CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

**CookyJar** · 09-27-11 03:30

Originally Posted by Hummer Bird [View Original Post]

...stay away from the freaky looking WSW's.

Humer Bird, I’m sorry but It’s not likely that I will be able to follow you directions/suggestions to stay away from the freaky looking WSW’s. I am an “Equal Opportunity Monger,” and “Freaky,” is not a bad word in my book.

CookyJar

**CookyJar** · 09-26-11 08:21

Originally Posted by Giani [View Original Post]

Jackson will tell us to take this discussion to the appropriate Safe Sex board, but evidence is that transmission by consensual (arroused and lubricated females) is relatively difficult. But rough, unlubricated, or FS with concomitant sores is high risk, but the worst is anal because of the tearing of the wall of the rectum which allows penetration of the virus through an otherwise relatively resistant mucous membrane.

Jackson is usually pretty lenient with what is posted in this thread. I don’t think he minds when we go off topic as long as there is no flaming, no bashing and no harm being done.
Personally, I don’t mind as long as the information is pertinent, factual and useful. I believe good information (such as yours) should be posted anywhere where it can be viewed by a receptive audience. Good health practice/information is too important to be relegated to a thread few people read.

CookyJar

**Fbtom** · 09-25-11 23:57

Originally Posted by Fkdave [View Original Post]

I am trying to suggest isn't that difficult. You can have a good time on the avenue without abusing the girls. You don't have to mistreat them to enjoy them. That's the point I am trying to make.

Believe that by taking it easy on the girls we make it better on ourselves, in the long run. Of cause there are those who disagree and believe that it's fun treating these women like garbage. However, if we can convince one new monger to ease up just a little, it's worth the effort.

CookyJar

Treating all with respect is the way to go. I don't no any other way of behaving.[/QUOTE]I totally agree with these guys with this post! Got to have respect for them, they are still human beings!

As for treating them nicely, something as simple as a cold soda or water is accepted with gratitude. I often have cigs on hand too. I even offer to those who I just meet, but decide not to date.

Be civil too.

About a year ago, a newbie girl admitted to me that she couldn't go through with the date after we got started. No biggie, let her go and wished her well with her only wanting enough to buy a fast food meal. She was like a fawn caught in a car's headlights. She wanted to go home. I even offered to take her there, but she took the train instead. Never saw her again on the streets.

Another wanted to "try out" the hobby, I told her that it would be best to get out now before getting started. She insisted to continue, but was very uncomfortable with it. So we stopped. She decided that she'd rather go back to being a stripper instead. Never saw her again on the streets.

Then there was a stripper that I convinced to try take out. She was pissed off at her ex-bf and said yes. After a few dates with me an another friend of hers, she decided to make up with bf and continue to being a stripper only. Good for her as she was getting way too involved with drugs during the short time that I was involved with her. She still uses, but at a mush lower rate than before. Her bf kind of monitors her addiction, somehow keeping her within reason as she will over do it on her own. Perhaps just sharing her stuff limits it naturally.

Just recalled a girl whose stomach kept growling. So I asked,"When was the last time you ate anything?" Oddly, she couldn't remember specifically, but said to be quite hungry. So we stopped, got some grub. Wasn't expected, but got some extended time with her as a reward for caring. She resumed the date as though we never started at all.

A lot of these woman that I have met insisted on staying UTR, so please don't ask for info on them. It is amazing at times the quantity, and quality if you're willing to be patient and considerate.

**Kmakth** · 09-25-11 21:49

Well, that's not actually my post. I agree with you. To claim men can't / don't get HIV from unprotected sex is ignorance of the highest level.

**Pdiddy77** · 09-25-11 21:29

Giani you had to bring up the topic what what in the butt butt?

**Giani** · 09-25-11 20:50

Jackson will tell us to take this discussion to the appropriate Safe Sex board, but evidence is that transmission by consensual (arroused and lubricated females) is relatively difficult. But rough, unlubricated, or FS with concomitant sores is high risk, but the worst is anal because of the tearing of the wall of the rectum which allows penetration of the virus through an otherwise relatively resistant mucous membrane.

[QUOTE=Jaydating; 1284538]

Originally Posted by Kmakth [View Original Post]

Heterosexual men, or women? Women can get HIV from sex far easier than men can; even so, where are all these straight women who got HIV from straight sex. Or is that statistic keyed to heterosexual men who shared needles and got HIV that way? Or bi men who were lying about being heterosexual? The point is, the 30% statistic is effectively bogus and extremely misleading if it's meant to imply that straight men are getting HIV from straight sex. As I wrote in the previous post, we've been hearing that "HIV is on the rise in the straight community" for the last 20 years. Sorry, but if that's really the case, where the F are all these straight men who got HIV from straight sex? There simply aren't any, in any numbers to compare with men who are struck by lightening. Jesus H, in the last 20 years there hasn't even been a single straight male porn star who has ever gotten HIV from straight sex! In the last 20 years, there have been millions and millions of sexual encounters, yet, who can anyone name besides Magic Johnson who allegedly got HIV from straight sex? It's this simple: the claim that HIV is a danger to straight men who participate in straight sex is just an urban myth, and the reason why "we don't hear about HIV anymore" is because the gay propoganda lobby's attempt to scare everyone into believing that straight sex can result in HIV has run out of gas.

**CookyJar** · 09-25-11 20:09

Originally Posted by Pdiddy77 [View Original Post]

WHOA, I guess cookyjar has gotten over his "I know this girl" "they're suffering! I care! I care! I care!" "I care so much" phase.

Awesome

Not to worry Pdiddy77. My memory is in tack. I still know her. I still care. I still post pictures (never stopped). Nothing has changed.

CookyJar

**Pdiddy77** · 09-25-11 17:22

WHOA, I guess cookyjar has gotten over his "I know this girl" "they're suffering! I care! I care! I care!" "I care so much" phase.

Awesome

**Member #4236** · 09-25-11 17:00

[QUOTE=Kmakth; 1284002]

Originally Posted by Jaydating [View Original Post]

A full 30% of HIV diagnosis' in 2009 were heterosexuals. By any measure, it's a long way from your 99. 9% of HIV carriers get it from homosexual acts or IV drug use.

Heterosexual men, or women? Women can get HIV from sex far easier than men can; even so, where are all these straight women who got HIV from straight sex. Or is that statistic keyed to heterosexual men who shared needles and got HIV that way? Or bi men who were lying about being heterosexual? The point is, the 30% statistic is effectively bogus and extremely misleading if it's meant to imply that straight men are getting HIV from straight sex. As I wrote in the previous post, we've been hearing that "HIV is on the rise in the straight community" for the last 20 years. Sorry, but if that's really the case, where the F are all these straight men who got HIV from straight sex? There simply aren't any, in any numbers to compare with men who are struck by lightening. Jesus H, in the last 20 years there hasn't even been a single straight male porn star who has ever gotten HIV from straight sex! In the last 20 years, there have been millions and millions of sexual encounters, yet, who can anyone name besides Magic Johnson who allegedly got HIV from straight sex? It's this simple: the claim that HIV is a danger to straight men who participate in straight sex is just an urban myth, and the reason why "we don't hear about HIV anymore" is because the gay propoganda lobby's attempt to scare everyone into believing that straight sex can result in HIV has run out of gas.

**Giani** · 09-25-11 11:19

Great set. These ARE two lovelies! Thanks from the rest of us, enviously drooling and wishing we were there.

**CookyJar** · 09-25-11 10:01

I had it in my mine to match Kensington Ave with Old York Road. I was thinking of a kind of “East meets West,” or “Country meets City,” kind of a thing.
The ”Girl on Girl,” stuff was a bust. Neither girl could relax enough to get into it. Donna smiled and tried to warm up to it, but Suzy was her old stand-offish self. However, when it came to pleasing me; they both gave it their all. Suzy even upped her BBBJ game as she tried to match Donna’s efforts. The highlight of the date was Suzy’s request to do the FS riding mesh. She slipped on top of me and tried to fuck me to death. Poor Donna never had a chance. Donna groped with her hands and manipulated what she could but Suzy wasn’t given up the dick. Suzy knew that Donna had out shown her during the BJ phase and wanted to prove herself during the FS phase. Thank God for the little blue pill.
Out of loyalty, Suzy will always be on my ATF list. However, it is time for me to move on. Given the choice, I’d take the younger girl, Donna. Donna is a better all-a-round date.

CookyJar

**CookyJar** · 09-25-11 09:20

Originally Posted by Fun Jersey [View Original Post]

…I've dated her several times. She is a sweetheart and does a great job with no drama. Her name is Dontoma.
…Odd name that I'm sure has caused her much confusion through the years.
…Treat her well!

And ya’ll remember this Brook Shields look-a-like (Click Here). It’s Donna, one of my newer ATFs.
I have trouble remembering her name – especially when she has me aroused and excited. Donna is one of those pretty girls who knows how important it is to provide good service.

CookyJar

**CookyJar** · 09-25-11 08:43

Originally Posted by Brucegeoff [View Original Post]

I joined in 2007 after I saw a picture of Suzy you posted. In 4 years she aged 40 years. Drug and street life aged a pretty girl. Hope she will find life not dependent on drug.

Ya’ll remember this girl; don’t you? That’s one of my long time, ATFs,-Suzy. Some of you may have counted her out after her last photo session, (Click Here). Don’t! Suzy still has a lot of body to offer.

CookyJar

**CookyJar** · 09-24-11 23:33

Originally Posted by Jaydating [View Original Post]

...I think you're half right bout wrapping the rascal, though CBJ's are such a sensual abomination I think it's worth the risk of infection to get a bbbj, and covering is no bar to getting genital herpes.

We are all adults. Do your own research. Come to your own conclusions. Make your own decisions. Personally, I plan to use condoms when having sexual intercourse. I will go bare back for oral sex. That’s my choice. Each of us most analyze the information as we perceive it. We live and die by the decisions that we make; that’s a fact.

CookyJar

**Kmakth** · 09-24-11 18:31

[QUOTE=Jaydating; 1283947]

Originally Posted by CookyJar [View Original Post]

Before moving on.

I can't tell if you're hinting at a conspiracy or what, but it's plain to me why HIV / AIDS is rarely mentioned. The much touted "aids epidemic" has always been confined to needle users and anal sex receivers, and so the general straight population was never at risk. The much ballyhooed "coming any day now straight-sex aids epidemic" of the 90s was a hoax, trumped up by Gay activists and propogandists. Does anyone else remember all those ridiculous TV ads 20 years ago, where high school Johnny calls Mary on the phone and tells her he's given her HIV? Even back then I knew this was a crock, and just a desperate attempt to get the public scared so that they'd support finding a cure for AIDS. Ditto for all those other bogus reports that HIV is increasing in the "straight" population. Shame on those gay propogandists for lying. Now it's all those years later, and where are all these straight, non IV drug users who have HIV? The answer is clear: there ain't any. We were lied to. Again, what was true at the beginning of the AIDS epidemic is true now: sharing needles and taking a dck up one's azz puts one at risk of getting HIV. 99. 9% of the time, that is how any guy gets HIV.

I think you're half right about wrapping the rascal, though CBJ's are such a sensual abomination I think it's worth the risk of infection to get a BBBJ, and covering is no bar to getting genital herpes.

A full 30% of HIV diagnosis' in 2009 were heterosexuals. By any measure, it's a long way from your 99. 9% of HIV carriers get it from homosexual acts or IV drug use.