Asian PLEASER discussion forum (please post reviews in the review forum)

[Pand25]

Actually might not be a bad option sometimes. In resent months I used to BBFS a YMMV non-bb advertising kgirl at cakdolls on the first shower. Bbfscip in about the first 15 min from entering. Second pop in the bedroom.

I'm surprised that's an option. Given a normal kgirl routine, the bathroom routine and exit shower can and will eat a good chunk out of the 15 minutes depending on the girl.

[King Kuts]

I'm surprised that's an option. Given a normal kgirl routine, the bathroom routine and exit shower can and will eat a good chunk out of the 15 minutes depending on the girl.

I would imagine the shower routine is eliminated or drastically reduced in the situation. Its not really necessary in most cases. The showers do you a little time before and after to get into it and I don't mind not bolting out the door right after. I might just try this to see how it works are report back.

[Owliee]

I've already seen and reviewed Siyeon. Check it out on the review thread.

For those that don't know, the booker for MKC or at least someone associated with him has been known to reach out to members on this forum for the expressed purpose of getting reviews for their girls. Which, in and of itself, I'm fine by. It's a legitimate tactic to use to get exposure and establish a presence across a large cross section of the monger pool. What I'm not fine by is if the resultant review is a dishonest, inflated, or overly undeserving portrayal of the girl.

I won't comment on Barbie as I haven't seen her. But calling Siyeon "a little thick" IMHO is a gross mischaracterization of her weight class. While I do admit and respect those out there that love bigger girls, I believe the vast majority of mongers out there would not call her only a little thick.

I have seen your review and I respect that you have an opinion but just like you have one so do I. SAG Luv, CG Chloe, and KTE Baby Chloe IMHO are "chunky" and considered big girls to me. When we are talking 36 DD with a height of around 5'5+ where their tits are sagging down cause of their sheer mass is what I would call big. If you are insinuating that I am one of those people who are posting reviews just because a booker asked would be incorrect.

Based on your reference of what's big you would probably think that NAV Jamie is a chunky big girl when she isn't to me. It wouldn't be too presumptuous of me to believe there are others who agree with you but also agree with me as well. Let's respect that we disagree on standards and move on.

[Bastard Chorum]

Those pics of her are real BTW for anyone that is interested in a CYA with real pictures up. She's a little thick in a Latina kind of way.

https://cupcakes4u.escortbook.com/model-siyeon-55146

I've already seen and reviewed Siyeon. Check it out on the review thread.

For those that don't know, the booker for MKC or at least someone associated with him has been known to reach out to members on this forum for the expressed purpose of getting reviews for their girls. Which, in and of itself, I'm fine by. It's a legitimate tactic to use to get exposure and establish a presence across a large cross section of the monger pool. What I'm not fine by is if the resultant review is a dishonest, inflated, or overly undeserving portrayal of the girl.

I won't comment on Barbie as I haven't seen her. But calling Siyeon "a little thick" IMHO is a gross mischaracterization of her weight class. While I do admit and respect those out there that love bigger girls, I believe the vast majority of mongers out there would not call her only a little thick.

[HornyToad75]

Hmm interesting booker didn't mention BBFS to me, unless you have to specifically ask do they offer BBFS, other bookers will tell you when you book if BBFS is an option for upcharge or not w / o you asking.

I did ask specifically since it was mentioned in this forum.

[PsuGuy911]

Haven't seen Barbie but booker did say she offers BBFS. I think for the first time you either include the upcharge in the donation so she knew from the beginning or asked for BB when it's time.

Hmm interesting booker didn't mention BBFS to me, unless you have to specifically ask do they offer BBFS, other bookers will tell you when you book if BBFS is an option for upcharge or not w / o you asking.

[HornyToad75]

So I decided to book Barbie finally and when the door opened I have to say I was a little disappointed, Barbie is not 20's or 30's, maybe late late 30's but I'd say more low 40's, her face may have had some work done hard to tell, but definitely not young. There was lots of kissing at the door and nice BBBJ in the shower, when we got to the bedroom more BBBJ with some camel slides while I sat on the edge of the bed, I was thrusting myself towards her during the camel slide hinting that I wouldn't mind BBFS but there was no talk of uncharge cost for it and she put on the cover next, so I'm pretty sure she does not offer BBFS which is the only chance she would have of me seeing her again as her face just doesn't cut it for me but her body is still nice, I'd give it a 7/10 since I like spinners, maybe a 6. 8/10. The other thing I noticed was during the deed she stopped kissing me, just some light kissing here and there but she would turn her face away which was weird. In the end for $280 not really worth it when I compare her to girls like Dana where $320 gets me BBFS and msog but I'm not a msog type of guy but Dana always tries hard. The other thing with Barbie is I only got a 45 minute session even though paid for the hour.

Haven't seen Barbie but booker did say she offers BBFS. I think for the first time you either include the upcharge in the donation so she knew from the beginning or asked for BB when it's time.

[PsuGuy911]

If the dude think she's 45, then she is 45 to him. If you think she's 18, then she's 18 to you. This is not tweeter. We don't need to shut down different opinions. The more opposite opinions here, the better. People are smart enough to choose who to believe. It's their money that they loose if they choose to see the wrong girl base on wrong opinion.

So I decided to book Barbie finally and when the door opened I have to say I was a little disappointed, Barbie is not 20's or 30's, maybe late late 30's but I'd say more low 40's, her face may have had some work done hard to tell, but definitely not young. There was lots of kissing at the door and nice BBBJ in the shower, when we got to the bedroom more BBBJ with some camel slides while I sat on the edge of the bed, I was thrusting myself towards her during the camel slide hinting that I wouldn't mind BBFS but there was no talk of uncharge cost for it and she put on the cover next, so I'm pretty sure she does not offer BBFS which is the only chance she would have of me seeing her again as her face just doesn't cut it for me but her body is still nice, I'd give it a 7/10 since I like spinners, maybe a 6. 8/10. The other thing I noticed was during the deed she stopped kissing me, just some light kissing here and there but she would turn her face away which was weird. In the end for $280 not really worth it when I compare her to girls like Dana where $320 gets me BBFS and msog but I'm not a msog type of guy but Dana always tries hard. The other thing with Barbie is I only got a 45 minute session even though paid for the hour.

[Syrpq]

[3rd Party Escort Ad deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because it appeared to be an Escort Advertisement posted by a 3rd party.

Per forum rules, escort advertisements and escort contact information may only be posted by the escort herself.

Of course, links to an escort's own advertisement and/or website are acceptable, and members are welcome to share escort contact information via the Forum's Private Messaging system.

Links to an escort's own advertisement and/or website are also acceptable. The limitation applies only to escort advertisements posted by 3rd parties claiming to represent the advertiser.

If you know an escort who is interested in promoting her services on the USASexGuide, then have her register a membership and post her own advertisement.

[Bastard Chorum]

Has anyone tried the 15 min option at lakangels? Just wondering if that's to rushed to even try.

Looking to try this agency for first time soon. Any favorites among Chloe, bunny, hera, daisy, zuri?

I'm surprised that's an option. Given a normal kgirl routine, the bathroom routine and exit shower can and will eat a good chunk out of the 15 minutes depending on the girl.

[Bastard Chorum]

She's likely to pop up in LA as these girls tend to ping pong between OC and LA. No clue on which agency she'll end up with though.

She's with MKC and AOV in LA.

[Owliee]

Do you know which ones?

If you're talking about the legend Diva whose been around LA and OC it will probably be this girl. I remember seeing her at NAV in LA-K town and she's definitely a real pro. I tried booking with her but she's literally fully booked for the next couple days so good luck trying to get an appointment.

https://cupcakes4u.escortbook.com/model-diva-55144

[Owliee]

She's likely to pop up in LA as these girls tend to ping pong between OC and LA. No clue on which agency she'll end up with though.

Those pics of her are real BTW for anyone that is interested in a CYA with real pictures up. She's a little thick in a Latina kind of way.

https://cupcakes4u.escortbook.com/model-siyeon-55146

[Owliee]

She's likely to pop up in LA as these girls tend to ping pong between OC and LA. No clue on which agency she'll end up with though.

Not sure if you were talking about this girl but MKC Siyeon used to work over at NAV and moved over just recently after her last day on 1/11 from NAV.

https://cupcakes4u.escortbook.com/model-siyeon-55146

Lmk if this is the same girl you were talking about .

[King Kuts]

Has anyone tried the 15 min option at lakangels? Just wondering if that's to rushed to even try.

Looking to try this agency for first time soon. Any favorites among Chloe, bunny, hera, daisy, zuri?