Asian Providers

**AllCock** · 12-08-23 07:57

Originally Posted by TempleAvenue [View Original Post]

What's the best way to reach her? Is texting number ending in 3663 a good way to book her?

Is number ending 3663? Yes.

**NiceTasting** · 12-07-23 22:08

Saw Emily again. I love how she looks, although her photos kinda Embelish her tits a bit, I love how hot her face looks. All things said recently are true, Although I kinda wish she DFK'd more, she tries to hug you while fucking so you can't kiss her the whole time. She does kiss every so often, but just not enough engagement. If that doesn't bother you, Go see see her cause she does offer BBFS but the connection could've been better if she just DFK more during the session.

**TempleAvenue** · 12-07-23 11:26

Originally Posted by AllCock [View Original Post]

Yeah I remember her from a couple of years ago. Sexy looks and wide hips. Did BBFS No CIP. Maybe she would allow CIP now?

What's the best way to reach her? Is texting number ending in 3663 a good way to book her?

**RocketManP** · 12-07-23 01:22

Originally Posted by TacoManVa [View Original Post]

Ummm ok, I am pretty sure that 99% of us are more interested in the women no matter what massage parlor they come from or what agency they come from, the service and the beauty of the women is what matters the most!

But hey, each to his own if the most important thing in your life is TER and reviews go for it brother. Good luck lol

Um, I did not say most important thing in my life (I mean, what?) is ter or reviews. I think you made this up.

I said I'm focusing on what is important to me, meaning protecting my monger brothers and ensuring they get correct information and have a voice to share this information without repressions.

As in, the ability to criticize the beauty and service of the said women, freely. And making sure all other brothers hear it, so doing it publicly like on this forum.

But some want to protect businesses and said women from negative reviews or feedback they deserved, suppressing such information. To each their own, like you said.

I'll just say I've never met a monger who said gee whiz I wish I had less information than more information about woman X before I saw her. But I sure as hell met many who wished they had more info. I'm pretty sure that's why mongers are on sites like this.

**Miguel Honcho** · 12-07-23 00:35

Originally Posted by Dolan85 [View Original Post]

Just curious, I always thought lollypop and SAG were the same? Lollypop has a new phone numbe now but I coulda sworn they were using the same 323 number as SAG. Also if you look at the 2 websites Cici and Ann are both on the menu (you have to expand the menu) and both sites are using the pictures.

I saw Gisella through SAG in OC. Sometimes the bookers are the same, sometimes the girls work with multiple bookers.

**TacoManVa** · 12-07-23 00:15

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

I'm focusing on what I consider to be the most important thing to me. Treating customers well and not suppressing the only public voice the customers have.

Ummm ok, I am pretty sure that 99% of us are more interested in the women no matter what massage parlor they come from or what agency they come from, the service and the beauty of the women is what matters the most!

But hey, each to his own if the most important thing in your life is TER and reviews go for it brother. Good luck lol

**RocketManP** · 12-06-23 06:48

Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]

I thought it was 6 or less? I've had one "5" out of 30 girls I've tried, but several sevens.

.....

I do agree if someone finds a girl not to their liking, go ahead and review for us to know. No one should be afraid to speak up. But the lack of low reviews isn't a sign by itself that "something is wrong". I've had one dud in 12 years.

It was seven or less.

https://archive.ph/VfFlw

Nowhere did I say that lack of low reviews means sdag are doing it again. I agree with you there. I merely said TER having the profiles up again doesn't mean that they must have "sorted out" things and now aren't bothering customers.

So. I'm interested to hear from people who have given anonymous negative reviews to their active girls recently. And whether they have received unsolicited text messages from the org / booker after this whole hoopla. I firmly believe in reviews being done by mongers for mongers as datapoints. Reviews aren't for orgs / bookers use. That isn't their lane or jurisdiction. They should be grateful they are able to use positive reviews as revenue source, but instead they take it for granted. Personally I'd want all reviews broadcasted publicly. Especially if it's a negative review, I'd want all my fellow mongers to be aware of such a data point. I care about my fellow mongers, I don't care about girl or org business. And why would anyone if the biz tells them "We will do our best to figure out who you are" if a review is honest?

Anyway. Hope I articulated well the point I was trying to make, LOL.

**FreeWally** · 12-05-23 12:24

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

I'd like to hear any new stories of people publicly writing negative or "seven or less" reviews.

I thought it was 6 or less? I've had one "5" out of 30 girls I've tried, but several sevens.

It's just going to take a while to find a girl I don't like, I mean I remember going to TJ for years. My last experience with a Kgirl was: She let me touch her everwhere, DFK, sucked my cock as long as I liked, 69, multiple positions, sensual massage, shower together. And she was relatively young and attractive. Hard to say between 8 or 9. My last experience 10+ years ago in TJ was: She was more attractive than the other 19 girls but still not comparable to a Kgirl, she lay like a robot as I fucked her, and that was that. She did the absolute bare minimum, didn't even smell good, and I will be polite in saying no more than that. Back then I would have called it a 5. Now with other experiences and compared to Kgirls I would call it a 2. I think there is a scaling problem when you try to compare Kgirls versus Kgirls, instead of Kgirls versus everything else. So I stand by saying 29 out of 30 were 7 or higher.

I do agree if someone finds a girl not to their liking, go ahead and review for us to know. No one should be afraid to speak up. But the lack of low reviews isn't a sign by itself that "something is wrong". I've had one dud in 12 years.

**Dolan85** · 12-05-23 08:53

Originally Posted by ADwightSchrute [View Original Post]

Gisella from Lollypop.

Was able to verify and book easily with the booker. Easy process and set up an appointment early. Gisela's pictures do not do her justice. She is way more beautiful in person. She is about 5 ft and petite with nice mm Cs. Her kitty is shaved with a tattoo on right boo and shoulder. These compliment her really well. She greeted me with a smile and stated with DFK. She has good English and easy to converse with. Shown to room and stated to undress and get comfy. We got comfy with DFK and teasing. She then sat me down on the bed and started an enthusiastic, wet and sloppy BBBJ. This goes for few minutes then 69 allowing me to dine in. She is receptive to everything. After that she hops on CG, RCG, Mish and Doggie. Busted on her, wanted to CIM but it released to fast. She cleaned me up and told me to lay down for a massage. Great firm massage. After a few minutes we go round 2 to a great finish. We laid down for a few minutes to relax and chat. She cleaned me up and brought me to the shower to clean up further. Help me get dressed and shown me out. I will repeat with her. Get her while she's in town.

Just curious, I always thought lollypop and SAG were the same? Lollypop has a new phone numbe now but I coulda sworn they were using the same 323 number as SAG. Also if you look at the 2 websites Cici and Ann are both on the menu (you have to expand the menu) and both sites are using the pictures.

**RocketManP** · 12-04-23 21:41

Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]

RockeManP, I wouldn't focus on the booker rather focus on the HYAs and who do you want to bang! Obviously he's cleaned shit up if TER has the agency back.

I'm focusing on what I consider to be the most important thing to me. Treating customers well and not suppressing the only public voice the customers have.

As far as them being back on ter being indicative of them changing their ways. Allow me to disagree. They have been on TER for ages while practicing that policy. So I don't see it being indicative of anything.

I'd like to hear any new stories of people publicly writing negative or "seven or less" reviews. That probably would be more indicative. I encourage everyone to watch their policies. And hey if you feel like you've been wronged or they (or any other org for that matter) are up to their old tricks again. Please let me know.

**ADwightSchrute** · 12-04-23 18:52

Gisella from Lollypop.

Was able to verify and book easily with the booker. Easy process and set up an appointment early. Gisela's pictures do not do her justice. She is way more beautiful in person. She is about 5 ft and petite with nice mm Cs. Her kitty is shaved with a tattoo on right boo and shoulder. These compliment her really well. She greeted me with a smile and stated with DFK. She has good English and easy to converse with. Shown to room and stated to undress and get comfy. We got comfy with DFK and teasing. She then sat me down on the bed and started an enthusiastic, wet and sloppy BBBJ. This goes for few minutes then 69 allowing me to dine in. She is receptive to everything. After that she hops on CG, RCG, Mish and Doggie. Busted on her, wanted to CIM but it released to fast. She cleaned me up and told me to lay down for a massage. Great firm massage. After a few minutes we go round 2 to a great finish. We laid down for a few minutes to relax and chat. She cleaned me up and brought me to the shower to clean up further. Help me get dressed and shown me out. I will repeat with her. Get her while she's in town.

**TugSpinosa** · 12-04-23 11:12

Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]

Yes! That is the girl that was here before and yes she was well known to offer BBFS to everyone. Looks like Sandra99 has a verified living breathing Thai girl that pushes all the buttons for most of us mongers! She's mid-20's, 5'8"ish, 34 C, dfk, BBBJ, BBFS with a donation and is a HYA. I'm not delaying or she'll head off to the OC.

Reached out to the booker and got no reply hope you did.

**Jstwntlvn1** · 12-04-23 11:08

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

I recommend. Plenty of intel at TER 387273 & 372287 (when she was Kate CA in the Bay).

I saw Gisella and had a blast. She's prettier than most of the K Org girls I've seen and her performance was top tier. Going to see her again soon.

**AllCock** · 12-04-23 07:55

Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]

Yes! That is the girl that was here before and yes she was well known to offer BBFS to everyone. Looks like Sandra99 has a verified living breathing Thai girl that pushes all the buttons for most of us mongers! She's mid-20's, 5'8"ish, 34 C, dfk, BBBJ, BBFS with a donation and is a HYA. I'm not delaying or she'll head off to the OC.

Yeah I remember her from a couple of years ago. Sexy looks and wide hips. Did BBFS No CIP. Maybe she would allow CIP now?