K-girl and other Asian agencies

**WarpFactor69** · 03-05-25 13:31

Originally Posted by BeavertronDoug [View Original Post]

Look at the pic that's up there now above the "stay tuned" message. Weird as fuck. Each arm looks to be about 5 feet long. Bizarre gigantic eyeballs that appear to be 3 inches in diameter. Misshapen nippleless tits. And the freakish robot hand.

If I actually saw a human in real life that looked like her, I would literally gasp in horror (although an actual robot hand could be interesting in a kinky sort of way). I know that most kgirl agencies do this to some degree, but I think the idea is usually to touch up actual photos of the girl, not just generate a completely fake image of an imaginary human-like object. KGFE is a joke.

The end result of using these stupid ass images is that I won't take a chance on any of their providers, because I have no idea what they're actually going to look like. So I'll wait for reviews to roll in, but by the time that happens, the girl is often already on her way out of town.

And that's why I've used kgirl agencies in LA 10 x more than in Portland, even though I live in Portland and I'm only in LA about 5% of the time.

Get your shit together, KGFE.

What have you been paying at the LA agencies? How long of a session and please tell us about the services you received and what the interior of the apartments were like.

**Urlboffer** · 03-05-25 13:16

Originally Posted by BeavertronDoug [View Original Post]

Look at the pic that's up there now above the "stay tuned" message. Weird as fuck. Each arm looks to be about 5 feet long. Bizarre gigantic eyeballs that appear to be 3 inches in diameter. Misshapen nippleless tits. And the freakish robot hand.

If I actually saw a human in real life that looked like her, I would literally gasp in horror (although an actual robot hand could be interesting in a kinky sort of way). I know that most kgirl agencies do this to some degree, but I think the idea is usually to touch up actual photos of the girl, not just generate a completely fake image of an imaginary human-like object. KGFE is a joke.

The end result of using these stupid ass images is that I won't take a chance on any of their providers, because I have no idea what they're actually going to look like. So I'll wait for reviews to roll in, but by the time that happens, the girl is often already on her way out of town.

And that's why I've used kgirl agencies in LA 10 x more than in Portland, even though I live in Portland and I'm only in LA about 5% of the time.

Get your shit together, KGFE.

Oh, f* that! (Actually, ~not~!)

I cannot *stand* AI. For anything. I can tolerate some Photoshop airbrushing here and there, but that's riDICulous.

**BeavertronDoug** · 03-05-25 03:23

Originally Posted by Pdx503 [View Original Post]

I have been saying it for a while now, those pictures get more and more odd.

Look at the pic that's up there now above the "stay tuned" message. Weird as fuck. Each arm looks to be about 5 feet long. Bizarre gigantic eyeballs that appear to be 3 inches in diameter. Misshapen nippleless tits. And the freakish robot hand.

If I actually saw a human in real life that looked like her, I would literally gasp in horror (although an actual robot hand could be interesting in a kinky sort of way). I know that most kgirl agencies do this to some degree, but I think the idea is usually to touch up actual photos of the girl, not just generate a completely fake image of an imaginary human-like object. KGFE is a joke.

The end result of using these stupid ass images is that I won't take a chance on any of their providers, because I have no idea what they're actually going to look like. So I'll wait for reviews to roll in, but by the time that happens, the girl is often already on her way out of town.

And that's why I've used kgirl agencies in LA 10 x more than in Portland, even though I live in Portland and I'm only in LA about 5% of the time.

Get your shit together, KGFE.

**Pdx503** · 03-04-25 18:11

Originally Posted by Cascadia210 [View Original Post]

Last one I saw was Diana, and she was pretty good but I concur with this take. Agency has been super hit or miss and IMO, a fair assessment is that the way they hype up some of the girls is misleading. Maybe that's catching up with them. I can only assume it's been slow. The good ones have been great, but I've also straight up walked out on appointments. I do hope they can find a way to bring in more consistent, high quality girls with a verifiable track record but unless they stop posting the fake pics (the latest with the weird AI looking robot hands is awful) and bringing in girls with no reviews, I'll continue avoiding them.

I have been saying it for a while now, those pictures get more and more odd.

**Cascadia210** · 03-04-25 13:59

Originally Posted by FastEddie70 [View Original Post]

It seems like they either get a wonderful girl that gets lots of good reviews, and is thus kept busy and happy, or they post totally fake photos of a girl who is less attractive or just not a whole lot of fun, word spreads, and she gets upset at the lack of customers and leaves. It could be that there are other reasons for all the "left early for personal reasons" but that seems to be the trend.

Last one I saw was Diana, and she was pretty good but I concur with this take. Agency has been super hit or miss and IMO, a fair assessment is that the way they hype up some of the girls is misleading. Maybe that's catching up with them. I can only assume it's been slow. The good ones have been great, but I've also straight up walked out on appointments. I do hope they can find a way to bring in more consistent, high quality girls with a verifiable track record but unless they stop posting the fake pics (the latest with the weird AI looking robot hands is awful) and bringing in girls with no reviews, I'll continue avoiding them.

**FastEddie70** · 03-03-25 17:18

Originally Posted by Burner77 [View Original Post]

Anyone know what's going on with KGFE? Lotta unexpected turnover seems like. Wonder if anyone has seen any of the last 3-4 girls who cares to report anything.

It seems like they either get a wonderful girl that gets lots of good reviews, and is thus kept busy and happy, or they post totally fake photos of a girl who is less attractive or just not a whole lot of fun, word spreads, and she gets upset at the lack of customers and leaves. It could be that there are other reasons for all the "left early for personal reasons" but that seems to be the trend.

**Burner77** · 03-03-25 00:23

Anyone know what's going on with KGFE? Lotta unexpected turnover seems like. Wonder if anyone has seen any of the last 3-4 girls who cares to report anything.

**RedLeader197** · 02-20-25 18:53

Originally Posted by FireOnRocks [View Original Post]

Had a date with Diana. She is 5'5" - 5'6" with man made DD's they felt great to squeeze, with sensitive nipples. Small ass flat tummy. Nothing like the girl in the pictures but she was pretty.

This review and description is accurate for anyone on the fence. She's back for a few days after having left early, and is a definite repeat for me. For those looking to verify they are seeing the same girl, she has a flower tattoo across her lower abdomen. Good luck,

Rl.

**Burner77** · 02-19-25 13:38

Will probably pass on new girl Kelly, too. Was already a little skeptical, but this review on TER sealed the deal. Lackluster service, and average appearance except for above average droopy naturals. Hard pass for me.

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...4928386-403118

**FireOnRocks** · 02-15-25 01:34

Had a date with Diana. She is 5'5" - 5'6" with man made DD's they felt great to squeeze, with sensitive nipples. Small ass flat tummy. Nothing like the girl in the pictures but she was pretty. She loved being sucked on nipples while stroking her clit. Our session began with quick shower then some light kissing and onto her knees for BBBJ. Ok technique continued for about 5-10 minutes then on went the protection and riding at the edge of the bed. Really tight gripping pussy within a few minutes I popped in the cover. We then talked for about 15-20 minutes. Some language barrier but ok to communicate with her. For second session she started with BBBJ and climbed on me with cover on again. I didn't mind the cover I prefer it. The booker quoted me $100 extra for BBFS. $400 for hr with cover. She said she is leaving town tomorrow.

Definitely a repeat with the agency but YMMV.

**BeavertronDoug** · 02-10-25 13:00

Originally Posted by Cascadia210 [View Original Post]

Any specific agency suggestions you think are worth trying? DM if needed. Thanks.

I've used get9irl.com and topangels. Ch with pretty good results. There are a lot of others, although their offerings tend to overlap quite a bit, so you don't really need to get setup with all of them. Girls are often listed on 2-4 sites simultaneously, sometimes under different names.

For the typical caliber of girl that KGFE has in Portland, these CA agencies will often advertise them for 320/ hour with BB and MSOG. KGFE charges 500 here for the same. I guess they feel that their regional monopoly warrants a 56% upcharge. This is the main reason why I've only ever used KGFE a few times.

The CA agencies will also have higher caliber girls pretty regularly, but they charge a bit more for them (typical is 400-500/ hr with BB and MSOG, but I've seen up to 600 in rare cases). It's also not uncommon to see multiple girls advertised together for duos and trios. Duos are usually 700-800/ hr, trios can be anywhere from 1000-1500.

**WarpFactor69** · 02-05-25 22:59

Originally Posted by Random2020 [View Original Post]

What are the screening requirements typically like for the local agencies? From what I've read on the California ones, doesn't seem like they are too accommodating of newer clients.

Aside from my post from February 02 and what West Side punter said (thank you), I don't have much more to add.

Whatever agency you want to try, contact them and ask them what they're screening requests are. It helps if you have multiple sources like I mentioned on February 02. If you don't have everything the agency is asking for they may be open to different types of proof to make them comfortable. For example a screenshot of your recent t e are reviews me be sufficient. The best thing is to contact them and start a dialogue.

**WestSidePunter** · 02-05-25 18:52

Originally Posted by Random2020 [View Original Post]

What are the screening requirements typically like for the local agencies? From what I've read on the California ones, doesn't seem like they are too accommodating of newer clients.

KGFE is pretty straightforward, especially if you have a TNA account.

**Random2020** · 02-05-25 16:30

Originally Posted by WarpFactor69 [View Original Post]

Adding two more thoughts. First, I suggest you do at least one session here with the local agency so you have something to compare it to. They usually get decent girls, so you will have a good time. Second, I suggest you get screened before you go to California. Most California agencies will accept a referral from other agencies. Others want you to have a presence on p411, or Humanaplex, or TER, etc.

What are the screening requirements typically like for the local agencies? From what I've read on the California ones, doesn't seem like they are too accommodating of newer clients.