shit! I just realized I got another infraction for STD allegations because I simply said someone was "high risk", which could literally mean anything. Once again, there were no std allegations made in that post either. Maybe someone doesn't fully understand the meaning of an allegation?

Admin has threatened to put me on moderation for these two bullshit infractions, so I won't be making anymore posts in any thread of the Hawaii forum unless this is cleared up, which I doubt will happen. There are still quite a few providers I've either seen and haven't had a chance to review yet and have information about. I'll share that information via PM if I see that any of you are inquiring about either of the women I'm referring to.

You have violated Hippa, That's number one and if you are an employee at Diamond Head Medical Center an / or if you are a medical professional with access to certain data bases you already know what you have done so knock it off already. These guys monger and take the chance just like all the rest of us when they take the plunge. If the person in question is high risk but from what I have read from your past posts you come right out and name the wahine. You deserve to be on moderation just as I deserved to have my old screen name blocked and banned. A little knowledge is a good or bad thing depending on the situation and use. I would strongly suggest you use your information and medical access prudently, because if you are a Doctor with a felony conviction it will be very difficult for you, especially on the insurance side where you would have to explain it. This is just my 2 cents but you will never win against administration so why even try? You are the looser and being on permanent moderation may suck but better than getting banned. Entirely.

[Admin2]

Holy shit! I just realized I got another infraction for STD allegations because I simply said someone was "high risk", which could literally mean anything. Once again, there were no std allegations made in that post either. Maybe someone doesn't fully understand the meaning of an allegation?

Admin has threatened to put me on moderation for these two bullshit infractions, so I won't be making anymore posts in any thread of the Hawaii forum unless this is cleared up, which I doubt will happen. There are still quite a few providers I've either seen and haven't had a chance to review yet and have information about. I'll share that information via PM if I see that any of you are inquiring about either of the women I'm referring to.

You're kind of obsessed with posting about unclean chicks, I spoke to you privately about it, you cried, then went public so now it's my turn.

You're telling people that you are a physician and that you have seen her actual medical records and the only thing prohibiting you from posting them are because that would be a hipaa violation and you would lose your license to practice. BULL FUCKING SHIT. If (and that is a BIG fucking if) you were a physician and you accessed her medical data without cause, that is a felony. If you disclose her medical information IN ANY WAY, you have just violated hipaa, you don't have to actually post a facsimile of her record.

I think but admit I do not know for sure that you are soooooo fucking full of shit about being a doctor your fucking eyes are brown.

As far as the post with the picture you sure as fuck inferred that the chick had some kind of bug, it's nearly all you do.

What you are is some sad little man that doesn't know the difference between to and too who likes to make people believe he has access to information in order to make your stature bigger. On a pussy board. Like I said, sad.

A2

[Blake123]

Model: Sasha.

L: 10.

A: 10.

S: 10 plus.

Normally I would write a detailed report about my experiences with AMP girls. You can view my history of detailed reports. However in Sasha's case I will withhold from writing any details. Rationale: Sasha is PSE to the extreme. Sasha has excellent PRS! We had so much fun this past weekend that Sasha cancelled the guy that was after me. Sorry to the dude that had an appointment and got cancelled at the last minute. The Mama wasn't happy that we went into OT either. Sasha is my nomination for Best PSE 2015 USASG AMP Awards! No one can cum close to being at Sasha's level. Sasha will win the 2016 provider of the year, next year IMO.

Damage Control: standard baker's dough. Will definitely repeat!!

Not really a beef. Just playing it safe since all my postings are being moderated.

Just to say I feel sorry for the guy that got cancelled at the last minute. I don't think that was right. He may have been saving up his money and finally had a chance to see her with a valid appointment, shows up at Happiness and then finds out she is not available. That was uncool and rather selfish, IMHO. Just saying.