Rubrankings.com
Click here for the best sugar babies
Ava Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
click for FREE hookups
Top Tier Escorts
Top Escorts
Sex Vacation
Mix and Match Combo Pack

Viagra 100mg
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #29796

    Angel

    Quote Originally Posted by NintyNine  [View Original Post]
    That new girl Angel at M must be stocky, judging by the amount of photoshop distortion in the photos.
    Not stocky. Not super thin like Miso, but not a dough ball either. More curvy. Cute girl. Didn't blow me away with service, but left satisfied. Could see others repeating if there was good chemistry.

  2. #29795
    Quote Originally Posted by Kent747  [View Original Post]
    Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.
    How ironic. Bay area has a higher cost of living too. Yet they get cheaper girls.

    I'm voting with my wallet. I haven't seen a girl in just over 6 months. Just masturbating for free in the meantime.

  3. #29794
    Quote Originally Posted by RandySteel  [View Original Post]
    I have been looking to her when I read her reviews under her previous identity of Jennie. The damage is done and my money wasted. Her plastic surgeon does nice work in masking her age. Estimating her age to be close to 35; however, her augmented face and youthful body appearance does achieve lower guessing. Her looks. I was not disappointed. The service. Was a grave disappointment and found reviews to be inflated. Be prepared to suck her tongue and not her lips. Dining at the why as she lay flat in a lazy manner hurt this ego. I went through the motions as fast as possible. She is not the worst provider I have had the pleasure of seeing, it just lacked any connection. My complaint is her cost does not match the expectation. Use of the term YMMV is warranted.
    Seems hella easy to waste $400 these days.

  4. #29793
    Senior Member


    Posts: 566

    Fake Pics

    Quote Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr  [View Original Post]
    All accounts are true. Young, tight, cute, bbfscip and won't be around long. She is probably getting pounded like crazy, definitely by me at least. LOL. Her time will be short, they always are.
    Those pics are from a Korean model's Instagram (e_seoa). What does Shani really look like?

  5. #29792
    Senior Member


    Posts: 566

    K-Girl Prices

    Back in the day the BBFS apartment K-girls had to compete with some massage parlors with high quality K-girls. Specifically, in Inglewood that had several places with younger K-girls. Oriental Acupressure on Manchester just east of the 405 had young K-girls willing to offer BBFS for a 100 tip with the house fee of 80 (I think) for the hour. Nearly the same service minus the privacy of an apartment and the higher standard of the space (I. E. Bed, shower, etc). Now days K-girl MPs all seem to be staffed by the old timers and most MPs seem to be staffed by Chinese girls either providing only rub-and-tugs or they are laundry lady cum dumpsters trying to hit loads per day quotas set by their boss.

  6. #29791

    Shani at Candy

    All accounts are true. Young, tight, cute, bbfscip and won't be around long. She is probably getting pounded like crazy, definitely by me at least. LOL. Her time will be short, they always are.

  7. #29790
    Quote Originally Posted by Kent747  [View Original Post]
    Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.
    This forum -like others- is a locker room, so I'm less critical about dudes tryna look cool. But noble? Big yikes. That's a no for for me dawg. Still, even if dudes were hush about flashing cash, the girls would not be.

  8. #29789

    True

    Quote Originally Posted by EyceeRaw  [View Original Post]
    It's always the best to just ask the booker. Honestly, I don't find these lineup posts helpful. The intention is good, but they're never going to be as accurate as simply messaging the booker yourself.
    I asked because SFK still has Joah on their list. When I asked about her, booker said she was gone. Like not even on vacation gone. Thought maybe the OP had inside info but yeah, imma just ask the booker myself.

  9. #29788

    Yara. KG LA

    Remi is another provider I am trying to see with this booker. Timing was not my friend for Remi, Yara was recommended by the booker. This lower price comforts my chance in seeing someone with low reviews. Pleasantly surprised with Yara and our DFK fest led to a passionate experience. There was action from the minute we entered her room. I had to pee and did not realize her restroom was located just outside the room. She escorted me and wiped me clean after. Girls should Escort us more often. Her pleasing attitude continued and she gave me a naughty wink during BBBJ. 2 pops and I think she would have gone for 3 if time permitted. Great time for the price and I would return.

  10. #29787

    Sakura. Ktownkgirl

    New org entry and I read reporting on another chat. The tattoo art covering many parts of her body was new to find on an rather skinny Asian provider. If you fantasize Anime girls, her looks will not disappoint. Her service is so so. She does not enjoy well endowed man. I was not disappointed but the rather high price did not match expectations. It was like being with a girl who is part of the Yakuza. Interesting experience. Recommend for Anime fans.

  11. #29786

    Sia CGLA

    I have been looking to her when I read her reviews under her previous identity of Jennie. The damage is done and my money wasted. Her plastic surgeon does nice work in masking her age. Estimating her age to be close to 35; however, her augmented face and youthful body appearance does achieve lower guessing. Her looks. I was not disappointed. The service. Was a grave disappointment and found reviews to be inflated. Be prepared to suck her tongue and not her lips. Dining at the why as she lay flat in a lazy manner hurt this ego. I went through the motions as fast as possible. She is not the worst provider I have had the pleasure of seeing, it just lacked any connection. My complaint is her cost does not match the expectation. Use of the term YMMV is warranted.

  12. #29785

    Ask the booker

    Quote Originally Posted by GardenBae  [View Original Post]
    Does this mean the other ladies that are listed on the site and not on this list are not available? For example, you don't Viki or Alli's name for SFK. Does that mean they are not available?
    It's always the best to just ask the booker. Honestly, I don't find these lineup posts helpful. The intention is good, but they're never going to be as accurate as simply messaging the booker yourself.

  13. #29784

    Availability

    Quote Originally Posted by JoyTraveller  [View Original Post]
    SFK- https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models.

    Dana, Tiana, Lucy, and Lina.

    Kbliss- https://kbliss.net.

    Angel, Tiana, Lucy, Jessica.
    Does this mean the other ladies that are listed on the site and not on this list are not available? For example, you don't Viki or Alli's name for SFK. Does that mean they are not available?

  14. #29783
    Quote Originally Posted by BuddhaHead  [View Original Post]
    Price increases are due mainly to supply / demand, not cpi inflation. When there is an oligopoly like the Kgirl business, and there's a growing demand and limited supply for these type of services, they can raise their prices to whatever the market will bear. You stated this yourself in your next post that some dropped their price because of reduced demand.
    I'm merely arguing that the kgirl model is just like any other business bowing down to the pressure of inflation. Based on that premise, the rates we're seeing today falls in line with an inflation adjusted price point. Regardless of what you think about the price point, I'm just offering an explanation that's both plausible and reasonable.

    Attributing price increases to only supply / demand dynamics oversimplifies and takes a lot of nuance away IMO. By that logic, the few years following FOSTA / SESTA and preceding COVID should have seen a massive surge in price as kgirl numbers dwindled and tapered off. Only when COVID was in full force and inflation started to rise dramatically, did we see increases across all agencies. Don't get me wrong, supply / demand plays a huge part but inflation has a sizeable role too.

    I'll make the case that inflation is built into the rates already. CPI, the government's measure of inflation as experienced by consumers, comprises of many market baskets. Three of which is directly applicable our situation: Shelter, Housing Supplies, and Transportation (specifically the Motor Fuel subset). I'm not sure if you've ever had the unfortunate and very awkward experience of being at an incall when they are restocking. For one thing, it's unexpected. Secondly, it's jarring how the ajummas are rather nonchalant about the whole thing. I was pretty much ignored while they were hauling up and unloading Kirkland body wash, water bottles, boxes of Okamotos, and other toiletries from a mini-van. I share this as it relates to the Housing Supplies market basket portion of the CPI. All three baskets have been hit hard during COVID. So when property management comes back when your incall lease ends with a take or leave it 10% or more increase in rent, all manner of housing supplies cost more, and fuel prices are at an all time high, the increase in overhead has to go somewhere. The bosses could be feeling charitable and take less of the profit and absorb the cost but that is incredibly unlikely. So the portion the house takes to cover these expenses increase. Consequently, the rate as a whole increases. I would imagine even durable goods (beds, mattress, mirrors, towels, etc.) would be factored in.

    Now these are just observations and musings of a random monger and may or may not accurately reflect what is really is happening. I'm just connecting the dots of what I see of the scene, my buying experiences, and publicly available data points about the current economy. This could be very much be utterly useless and worth jack shit to some but I hope that others can appreciate a better understanding of or at least an approximation of the what may be happening behind the scene. Personally, I find it satisfying when I can piece together a puzzle that makes sense to me even if I'm completely wrong about it. Take of it what you will.

  15. #29782
    Quote Originally Posted by SsStuntCock  [View Original Post]
    Meanwhile the Bay only increased 18% during this time span. 220 then, 260 now.
    Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
High Class Companions
Best Escorts
click for FREE hookups
Adult Live Video Cam Chat Models 4U!        Watch Online Cams Girl Now!
Generic Cialis (Vidalista 20 mg) USA to USA Only

Mvitra 20 mg (Generic Levitra or vardenafil 20 mg pills)
Fast-Acting Kamagra Oral Jelly – Feel the Difference in Minutes! Best ED Solution – Powerful Combination for Peak Performance! Complete Protection – Stay Safe & Stress-Free!

click for FREE hookups
Protected by Copyscape