Massage Parlor Reports

**NHughty** · 02-25-13 22:09

From the Reading local news:

On Feb. 21, Reading Police Detectives in conjunction with North Eastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council (NEMLEC) Detectives conducted an investigation of alleged prostitution at two separate locations in Reading. They were Lotus Blossom Bodyworks located at 274 Main St. And Asian Bodyworks located at 150 Main St.

An undercover police officer was sent into both businesses posing as a customer. Arrested from the scene at Asian Bodyworks XXXXXXXXXXXXX 47, of Worcester. Arrested from the scene of Lotus Blossom Bodyworks was XXXXXXXX 36, of Quincy. Both were charged with sexual conduct for a fee. Both will be arraigned in Woburn District Court on Feb. 22.

**Bigben99** · 02-25-13 22:06

Any intelligence on this place? Send me a PM. Will trade info on any metrowest locations. Looking to branch out.

**Herow** · 02-25-13 21:40

Anyone hit up the new provider posting nuru bodyslides in Brighton? Not cheap but, for that, I wouldn't expect it to be. Sounded intelligent enough on the phone. Probably taking the plunge one way or another.

**Member #4868** · 02-25-13 20:50

Looking for some fresh info on Beijing, La Dolce, both Lex places and 195. Yes, I am asking alot! LOL. PM is preferred

**JimmyMcC** · 02-25-13 17:38

The Russian girl seems very popular. I couldn't get an appointment yesterday. She was booked all day. Can anyone here describe her? She can't be the one in the ad!

**Beepers** · 02-25-13 16:48

Went to Angel's.

This time I wasn't happy at all. Nothing wrong just me. I had Taco Bell and my stomach was producing Mozart and Beethoven musical. By the time Lisa finish I quickly tip her and ran to Papa Gino for my other release. Good massage, tease, ball play and ending. 60+40. Bad stomach.

**Top Floor** · 02-25-13 14:57

I prefer therapists not answer the phone when I'm getting a massage. That's why I don't see her anymore.

Originally Posted by Santa66 [View Original Post]

It's my understanding that Hong prefers her clients to refrain from reviewing her. I respect that and encourage others to do the same.

**Spectator** · 02-25-13 14:31

Originally Posted by Santa66 [View Original Post]

It's my understanding that Hong prefers her clients to refrain from reviewing her. I respect that and encourage others to do the same.

I have heard that too.

**Stevie Ray6977** · 02-25-13 14:18

Thanks for the feedback gents.

**Member #5013** · 02-25-13 14:01

Originally Posted by Stevie Ray6977 [View Original Post]

Any recent reviews for Hong's in Wilmington?

Any feedback is appreciated.

Thanks,

SR

She's an older Asian lady that was something back in the day. Now average in my opinion. She's business like and savy. A phone answerer while you're on the table. CBJ and FS are on the table for the right price. If she likes you she will invite you to her apartment for an appointment.

She's been well reviewed here on numerous occasions. I don't find her worth the drive or $. But I believe I'm in the minority.

BB

**Santa66** · 02-25-13 13:45

Originally Posted by Stevie Ray6977 [View Original Post]

Any recent reviews for Hong's in Wilmington?

Any feedback is appreciated.

Thanks,

SR

It's my understanding that Hong prefers her clients to refrain from reviewing her. I respect that and encourage others to do the same.

**Stevie Ray6977** · 02-25-13 13:08

Any recent reviews for Hong's in Wilmington?

Any feedback is appreciated.

Thanks,

SR

**Joseph Alley** · 02-25-13 07:22

I think I might have erred in asking the question in an open forum but the answer given quite satisfies me and I hope all others. In taking a second look at the rule It is quite clear what is intended.

Originally Posted by Skatar018 [View Original Post]

Perhaps you should've have pmed the Admin to ask this question.

When it's your site, or when you start your own site, you get to say what content is & isn't allowed regardless of the reasons why.

Speaking for myself I like this rule / guideline & feel it's fits perfectly with the purpose of the site: The purpose of this Forum is to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women.

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/fa...l_questions_01

**Smoke Screen** · 02-25-13 06:32

Originally Posted by Skatar018 [View Original Post]

Perhaps you should've have pmed the Admin to ask this question.

When it's your site, or when you start your own site, you get to say what content is & isn't allowed regardless of the reasons why.

Speaking for myself I like this rule / guideline & feel it's fits perfectly with the purpose of the site: The purpose of this Forum is to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women.

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/fa...l_questions_01

The only problem I have with this rule is not knowing when a male provider is advertising himself as a female. I think we should be able to tell the truth in a case like that. I can only imagine what I would do if I learned I was tricked into thinking I was with someone other than a female, it wouldn't be a pretty sight. Make up & manmade tits can fool even the best of us. But as you say, it's his site, not mine.

**Skatar018** · 02-24-13 21:46

Perhaps you should've have pmed the Admin to ask this question.

When it's your site, or when you start your own site, you get to say what content is & isn't allowed regardless of the reasons why.

Speaking for myself I like this rule/guideline & feel it's fits perfectly with the purpose of the site: The purpose of this Forum is to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women.

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/fa...l_questions_01

Originally Posted by Joseph Alley [View Original Post]

You must forgive me but I do not know and suspect several others do not know why it is inappropriate or forbidden to make reference to Homosexuals / Trandvestites / Trandsexuals / Shemales. I know the guidelines says so but it would be helpful to understand why since this is fast becoming a lifestyle and in some places a third Gender.