Asian Providers

[TrickOrTreat68]

Thanks bro. Almost jumped on that granade.

Anyone got info on Giyo?

Saw Giyo the other day.

Pros: She is very enthusiastic with little to no limits (BBFS, Anal etc). Gives a great rim job with plenty of cock worship.

Cons: Older thicker MILF I would say 40's or so.

If you like older nasty milfs who will obey and worship you then she should be fun, but if you are hoping to see a HYA look elsewhere.

[FreeWally]

I met her off seeking in 2022 and banged her regularly for about 6 months. She's fun, enthusiastic and fun. I recommend, but I didn't pay anything close to what she is asking now. I wanted some variety, so I moved on.

Oh. I didn't notice the price. She looks great but I think I just went limp noodle looking at the rate.

I once had the best sex of my life. It was only 300, the same as the most average sex I've paid for. Important lesson for me.

Looks-wise she reminds me of a young girl like Emily from SC except Emily charges the same as every girl at the agency. 300. Easy to book, easy to park, in and out on the clock with no drama. Hot girls like her simply get more business, I visited her several times so her looks did make her more money from me by repeat visits. It's just hard to justify a higher rate because of competition that exists on HX.

I guess PD is in its own world. Some girls in strip clubs will ask for those rates but as one girl admitted they only ask that because once in a while a new guy with money will pay, and also it's a way to say no to a guy she doesn't want (but will do if he pays that rate). Her words.

[Dudeonthecouch]

Anybody got intel on this baddie on PD? Pricier than what's usually discussed here but I might pull the trigger if it means getting in the sheets with a solid 9/10 hottie.

https://privatedelights.ch/USA/Calif...go/GigiSweetie

I met her off seeking in 2022 and banged her regularly for about 6 months. She's fun, enthusiastic and fun. I recommend, but I didn't pay anything close to what she is asking now. I wanted some variety, so I moved on.

[DRaj123]

YLP Alissa was Rebeca at VAC in Las Vegas recently. T eee are number 348721.

Thanks for this info.

[Clclcl]

YLP Alissa was Rebeca at VAC in Las Vegas recently. T eee are number 348721.

Thanks bro. Almost jumped on that granade.

Anyone got info on Giyo?

[Trusty Hairlip]

YLP Alissa was Rebeca at VAC in Las Vegas recently. T eee are number 348721.

[Clclcl]

Here's the current line for us in San Diego with the K-Girls and Thai girls. I've seen a few of them but who would you select and why?

In doing my research with various review platforms I have recently returned to the question, "Does she look hot in the pic". Since I was 10 and hiding Playboys under a mattress it's always been the visual. Nothing changes after 7 decades. It's the visual. Who would you select?

Ash aka Yogi, 4'11" 34 C - 2 visits both BBFS, 2 pops.

Zia, 5'4", 32 C, 22 yrs. Nice ass, points for the option and youth.

Swan, 5'4" 32 C, 22 yrs. Longer hair, better possible CG rider.

Giyo, 5'4" 32 C, - nicer black hair, has (o) and (a) option.

Kathy, 5'4" 32 C, Thai and JPN!! - is option there.

Olive 5'6" 34 D. Looks like basic k-girl.

Ellie, Thai. Nice visit CFs, little to no lfk.

Chi Chi aka Kira, Thai. Looks older, no info.

Bro Giyo (a)?

Also swan would be my pic.

Not a fan of milfs and Lory / Jamie are my idea of a 8 and 9.

Message me. Sounds like we have the same taste.

[Yogurt2020]

Anybody got intel on this baddie on PD? Pricier than what's usually discussed here but I might pull the trigger if it means getting in the sheets with a solid 9/10 hottie.

https://privatedelights.ch/USA/Calif...go/GigiSweetie

[Sir Bishop]

Here's the current line for us in San Diego with the K-Girls and Thai girls. I've seen a few of them but who would you select and why?

In doing my research with various review platforms I have recently returned to the question, "Does she look hot in the pic". Since I was 10 and hiding Playboys under a mattress it's always been the visual. Nothing changes after 7 decades. It's the visual. Who would you select?

Ash aka Yogi, 4'11" 34 C - 2 visits both BBFS, 2 pops.

Zia, 5'4", 32 C, 22 yrs. Nice ass, points for the option and youth.

Swan, 5'4" 32 C, 22 yrs. Longer hair, better possible CG rider.

Giyo, 5'4" 32 C, - nicer black hair, has (o) and (a) option.

Kathy, 5'4" 32 C, Thai and JPN!! - is option there.

Olive 5'6" 34 D. Looks like basic k-girl.

Ellie, Thai. Nice visit CFs, little to no lfk.

Chi Chi aka Kira, Thai. Looks older, no info.

[GoKipper]

Pics are somewhat accurate just add 10 years to her face. She's small, but in no way spinner skinny.

Service was good, lots of DFK, decent BJ and seems to enjoy herself at all times. Would repeat if no one else was available, but I prefer dreamy skinny girls.

Was going to make an appointment with her as well for tomorrow, but got busy. Please share experience.

[LeSseradim97]

Agree and feel that the appearances reported on TER are increasingly not matching my imagination based on the descriptions. Often, it's the same few specific and familiar users who first define the attractive parameters that pass through my HYA filter. However, they frequently turn out to be less aligned with my expectations. Perhaps I am simply setting my expectations too high or not sharing the same standard with those users.

I had a TER subscription and it did not help me at all in rating a girl. I think it's because I have different tastes, half the reviews for some girls are shills (some more than half, some less). The most obvious shill is when it doesn't even match the girl or her menu.

For example, I prefer young and friendly, but many reviewers love old and nasty. So a girl I'd easily give an 8 or 9 to someone else will give a 5 to 7. I've looked up about 15 girls I've personally been with, and the review ratings did not correlate in any way at all. My method was to rank my experiences first, then see if there was any positive correlation. There was zero correlation (a girl high on my list is no more likely to have a higher rating, a girl low on my list is no more likely to have a low rating).

What I did enjoy was reminiscing when a review accurately described a girl's quirks and routine, gave me insight on a girl I liked, and helped me remember some girls from the past. I was amazed to see a girl like Bunny from around 2013 having worked years and years but I never saw her again after the first time (probably because I switched to FEC for 90% of the time until recently). And a girl with years / pages of reviews is typically more skilled than a girl with just a handful of reviews. So it doesn't surprise me when I meet a girl from the Thai booker who is young, beautiful, but totally amateur and unskilled. I see she literally just started. Again, the ratings were worthless (for many girls, most if not every review was a shill, but the timestamp on the review was ironically useful for figuring out how long a girl worked since the shill consistently reviewed from her starting date).

I've let my subscription lapse and don't care about it anymore. Reviews here have been very useful, in contrast. I'm sure there are a few shills but most were accurate to at least where the person clearly visited the girl. And gave me a useful heads up.

[SsStuntCock]

Anyone seen her? I made an appointment for tomorrow but just wondering if anyone here has seen her recently.

Haven't myself. But fwiw, her TER is 353118.

[ADwightSchrute]

Anyone seen her? I made an appointment for tomorrow but just wondering if anyone here has seen her recently.

Was going to make an appointment with her as well for tomorrow, but got busy. Please share experience.

[TrayParker68]

Anyone seen her? I made an appointment for tomorrow but just wondering if anyone here has seen her recently.

[FreeWally]

TER actually has reviews we can read? LOL. I stopped believing those things.

I had a TER subscription and it did not help me at all in rating a girl. I think it's because I have different tastes, half the reviews for some girls are shills (some more than half, some less). The most obvious shill is when it doesn't even match the girl or her menu.

For example, I prefer young and friendly, but many reviewers love old and nasty. So a girl I'd easily give an 8 or 9 to someone else will give a 5 to 7. I've looked up about 15 girls I've personally been with, and the review ratings did not correlate in any way at all. My method was to rank my experiences first, then see if there was any positive correlation. There was zero correlation (a girl high on my list is no more likely to have a higher rating, a girl low on my list is no more likely to have a low rating).

What I did enjoy was reminiscing when a review accurately described a girl's quirks and routine, gave me insight on a girl I liked, and helped me remember some girls from the past. I was amazed to see a girl like Bunny from around 2013 having worked years and years but I never saw her again after the first time (probably because I switched to FEC for 90% of the time until recently). And a girl with years / pages of reviews is typically more skilled than a girl with just a handful of reviews. So it doesn't surprise me when I meet a girl from the Thai booker who is young, beautiful, but totally amateur and unskilled. I see she literally just started. Again, the ratings were worthless (for many girls, most if not every review was a shill, but the timestamp on the review was ironically useful for figuring out how long a girl worked since the shill consistently reviewed from her starting date).

I've let my subscription lapse and don't care about it anymore. Reviews here have been very useful, in contrast. I'm sure there are a few shills but most were accurate to at least where the person clearly visited the girl. And gave me a useful heads up.