Korean Agency BB

**Veni1** · 04-21-22 23:47

Apparently ca-kdolls has resurfaced. New website is: www.kstars.ch.

The only problem is that there are no Los Angeles gals listed. The wave of the future?

**HotManGuy** · 04-21-22 23:11

Went to go see Hana from SFK the other weekend. Heard some good things on the thread and decided to give her a shot. Open the door, was not expecting what I saw. She wasn't unattractive but definitely not what the pictures represented. I could say older but still not great. She was very friendly and DFK right after the door closed. Giggling to the bed room and making small talk. Went for the shower and the blue toast, it was what you'd expect. What I didn't expect was her to DT me. That came at a complete shock. I'm not huge by any means but that doesn't happen often. Little preview for later. Sat me down to give more DT and then proceeded to pound me HARD. She played with herself as I pounded her and was yelling plenty. Was for show? Who knows, it felt good. The fucking lasted most of the time and then gave a really good massage that was strong and professional. Kissing and then shower. Would I go back? Probably not. I heard she squirted but I couldn't get her to sadly. Was fun but not someone I can see myself going back to every week. Definitely worth a try.

**FillHerPussyUp** · 04-21-22 22:32

Calling out the inconsistencies of your post / reviews is not "being in love" with your post, it's just exactly that, calling out your inconsistencies, don't get it twisted. Can't dispute what's fact.

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

Why would I address or dispute anything that is written by someone who is in love with my posts. You must have something better to do or not.

**AlexisDavis** · 04-21-22 22:26

Going to interrupt all the arguing here and get back to reviewing girls:

SharingHer told me to pass this, but I gave it a shot anyways. Overall everything he said was accurate—it was a great, fun time. He was also right that I wouldn't like the girls themselves, but that is usually not their fault, I just have different tastebuds from many here.

Objectively speaking, the duo itself was very good. The girls were really enjoying themselves, they're fun, they want to please, and they are willing to do just about everything you'd see in a porno. The double BBBJ was one of the most pleasurable things I'd ever experience. Both girls have a lot of BBBJ stamina and individually very skilled. I rate the double BBBJ as one of the best parts of this experience.

Stacy is not my type, but she is attractive enough. Her face isn't all that, but she's got a nice body, like a smaller, younger, skinnier Allie. The photos on the site are her, just super glamoured up, and she is blonde now. She takes charge of the session, but like someone else said, Cara is not shy.

Cara looks like JAV star Ayami Shunka, just taken down a few notches. Her body is not as nice as Stacy's, but she's still attractive enough. I think both girls, while not repeatable for me, are both attractive enough to make the experience good.

I would say Cara has a slightly better face, while Stacy is overall more attractive because of her body. Both are in their late 20's or early 30's, and very playful. Very willing to please and try every position you want. There is no wiping between switching, and they are very comfortable with each other. The three way DFK is an interesting treat.

Overall I would recommend this, if you don't mind dishing out the 800. If you're going to have a duo, this is the duo that is closest to what we all imagine a duo to be, especially if you find the girls attractive. I can see why SharingHer likes them so much. I would probably not repeat since it's a one and done experience for me, despite it being a good one. Neither of them are repeatable solo for me, but if I had to choose, probably Stacy since she's quite the freak. However Cara's rimming skills are probably comparable to Stella's, which is saying a lot.

I'm done, you may now resume fighting amongst yourselves.

**Toungsten** · 04-21-22 22:10

Originally Posted by Shinjiku [View Original Post]

Rule #1: Don't stick your dick in crazy.

We are all guilty of breaking Rule #1 in regards to Megan. But allow me to articulate her speciality with "anything goes". If you like pissing, farting, shitting, smelling / licking armpits, eating foot / ass, HJ with her hair wrapped in semen and body sweat, have herself a big strap on and ram you in the butt, bring a pre-op trans and have a 3 P. Then yes she is all game. If any of those fetishes fits your liking then I doubt any other Kgirl in the market will be able to fulfill those needs other than Megan.

Just remember by breaking rule #1 you have to deal with the consequences.

It takes two to tango doesn't it?

**Toungsten** · 04-21-22 22:08

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

He just "misremembered" what he wrote. He only remembered that he was the 2nd one to review her in 2016. You know, they say memory is the 2nd thing to go when you get old.

Looks like the ability to follow my posts hasn't gone from you. Try more sex and less criticizing.

**Toungsten** · 04-21-22 22:07

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

On the other end of that spectrum, let's not underestimate the impact that 'overblown positive talk' can have.

To the noobs reading this, 3-star handles sporting 3k+ posts dont mean diddly if those reviews are really just advertisements.

Were those "advertisements" not true. That's the point isn't it?

**Toungsten** · 04-21-22 22:05

Originally Posted by FillHerPussyUp [View Original Post]

Thank you too, glad to see that you don't dispute facts.

Why would I address or dispute anything that is written by someone who is in love with my posts. You must have something better to do or not.

**FillHerPussyUp** · 04-21-22 21:21

Thank you too, glad to see that you don't dispute facts.

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

Thank you too for the read.

**SsStuntCock** · 04-21-22 21:15

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

I don't know where all this crazy talk about Megan is coming from (…) Let's not scare off the newbies with some overblown negative talk

On the other end of that spectrum, let's not underestimate the impact that 'overblown positive talk' can have.

To the noobs reading this, 3-star handles sporting 3k+ posts dont mean diddly if those “reviews” are really just advertisements.

**BuddhaHead** · 04-21-22 21:02

Originally Posted by FillHerPussyUp [View Original Post]

Well the beholder doesn't know how to lie. First she's "She is just so hot to look at. Beautiful face and a smokin' hot body that she uses to entrance and captivate her partner. " But now that she's back and with a new price and haven't even seen her again because she hasn't even started yet, "she's not that good looking. " 'What? What happened so suddenly? I know what happened and I know you won't admit it but I'll admit it here for you, it's her new price. It turned you off enough to make you comment that, even though, in your reviews of her, you knew well that you loved her looks and emphasized it.

He just "misremembered" what he wrote. He only remembered that he was the 2nd one to review her in 2016. You know, they say memory is the 2nd thing to go when you get old.

**Toungsten** · 04-21-22 19:47

Originally Posted by FillHerPussyUp [View Original Post]

I believe on-lookers on this forum and on review sites are just trying to look for the most honest, consistent feedback from several trusted sources, not just read reviews that speak of a grandiose time and describing a girl to having "the best of the best looks", just to see that SAME reviewer turn and come to the forums, years later and not speak highly of her "Didn't think she was that good looking. " (your words), as he so once did, even from his most latest review of said girl. So she wasn't as hot like you last wrote about her? "Her looks can be considered absolutely gorgeous. She is really hot and probably could be a model but to me she is in a special category that is reserved for a very few. Super hot and special. " (your words). Claim to see her ONLY twice "I never saw, in the only two times that I saw her, any dysfunction in her mind or personality. " (Again, your words) but yet I found another 2 reviews from Megan, one where she even did a duo, written by you, Mufftime / Toungsten, from my count, that's 4 visits based on your reviews alone, not only 2 like you claim. Here I'll help with the refresher, all 4 reviews:

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-1896555

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-1933181

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-2069860

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-2190718

Now, if she wasn't a favorite, then why take the time to revisit over and over and review several times, even with your claim of seeing her only twice? If she wasn't that good looking then why say in the reviews several times, that she's gorgeous, hot. Etc? Did her price change or location suddenly make her not as hot now? Can't consider her a favorite despite the glowing repeated reviews that you wrote of her before she left the scene? I mean if the purpose of a review is to shill, have a fap story for later or just take up space and then come on here and contradict your own words, then it's fair to say we know who's reviews or post we should consider as not reliable information. Not being consistent or can't get the full story straight, is signs of dishonesty, just facts.

Thank you too for the read.

**FillHerPussyUp** · 04-21-22 19:45

Well the beholder doesn't know how to lie. First she's "She is just so hot to look at. Beautiful face and a smokin' hot body that she uses to entrance and captivate her partner. " But now that she's back and with a new price and haven't even seen her again because she hasn't even started yet, "she's not that good looking. " 'What? What happened so suddenly? I know what happened and I know you won't admit it but I'll admit it here for you, it's her new price. It turned you off enough to make you comment that, even though, in your reviews of her, you knew well that you loved her looks and emphasized it.

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

**Shinjiku** · 04-21-22 19:37

Rule #1: Don't stick your dick in crazy.

We are all guilty of breaking Rule #1 in regards to Megan. But allow me to articulate her speciality with "anything goes". If you like pissing, farting, shitting, smelling / licking armpits, eating foot / ass, HJ with her hair wrapped in semen and body sweat, have herself a big strap on and ram you in the butt, bring a pre-op trans and have a 3 P. Then yes she is all game. If any of those fetishes fits your liking then I doubt any other Kgirl in the market will be able to fulfill those needs other than Megan.

Just remember by breaking rule #1 you have to deal with the consequences.

**FillHerPussyUp** · 04-21-22 19:27

I believe on-lookers on this forum and on review sites are just trying to look for the most honest, consistent feedback from several trusted sources, not just read reviews that speak of a grandiose time and describing a girl to having "the best of the best looks", just to see that SAME reviewer turn and come to the forums, years later and not speak highly of her "Didn't think she was that good looking. " (your words), as he so once did, even from his most latest review of said girl. So she wasn't as hot like you last wrote about her? "Her looks can be considered absolutely gorgeous. She is really hot and probably could be a model but to me she is in a special category that is reserved for a very few. Super hot and special. " (your words). Claim to see her ONLY twice "I never saw, in the only two times that I saw her, any dysfunction in her mind or personality. " (Again, your words) but yet I found another 2 reviews from Megan, one where she even did a duo, written by you, Mufftime / Toungsten, from my count, that's 4 visits based on your reviews alone, not only 2 like you claim. Here I'll help with the refresher, all 4 reviews:

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-1896555

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-1933181

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-2069860

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-2190718

Now, if she wasn't a favorite, then why take the time to revisit over and over and review several times, even with your claim of seeing her only twice? If she wasn't that good looking then why say in the reviews several times, that she's gorgeous, hot. Etc? Did her price change or location suddenly make her not as hot now? Can't consider her a favorite despite the glowing repeated reviews that you wrote of her before she left the scene? I mean if the purpose of a review is to shill, have a fap story for later or just take up space and then come on here and contradict your own words, then it's fair to say we know who's reviews or post we should consider as not reliable information. Not being consistent or can't get the full story straight, is signs of dishonesty, just facts.

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

So glad you spend your days reading my reviews. Mission accomplished.