General Reports

[CookyJar]

Any Star / Emily pics?

Is that Kate? I love Kate. If that's her, tell her I said, "Hi. ".

CookyJar.

[DjScramble]

Dream she's back.

She's definitely hot.

[Member #4519]

Any Star / Emily pics?

[Member #4519]

Emily / Star. Look for backpage Jade. You will find StAr.

[IHeartSpinners]

Dream she's back.

Damn. She's cute.

[Member #4519]

Dream she's back.

[Member #4519]

Send me your email I'm her sugar daddy.

Wrong girl sorry got the name wrong.

[Member #4519]

I tried searching for threads on her but couldn't find more than 6 and none of them have any pics. Does any one have any pics or know where her pics are.

Thanks.

Send me your email I'm her sugar daddy.

[JCM2767]

What is the forums opinion on Girl or Girl action photos? Are they a, "Turn on," or a "Turn off?" Do they make a difference? What's YOUR opinion? Does a girl kissing, fondling, and getting it on with another girl turn you on or off?

As long as I'm getting mine, it doesn't bother me.

I have always thought that girl on girl action shots showed how willing a lady was to approach the freaky side of her nature. Freakiness may not be a desirable feature for some guys. Wholesome girls, wifey types and girls who wouldn't do that kind of stuff, maybe what some guys want.

What's YOUR opinion?

CookyJar.

Girl on girl photos work for me. Like the idea. This is definitely helpful for picking future candidates for possible threesome. Awesome work CJ!

[WhenWhen]

By now, you should have read a surfeit of positive feedback. Disregard the occasional negative one. Thanks for all you do. WW.

Rule #1: Do no harm.

In order to keep Rule #1, I often have to walk a very fine line between my obligations to the ladies I photograph and my obligations to my fellow mongers. The girls want to be featured at their best and the guys want to know what's out there.

I am not trying to mislead or deceive anyone. I am not trying to promote or get dates for anyone. I am just trying to have some fun doing what I enjoy. If I can help others while I am doing what I enjoy doing so be it. If others benefit, that is alright with me.

If posting Girl on Girl Action pictures means that some poor working girl might be rejected by a monger because he saw her pictured with another female; then I do not have to do Girl on Girl. I mean, it is not that important. I could always just show two girls posing together. They don't have to be licking and sucking on each other. I am not trying to hurt anybody or hurt their business.

I was a little concerned when I saw what I perceived to be a lack of interest in the female action shots.

CookyJar.

[Rito1]

If posting Girl on Girl Action pictures means that some poor working girl might be rejected by a monger because he saw her pictured with another female; then I do not have to do Girl on Girl. I mean, it is not that important. I could always just show two girls posing together. They don't have to be licking and sucking on each other. I am not trying to hurt anybody or hurt their business.

I was a little concerned when I saw what I perceived to be a lack of interest in the female action shots.

CookyJar.

I am one of your big fans from the Boston board. I love those those pics. I wish we had anything close to that here. (You guys are so lucky) I would be happy to pick both of they up just to watch them. Don't get me wrong I would be happy do jump in also.

[JohnnyTheWad]

What is the forums opinion on Girl or Girl action photos? Are they a, "Turn on," or a "Turn off?" Do they make a difference? What's YOUR opinion? Does a girl kissing, fondling, and getting it on with another girl turn you on or off?

As long as I'm getting mine, it doesn't bother me.

I have always thought that girl on girl action shots showed how willing a lady was to approach the freaky side of her nature. Freakiness may not be a desirable feature for some guys. Wholesome girls, wifey types and girls who wouldn't do that kind of stuff, maybe what some guys want.

What's YOUR opinion?

CookyJar.

DEFINITELY a turn on! Keep'em cum'n bro. I only have one question: which one is Stacy and which one is Deena? Not that it matters, just curious LOL.

[CookyJar]

Rule #1: Do no harm.

In order to keep Rule #1, I often have to walk a very fine line between my obligations to the ladies I photograph and my obligations to my fellow mongers. The girls want to be featured at their best and the guys want to know what's out there.

Love it. Cookie you can do no wrong. One picture or one thousand I'm happy. Girls solo, double or group-able I'm happy. Daily posts from you I'm happy. Only when you are absent or others, with the ability to choose not to look, criticize you am I unhappy. It would only make me happier to meet you some day to encourage and support you. Every town on USASG needs a Cookie.

I am not trying to mislead or deceive anyone. I am not trying to promote or get dates for anyone. I am just trying to have some fun doing what I enjoy. If I can help others while I am doing what I enjoy doing so be it. If others benefit, that is alright with me.

If posting Girl on Girl Action pictures means that some poor working girl might be rejected by a monger because he saw her pictured with another female; then I do not have to do Girl on Girl. I mean, it is not that important. I could always just show two girls posing together. They don't have to be licking and sucking on each other. I am not trying to hurt anybody or hurt their business.

I was a little concerned when I saw what I perceived to be a lack of interest in the female action shots.

CookyJar.

[CookyJar]

This may not be well received. I am a big fan of CJ's work but after dating a recent model of his I will have to say his PhotoShop skills are too good and hide the blemishes too well. Her pussy really was one of the tightest I ever put my dick in, but as she hopped into the car I was thinking how do I get out of this as I looked her over. I didn't want to be rude so I completed the act. I will not out her here in public forum.

I ain't mad at cha.

I am sorry if my pictures were the cause of your disappointment. Having said that, I am certain that you are aware that none of us are flawless? The women we oogle the most, movie stars, singers, models and all of the popular media celebrities, wear make-up put on by make-up artist and then have their likeness enhanced before we see them. Perhaps you caught this particular girl without her make-up.

You have made a good point and brought up a valid issue. No one should make a selection solely based on my interpretation of a girls look. You always have the right to says, "Oops, I thought you were someone else." I have done that many times. Let's call it, "Catch and Release."

You have every right to make a complete review of the girl you dated, with a complete description that includes name and quality of services provided. There is no harm in mentioning a girl's blemishes, in a tasteful manner there is never a need to be vulgar.

And, if you want to blow you top off at me for making you drive a huge distance for what turned out to be a lackluster event, you can do that too. I can take it.

CookyJar.

[ILikePussy]

This may not be well received. I am a big fan of CJ's work but after dating a recent model of his I will have to say his PhotoShop skills are too good and hide the blemishes too well. Her pussy really was one of the tightest I ever put my dick in, but as she hopped into the car I was thinking how do I get out of this as I looked her over. I didn't want to be rude so I completed the act. I will not out her here in public forum.