Korean Agency BB

**Phazze93** · 07-14-23 13:32

Just out of random curiosity. How long do you guys think the girls at these agencies work? Months? Years?

As someone mentioned before. Their soul is probably gone after the first month LOL but presumably they're making very good money if they're able to stay in the game.

On a daily avg, 4-5 guys? If you blend slower days like Mon. / Tues. + higher volume days like weekends? Girl can easily take home 20 k+ a month, tax free.

Comparably to a monger. Pretax income would be at 300 k+ annually.

Or do most don't even get close because they're worn down within the first couple months. Half year?

Separately, are most mongers here 6 figure+ earners? Only asking from a financial allocation perspective.

Myself I'm in the lower 6 figures, within a quarter mil, in early 30's. Often find myself pondering if my life would be different if I didn't have this hobby and could be closer to retirement LOL.

**PumpNDump** · 07-14-23 11:51

Kbliss Friday funtime availability.

Viki Diva.

Hana Krystal Maia Juni Ina.

**LoveFromFrank** · 07-14-23 11:36

Finally struck out on a provider and it was less that satisfactory in terms of service. I always expect that the provider isn't the girl in the photos exactly and that's fine but if it's a bad day or maybe you don't like the work, just take some time off. Girl was not just bad service but bad attitude. As soon as I got through the door I could smell something fishy in the air and chalked it up to perhaps food she was eating. Should've been my first instinct to maybe not pull the trigger or ask for another girl. Little head got the better of me and as we made our way to the bedroom. She just hops on her phone and texts for like 5 minutes continuously as I sat there on the edge of the bed feeling a bit awkward. When she was done, she tells me to go shower after collecting the donation. A bit stand off ish but hey, again, maybe it's just not the day. I dry off and she's there naked and her body isn't bad, quite nice actually, but she just starts flicking my dick and asking if I was ready. I was so perplexed as this wasn't my usual experience with providers and she seemed annoyed that I was hard just looking at her.

I ask her to help me and she groans loudly and said "fucking bastard" in Korean not knowing I understood what she said. I had already paid though and felt pressured to follow through. I finally manage to get a half chub going despite the vibe and try to enter her and she's dry so I she just cakes a fat slap of lib and says let's go. I'm soft again and at this point I'm just over it. I ask for a refund and text the booker if there was someone else immediately available because this was just uncomfortable at this point. The booker and I were able to hash it out and came to a reasonable agreement with the fees paid and I was still able to see another girl soon after but Baby Sky was just not it that day. It is what it is and bad days happen. Still love the hobby but thought I'd put it out there that whatever is going on in her personal life affects service and may need a break for a bit.

https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-sky

**DankDonk** · 07-14-23 07:03

Originally Posted by Kent747 [View Original Post]

Some house owners are ex providers who got chummy with their regular clients. I met few owners when they were hanging around with their girls although not in recent years. Allegedly NG got hooked up with her current boss by a client who had a connection with the boss.

Its more like bookers checking out new talent to recruit them.

What concerns me the most about "clients" that get chummy with the bookers / owners is whose to say they don't have access to all our personal info? Or that they won't reveal who's who on this platform?

As of late, getting questions about this site from bookers and requests to email admins is super weird. Or bookers saying "clients" send them screenshots of threads here. Like are you guys on the side of the bros or the bookers?

**Xnaffie** · 07-14-23 02:46

Saw that Yami is back so had to make a appointment to see her. Got to the location and was greeted by her in a black see through outfit showing off her slim figure and tits. She then leads me to the room as she takes my clothes off she starts kissing me and rubbing my cock. After we shower and cleanup she has me sit on the bed and starts sucking and kissing jr till I get hard. She then pushes me down and gets on top and starts riding me in cg. She keeps going and doesn't stop. While she is riding me she is dfk me and rubbing her hands all over my body. As I am about to cum she starts riding and grinding on me even faster and more intense so I can't help it and cum inside her. As I cum she keeps pumping up and down till I go soft. For round 2 I have her get into missionary and start eating her out. She starts to get really wet and can't take it anymore and pulls me up and sticks me in telling me to fuck her. As I am about to cum I ask to cim and she happily starts sucking me off / handjob combo till I cum in her mouth. Fun time with her like before. Would recommend trying her out if you have not already seen her.

**Bastard Chorum** · 07-14-23 02:11

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

Do you think someone disclosing in the review that they had "early access" is an unreasonable ask?

Here's my take on that. For one, I could have easily just waited a day or two to post the review and no one would be none the wiser. As for why I did, I'll get to that later on. I wouldn't be surprised if there's reviews out there in the wild similar to mine that are the result of VIP or "early access" privileges. This isn't some regulated field where conflict of interest disclosure is mandated. I would argue that disclosing such details would color the perception of the review and backlash that it entails, as clearly shown here. Here's why I believe such disclosure is not needed in this space, at the end of the day it's the content of the review that matters. How honest and accurate the details are are what everyone here relies on to evaluate whether to pull the trigger or not for themselves. Whether the poster is a complete newbie, a shill, or an OG poster, the review should be judged by it's content and not the context it was derived from. Albeit, it's understandable to be more skeptical of complete newbies and shills with less than reliable track records. Everyone on this forum can critique and evaluate the review themselves according to their own rubric to draw their own conclusions.

Moving on to why I posted it "early". To me it wasn't early per se, I posted it once I saw that Krystal's ad was up on Sesang's website. Secondly, I posted at that time because I personally felt that she was worth seeing for the vast majority of mongers out there. And reviews, as many of us know and are keenly aware of, drive demand hard as recent examples of Hana, NG, Ina, Celine, etc have shown. More business for her equals a higher likelihood she'll stay longer and not bounce around. I initially saw her as a result of a recommendation from another monger who I regard as a mentor as he's showed me the ropes when first getting my feet wet seeing providers in general. He saw her on Friday and was impressed and informed me that I would appreciate her service as he knows I value that more than anything else in a session. In addition, according to him, she was originally bound for Norcal but the boss didn't have any available room so she got diverted to LA. Keeping Krystal busy here may cause her to rethink going to Norcal. And I would like that, plain and simple.

**SharingHer** · 07-13-23 22:38

Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]

So when Nicole came back briefly for about two weeks recently, I saw her once for the old time sake, and I ask how was other city vs LA, she told me that east coast was so much nicer and people pays more and she fuck a bit less. On top of that, the client there seem to be more gentle and polite.

And right after, she is gone to other city again because she didn't want to stay in L. A.

Its sad that sometimes girls move around not because of slow traffic or themselves, could be few of the bad seeds in our area too, just saying.

She was 340 or 320 all in. Then she suddenly went to 340 + 40 + 40 if I recall. Stacy did the same thing. They both left quickly. I wonder why LOL. Again, you can see Hana, Krystal, Mini, Maia, Juni and Ina for 340 all in BBFS from the moment you enter the door CIP and MSOG. Why go with inferior products that cost more?

**Vulcan1009** · 07-13-23 22:16

Originally Posted by GoldDust58 [View Original Post]

You can only say they are actually retired if you have actual proof. Even then I've heard kgirls make up fake pics to fool you that they are in Korea. With this new trend of using pics of IG models, they can rebrand in any city across the US. Scroll through all the orgs in other cities and you'll see where all the LA kgirls went. Many are popping up on the east coast and Dallas lately.

So when Nicole came back briefly for about two weeks recently, I saw her once for the old time sake, and I ask how was other city vs LA, she told me that east coast was so much nicer and people pays more and she fuck a bit less. On top of that, the client there seem to be more gentle and polite.

And right after, she is gone to other city again because she didn't want to stay in L. A.

Its sad that sometimes girls move around not because of slow traffic or themselves, could be few of the bad seeds in our area too, just saying.

**Slicer4** · 07-13-23 22:14

Originally Posted by SharingHer [View Original Post]

You all need to relax on BC's review being "early". There are many ways for bookers to advertise their girls. One of the ways is through a website. Another way is through text message. I also received a text asking if I wanted to try out Krystal before she was put on the website. They said she was just 21 and getting her feet wet so taking a limited amount of appointments at first each day. I am sure the booker reached out to several regular customers who were likely to enjoy Krystal, and guys that Krystal would probably like, guys that girls never complain about. I paid full price. Krystal is also an auto repeat for me and I have repeated a few times already. If anything, I am even more enthusiastic about her than BC.

It is funny though. BC's review styles are in my head. When I first saw the small tattoo on her, I thought to myself, "This tattoo is a surprise because this girl is not been reviewed yet. BC will write about this tattoo with the scientific name for the location on her anatomy. " Anyone who does not trust BC's reviews has problems. I have found him to be the most impartial reviewer on here. I have taken note of all of you who have reviewed Jaehee positively the last few weeks, and started to mute you.

Full disclosure: Krystal is pure dynamite, like Hana's slightly younger sister. Anyone paying 420 to 460 to meet almost anyone else in LA is nuts in my opinion is nuts when Hana, Ina, Juni, Maia, Mini and now Krystal are available for 340.

I believe a lot of clients receive texts from their frequently used bookers for incoming new to get in early, and if we partake then we pay and go, no big deal, no problem in my opinion.

BC is as real as it gets, I love reading his reviews. His post about Krystal has a good review, with cost noted. Sounds good, I look forward to reading the next.

**AsianBaller1** · 07-13-23 22:00

Even though he doesn't have the same taste as me, but his reviews seem to be legit through out the years. I normally just use his reviews to filter some of the girls.

He even saw the girls I wouldn't think of so kudos to him. I kind a use other people to judge my own sense to see if it's accurate and improve for the future.

**RocketManP** · 07-13-23 21:59

I have nothing against BC.

It's just the concept of early access needs disclosure imo.

Let me try to explain it.

Imagine you have someone higher up connected to the very top of company executive, arriving to check on your work for a day.

You prepare your ass off, give a great impression, everything looks great. You go a mile above and beyond.

Now fast forward few weeks. You've relaxed on a Friday ready to go to happy hour. You are kinda half assing your work, making some jokes with co-workers and stuff. There's some quiet guy in the corner you don't know taking some notes but you're like whatever who dis don't matter.

Then it turns out the guy in the corner was actually evaluating your work, he is an executive from private equity firm that owns your company.

It's not a perfect analogy, but hopefully it's clear what I'm trying to say here.

A lot of girls during early access know that they are about to be fucked / evaluated by VIP folks with tons of reviews and whom they need to impress so they can tell others they're good.

Obviously they won't be able. To change body or face, but they will likely be on top of their game. Often these are guys who spend a lot of money on this org.

Just my two cents.

**Kent747** · 07-13-23 21:20

Originally Posted by Leocat2020 [View Original Post]

How do I get that gig? 😋

Some house owners are ex providers who got chummy with their regular clients. I met few owners when they were hanging around with their girls although not in recent years. Allegedly NG got hooked up with her current boss by a client who had a connection with the boss.

**SharingHer** · 07-13-23 19:28

You all need to relax on BC's review being "early". There are many ways for bookers to advertise their girls. One of the ways is through a website. Another way is through text message. I also received a text asking if I wanted to try out Krystal before she was put on the website. They said she was just 21 and getting her feet wet so taking a limited amount of appointments at first each day. I am sure the booker reached out to several regular customers who were likely to enjoy Krystal, and guys that Krystal would probably like, guys that girls never complain about. I paid full price. Krystal is also an auto repeat for me and I have repeated a few times already. If anything, I am even more enthusiastic about her than BC.

It is funny though. BC's review styles are in my head. When I first saw the small tattoo on her, I thought to myself, "This tattoo is a surprise because this girl is not been reviewed yet. BC will write about this tattoo with the scientific name for the location on her anatomy. " Anyone who does not trust BC's reviews has problems. I have found him to be the most impartial reviewer on here. I have taken note of all of you who have reviewed Jaehee positively the last few weeks, and started to mute you.

Full disclosure: Krystal is pure dynamite, like Hana's slightly younger sister. Anyone paying 420 to 460 to meet almost anyone else in LA is nuts in my opinion is nuts when Hana, Ina, Juni, Maia, Mini and now Krystal are available for 340.

**RocketManP** · 07-13-23 17:52

Ideally any conflict of interest, any status of VIP or ability to have "early access" should probably be mentioned in a review and fully disclosed.

Besides maybe orgs knowing who you are, what else does one have to hide?

Ironically, I've read thousands upon thousands of kgirl reviews and I text searched scraped reviews I have from different platforms.

Anyone want to guess how many reviews mention being VIPs / early access? Barely any. Conflict of interest? Zero.

There are some intricate nuances involved when you have early access. If I read a review that is written for an early access girl, I kinda want to know that fact without having to infer or deduce it based on the poster.

But maybe that's just me.