"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[Airmantroy]

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...f-2bc4f052a1e1

She's been in and out of town recently, claims she's getting 10 k a month. I literally told her she was full of shit as I hit the block button. Why'all can pester the shit out of her in messages, make her earn that cheese 😂128514;128514;.

[Airmantroy]

I'm betting this is a scammer https://members.seeking.com/member/d...d-4af733d7a16e.

Lisey Sweet porn star in Decatur. I doubt that very seriously, and besides she's married and lives in LA.

[SeekingHead]

The girls I am referring to are not escorts and they are not on any sites. They are broke college students or students who want to make good money instead of minimum wage jobs like waitresses etc. Since I own multiple businesses, I have some common connections / vendors that are skirt chasers and I get these contacts through them.

$250-400 for 90-120 minutes of flirting & laying on her back vs. 25-30 hours at $10 an hour breaking her back serving or retail. If a SB has 2-3 SD's she sees weekly that's $500-1200 a week, better than what she can make at a normal job. Things are starting to turn as two girls I haven't talked to in over 6 months recently hit me up, the student loan repayments are going to help us quite a bit.

[Airmantroy]

It's a bear market for sure, but the job market is finally starting to sour and student loan payments are resuming. Check back in 6 months.

I must be trolling with magic bait. I'm chatting with numerous, so far they are all appear real with 1 or 2 exceptions that may be content or deposit scammers. They all want to meet within the next week. If only my time and funds were that flexible.

[LouisHernandez]

Being an SD from seeking seems dead to me. No responses even being a diamond member and with a decent profile. I highly doubt this will ever work.

It's a bear market for sure, but the job market is finally starting to sour and student loan payments are resuming. Check back in 6 months.

[FarFarAway]

The girls I am referring to are not escorts and they are not on any sites. They are broke college students or students who want to make good money instead of minimum wage jobs like waitresses etc. Since I own multiple businesses, I have some common connections / vendors that are skirt chasers and I get these contacts through them.

Call me a skeptic, but I have never heard of anyone operating in this way, either in the role you are in, or more particularly, young women. I mean, there is a reason seeking is successful. They can assume, because seeking requires a membership payment and does some elements of vetting of guys, that those they connect with on the site aren't axe-murderers.

And then, I am especially skeptical of anyone such a newbie to this site. IDK what your angle is, but it isn't anything like anyone I have ever seen posting here before. You do all of this out of the goodness of your heart, hooking up desperate and horny young women with us older guys who want to defile them. Do I understand that correctly? And they all trust you.

The proof is in the pudding. Put up or shut up.

[Airmantroy]

Being an SD from seeking seems dead to me. No responses even being a diamond member and with a decent profile. I highly doubt this will ever work.

Being a Diamond member is an additional waste of money. It's all a numbers game from the start, there are numerous girls of all shapes and sizes that have been mentioned in this thread. Start there. Get your dick wet, wallet lightened and then work on your pick up game with unknown contacts. There's less pressure on you after you've established how they want to be wooed.

[Airmantroy]

I don't think so and it's your personal opinion. I shared a lot of SB's who were mostly college students and they appreciated the referrals. Most of these girls are broke out of state / country students.

Of course, these girls are not from any sites like SA, LC but are part of a trusted referral network.

Frankly, I am new to these sites as well but why not for variety's sake.

That speaks volumes to most of us who are paid members there, why would I share the number of a girl who I have had interaction with, without her permission? I don't know you or anything about you. I could very well be giving her info to her father, brother, axe murderer, or someone wanting to harm them for the fun of it. You're new to the sites and you won't have a lot of luck if you start tossing out their number without permission. The number of "pros" on SA are very few and very obvious once contact is made.

BTW, it's not just personal opinion, it's the overwhelming majority of guys who are sucessful on SA.

[AdmirerSecret]

Which Richmond thread? Can you post the link. I am going to read it.

Oh it works. The problem is not them. Highly recommend you read the Richmond thread FAQ and invest some time in learning the ins and outs of the sugar bowl. If that's too much trouble, then yes you're right, it will never work. You'll be much better off finding your dates on an escort site.

[AdmirerSecret]

I had the same experience, one month was on Diamond. No success so I moved to secret benefits, there I met 5 girls and fucked 3. One is still in contact.

Being an SD from seeking seems dead to me. No responses even being a diamond member and with a decent profile. I highly doubt this will ever work.

[JoyDrop]

I don't think so and it's your personal opinion.

Ummm, not really. Most girls on SA aren't going to be good with having their digits distributed without their permission.

Of course, these girls are not from any sites like SA, LC but are part of a trusted referral network.

Right so you are trading UTR girls, basically low volume escorts. While there will be some overlap, for the most part the girls you find on SA are NOT going to be cool with anyone contacting them out of the blue. It's a very different type of girl and a very different mindset.

[JoyDrop]

Being an SD from seeking seems dead to me. No responses even being a diamond member and with a decent profile. I highly doubt this will ever work.

Oh it works. The problem is not them. Highly recommend you read the Richmond thread FAQ and invest some time in learning the ins and outs of the sugar bowl. If that's too much trouble, then yes you're right, it will never work. You'll be much better off finding your dates on an escort site.

[RoofToPremo]

Being an SD from seeking seems dead to me. No responses even being a diamond member and with a decent profile. I highly doubt this will ever work.

[LovePunnany]

If these girls wanted their numbers available for any and everyone, they'd be on Listcrawler, Eros, etc. They don't (ok some do) want to feel like they are prostitutes. They want to feel special like we earned the pussy they let us have. Sharing numbers without explicit permission is a sure fire way to piss off a reliable SB.

Sir, I agree with you. Althought these girls are looking for sugar daddies they still screening you and if there is not an immediate attraction with you they move on.

[Airmantroy]

I own multiple successful e-commerce stores that run through affiliate marketing which is nothing but a referral system. Most of the SB's see multiple daddies and appreciate referrals.

I am seeing a lot of posts with SD's saying they can't share the direct contact #'s of SB's. The main purpose of this thread is to trade / share info and not to re-invent the wheel.

I have fucked mostly white & Latina chicks that are in early 20's, I have a big list with contact numbers, links, pics etc of the SB's.

I like a lot of variety and don't repeat unless there is a vibe. Please share contact numbers, links, pics etc by 'DM'ing me and I will do the same.

If these girls wanted their numbers available for any and everyone, they'd be on Listcrawler, Eros, etc. They don't (ok some do) want to feel like they are prostitutes. They want to feel special like we earned the pussy they let us have. Sharing numbers without explicit permission is a sure fire way to piss off a reliable SB.