Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 2,296 to 2,310 of 8264
-
01-30-24 13:43 #5969
Posts: 466YLP Alissa
YLP Alissa was Rebeca at VAC in Las Vegas recently. T eee are number 348721.
-
01-30-24 10:43 #5968
Posts: 48Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]
Also swan would be my pic.
Not a fan of milfs and Lory / Jamie are my idea of a 8 and 9.
Message me. Sounds like we have the same taste.
-
01-30-24 03:18 #5967
Posts: 134Gigisweetie
Anybody got intel on this baddie on PD? Pricier than what's usually discussed here but I might pull the trigger if it means getting in the sheets with a solid 9/10 hottie.
https://privatedelights.ch/USA/Calif...go/GigiSweetie
-
01-29-24 20:16 #5966
Posts: 904SDAG, TER, Sandra99 Lineup this week
Here's the current line for us in San Diego with the K-Girls and Thai girls. I've seen a few of them but who would you select and why?
In doing my research with various review platforms I have recently returned to the question, "Does she look hot in the pic". Since I was 10 and hiding Playboys under a mattress it's always been the visual. Nothing changes after 7 decades. It's the visual. Who would you select?
Ash aka Yogi, 4'11" 34 C - 2 visits both BBFS, 2 pops.
Zia, 5'4", 32 C, 22 yrs. Nice ass, points for the option and youth.
Swan, 5'4" 32 C, 22 yrs. Longer hair, better possible CG rider.
Giyo, 5'4" 32 C, - nicer black hair, has (o) and (a) option.
Kathy, 5'4" 32 C, Thai and JPN!! - is option there.
Olive 5'6" 34 D. Looks like basic k-girl.
Ellie, Thai. Nice visit CFs, little to no lfk.
Chi Chi aka Kira, Thai. Looks older, no info.
-
01-28-24 00:25 #5965
Posts: 110Serina
Pics are somewhat accurate just add 10 years to her face. She's small, but in no way spinner skinny.
Service was good, lots of DFK, decent BJ and seems to enjoy herself at all times. Would repeat if no one else was available, but I prefer dreamy skinny girls.
Originally Posted by ADwightSchrute [View Original Post]
-
01-27-24 21:30 #5964
Posts: 6Agree and feel that the appearances reported on TER are increasingly not matching my imagination based on the descriptions. Often, it's the same few specific and familiar users who first define the attractive parameters that pass through my HYA filter. However, they frequently turn out to be less aligned with my expectations. Perhaps I am simply setting my expectations too high or not sharing the same standard with those users.
Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]
-
01-27-24 19:12 #5963
Posts: 2365Originally Posted by TrayParker68 [View Original Post]
-
01-27-24 15:37 #5962
Posts: 239Originally Posted by TrayParker68 [View Original Post]
-
01-26-24 23:20 #5961
Posts: 47Serena at Lollygirls?
Anyone seen her? I made an appointment for tomorrow but just wondering if anyone here has seen her recently.
-
01-26-24 03:37 #5960
Posts: 785Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]
For example, I prefer young and friendly, but many reviewers love old and nasty. So a girl I'd easily give an 8 or 9 to someone else will give a 5 to 7. I've looked up about 15 girls I've personally been with, and the review ratings did not correlate in any way at all. My method was to rank my experiences first, then see if there was any positive correlation. There was zero correlation (a girl high on my list is no more likely to have a higher rating, a girl low on my list is no more likely to have a low rating).
What I did enjoy was reminiscing when a review accurately described a girl's quirks and routine, gave me insight on a girl I liked, and helped me remember some girls from the past. I was amazed to see a girl like Bunny from around 2013 having worked years and years but I never saw her again after the first time (probably because I switched to FEC for 90% of the time until recently). And a girl with years / pages of reviews is typically more skilled than a girl with just a handful of reviews. So it doesn't surprise me when I meet a girl from the Thai booker who is young, beautiful, but totally amateur and unskilled. I see she literally just started. Again, the ratings were worthless (for many girls, most if not every review was a shill, but the timestamp on the review was ironically useful for figuring out how long a girl worked since the shill consistently reviewed from her starting date).
I've let my subscription lapse and don't care about it anymore. Reviews here have been very useful, in contrast. I'm sure there are a few shills but most were accurate to at least where the person clearly visited the girl. And gave me a useful heads up.
-
01-26-24 00:42 #5959
Posts: 904Originally Posted by DRaj123 [View Original Post]
-
01-24-24 19:33 #5958
Posts: 785Originally Posted by Clclcl [View Original Post]
Swan is young as far as SDAG goes, as someone else mentioned she has a typical Korean face, her photos are close enough after P.S. Normal proportions, small natural tits, girl next door type, very friendly, would try again. But it's always hard to recommend since every guy is looking for something different.
-
01-24-24 17:57 #5957
Posts: 400Originally Posted by Clclcl [View Original Post]
I'd pass.
-
01-24-24 17:00 #5956
Posts: 48Originally Posted by BrainLara [View Original Post]
From SF and sophie will come soon.
Need a HYA blog.
Is swan, beam, olive or kathy k HYA?
-
01-24-24 11:08 #5955
Posts: 607Both Kamela and Essie gone in 5 days. Too bad the boss decided to tinker with the only thing that made them stand out from the competition. Oh well, it was good while it lasted LOL.
Originally Posted by MisterO [View Original Post]