Korean Agency BB

[Toungsten]

Rule #1: Don't stick your dick in crazy.

We are all guilty of breaking Rule #1 in regards to Megan. But allow me to articulate her speciality with "anything goes". If you like pissing, farting, shitting, smelling / licking armpits, eating foot / ass, HJ with her hair wrapped in semen and body sweat, have herself a big strap on and ram you in the butt, bring a pre-op trans and have a 3 P. Then yes she is all game. If any of those fetishes fits your liking then I doubt any other Kgirl in the market will be able to fulfill those needs other than Megan.

Just remember by breaking rule #1 you have to deal with the consequences.

It takes two to tango doesn't it?

[Toungsten]

He just "misremembered" what he wrote. He only remembered that he was the 2nd one to review her in 2016. You know, they say memory is the 2nd thing to go when you get old.

Looks like the ability to follow my posts hasn't gone from you. Try more sex and less criticizing.

[Toungsten]

On the other end of that spectrum, let's not underestimate the impact that 'overblown positive talk' can have.

To the noobs reading this, 3-star handles sporting 3k+ posts dont mean diddly if those reviews are really just advertisements.

Were those "advertisements" not true. That's the point isn't it?

[Toungsten]

Thank you too, glad to see that you don't dispute facts.

Why would I address or dispute anything that is written by someone who is in love with my posts. You must have something better to do or not.

[FillHerPussyUp]

Thank you too, glad to see that you don't dispute facts.

Thank you too for the read.

[SsStuntCock]

I don't know where all this crazy talk about Megan is coming from (…) Let's not scare off the newbies with some overblown negative talk

On the other end of that spectrum, let's not underestimate the impact that 'overblown positive talk' can have.

To the noobs reading this, 3-star handles sporting 3k+ posts dont mean diddly if those “reviews” are really just advertisements.

[BuddhaHead]

Well the beholder doesn't know how to lie. First she's "She is just so hot to look at. Beautiful face and a smokin' hot body that she uses to entrance and captivate her partner. " But now that she's back and with a new price and haven't even seen her again because she hasn't even started yet, "she's not that good looking. " 'What? What happened so suddenly? I know what happened and I know you won't admit it but I'll admit it here for you, it's her new price. It turned you off enough to make you comment that, even though, in your reviews of her, you knew well that you loved her looks and emphasized it.

He just "misremembered" what he wrote. He only remembered that he was the 2nd one to review her in 2016. You know, they say memory is the 2nd thing to go when you get old.

[Toungsten]

I believe on-lookers on this forum and on review sites are just trying to look for the most honest, consistent feedback from several trusted sources, not just read reviews that speak of a grandiose time and describing a girl to having "the best of the best looks", just to see that SAME reviewer turn and come to the forums, years later and not speak highly of her "Didn't think she was that good looking. " (your words), as he so once did, even from his most latest review of said girl. So she wasn't as hot like you last wrote about her? "Her looks can be considered absolutely gorgeous. She is really hot and probably could be a model but to me she is in a special category that is reserved for a very few. Super hot and special. " (your words). Claim to see her ONLY twice "I never saw, in the only two times that I saw her, any dysfunction in her mind or personality. " (Again, your words) but yet I found another 2 reviews from Megan, one where she even did a duo, written by you, Mufftime / Toungsten, from my count, that's 4 visits based on your reviews alone, not only 2 like you claim. Here I'll help with the refresher, all 4 reviews:

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-1896555

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-1933181

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-2069860

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-2190718

Now, if she wasn't a favorite, then why take the time to revisit over and over and review several times, even with your claim of seeing her only twice? If she wasn't that good looking then why say in the reviews several times, that she's gorgeous, hot. Etc? Did her price change or location suddenly make her not as hot now? Can't consider her a favorite despite the glowing repeated reviews that you wrote of her before she left the scene? I mean if the purpose of a review is to shill, have a fap story for later or just take up space and then come on here and contradict your own words, then it's fair to say we know who's reviews or post we should consider as not reliable information. Not being consistent or can't get the full story straight, is signs of dishonesty, just facts.

Thank you too for the read.

[FillHerPussyUp]

Well the beholder doesn't know how to lie. First she's "She is just so hot to look at. Beautiful face and a smokin' hot body that she uses to entrance and captivate her partner. " But now that she's back and with a new price and haven't even seen her again because she hasn't even started yet, "she's not that good looking. " 'What? What happened so suddenly? I know what happened and I know you won't admit it but I'll admit it here for you, it's her new price. It turned you off enough to make you comment that, even though, in your reviews of her, you knew well that you loved her looks and emphasized it.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

[Shinjiku]

Rule #1: Don't stick your dick in crazy.

We are all guilty of breaking Rule #1 in regards to Megan. But allow me to articulate her speciality with "anything goes". If you like pissing, farting, shitting, smelling / licking armpits, eating foot / ass, HJ with her hair wrapped in semen and body sweat, have herself a big strap on and ram you in the butt, bring a pre-op trans and have a 3 P. Then yes she is all game. If any of those fetishes fits your liking then I doubt any other Kgirl in the market will be able to fulfill those needs other than Megan.

Just remember by breaking rule #1 you have to deal with the consequences.

[FillHerPussyUp]

I believe on-lookers on this forum and on review sites are just trying to look for the most honest, consistent feedback from several trusted sources, not just read reviews that speak of a grandiose time and describing a girl to having "the best of the best looks", just to see that SAME reviewer turn and come to the forums, years later and not speak highly of her "Didn't think she was that good looking. " (your words), as he so once did, even from his most latest review of said girl. So she wasn't as hot like you last wrote about her? "Her looks can be considered absolutely gorgeous. She is really hot and probably could be a model but to me she is in a special category that is reserved for a very few. Super hot and special. " (your words). Claim to see her ONLY twice "I never saw, in the only two times that I saw her, any dysfunction in her mind or personality. " (Again, your words) but yet I found another 2 reviews from Megan, one where she even did a duo, written by you, Mufftime / Toungsten, from my count, that's 4 visits based on your reviews alone, not only 2 like you claim. Here I'll help with the refresher, all 4 reviews:

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-1896555

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-1933181

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-2069860

https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...fftime-2190718

Now, if she wasn't a favorite, then why take the time to revisit over and over and review several times, even with your claim of seeing her only twice? If she wasn't that good looking then why say in the reviews several times, that she's gorgeous, hot. Etc? Did her price change or location suddenly make her not as hot now? Can't consider her a favorite despite the glowing repeated reviews that you wrote of her before she left the scene? I mean if the purpose of a review is to shill, have a fap story for later or just take up space and then come on here and contradict your own words, then it's fair to say we know who's reviews or post we should consider as not reliable information. Not being consistent or can't get the full story straight, is signs of dishonesty, just facts.

So glad you spend your days reading my reviews. Mission accomplished.

[Toungsten]

Ha ha ha. Good one. Recent post: "Didn't think she was that good looking." Review: "OMG, OMG, OMG. Megan is one of the hottest K-girls or even non K-girls I have ever been with. I saw her pictures and instantly spoke to my favorite booker to make an early morning appointment. When I got there I was floored. As good as her pics are she is even much much hotter and beautiful in person. Non VIP members you got to make her a must see on your to do list. When I say Megan is hot it is the understatement of the year."

But, he gets a medal for being the 2nd to review her in LA.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

[Toungsten]

But that foxylists link you posted? Is that a booker? I texted the number in that link but got no reply.

Just an old ad of her.

[Dlee9753]

CGLA Seulgi: Body-wise, Peach3 without the implants. Fit spinner body, large A's or small B's. Cute little spinner butt. Has a lot of small bruises / blemishes on legs and back. Decent face with a nose job. Looks late twenties. Average service. Friendly and accommodating. Possible repeat.

CGLA Sweet: Thick for a k-girl. Body is similar to KGLA Daisy. Face is GND. Looks late twenties. Big round butt (for a k-girl). Smooth skin. Decent service and friendly attitude. Possible repeat.

All of the CGLA girls I've seen recently (including Ring, Kara, Timo) were just okay in looks and / or service-- No definite repeats for me. Perhaps I'll try Sammy next but losing hope.

My go-to girls so far have been: Hana --> Joanne / Yuna --> Jean --> ?

[OCaznLuvr]

So it appears Kara at M equates to Cara at CG, but not Kara at gardenksecret or 2 pop.

M lists Kara as 32 B, while CG as 34 DD. Big diff. So does anyone have a good description of looks + action at M?

Thanks in advance.

It appears "Kara's" photos at CG and GKS are the same and not the same as M Kara. I recently visited M Kara and can say pictures with M are somewhat representative but not actually Kara or they're heavily P.S. , but in no way close to picture of "Kara" at CG / CKS. M Kara is not the tone / lean body pictured and she has a little pooch but in no way fat (maybe a little baby fat). She is tanned / darker skinned than pictured. She's probably a small C and felt firm mm. M Kara has a tattoo on right back shoulder blade that says something like " Happiness and Peace. ". Another distinguishing feature for you dentist types is M Kara has some crooked front teeth. Overall, I would guess late 20's (and CYA but not HYA. I actually had an issue getting in the building and she got dressed and was coming down to let me in. I finally got in the building and met her outside her front door dressed as civie and would say she's cute but not quite a head turner. Service wise, she loves DT, BLS and rimming and will do it the whole hour if you let her. I had to slow her down several times to stop popping early. Best feature was watching her eyes / facial expressions while worshiping jr. Multiple positions but enjoyed doggie most with above avg asian ass and watching her enjoyment in all 3 mirrors! Overall too many others to try first but would consider a second try to see if there's a better connection.