Asian Providers

**TacoManVa** · 12-07-23 00:15

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

I'm focusing on what I consider to be the most important thing to me. Treating customers well and not suppressing the only public voice the customers have.

Ummm ok, I am pretty sure that 99% of us are more interested in the women no matter what massage parlor they come from or what agency they come from, the service and the beauty of the women is what matters the most!

But hey, each to his own if the most important thing in your life is TER and reviews go for it brother. Good luck lol

**RocketManP** · 12-06-23 06:48

Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]

I thought it was 6 or less? I've had one "5" out of 30 girls I've tried, but several sevens.

.....

I do agree if someone finds a girl not to their liking, go ahead and review for us to know. No one should be afraid to speak up. But the lack of low reviews isn't a sign by itself that "something is wrong". I've had one dud in 12 years.

It was seven or less.

https://archive.ph/VfFlw

Nowhere did I say that lack of low reviews means sdag are doing it again. I agree with you there. I merely said TER having the profiles up again doesn't mean that they must have "sorted out" things and now aren't bothering customers.

So. I'm interested to hear from people who have given anonymous negative reviews to their active girls recently. And whether they have received unsolicited text messages from the org / booker after this whole hoopla. I firmly believe in reviews being done by mongers for mongers as datapoints. Reviews aren't for orgs / bookers use. That isn't their lane or jurisdiction. They should be grateful they are able to use positive reviews as revenue source, but instead they take it for granted. Personally I'd want all reviews broadcasted publicly. Especially if it's a negative review, I'd want all my fellow mongers to be aware of such a data point. I care about my fellow mongers, I don't care about girl or org business. And why would anyone if the biz tells them "We will do our best to figure out who you are" if a review is honest?

Anyway. Hope I articulated well the point I was trying to make, LOL.

**FreeWally** · 12-05-23 12:24

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

I'd like to hear any new stories of people publicly writing negative or "seven or less" reviews.

I thought it was 6 or less? I've had one "5" out of 30 girls I've tried, but several sevens.

It's just going to take a while to find a girl I don't like, I mean I remember going to TJ for years. My last experience with a Kgirl was: She let me touch her everwhere, DFK, sucked my cock as long as I liked, 69, multiple positions, sensual massage, shower together. And she was relatively young and attractive. Hard to say between 8 or 9. My last experience 10+ years ago in TJ was: She was more attractive than the other 19 girls but still not comparable to a Kgirl, she lay like a robot as I fucked her, and that was that. She did the absolute bare minimum, didn't even smell good, and I will be polite in saying no more than that. Back then I would have called it a 5. Now with other experiences and compared to Kgirls I would call it a 2. I think there is a scaling problem when you try to compare Kgirls versus Kgirls, instead of Kgirls versus everything else. So I stand by saying 29 out of 30 were 7 or higher.

I do agree if someone finds a girl not to their liking, go ahead and review for us to know. No one should be afraid to speak up. But the lack of low reviews isn't a sign by itself that "something is wrong". I've had one dud in 12 years.

**Dolan85** · 12-05-23 08:53

Originally Posted by ADwightSchrute [View Original Post]

Gisella from Lollypop.

Was able to verify and book easily with the booker. Easy process and set up an appointment early. Gisela's pictures do not do her justice. She is way more beautiful in person. She is about 5 ft and petite with nice mm Cs. Her kitty is shaved with a tattoo on right boo and shoulder. These compliment her really well. She greeted me with a smile and stated with DFK. She has good English and easy to converse with. Shown to room and stated to undress and get comfy. We got comfy with DFK and teasing. She then sat me down on the bed and started an enthusiastic, wet and sloppy BBBJ. This goes for few minutes then 69 allowing me to dine in. She is receptive to everything. After that she hops on CG, RCG, Mish and Doggie. Busted on her, wanted to CIM but it released to fast. She cleaned me up and told me to lay down for a massage. Great firm massage. After a few minutes we go round 2 to a great finish. We laid down for a few minutes to relax and chat. She cleaned me up and brought me to the shower to clean up further. Help me get dressed and shown me out. I will repeat with her. Get her while she's in town.

Just curious, I always thought lollypop and SAG were the same? Lollypop has a new phone numbe now but I coulda sworn they were using the same 323 number as SAG. Also if you look at the 2 websites Cici and Ann are both on the menu (you have to expand the menu) and both sites are using the pictures.

**RocketManP** · 12-04-23 21:41

Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]

RockeManP, I wouldn't focus on the booker rather focus on the HYAs and who do you want to bang! Obviously he's cleaned shit up if TER has the agency back.

I'm focusing on what I consider to be the most important thing to me. Treating customers well and not suppressing the only public voice the customers have.

As far as them being back on ter being indicative of them changing their ways. Allow me to disagree. They have been on TER for ages while practicing that policy. So I don't see it being indicative of anything.

I'd like to hear any new stories of people publicly writing negative or "seven or less" reviews. That probably would be more indicative. I encourage everyone to watch their policies. And hey if you feel like you've been wronged or they (or any other org for that matter) are up to their old tricks again. Please let me know.

**ADwightSchrute** · 12-04-23 18:52

Gisella from Lollypop.

Was able to verify and book easily with the booker. Easy process and set up an appointment early. Gisela's pictures do not do her justice. She is way more beautiful in person. She is about 5 ft and petite with nice mm Cs. Her kitty is shaved with a tattoo on right boo and shoulder. These compliment her really well. She greeted me with a smile and stated with DFK. She has good English and easy to converse with. Shown to room and stated to undress and get comfy. We got comfy with DFK and teasing. She then sat me down on the bed and started an enthusiastic, wet and sloppy BBBJ. This goes for few minutes then 69 allowing me to dine in. She is receptive to everything. After that she hops on CG, RCG, Mish and Doggie. Busted on her, wanted to CIM but it released to fast. She cleaned me up and told me to lay down for a massage. Great firm massage. After a few minutes we go round 2 to a great finish. We laid down for a few minutes to relax and chat. She cleaned me up and brought me to the shower to clean up further. Help me get dressed and shown me out. I will repeat with her. Get her while she's in town.

**TugSpinosa** · 12-04-23 11:12

Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]

Yes! That is the girl that was here before and yes she was well known to offer BBFS to everyone. Looks like Sandra99 has a verified living breathing Thai girl that pushes all the buttons for most of us mongers! She's mid-20's, 5'8"ish, 34 C, dfk, BBBJ, BBFS with a donation and is a HYA. I'm not delaying or she'll head off to the OC.

Reached out to the booker and got no reply hope you did.

**Jstwntlvn1** · 12-04-23 11:08

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

I recommend. Plenty of intel at TER 387273 & 372287 (when she was Kate CA in the Bay).

I saw Gisella and had a blast. She's prettier than most of the K Org girls I've seen and her performance was top tier. Going to see her again soon.

**AllCock** · 12-04-23 07:55

Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]

Yes! That is the girl that was here before and yes she was well known to offer BBFS to everyone. Looks like Sandra99 has a verified living breathing Thai girl that pushes all the buttons for most of us mongers! She's mid-20's, 5'8"ish, 34 C, dfk, BBBJ, BBFS with a donation and is a HYA. I'm not delaying or she'll head off to the OC.

Yeah I remember her from a couple of years ago. Sexy looks and wide hips. Did BBFS No CIP. Maybe she would allow CIP now?

**SsStuntCock** · 12-04-23 05:17

I recommend. Plenty of intel at TER 387273 & 372287 (when she was Kate CA in the Bay).

**AllCock** · 12-04-23 02:45

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

Do they still insist on texting and chiding you if you give their girl a low rated review?

I haven't yet seen any of the girls since TER shut SDAG down. Just happy to get all my old reviews back.

**BDDelti3** · 12-04-23 00:02

There was a new girl on FEC's roster so I decided to see what she was like today. She didn't offer any MSOG or BBFS options, but that was fine with me since I didn't want to spend extra on a new girl.

She's probably somewhere in her late 20's / early 30's, with man made Bs, and only a few inches above 5'.

Overall, the experience was pretty nice. She's very friendly and I would almost consider her to give some high tier GFE service but she wasn't ok with DFK. There was a *lot* of LFK so that kind of made up for it. Her actual service was very gentle; I would not recommend her for anyone who likes things even a little bit rough, but I personally liked how slow and tender her BBBJ was. I only lasted long enough to have her in CG since she was pretty tight and knew how to use her muscles. She ended the session with a massage that was pretty mediocre, but I did appreciate her using the full hour that I booked and not trying to rush me out after I popped.

Her English was passable, we couldn't hold a long conversation but we could converse, and the pictures FEC has of her are representative of her overall body type and looks, though not her. I would repeat, but I have a few other providers I want to try out first so we'll see if she sticks around long enough for me to have another session with her.

**SuchaDilf** · 12-03-23 16:08

Originally Posted by TempleAvenue [View Original Post]

I am thinking of seeing Kyss or Nammy from SDASG. Anyone has seen them? Please share your experiences.

Saw her yesterday. She is built and looks like Ash's prettier sister.

More sensual than ash, very nice natural boobs and was lots of fun. Would see again.

FYI, I was trying to see Nova but she was not available at the last minute so they offered kyss.

Was not disappointed.

**Sir Bishop** · 12-03-23 14:15

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

Do they still insist on texting and chiding you if you give their girl a low rated review?

RockeManP, I wouldn't focus on the booker rather focus on the HYAs and who do you want to bang! Obviously he's cleaned shit up if TER has the agency back.

**Sir Bishop** · 12-03-23 14:12

Originally Posted by TacoManVa [View Original Post]

Yes the pics are real at least 1,3,5 are her. She has been to San Diego at least 2 times before and she is hot. First tour she offered BBFS to everyone. She has a Bush FYI. Some guys really liked her and hit it off with her. The last visit the BBFS was an upcharge of 100, and for me she was just ok. Not into dfk as most Thai girls are not.

Yes! That is the girl that was here before and yes she was well known to offer BBFS to everyone. Looks like Sandra99 has a verified living breathing Thai girl that pushes all the buttons for most of us mongers! She's mid-20's, 5'8"ish, 34 C, dfk, BBBJ, BBFS with a donation and is a HYA. I'm not delaying or she'll head off to the OC.