Korean Agency BB

**JrueArtist** · 08-30-21 19:14

Hey I'm just adding My opinion just like you are. I happen to be ok with the prices. You don't have to "shame" me for it. I'm just trying to contribute to the forum.

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

Well, I just ask that people don't use inflation as a reason for things like 100% spike. There is little correlation.

Sure, "take or leave it" approach can work. If you are going to take that approach, then you also need to prepare for people stating that the girl X is not worth the price, in their opinion. This is a board where people state their opinions and evaluations. As price rises twofold, many girls on the threshold start falling into "not worth it" category. Whose fault is it? Certainly not the consumers. It is a direct consequence of prices rising. And mongers are then shamed into being "cheap" or interfering with girls business. Huh? No, mongers just think that value-wise some are not worth it anymore at such price.

.

**GoofyPanda** · 08-30-21 18:54

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

Not a chance. Advertised weight is not even close.

Good eye. I didn't even notice. Ya 20 LB heavier than SFK Dana. Damn, we might have another ewok.

**RocketManP** · 08-30-21 18:30

Originally Posted by JrueArtist [View Original Post]

Nobody likes inflation or spikes in prices. However for the past century, it's been in effect and we all adjust to it. If you are ok with the rates, enjoy yourself. If you are not ok with the rates, there are other options. If you want the Kgirl experience, going to have to pay for it.

Well, I just ask that people don't use inflation as a reason for things like 100% spike. There is little correlation.

Sure, "take or leave it" approach can work. If you are going to take that approach, then you also need to prepare for people stating that the girl X is not worth the price, in their opinion. This is a board where people state their opinions and evaluations. As price rises twofold, many girls on the threshold start falling into "not worth it" category. Whose fault is it? Certainly not the consumers. It is a direct consequence of prices rising. And mongers are then shamed into being "cheap" or interfering with girls business. Huh? No, mongers just think that value-wise some are not worth it anymore at such price.

**Toungsten** · 08-30-21 18:07

M. Allie. Nicole.

Newtopasian. http://newtopasia.cuties-sites.com/models/......

Pink Angels. https://pinkangels.site/......

Sexy Angels. https://sexyangels.site/......

SFK. https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/ Dana, Nina, Nicole.

PKL http://preciousklove.com/ Pink, Eunji.

Angels of Ktown (AKT) http://angelsofktown.cuties-sites.com/home Dayoung, Soyoung.

KGLA. https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/....

**Toungsten** · 08-30-21 18:06

Originally Posted by GoofyPanda [View Original Post]

SAG has a new Dana https://www.sweetasiangem.com/dana.

Is this the same Dana as SFK?

Pictures don't look close to the same person.

Different Dana.

**Toungsten** · 08-30-21 18:04

Originally Posted by Veni1 [View Original Post]

A lot has been mentioned about the increase in charges regarding the Kgirls. BUT. I remember that long before the Kgirl invasion with their agencies and bookers there were a lot of Asian gals charging a lot more. Starting around 2006, some gals were at $400 per hour. Mimi LAX, Joanna, Seda, Rene (Sylvia) were just a few that I remember. I recall Seda later telling me that she had to drop her fee to $250 so as to complete with the new talent. Anyway, my point is that this increase is just a part of life. If down the line, we drop into a major recession with a loss of discretionary income, we might see a drop in fees. But I'm not really sure of that either.

You're talking about top of the line girls as opposed to run of the mill girls.

**Veni1** · 08-30-21 17:46

A lot has been mentioned about the increase in charges regarding the Kgirls. BUT. I remember that long before the Kgirl invasion with their agencies and bookers there were a lot of Asian gals charging a lot more. Starting around 2006, some gals were at $400 per hour. Mimi LAX, Joanna, Seda, Rene (Sylvia) were just a few that I remember. I recall Seda later telling me that she had to drop her fee to $250 so as to complete with the new talent. Anyway, my point is that this increase is just a part of life. If down the line, we drop into a major recession with a loss of discretionary income, we might see a drop in fees. But I'm not really sure of that either.

**SsStuntCock** · 08-30-21 16:07

Originally Posted by DblEspresso [View Original Post]

We'll never see those $250 days again.

Just saw LSC Cora up in the Bay for 260. Actually felt kinda weird, knowing what she could fetch in SoCal. Looks like a spinner version of JAV Natsuki Maron. If your in the area and miss La Lina / Sera /"Radeon" for her anime-sized peepers, I recommend.

**SsStuntCock** · 08-30-21 15:52

Originally Posted by GoofyPanda [View Original Post]

SAG has a new Dana https://www.sweetasiangem.com/dana.

Is this the same Dana as SFK?

Pictures don't look close to the same person.

Not a chance. Advertised weight is not even close.

**JrueArtist** · 08-30-21 15:21

Nobody likes inflation or spikes in prices. However for the past century, it's been in effect and we all adjust to it. If you are ok with the rates, enjoy yourself. If you are not ok with the rates, there are other options. If you want the Kgirl experience, going to have to pay for it.

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

I didn't understand half of what you asked me.

I was not looking for a bargain, I'm explaining how it worked in the bay. We had all inclusive services with no upcharges for 220. By all orgs.

Imagine you buy a new iphone every year. It costs let's say 1 k.

You do so for five years and it's always 1 k.

Next year it's 2 k. For same iPhone. Many people will say, hey not worth it to pay double. Many will be unhappy. Even if you say hey iPhone always cost 2 k in bumblefuck, Australia. Not many people would care. They compare present and the past, and a sharp spike in price is never favored by a consumer.

**EasyPeasyDong** · 08-30-21 15:06

Originally Posted by BuildingGuy [View Original Post]

"Bad money drives out good. The legends, the gorgeous and the super freaks are as busy as they want. The old, the fat and the burn-outs (Nuri? Don't have enough business and the bookers try to push them on the clients. If you want to see the legends and the gorgeous be nice and give good tips ($100 min.). You'll be treated well..

Yep. I've noticed more than a handful of new reviews for Nuri. One hobbyist stated that the main issue is that she is just "shy." Trying to pump up, send business to certain providers that should not be in the business.

Nuri with her super tight pussy would be a regular on my list every week, especially since she can handle magnum. The problem is that she is as your post says 'burnt-out" and is not shy about showing that she does not like this profession.

Seriously?

**RamShackled** · 08-30-21 15:01

Originally Posted by SixDNine [View Original Post]

Welcome back. I see Jenny listed as available at SA website. Is she working or just site is not updated?

Nope, got to see her one time. Super sweet and attractive. But now she is on long Vacation.

**RocketManP** · 08-30-21 15:01

Originally Posted by SuperMan333 [View Original Post]

As with everything, the market dictates the price and we as consumers don't really have an option unless we could find alternatives. Just look at the real estate price, easily gone up 20-30 percent and if you don't want to pay for that then someone else will. From what I learned during my visits, even some of the unattractive girls get 2-3 customers a day, that would still be higher than a lot of what people make so why would they give up that price? I wish we could go back to $240 but I just don't see it.

Well 20-30% is not 100%. Also, real estate prices fluctuate and can and do go down. Pussy price won't go down below current rates.

I agree that we can't go back. But you also Ave to agree that many are not happy with a sudden spike and now many girls who were maybe worth a toftt or a quick visit are not worth it at the price point.

And yeah you hit on an excellent point about universal price scale for girls. I'm a service guy, and my atfs I have zero issues paying more for. In fact, I'd estimate their worth above 400 to me. They're amazing at what they do. So if anyone asks if theyre worth it just service-wise I'd say yes. Paying for a random or just OK girl for a blind date for 400 with all the upcharges? Yeah no thanks. Not worth it. I've had situations where I'd binge 4 kgirls in a row on the same day and two or even three were mediocre. That still was under 1 k.

My point was, with prices moving up, people shouldn't get on mongers case for saying certain girls are not worth it at the price point. We are simply evaluating the product and product value here.

**BuildingGuy** · 08-30-21 14:49

Originally Posted by SuperMan333 [View Original Post]

As with everything, the market dictates the price and we as consumers don't really have an option unless we could find alternatives. Just look at the real estate price, easily gone up 20-30 percent and if you don't want to pay for that then someone else will. From what I learned during my visits, even some of the unattractive girls get 2-3 customers a day, that would still be higher than a lot of what people make so why would they give up that price? I wish we could go back to $240 but I just don't see it.

"Bad money drives out good. The legends, the gorgeous and the super freaks are as busy as they want. The old, the fat and the burn-outs (Nuri? Don't have enough business and the bookers try to push them on the clients. If you want to see the legends and the gorgeous be nice and give good tips ($100 min.). You'll be treated well. ".