Korean Agency BB

[Bastard Chorum]

Whether it's 100%, 99%, or 75%, is irrelevant since one has to assume they are fake if there is no prior information to the contrary. Even if there are prior reviews, most hobbyists who see someone in person cannot tell for certain whether the pictures are fake (not the same person), real but altered, or real but from several years ago. Hobbyists' physical descriptions are very unreliable and are open to interpretation based on the words used and their own biases about looks ("not my type" That's why we get vague descriptions on body type and age, and that pics are "representative" or "90% accurate". All of these descriptions are unreliable and near meaningless. One has to see in-person in order to decide for themselves about their looks, regardless of whether the pics are "real".

I adopt a more practical perspective than your pessimistic view of other's descriptive capacity. Not everyone can be a Pulitzer Prize awardee in literature or a walking thesaurus. Their own limitations shouldn't discount what they can offer and bring to the table. Everyone's description will be bound by their biases and collective pool of people that are familiar and recognizable to them. That's why in lieu of physical descriptions, some opt to point to a pornstar, celebrity, etc. As a visual proxy. I commend and tip my hat off to those that take the time to write and post a review, no matter how succinct or verbose it may be. We desperately need more people that do and everyone benefits from it.

Given the alternative (none really), any feedback from a trusted source is good. Biases should always be expected regardless of who it's from because, pardon the platitude, everyone is inherently biased. It's vastly more important to take into account the bias, see through it as best you can, and distill and formulate your own conclusions and key points from it. It's been tossed about here and there but a good method is to pay attention and put more weight on those that have similar tastes and preferences to your own. Similarly, compare and contrast reviews of girls that you and another have seen to determine biases and what aspects you both experienced and can agree upon so you can focus on that moving forward.

As I see it, the more reviews, the better. By collating them, picking them apart, and distilling them, you can form a more informed and realistic narrative of who you'll actually see.

[BuildingGuy]

By all means, adopt whatever approach works for you. Just keep in mind, once you air it out on a public forum, it's fair game to be challenged, criticized, and scrutinized by any and all here.

Based on what you linked, your definition of 'real' pictures seems to be amateur selfies shot exclusively with a cell phone. If you've been mongering for 10 years with kgirls, you should know that is the exception and not the norm. For those that do post pictures of themselves, it largely consists of professionally taken shots at a studio, touched up and photoshopped to the girls preference or left up to the expertise of the photo editor / retoucher (kdolls is infamous for this as sometimes their girls look so damn similar). And in some cases, you can tell it's from the same photographer / studio as the props are the same, if only marginally rearranged or from a different angle.

Given the nature of the business, it stands to reason that they need to put their best face / tits / ass / body forward to pique the interest of their window shopping customers. Ultimately, giving rise to the adoption of professional photoshoots. You won't find detailed anecdotes of their personality, favorite pastimes, or the like here. All you get are photos, pertinent measurements, and an alphabet soup of services rendered. This has been the formula for kgirls for a while.

All said, you can definitely make the case that there's misrepresentation of who you finally see behind the door as a result of the above mentioned format but, IMO, for most of us here, real pictures means it's really her standing in front of the camera lens. Wildly imaginative, ambitious, and creative photoshoppers appears to be an unfortunate side effect of the whole process for us mongers. Sadly enough, one that isn't going to change or go away anytime soon regardless of monger's gripes about it, including mines.

The photos you see are more often than not, the best representation of what you can get. Take it for what it is and evaluate / decide accordingly. From the vantage of mongers, not the best scenario to be in but if someone has a better approach, I'm all ears.

"There is a class system. The 90 day wonders want to make money fast and clearly falsify their photos. They turn, they burn and then they are gone. The superstars and UTRs have such loyal followings that they really don't need photos or advertising. But many of them have posted totally accurate photos. I won't mention current providers but didn't Moli, Megan, Roya, Cona and Shannon (among others) look almost exactly like their ads?

[Bastard Chorum]

I am responding to your post because you were articulate and made a case. I will agree that I used superlatives to make a point. I will get more specific: 90% of Kgirl pics have been found elsewhere online as Korean models. Another 9% come from who-knows-where. I'll allow 1% that could be real but highly photoshopped. So, still invalid in any practical sense. I have seen Megan. Hell, she worked literally across the street from me. Her pics were not representative of what I saw. Still sexy, no complaints, other than she demanded a condom which was odd and unfortunate. Want to see real pics? Here ya go:

https://goodgirls.catalog.to/s/goodgirls/goodgirls/cmh

I stand by my assertion.

By all means, adopt whatever approach works for you. Just keep in mind, once you air it out on a public forum, it's fair game to be challenged, criticized, and scrutinized by any and all here.

Based on what you linked, your definition of 'real' pictures seems to be amateur selfies shot exclusively with a cell phone. If you've been mongering for 10 years with kgirls, you should know that is the exception and not the norm. For those that do post pictures of themselves, it largely consists of professionally taken shots at a studio, touched up and photoshopped to the girls preference or left up to the expertise of the photo editor / retoucher (kdolls is infamous for this as sometimes their girls look so damn similar). And in some cases, you can tell it's from the same photographer / studio as the props are the same, if only marginally rearranged or from a different angle.

Given the nature of the business, it stands to reason that they need to put their best face / tits / ass / body forward to pique the interest of their window shopping customers. Ultimately, giving rise to the adoption of professional photoshoots. You won't find detailed anecdotes of their personality, favorite pastimes, or the like here. All you get are photos, pertinent measurements, and an alphabet soup of services rendered. This has been the formula for kgirls for a while.

All said, you can definitely make the case that there's misrepresentation of who you finally see behind the door as a result of the above mentioned format but, IMO, for most of us here, real pictures means it's really her standing in front of the camera lens. Wildly imaginative, ambitious, and creative photoshoppers appears to be an unfortunate side effect of the whole process for us mongers. Sadly enough, one that isn't going to change or go away anytime soon regardless of monger's gripes about it, including mines.

The photos you see are more often than not, the best representation of what you can get. Take it for what it is and evaluate / decide accordingly. From the vantage of mongers, not the best scenario to be in but if someone has a better approach, I'm all ears.

[Bastard Chorum]

Is Megan back?

No, at least not that I'm aware of. I simply used her as an example to prove a point.

[GoodBoy88]

If seeing Remi nude doesn't make you happy, it's time to hang up the boots and go have fun with civies. Go browse on PD and see what ratchet hoes you will find anywhere near her price and looks. Sure, you can find girls that look exactly like the model in those pics at a rate of 3000 per hour, but we pay 10 percent for something just as hot. No thank you, I will take Remi over that model for value. In and out satisfied. Remi is my atf, the hottest in LA, to me. If her service isn't good for you, you aren't doing her right. I'm not saying she is 10 all around, hottest ever, but she is exactly how I love them. One man's beast is another man's beauty. We all wear different googles, some groggy but Remi holds her own on body. Amazing rack for tit lovers. More girls should call her doc.

More proof in my mind that the fellas here evaluating photos are operating under freakin amateur hour skills. That girl in the link is pretty damn close to a 10, with near perfect proportions. Remi is hot, but she does not have this body. Her Legs are proportionally shorter, her arms are more doughy, and when she sits in front of you giving you a handjob you can see a loose stomach. No doubt she's hot but come on now.

I've been with so many civilians and pros at this point that looks are less important to me than performance and vibe. This is why I rely on trusted opinions. not pictures.

That's bullshit because George didn't say Remi was ugly, he said she's hot, but not on par with the model in that pic, which is true. I agree with George, I think you'd have to be smoking crack to say Remi's physique is on par with the model in that picture. What George said is exactly on point, her legs are proportionally shorter and not as firmly shaped. Her arms are in fact doughy and straight, not having the curvature of that model in the picture. And yea Remi has a small pouch on her belly whereas that model is flat as a drum. Remi straight up told me herself she felt out of shape and said she never works out or anything, and yea she exactly looks like a girl who never works out. The model on that picture clearly does. Remi has big tits on a fairly flat but curvy body. I don't have rose colored glasses, but clearly some of the members here do when it comes to her. She's not a tight spinner and she's not "cream of the current crop" IMO. If you ask me Dana has her bear easily in all areas except she doesn't have Remi's huge tits. Mini also has superior looks and service IMO. We won't even talk about Remi's face, because we all already know it's not the best.

[LandOfKGirls]

If seeing Remi nude doesn't make you happy, it's time to hang up the boots and go have fun with civies. Go browse on PD and see what ratchet hoes you will find anywhere near her price and looks. Sure, you can find girls that look exactly like the model in those pics at a rate of 3000 per hour, but we pay 10 percent for something just as hot. No thank you, I will take Remi over that model for value. In and out satisfied. Remi is my atf, the hottest in LA, to me. If her service isn't good for you, you aren't doing her right. I'm not saying she is 10 all around, hottest ever, but she is exactly how I love them. One man's beast is another man's beauty. We all wear different googles, some groggy but Remi holds her own on body. Amazing rack for tit lovers. More girls should call her doc.

Remi is the cream of the current crop. She packs it all looks, attitude and service.

[GoldDust58]

More proof in my mind that the fellas here evaluating photos are operating under freakin amateur hour skills. That girl in the link is pretty damn close to a 10, with near perfect proportions. Remi is hot, but she does not have this body. Her Legs are proportionally shorter, her arms are more doughy, and when she sits in front of you giving you a handjob you can see a loose stomach. No doubt she's hot but come on now.

I've been with so many civilians and pros at this point that looks are less important to me than performance and vibe. This is why I rely on trusted opinions. not pictures.

If seeing Remi nude doesn't make you happy, it's time to hang up the boots and go have fun with civies. Go browse on PD and see what ratchet hoes you will find anywhere near her price and looks. Sure, you can find girls that look exactly like the model in those pics at a rate of 3000 per hour, but we pay 10 percent for something just as hot. No thank you, I will take Remi over that model for value. In and out satisfied. Remi is my atf, the hottest in LA, to me. If her service isn't good for you, you aren't doing her right. I'm not saying she is 10 all around, hottest ever, but she is exactly how I love them. One man's beast is another man's beauty. We all wear different googles, some groggy but Remi holds her own on body. Amazing rack for tit lovers. More girls should call her doc.

[LARckr720]

No way. I was told they no longer do duos.

Damnnn.

Got be a marketing thing. Happens before.

They do duos, some guy has time of his time and writes a raving review. Drums up business for the duos. They stop and yet guys start booking other girl in hopes Pepsi pops in for impromptu threesome. Happen to me with Vixen.

[TD Leafs]

More proof in my mind that fellas here evaluating photos is freakin amateur hour. That girl in the link is pretty damn close to a 10, with near perfect proportions. Remi is hot, but she does not have this body. Her Legs are shorter, her arms are doughier, when she sits in front of you giving you a handjob you can see a loose stomach. No doubt she's hot but come on now.

IDK about that, I agree with OP that photo is Remi's body type.

[MrGeorge]

More proof in my mind that the fellas here evaluating photos are operating under freakin amateur hour skills. That girl in the link is pretty damn close to a 10, with near perfect proportions. Remi is hot, but she does not have this body. Her Legs are proportionally shorter, her arms are more doughy, and when she sits in front of you giving you a handjob you can see a loose stomach. No doubt she's hot but come on now.

I've been with so many civilians and pros at this point that looks are less important to me than performance and vibe. This is why I rely on trusted opinions. not pictures.

Yep. Very good representation of Remi's body!

[CaptCaveman99]

Hi: today I see Julie at Thailand shop. Her body not so skinny like hot fuck Pepsi but looking sexy to me. We in darkness room she touch my body with soft hand. Make my cock wake up. Nice feeling of relax. I touch her breast and ass. Soft skin now my cock hard. I ask for hot fuck. She laughing say no no no she can no do. I very want hot fuck with sexy Thailand girl so say I give good top. She say how much tip for Julie? I say 3 hundred is ok? She say ok. She move down pants and panties get on bed. I so happy and surprise her no want the condom. I put hard cock inside Julie pussy. So wonderful this feeling. I want stay this wonderful pussy feeling. Life to hard now. Want this happy pussy feeling not stop. But to good feeling my cock squirt the cum inside. Julie clean me give more relax touch. So good surprise her give the no condom hot fuck.

Did she love you long time?

[CaptCaveman99]

I just got blacklisted by booker gray for asking about a girl's availability by text. Asked if she was available they said not today all booked up. Said ok how about tomorrow? Replied with "do not contact me again, I'm very busy and you're wasting my time. Other girls available. You ask about busy girl you book other girl. Fuck yourself time waster".

Whoever answered the texts for Booker Gray was very nice before. New person has a short fuse.

Just because other girls are available doesn't mean I want to see them. So now I'm blacklisted.

Luckily I'm still good with CG, M, and Jane's girls.

Must have been off his meds again as the same thing happened me. I didn't respond in kind as it is pointless.

[Irresponsible]

Anyone here been with Allie? How old is she actually and her body type?

Late 30's or in her 40's. In the lighting she will look in her 30's to the untrained eye.

[Eddie Penisi]

I was just browsing through and saw ANN from M pop up on CGLA with stats of DD cup which is NO WHERE CLOSE.

More like saggy small C or big B. Thing got so bad that multiple booker booking same girl with all different stats and names.

Sometime I just feel tired to do all that research and at the end just went back to the usual.

Looking at most of recent post from yall gents, many were rebrands, fake or heavily photoshopped.

The good old days of real photos are gone, I don't mind glammed up photoshop like Nicole, Allie or Mini or Rami, but some just a complete different person.

I think we should start a list of who use real photo BUT glammed up, many of us has been fooled by booker and took that grenade hard.

I will start here just a few:.

Lyn, Cami and Rebecca are still working.

I agree with your list and I'll add some more of current working girls.

Baby Sky.

Soy.

Sweet (I'm like 90% sure).

Kira (Its her just younger looking).

Cami.

Jamie.

Yara.

Heri.

Min (BBBJ Queen).

Bella (Thai in OC).

Jay DD (She just left but I think she'll be back).

Ace / Diva (Also gone for now but will probably be back. I'm like 80% sure those are older pics of her).

Nora's last set of pics were of her. I know she's gone but someone mentioned she was coming back to OC.

I know I'm forgetting some.

[BuildingGuy]

Anyone here been with Allie? How old is she actually and her body type?

"She looks exactly like this photo plus a few years: https://myalbum.com/album/Yb77hNMuHTjK . See is mid-40's. Her reviews are generally accurate. I am a fan because her personality is so pleasant. ".