Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 4,501 to 4,515 of 16344
-
01-31-23 15:30 #11844Senior Member

Posts: 196Looks like she's working two profiles now. She has another one where the profile pic doesn't show the neck tattoos:
Originally Posted by Bawall69
[View Original Post]
https://members.seeking.com/member/8...dWlkZS5ubC8%3D
There have been some reviews on her under that profile before.
I talked to her before but decided to pass, partially because the neck tattoos in the pics she sent me and also something about her attitude I didn't care for, I don't recall exactly what it was.
-
01-31-23 12:40 #11843Senior Member

Posts: 1155Classandsass
https://members.seeking.com/member/8...9-eabcb64d9f45
Classandsass.
In or near Conyers. Standard chat, she mentioned she was into kink. We moved things to snap where texting was fun and flirty. She sent over a few nudes. Very open to BBJ CIM and seemed open to bare, was willing to host. Went to discuss $ and she wanted 800 PPM. LOL. It's clear from her profile pics that she's older than 29 in the face and is using some heavy filters, so that was a no go from me. Considering I'm seeing a much hotter actually late 20's girl for less than half that much.
Maybe worth 200 at the most. If you're paying more than 3 for this, you need to work on your game.
-
01-31-23 12:13 #11842Senior Member

Posts: 479I wouldn't call it shallow. I call it playing the odds. Those with neck (and especially face) tattoos are much more likely to be disinterested high volume hos, IMO. That doesn't mean there aren't gems who have them. There are gems of all stripes. Still, I won't find them because I try to invest my limited time in the SB pool with higher chances of success.
Originally Posted by Bawall69
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-23 12:06 #11841Senior Member

Posts: 355Oops, yes.
Originally Posted by NewAnonymousName
[View Original Post]
https://members.seeking.com/member/c...2-2a3005a81c2a
And this was my first experience like that. I tend to avoid making such shallow assumptions, but Lesson learned I guess.
-
01-31-23 09:07 #11840Senior Member

Posts: 479Your link didn't work for me. I think you accidentally linked to your messages. I searched and found a FunHottie who has neck tattoos. Is that her? If so, neck tattoos scream cheap backpage ho, at least to me. I would have expected just the kind of disinterested service you got.
Originally Posted by Bawall69
[View Original Post]
-
01-31-23 01:04 #11839Senior Member

Posts: 355FunHottie
https://members.seeking.com/messages...8-11cd22c8d37d
Just saw this one. When I texted, she immediately said she wanted to meet right away because rent is due. That tends to make me nervous, but little head was in charge tonight.
She is definitely real and the pics are definitely her. If anything, She may have lost a little weight since the pics, but not really noticeable. She is also very nice and easy to talk to. She seemed very nervous, and whenever I started touching she would fire up more conversation.
Sexually, she was definitely not into me. I am always willing to take my time breaking the ice, and am reasonably young and attractive, so I am not used to feeling that way, but the chemistry was not there. In all of her talking before, she showed me a picture of her son and his Dad, so now I assume based on him that she is more into black guys. But then weirdly she also made it very clear that she didn't want deep penetration. I have read reviews before where guys would talk about a girl positioning herself to where it was impossible to get all the way in, and I always assumed I was just too small to experience that (I am average size), but no. It was just that no one had ever done it to me and now I finally know what you guys are talking about. LOL.
In short, she is very real and she is hot. She wasn't crazy or dangerous, so not the worst experience I have had. If she is into you maybe it could be an amazing time, but I doubt I will repeat. I gave her $$$ She was here for a couple hours, but the sex should have been a QV. I usually take my time, but I was just ready to nut and call it a night.
-
01-31-23 00:17 #11838Senior Member

Posts: 277When I met she was 21. That article was few years old mate! I don't go less than 21 personally.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
-
01-30-23 23:37 #11837Senior Member

Posts: 107Never
Stories like this are why I stopped even talking to girls on seeking who say they are under 21. I had a several close calls with meetups up showed IDs of being under 18. A quick walk away and creating a whole new GV account / number.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
-
01-30-23 22:52 #11836Senior Member

Posts: 1743I may have to revisit that one if could get her down to 350 and BBFS. I'm not crazy about that metal in her face, but still could be worth it. Thanks for the intel.
Originally Posted by AmpFanatl
[View Original Post]
-
01-30-23 22:48 #11835Senior Member

Posts: 1743She is very pretty and sounds like a party, but I wouldn't go anywhere near a girl under 18, even if it was platonic. They can still charge you with "Contributing the delinquency of a minor", if nothing else.
Originally Posted by PeterPan
[View Original Post]
But so you met this girl on there when she was 15 or 16 why / o? That does sound like a good story, but of course can understand if you don't want to tell it, publicly.
-
01-30-23 19:46 #11834Senior Member

Posts: 479It's presented in the article as a mutual relationship after he met her at an event. That's why the 16 year old age of consent is protecting the guy who moved out of state with her. If it comes out that the 44 year old actually met her on Seeking, I would be shocked if they don't throw the book at him. It is definitely illegal to pay a girl under 18 for sex. Even now, with the assumption that he met her as a civilian, the article implies that the authorities are considering lesser charges for not disclosing her whereabouts.
Originally Posted by PeterPan
[View Original Post]
So as I said before, never, ever, ever have a PPM or an allowance arrangement with a girl under 18 unless it's platonic (which none of us are looking for). If you can pick her up as a civilian and she's above the state's age of consent, that's for you to decide even though I personally wouldn't go there either. But if money is changing hands, do yourself a favor and just don't. Find an 18 year old instead.
("You" is plural to the entire board. I'm not implying that you are doing this, Peter Pan.).
-
01-30-23 19:21 #11833Senior Member

Posts: 277Age of consent!
Since this thread was talking on age and consent thought of sharing this article!
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
Funny thing is I actually met this girl last year on seeking!!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...r-16-home.html
-
01-30-23 18:58 #11832Senior Member

Posts: 107IsabelleR12
TOFTT. Red heads of my weakness.
Originally Posted by SugarDaddio
[View Original Post]
Agreed on 350 PPM and she hosts.
On the looks side. That is 100% her in the pics, she has also lost some weight since the pics were taken.
She is spunky and eager to please, and has some 420 available if that is your thing.
Not even a discussion of a rubber after I told her I had a vasectomy. Gives a great BBJ with some DT, was a fun lay overall. Even has a trimmed little Bush above her kitty, so you know the curtains match the drapes.
-
01-30-23 18:20 #11831Senior Member

Posts: 352Jenny Love
She asked for 500 first meeting as I said I was looking for on-going. Told her that was more than I could do even on the first meet. She dropped to 400. That is still too much for me unfortunately. I haven't tried to negotiate any lower yet LOL. Let us know if she does go lower.
May the pussy be with you.
SD.
Originally Posted by WoodstockShane
[View Original Post]
-
01-30-23 16:56 #11830Senior Member

Posts: 140JennyLove
Chatting with this lady.
Anyone have any intel to pass on?
Stay Frosty!
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...3-27f1a6a68f93















Reply With Quote









