Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 20,026 to 20,040 of 24899
-
10-20-11 18:22 #4874Senior Member

Posts: 428Finally
Finally an actual report that belongs in this section instead of bickering. Thanks BS.
Originally Posted by Bob Stuff
[View Original Post]
-
10-19-11 12:20 #4873Senior Member

Posts: 81Met with Melissa yesterday
I met Melissa yesterday. Enjoyable time, great bargain. Seniors can PM for details.
BS
-
10-18-11 21:07 #4872Senior Member

Posts: 102Somehow I feel indirectly responsible for the conflict between Chelli and B Beal. I think its time for us to remember the goal of our hobby, to make love not war, right? Peace guys, and happy hobbying.
Originally Posted by Chelli4me
[View Original Post]
-
10-18-11 17:47 #4871Senior Member

Posts: 84Got a number?
[ Sugar coat it any way you want but even when you put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig.[/QUOTE]Been looking for a pig with lipstick.
-
10-18-11 13:39 #4870Senior Member

Posts: 2149Hmmmm
I don't have a chip on my shoulder. It's called reality. Escort, Craigslist / Backpage / Website provider, AMP or SW it's all the same providers are prostitutes plain and simple. And those that use them are johns / mongers etc. Sugar coat it any way you want, it doesn't change reality. It's all criminal / illegal.
Originally Posted by B Beall
[View Original Post]
I have never denigrated the ladies here. I have stated unfavorable opinions several times but that's it. I have never tried to make "an appreciable dent" in any provoder's services, just stated my opinion on paying hundreds of dollars for sex.
I don't look for, or require, respect from providers. I am self confident enough and secure enough with who I am that I don't expect / need respect from a prostitute. And when married mongers cheat on their wives with a provider, where's the respect for her in that? And if so much respect exists is this game why don't mongers tell their wives, moms, daughters or preists what they're out doing? And why don't providers tell their parents, children or priests what they do? If this is such a respectable game, why is it illegal and ostracized by society? Sugar coat it any way you want but even when you put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig.
-
10-18-11 12:27 #4869Senior Member

Posts: 260Chelli, I even respect your right to carry that chip around on your shoulder all the time, but it doesn't make you right. If I see someone once every two months, and spend four bills, it's the same as you spending fifty a week. I prefer my way, and don't interfere with yours.
Originally Posted by Chelli4me
[View Original Post]
Snobbery's the practice of evaluating everything by price, or by reputation. That's objectionable even where price might have some connection to value, but it's ridiculous in the present circumstances where everything's subjective. I've never said a $$ date is better than a $ date (and I've sure never posted that to the streetwalker board just to air out my opinion). I've never said it's the only way to be. Absurd notion. I defend my idea, and the reputation of several wonderful women who charge what the traffic allows, and earn every penny, in my estimation, when people come here to denigrate them.
And there's such a thing as reverse snobbery, too; that's insisting that no bottle of wine could possibly be worth more than $4. 95, and no woman's time worth $, something you've said here before, without it making an appreciable dent in the number of people who disagree or the average cost of services.
As for respect, well, I've got plenty for several providers, as do many other hobbyists, and I've gotten a lot in return. No secret that you don't have any, no surprise you don't get any, but don't presume to tell the rest of us how to play a game you have no interest in.
-
10-18-11 11:23 #4868Senior Member

Posts: 2149Well
I think you should take your own advice. You sound like an elist arrogant slob. You are obviously one of those that thinks their's is the only opinion that counts. I don't agree with luchi either but, unlike you, I believe in freedom of speech and the right to voice one's own opinions. I believe that's written down somewhere. Also, like every other service or business in the world, there are different financial levels. One shops where they can afford to. For anyone to put down those less well off than themselves is snobbish and pig headed. And don't get me started on the laughable idea of respect in this hobby. Now, take your own advice and head to the nearest railyard and get on the next one way out of town freight train.
Originally Posted by B Beall
[View Original Post]
-
10-18-11 09:54 #4867Senior Member

Posts: 260It could-and should have-been confined to any of the eight or nine Indianapolis boards dedicated to cut-rate entertainment in the first place.
Originally Posted by Eros69
[View Original Post]
In brighter times this board was more-or-less dedicated to the discussion of the ladies who advertised on a now-defunct site, a couple other spots, and locals or travelers of similar, high-quality service. There's ample opportunity for the aficionado of the fifty-buck handjob or the fleabag motel half-hour to discuss the finer points of saving ten dollars with others who share his focus. Elsewhere.
Here it's insulting. It insults the intelligence and the experience of any number of hobbyists who know and respect the services these wonderful women provide, and it especially insults-I think intentionally-the women who have the charm and the talent to provide those services, the the willingness to assume all the risks, and the grace to put up with slobs like us. Anyone who can't appreciate and respect that should go elsewhere. Preferably by rail.
-
10-17-11 13:26 #4866Senior Member

Posts: 56Luchi is on the wrong team.
Dear God, we're still beating this drum? Let it go, fellas! Most of this conversation could've been confined to PM's. Stop boring the rest of us with this mind-numbing nonsense and get back to the topic of discussion. ESCORT REPORTING
-
10-16-11 15:00 #4865Senior Member

Posts: 102Good Question Simple Answer
Thank you for at least having the courtesy of asking a good question. The answer is simple. I believe she could charge more if she upgraded her service by offering a little more time, dressing up, as well as taking care of herself in certain ways. In such case I do think she could get at least $80. I've seen many women I personally would not see offer themselves for such a price that are past the potential Melissa has. But you are right, for where she is at now $30 is a great deal that helps keeps her business full. If she chooses to keep this level of service based in relation to present condition, that's fine with me. I just thought if I were in her position and chose escorting as a career my advice is what I would have taken for myself.
Originally Posted by Nells M All
[View Original Post]
-
10-16-11 07:35 #4864Senior Member

Posts: 206Luchi is on the wrong team.
I thought our team was supposed to try to help each other get it as cheap as possible. Even free shouldn't we be trying to convince her to do it for $20. If she does $30. Not telling her to do less for more money WTH. WTF. Why would luchi try to get her to charge us more for what many women of her calabre do for free or $20. I also seen her. And even though she is nice and clean. She will never be a escort. I thought the price was fair and so did she. Actully I wasnt impressed enough to repeat for $30.
Originally Posted by Luchi
[View Original Post]
-
10-15-11 11:37 #4863Senior Member

Posts: 260The Detroit News saw this as an important part of the story:
Originally Posted by Ilapp
[View Original Post]
So at least we know they were attracting real hobbyists.A client named "Harmonic" gave Escort Vault a poor review three years ago.
"You will find some very overpriced escorts," Harmonic wrote in an Internet review."Some escorts there have very good service and (are) nice looking but most are over priced, fat, ugly, or just give bad service or have a bad attitude."
Do I have to say it again? Some state agency in the hands of the anti-sex brigade gets its nose in the door via "child prostitution": a seventeen-year-old whose parents complained about scorps because their daughter was getting high and turning tricks. And that's because of scorps? The first people to've gone to prison should have been the parents.
Then the locals find that someone somewhere has crossed a state line, and in come the Feds to do what they always do: charge a small-time operator with everything they can think up, because he won't have the resources to fight the G forever and will have to plead out. Success! Helping, once again, to make the world safe for the bigger, organized, real criminals who have the resources to fight. They know this is how it works. Not that I'm suggesting it's one big conspiracy. It's careerism. People at Justice know that sooner or later, or as likely as not, the DOJ, or the FBI, will be run by some Patrick Henry or Liberty University grad whose own stunted sexuality (John Edgar in a housedress, anyone?) will be mightily impressed by cleaning up another global child sex-slave ring.
And who pays for all this? You and me.
-
10-15-11 10:33 #4862Senior Member

Posts: 73Luchi
Who the hell do you think you are? You come across as a pompous, self centered ass! I thought your report was brutal, overly descriptive, full of uneducated opinions and about 8 paragraphs too long for a $30 blowjob. Luchi, will you be my friend? Can't wait til your next report.
Originally Posted by Luchi
[View Original Post]
-
10-15-11 09:31 #4861Senior Member

Posts: 1822FYI- in particular for some good friends until we can chat
http://www.detnews.com/article/20111...ook-up-clients
More troubling news.
On a lighter note; Misogyny for $50, really? Now that's funny though, back to you Alex! I prefer to hit the daily double myself.
-
10-15-11 08:31 #4860Senior Member

Posts: 84Good word skills
But shut the hell up please, its over, its done, no need to comment anymore.
Originally Posted by Luchi
[View Original Post]











Reply With Quote




