Massage Parlor Reports

[Rtr111]

For me I like uncomplicated sexual experiences most men do. We all know that regular "free" sex turns in an expectation of a committed relationship. This is complicated no matter your marital status or age. There is one fundamental truth.

We don't pay them to cum we pay them to go.

MTs or apartment girls or girls on the street do not expect a relationship.

[Alterxxx]

I was drawn to this ad due to it's close proximity to my place and due to the fact that I heard one of the chicks that use to work at Claudia's opened up an apt in the area and I thought I might run into her here. Anyways. The place is on California right next to the school. AVOID this place unless you like ugly, chubby, fresh off the boat looking Mexican chicks (barrel shaped bodies with flat ass, chicken legs, frizzy hair that don't know how to put on makeup) that try to upsell like crazy. Massage was even worse than her looks, and I actually got the better looking of the 2 that were there. HJ technique was totally lacking and I told her to stop as it just was not going to happen.

http://chicago.backpage.com/BodyRubs...-65-23/7783142

[F Blaster]

What I reject is the mentality that I see expressed in some of these postings that goes: "I can't believe those unreasonable people." when referring to people who either express opposition to the "trade", attempt to shut down MPs, street walking and so forth. As though they can't understand how "those unreasonable people" could have a different view from their own. For my own part, I can understand why people would be opposed to this kind of stuff; so I don't necessarily consider such people to be unreasonable.

Maybe it's fine with you to have MP and street walking activity near where you live, but I assure you that to many people, your perspective would be considered to be rather "unique". For my own part, unlike you, I would *not* want this kind of trade operating near where I live. In fact, I have always tended to have a preference for places farther away from where I live. So I can understand why a place like Downers Grove would want to shut down MPs that operate on Ogden Avenue; to people who don't share your viewpoint, these MP establishments put the community in an unfavorable light.

I'm not moralizing on mongering; I'm criticizing people who act like they can't understand why some people don't care for mongering.

OK, Professor, get off your high horse.

Regarding the MP, it's been there in some incarnation for at least a decade. If it were causing a disturbance or bringing an unwanted element to the neighborhood, it would have been shut down years ago. There's no gaudy signage and the windows are all covered so you can't see inside. It's just another storefront business. I bet if you asked most residents nearby what was in that spot, most couldn't even tell you.

I'm sure most residents in the neighborhood would be up in arms if they knew SW activity was occuring near them. I understand that. If the SW were dressing outlandishly and drawing attention to themselves, I'd want it stopped as well. As I said before, business is done very discreetly. Most people have no clue as to what's going on. It's all a matter of giving and getting the look. If it's done right, the pickup can be made without anyone noticing.

You'd be surprised where SW activity occurs in the city. I've gotten the look in areas where I never imagined making a pickup. If mongering happens and no one notices, does it affect the neighborhood?

[Gilibee]

It is illegal for two reasons: (1) when you do the math, it is cheaper than marriage (if you count the number of times you have married sex). Rational men would not marry if they could buy sex daily at market prices. Given the choice of paid sex on demand, or marriage, paid sex wins; (2) Absent the scarcity created by making prostitution illegal (and by marriage) , in a pay for sex world, women over 30 would have to give it away to find sex. Men would line up to pay for sex with 20 year olds.

But lets look at the facts guys. When you get 40 or 50 you don't want sex like when you were 25. You have more cash. You really would save up for a great night with a 20 something.

I'd rather have fun twice a week with a 20 something than 5 times a week with a woman my own age.

ROTL! This is pretty funny. But some pretty true observations. I mean, when a woman is middle aged, you're not going to get off-the-scale aroused just from looking at her.

When it comes to the economics of "paid for" sex versus "marriage" sex (although nothing is free, but the medium of exchange can vary) , one way to look at it is that with "paid for" sex you encounter relatively low fixed cost (for the first sex act) but relatively high marginal cost. With "marriage" sex you pay a relatively high cost for the first sex act (high fixed cost) but a decreasing cost trend for subsequent sex acts (low marginal cost). LOL. Of course, by the time the woman hits middle age, her ability to extract any kind of "rent", fixed or marginal, decreases considerably.

[Gilibee]

I live right by a massage parlor and it doesn't bother me one bit. I doubt if anyone else even notices; they're probably pleased that it isn't ANOTHER empty storefront. There's no gaudy signage or traffic congestion; it's doesn't disrupt the neighborhood at all.

There are some SW who work nearby as well. They are low key for the most part. It's not a known stroll, so there aren't a lot of mongers running around. (Traffic is so bad anyway, I don't think anyone could tell the difference.) As long as they don't walk around in minis and high heels and walk around in traffic and draw attention to themselves, it's not that big of a deal. I admit, it kind of bothered me at first, but now I don't even think about it.

One request. Please stop posting down to us like some condescending schoolteacher and let's all get back to meaningful reporting.

What I reject is the mentality that I see expressed in some of these postings that goes: "I can't believe those unreasonable people." when referring to people who either express opposition to the "trade", attempt to shut down MPs, street walking and so forth. As though they can't understand how "those unreasonable people" could have a different view from their own. For my own part, I can understand why people would be opposed to this kind of stuff; so I don't necessarily consider such people to be unreasonable.

Maybe it's fine with you to have MP and street walking activity near where you live, but I assure you that to many people, your perspective would be considered to be rather "unique". For my own part, unlike you, I would *not* want this kind of trade operating near where I live. In fact, I have always tended to have a preference for places farther away from where I live. So I can understand why a place like Downers Grove would want to shut down MPs that operate on Ogden Avenue; to people who don't share your viewpoint, these MP establishments put the community in an unfavorable light.

I'm not moralizing on mongering; I'm criticizing people who act like they can't understand why some people don't care for mongering.

[DaFlyestCubano]

I've been to many providers and although many are are pretty good I'm glad this one has dropped there prices a bit. I asked Mia if they dropped there prices because they've been slow and she responded by saying that they dropped their prices because many customers had thought that too many providers were over priced. This location and the other on Christiana are my 2 favorite spots yet their prices have got cheaper while others keep going up. They are by appointment only but atleast you can choose your provider. If anyone needs info I'd be willing on helping in exchange for info on another location or future lead.

http://chicago.backpage.com/BodyRubs...032-21/6927782

Or.

http://chicago.backpage.com/BodyRubs/and9608-22/7149447

[Gus Hogan]

For the life of me, I cannot understand why there is no tolerance by the thought police who accept all these other sex concepts, but hound and demonize hetero mongers like they were moral terrorists.

Your thoughts, gentlemen?

It is illegal for two reasons: (1) when you do the math, it is cheaper than marriage (if you count the number of times you have married sex). Rational men would not marry if they could buy sex daily at market prices. Given the choice of paid sex on demand, or marriage, paid sex wins; (2) Absent the scarcity created by making prostitution illegal (and by marriage) , in a pay for sex world, women over 30 would have to give it away to find sex. Men would line up to pay for sex with 20 year olds.

But lets look at the facts guys. When you get 40 or 50 you don't want sex like when you were 25. You have more cash. You really would save up for a great night with a 20 something.

I'd rather have fun twice a week with a 20 something than 5 times a week with a woman my own age.

[Northside Jim]

It took the likes of Harvey Milk and the Stonewall Riots to shift the tide for the Gays. Seems that all we have is "The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet" in the Monger corner.

Most mongers want to remain in secret. There is no political will to change things because there are no voices calling for change. I'm not about to step out from behind my screen name and I bet most of the people on this board aren't either.

[Grateful One]

Another area is if your browse C-list, how many m4m posts are there with depictions and open proposals where if a W4M was to, it is flagged and removed.

Perhaps the key to this is NOT mentioning a donation at all.

Stay safe and prosper.

In my time on this earth, about three score years, the political climate has changed regarding most sexual mores. Now divorce is commonplace and no longer a stigma. Now living together without a marriage certificate is no longer "living in sin." The biggest change in sexual ethics is that homosexuality is now in your face with "gay pride" parades and openly accepted gay bars, etc.

In other words, there has been a tidal wave of change in many areas of sexual conduct. EXCEPT for heterosexual activity regarding escorts and especially massage parlors.

For the life of me, I cannot understand why there is no tolerance by the thought police who accept all these other sex concepts, but hound and demonize hetero mongers like they were moral terrorists.

Your thoughts, gentlemen?

[Musei]

For the life of me, I cannot understand why there is no tolerance by the thought police who accept all these other sex concepts, but hound and demonize hetero mongers like they were moral terrorists. Your thoughts, gentlemen?

It took the likes of Harvey Milk and the Stonewall Riots to shift the tide for the Gays. Seems that all we have is "The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet" in the Monger corner.

[Ghostface89]

In my time on this earth, about three score years, the political climate has changed regarding most sexual mores. Now divorce is commonplace and no longer a stigma. Now living together without a marriage certificate is no longer "living in sin." The biggest change in sexual ethics is that homosexuality is now in your face with "gay pride" parades and openly accepted gay bars, etc.

In other words, there has been a tidal wave of change in many areas of sexual conduct . EXCEPT for heterosexual activity regarding escorts and especially massage parlors.

For the life of me, I cannot understand why there is no tolerance by the thought police who accept all these other sex concepts, but hound and demonize hetero mongers like they were moral terrorists.

Your thoughts, gentlemen?

[Swvac]

Did anyone ever find out the name and address for the place by 47th and Kedzie. Drove by couldn't find it.

No I'm still searching for the salon near 47th & Kedzie.

Just looking for a good legit massage, thats all.

If anyone konow the name of the place that you be much appreciated.

[F Blaster]

I believe that most of the prosecution tends to involve streetwalkers and massage parlors. So I would say, ask yourself if *you* would want a massage parlor or streetwalker trade near where *you* live? I suspect that while thinking about your answer to this question it will go a long way toward also answering the questions that you pose above.

My advice is that people should try to be reasonable. While you may have perfectly valid reasons to want to monger, your actions may have negative impacts on others, and those others may not like it. Try to keep in mind the impact that your actions have on others and at least you will be a more reasonable monger.

I live right by a massage parlor and it doesn't bother me one bit. I doubt if anyone else even notices; they're probably pleased that it isn't ANOTHER empty storefront. There's no gaudy signage or traffic congestion; it's doesn't disrupt the neighborhood at all.

There are some SW who work nearby as well. They are low key for the most part. It's not a known stroll, so there aren't a lot of mongers running around. (Traffic is so bad anyway, I don't think anyone could tell the difference.) As long as they don't walk around in minis and high heels and walk around in traffic and draw attention to themselves, it's not that big of a deal. I admit, it kind of bothered me at first, but now I don't even think about it.

One request. Please stop posting down to us like some condescending schoolteacher and let's all get back to meaningful reporting.

[RogerC]

So I would say, ask yourself if *you* would want a massage parlor or streetwalker trade near where *you* live?

As a matter of fact, years ago I lived in a place where prostitution was legal and there was a low-key massage parlor up the street from where I lived. Did it bother anyone? No more than the doctor's office on the same block.

Also, since it was legal, there weren't any streetwalker strolls. There was a red light district you could go to and there were scattered bars where "working girls" were known to habituate.

Regardless of the morality of it, decriminalizing prostitution would dramatically reduce the visible negative aspects of the business and it would improve the lives of sex workers.

[Gilibee]

Amen! How can stupidity and hypocrisy be so universal in politics that such a law could have passed! In a 'free' country where people are on the news everyday talking about civil liberty, in a city that votes blue in every election, there exists a law that criminalizes interaction between two consenting adults.

What is the end goal? That one day prostitution will not exist? First, it is impossible. There is a reason that prostitution is the oldest profession. Because it has been around forever and will continue to be around forever.

Second, what is the friggin point? Let's say one day Chicagoans can not get a massage in the city. Is there ANYONE who's life would benefit from that? All the 'would-be' massage parlor employees would shrug their shoulders, find a nice $8 an hour job to support themselves and their two kids, and go to school at night to obtain their Ph. D? Is that what would happen?

I believe that most of the prosecution tends to involve streetwalkers and massage parlors. So I would say, ask yourself if *you* would want a massage parlor or streetwalker trade near where *you* live? I suspect that while thinking about your answer to this question it will go a long way toward also answering the questions that you pose above.

My advice is that people should try to be reasonable. While you may have perfectly valid reasons to want to monger, your actions may have negative impacts on others, and those others may not like it. Try to keep in mind the impact that your actions have on others and at least you will be a more reasonable monger.

Third, what are they going to do about girl X who decides to sleep with guy Y because he always picks up the check on their dates? Or who decides to date the pre-med student and not the bus driver because he's more likely to be able to *wink* take care of her and her kids? Or the girl who let's her boyfriend sleep over because he helps her with her rent? Do all those people go to jail as well? Why not?

I would say this: if guy Y agrees to pick up the check in exchange for sex with girl X, then that would be prostitution. Of course, proving it is another thing altogether because even if guy Y and girl X had an "understanding", LE does not have mind-reading technology, so proving the case would effectively be impossible. I mean, people break laws all the time; but if there is no way for LE to catch them, then there is no way to enforce the law.